Skip to main content

Communities and Resilience: Contextual and Collective Resilience

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Resilience and Aging

Part of the book series: Risk, Systems and Decisions ((RSD))

Abstract

Resilience is a useful and flexible concept for thinking about aging well, but research on this area has tended to focus on individual factors. In this chapter, drawing from research working with older people to define resilience and aging well, I argue that resilience should be considered as a collective, contextual, and participatory process and outcome. In participatory research, we find that older people perceive resilience as an ongoing and negotiated process of balance and emphasise living with adversity rather than necessarily overcoming it. Resources and assets for resilience operate at micro or individual, as well as meso and macro levels. The social, physical, and symbolic environments in which older people live contribute to their resilience (and older people contribute to the resilience of the places in which they live). Similarly, we can think about the resilience of groups and communities as well as of individuals. This raises questions about the distribution of adversity and of access to resources for resilience, necessitating we also consider issues around inequities and resilience and how resilience as both process and outcome is different for diverse older people. Fostering collective resilience will require thoughtful collaboration with diverse older people and partnerships across sectors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arnstein, S. (1969, July). A ladder of citizen participation. American Institute of Planners, pp. 216–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, S., Adams, J. H., & Waldo, M. (2001). Resilience in the oldest-old. Counseling and Human Development, 34(2), 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolton, K., Praetorius, R., & Smith-Osborne, A. (2016). Resilience protective factors in an older adults population: A qualitative interpretive meta-synthesis. Social Work Research, 40(3), 171–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowling, A., & Dieppe, P. (2005). What is successful ageing and who should define it? British Medical Journal, 331, 1548–1551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brasche, I. (2008). Cultural resilience and social wellbeing: A case for research on Groote Eylandt. Australian Aboriginal Studies, 2, 93–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks-Cleator, L., Giles, A., & Glaherty, M. (2019). Community-level factors that contribute to first nations and Inuit older adults feeling supported to age well in a Canadian city. Journal of Ageing Studies, 48(June), 50–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browne, C. V., Mokuau, N., & Braun, K. L. (2009). Adversity and resiliency in the lives of native Hawaiian elders. Social Work, 54(3), 253–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buffel, T. (2018). Social research and co-production with older people: Developing age-friendly communities. Journal of Ageing Studies, 44(March), 52–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buffel, T., Handler, S., & Phillipson, C. (Eds.). (2018). Age-friendly cities and communities: A global perspective. Bristol/Chicago: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connelly, E., Allen, C., Hatfield, K., Palma-Oliveira, J., Woods, D., & Linkov, I. (2017). Features of resilience. Environmental Systems and Decisions, 37(1), 46–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dannefer, D. (2003). Cumulative advantage/disadvantage and the life course: Cross-fertilizing age and social science theory. Journals of Gerontology B Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 58(6), S327–S337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dizon, L., Wiles, J., & Peiris-John, R. (2019). What is Meaningful Participation for Older People? An Analysis of Ageing Policies. The Gerontologist.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyall, L., Kēpa, M., Teh, R., Mules, R., Moyes, S., Wham, C., et al. (2014). Cultural and social factors and quality of life of Māori in advanced age. Te puawaitanga o ngā tapuwae kia ora tonu – Life and living in advanced age: A cohort study in New Zealand (LiLACS NZ). New Zealand Medical Journal, 127(1393), 62–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, K., & Caro, F. (2014). An overview of age-friendly cities and communities around the world. Journal of Ageing & Social Policy, 26(1–2), 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, P. (2011). Natural neighborhood networks – Important social networks in the lives of older adults aging in place. Journal of Aging Studies, 25(3), 263–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gattuso, S. (2003). Becoming a wise old woman: Resilience and wellness in later life. Health Sociology Review, 12(2), 171–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golant, S. (2014). Age-friendly communities: Are we expecting too much? Institute for Research on Public Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grothberg, E. (2003). Resilience for today: Gaining strength from adversity. Westport: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutman, G., Knudsen, L., & Olsen, A. (2010). Population ageing and apocalyptic demography: separating fact from fiction Our demographic future–A challenge: On the need for demographic analyses. Scandinavian Population Studies. Aalborg Oest, Denmark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, P. B. (2008). Another wrinkle in the debate about successful aging: The undervalued concept of resilience and the lived experience of dementia. International Journal of Aging & Human Development, 67(1), 43–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Havighurst, R. J. (1961). Successful aging. The Gerontologist, 1(1), 8–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higginbottom, G., & Liamputtong, P. (Eds.). (2015). Participatory qualitative research methodologies in health. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hildon, Z., Montgomery, S. M., Blane, D., Wiggins, R. D., & Netuveli, G. (2010). Examining resilience of quality of life in the face of health-related and psychosocial adversity at older ages: What is “right” about the way we age? The Gerontologist, 50(1), 36–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huisman, M., Klokgieters, S., & Beekman, A. (2017). Successful ageing, depression and resilience research; A call for a priori approaches to investigations of resilience. Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences, 26(6), 574–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Israel, B. A., Eng, E., Schulz, A. J., & Parker, E. A. (2005). Methods in community-based participatory research for health. San Francisco: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, S., Cameron, A., Ouellete, S., & Fine, M. (1998). Qualitative approaches to the study of thriving: What can be learned? Journal of Social Issues, 54(2), 337–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masten, A. (2007). Resilience in developing systems: Progress and promise as the fourth wave rises. Development and Psychopathology, 19, 921–930. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579407000442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milligan, C. (2001). Geographies of care: Space, place, and the voluntary sector. Aldershot/Burlington: Ashgate Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, L., Burton, E., Raman, S., Blackman, T., Jenks, M., & Williams, K. (2003). Making the outside world dementia-friendly: Design issues and considerations. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 30(4), 605–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moeke-Maxwell, T., Nikora, L. W., & Te Awekotuku, N. (2014). End-of-life care and Māori Whānau Resilience. MAI, 3(2), 140–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, T., Wiles, J., Moeke-Maxwell, T., Black, S., Park, H.-J., Williams, L., & Gott, M. (2019). People haven’t got that close connection’: Meanings of loneliness and social isolation to culturally diverse older people. Journal of Aging and Mental Health, 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, T., Wiles, J., Williams, L., Park, H.-J., Moeke-Maxwell, T., Dewes, O., et al. (2020). Social connectedness: What matters to older people? Ageing & Society. Accepted October 23.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Rand, A. (2006). Stratification and the life course: Life course capital, life course risks, and social inequality. In R. Binstock & L. George (Eds.), Handbook of aging and the social sciences (pp. 145–162). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pomeroy, A. (2016). Understanding the place of intangible cultural heritage in building enduring community resilience: Murupara case study. New Zealand Sociology, 31(7), 183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, J. W., & Kahn, R. L. (1997). Successful aging. The Gerontologist, 37(4), 433–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, A. (2007). Walking the talk: How participatory interview methods can democratize research. Qualitative Health Research, 17(7), 982–993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sapountzaki, K. (2014). “Resilience for all” and “collective resilience”: Are these planning objectives consistent with one another? In Resilience and sustainability in relation to natural disasters: A challenge for future cities (pp. 39–53). Cham: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sarre, S., Redlich, C., Tinker, A., Sadler, E., Bhalia, A., & McKevvit, C. (2014). A systematic review of qualitative studies on adjusting after stroke: Lessons for the study of resilience. Disability and Rehabilitation, 36(9), 716–726.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seccombe, K. (2002). “Beating the odds” versus “changing the odds”: Poverty, resilience, and family policy. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 64(2), 384–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teng, A., Blakely, T., Scott, N., Jansen, R., Masters-Awatere, B., Krebs, J., & Oetzel, J. (2019). What protects against pre-diabetes progressing to diabetes? Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, 148, 119–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ungar, M. (2011). The social ecology of resilience: Addressing contextual and cultural ambiguity of a nascent construct. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 82(1), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Kessel, G. (2013). The ability of older people to overcome adversity: A review of the resilience concept. Geriatric Nursing, 34(2), 122–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weldrick, R., & Grenier, A. (2018). Social isolation in later life: Extending the conversation. Canadian Journal on Aging, 37(1), 76–83. https://doi.org/10.1017/S071498081700054X.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wild, K., Wiles, J. L., & Allen, R. (2011). Resilience: Thoughts on the value of the concept for critical gerontology. Ageing & Society, 33(2), 137–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiles, J. L. (2011). Reflections on being a recipient of care: Vexing the concept of vulnerability. Social and Cultural Geography, 12(6), 573–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiles, J. L., & Jayasinha, R. (2013). Care for Place: The contributions older people make to their communities. Journal of Aging Studies, 27(2), 93–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiles, J. L., Leibing, A., Guberman, N., Reeve, J., & Allen, R. E. S. (2012a). The meaning of ‘Ageing in place’ to older people. The Gerontologist, 52(3), 357–366. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnr098.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiles, J. L., Wild, K., & Allen, R. (2012b). Resilience from the point of view of older people: ‘There’s still life beyond a funny knee. Social Science and Medicine, 74(3), 416–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.11.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiles, J. L., Rolleston, A., Pillai, A., Broad, J., Teh, R., Gott, M., & Kerse, N. (2017). Attachment to place in advanced age: A study of the LiLACS NZ cohort. Social Science and Medicine, 185, 25–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiles, J. L., Miskelly, P., Stewart, O., Rolleston, A., Kerse, N., & Gott, M. (2019a). Challenged but not threatened: Managing health in advanced age. Social Science and Medicine, 227(April), 104–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiles, J. L., Morgan, T., Moeke-Maxwell, T., Black, S., Dewes, O., Park, H.-J., et al. (2019b). Befriending Services for Culturally Diverse Older People. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Windle, G. (2011). What is resilience? A review and concept analysis. Reviews in Clinical Gerontology, 21(2), 152–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wister, A., Coatta, K., Schuurman, N., Lear, S., Rosin, M., & MacKey, D. (2016). A Life course model of multimorbidity resilience: Theoretical and research developments. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 82(4), 290–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organisation. (2007). Global age-friendly cities project. Geneva: WHO Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. (2015). World report on ageing and health. Geneva: WHO Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Janine Wiles .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Wiles, J. (2020). Communities and Resilience: Contextual and Collective Resilience. In: Wister, A.V., Cosco, T.D. (eds) Resilience and Aging. Risk, Systems and Decisions. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57089-7_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics