Abstract
The previous chapter, Chap. 8, introduces the Emulated Recursive Jigsaw Reconstruction (eRJR) technique, developed to emulate the RJR technique using simplified, laboratory frame variables. This technique, defined and validated in Sect. 8.3, reproduces the three-lepton excesses in the low-mass region and ISR regions in the laboratory frame using \(36.1~\text{ fb}^{-1}\) of pp collision data collected between 2015 and 2016 by the ATLAS detector at the LHC.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The \(h_{\mathrm {damp}}\) parameter controls the transverse momentum \({p}_{T}\) of the first additional emission beyond the leading-order Feynman diagram in the parton shower and therefore regulates the high-\({p}_{T}\) emission against which the \(t\bar{t}\) system recoils.
References
ATLAS Collaboration (2018) Search for chargino-neutralino production using recursive jigsaw reconstruction in final states with two or three charged leptons in proton-proton collisions at \(\sqrt{s}=13\) TeV with the ATLAS detector. Phys Rev D98(9):092012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.98.092012, arXiv:1806.02293 [hep-ex]
ATLAS Collaboration (2019) Search for chargino-neutralino production with mass splittings near the electroweak scale in three-lepton final states in \(\sqrt{s}\) = 13 TeV \(pp\) collisions with the ATLAS detector. Technical Report ATLAS-CONF-2019-020, CERN, Geneva, May. http://cds.cern.ch/record/2676597
ATLAS Collaboration, Aad G et al (2020) Search for chargino-neutralino production with mass splittings near the electroweak scale in three-lepton final states in \(\sqrt{s}\) = 13 TeV \(pp\) collisions with the ATLAS detector. Phys Rev D101(7):072001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.101.072001, arXiv:1912.08479 [hep-ex]
ATLAS Collaboration (2017) Multi-Boson Simulation for \(\it 13\it \text{TeV}\) ATLAS Analyses, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2017-005. https://cds.cern.ch/record/2261933
ATLAS Collaboration (2017) ATLAS simulation of boson plus jets processes in Run 2, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2017-006. https://cds.cern.ch/record/2261937
Bothmann E et al (2019) Event Generation with Sherpa 2.2. SciPost Phys 7(3):034. http://dx.doi.org/10.21468/SciPostPhys.7.3.034, arXiv:1905.09127 [hep-ph]
Gleisberg T, Höche S (2008) Comix, a new matrix element generator. JHEP 12:039. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2008/12/039, arXiv:0808.3674 [hep-ph]
Schumann S, Krauss F (2008) A Parton shower algorithm based on Catani-Seymour dipole factorisation. JHEP 03:038. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2008/03/038, arXiv:0709.1027 [hep-ph]
NNPDF Collaboration, Ball RD et al (2015) Parton distributions for the LHC Run II. JHEP 04:040. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP04(2015)040, arXiv:1410.8849 [hep-ph]
Höche S, Krauss F, Schonherr M, Siegert F (2012) A critical appraisal of NLO+PS matching methods. JHEP 09:049. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP09(2012)049, arXiv:1111.1220 [hep-ph]
Catani S, Krauss F, Kuhn R, Webber BR (2001) QCD matrix elements + parton showers. JHEP 11:063. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2001/11/063, arXiv:hep-ph/0109231
Höche S, Krauss F, Schönherr M, Siegert F (2013) QCD matrix elements + parton showers: the NLO case. JHEP 04:027. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP04(2013)027, arXiv:1207.5030 [hep-ph]
Cascioli F, Maierhofer P, Pozzorini S (2012) Scattering amplitudes with open loops. Phys Rev Lett 108:111601. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.111601, arXiv:1111.5206 [hep-ph]
Anastasiou C, Dixon LJ, Melnikov K, Petriello F (2004) High precision QCD at hadron colliders: electroweak gauge boson rapidity distributions at NNLO. Phys Rev D 69:094008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.69.094008, arXiv:hep-ph/0312266
Alioli S, Nason P, Oleari C, Re E (2010) A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX. JHEP 06:043. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP06(2010)043, arXiv:1002.2581 [hep-ph]
ATLAS Collaboration (2016) Studies on top-quark Monte Carlo modelling for Top2016, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2016-020. https://cds.cern.ch/record/2216168
Sjöstrand T, Ask S, Christiansen JR, Corke R, Desai N, Ilten P, Mrenna S, Prestel S, Rasmussen CO, Skands PZ (2015) An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2. Comput Phys Commun 191:159. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2015.01.024, arXiv:1410.3012 [hep-ph]
ATLAS Collaboration (2014) ATLAS Pythia 8 tunes to \(7 \text{ TeV }\) data, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2014-021. https://cds.cern.ch/record/1966419
Ball RD et al (2013) Parton distributions with LHC data. Nucl Phys B 867:244. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2012.10.003, arXiv:1207.1303 [hep-ph]
Czakon M, Mitov A (2014) Top++: A program for the calculation of the top-pair cross-section at hadron colliders. Comput Phys Commun 185:2930. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2014.06.021, arXiv:1112.5675 [hep-ph]
ATLAS Collaboration (2016) The Pythia 8 A3 tune description of ATLAS minimum bias and inelastic measurements incorporating the Donnachie–Landshoff diffractive model, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2016-017. https://cds.cern.ch/record/2206965
Alwall J, Frederix R, Frixione S, Hirschi V, Maltoni F, Mattelaer O, Shao HS, Stelzer T, Torrielli P, Zaro M (2014) The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations. JHEP 07:079. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2014)079, arXiv:1405.0301 [hep-ph]
ATLAS Collaboration (2014) Measurement of the \(Z/\gamma ^*\) boson transverse momentum distribution in \(pp\) collisions at \(\sqrt{s} = 7\;\text{ TeV }\) with the ATLAS detector. JHEP 09:145. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP09(2014)145, arXiv:1406.3660 [hep-ex]
Pumplin J et al (2002) New generation of parton distributions with uncertainties from global QCD analysis. JHEP 07:012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2002/07/012, arXiv:hep-ph/0201195
LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group Collaboration, Handbook of LHC Higgs Cross Sections: 4. Deciphering the Nature of the Higgs Sector. arXiv:1610.07922 [hep-ph]
Fuks B, Klasen M, Lamprea DR, Rothering M (2013) Precision predictions for electroweak superpartner production at hadron colliders with Resummino. Eur Phys J C 73:2480. http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-013-2480-0, arXiv:1304.0790 [hep-ph]
Lange DJ (2001) The EvtGen particle decay simulation package. Nucl Instrum Meth A 462:152. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9002(01)00089-4
ATLAS Collaboration (2010) The ATLAS simulation infrastructure. Eur Phys J C 70:823. http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-010-1429-9, arXiv:1005.4568 [physics.ins-det]
GEANT4 Collaboration, Agostinelli S et al (2003) GEANT4—a simulation toolkit. Nucl Instrum Meth A 506:250 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9002(03)01368-8
ATLAS Collaboration (2012) Measurement of the \(W W\) cross section in \(\sqrt{s} = 7\,\text{ TeV }\)\(pp\) collisions with the ATLAS detector and limits on anomalous gauge couplings. Phys Lett B 712:289. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2012.05.003, arXiv:1203.6232 [hep-ex]
Prospects for Higgs Boson Searches using the \(H\rightarrow WW^{(*)}\rightarrow \ell \nu \ell \nu \) Decay Mode with the ATLAS Detector for 10 TeV. Technical Report, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2010-005, CERN, Geneva, Jun, 2010. https://cds.cern.ch/record/1270568
ATLAS Collaboration (2017) Jet energy scale measurements and their systematic uncertainties in proton–proton collisions at \(\sqrt{s} = 13\;\text{ TeV }\) with the ATLAS detector. Phys Rev D 96:072002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.96.072002, arXiv:1703.09665 [hep-ex]
ATLAS Collaboration (2015) Jet energy measurement and its systematic uncertainty in proton–proton collisions at \(\sqrt{s} = 7\;\text{ TeV }\) with the ATLAS detector. Eur Phys J C 75:17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-014-3190-y, arXiv:1406.0076 [hep-ex]
ATLAS Collaboration (2019) Electron and photon energy calibration with the ATLAS detector using 2015–2016 LHC proton–proton collision data. JINST 14:P03017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-0221/14/03/P03017, arXiv:1812.03848 [hep-ex]
ATLAS Collaboration (2016) Muon reconstruction performance of the ATLAS detector in proton–proton collision data at \(\sqrt{s} = 13\;\text{ TeV }\). Eur Phys J C 76:292. http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-016-4120-y, arXiv:1603.05598 [hep-ex]
ATLAS Collaboration (2018) Performance of missing transverse momentum reconstruction with the ATLAS detector using proton-proton collisions at \(\sqrt{s}\) = 13 TeV. Eur Phys J C78(11):903. http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-6288-9, arXiv:1802.08168 [hep-ex]
ATLAS Collaboration (2015) Performance of missing transverse momentum reconstruction with the ATLAS detector in the first proton–proton collisions at \(\sqrt{s} = 13 \text{ TeV }\), ATL-PHYS-PUB-2015-027. https://cds.cern.ch/record/2037904
ATLAS Collaboration (2019) Electron reconstruction and identification in the ATLAS experiment using the 2015 and 2016 LHC proton-proton collision data at \(\sqrt{s}\) = 13 TeV. Submitted to: Eur Phys J. arXiv:1902.04655 [physics.ins-det]
ATLAS Collaboration (2016) Performance of pile-up mitigation techniques for jets in \(pp\) collisions at \(\sqrt{s} = 8\;\text{ TeV }\) using the ATLAS detector. Eur Phys J C 76:581. http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-016-4395-z, arXiv:1510.03823 [hep-ex]
ATLAS Collaboration (2014) Tagging and suppression of pileup jets with the ATLAS detector, ATLAS-CONF-2014-018. https://cds.cern.ch/record/1700870
ATLAS Collaboration (2016) Luminosity determination in \(pp\) collisions at \(\sqrt{s} = 8\;\text{ TeV }\) using the ATLAS detector at the LHC. Eur Phys J C 76:653. http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-016-4466-1, arXiv:1608.03953 [hep-ex]
Avoni G et al (2018) The new LUCID-2 detector for luminosity measurement and monitoring in ATLAS. JINST 13(07):P07017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-0221/13/07/P07017
ATLAS Collaboration (2018) Measurement of \(W^{\pm }Z\) production cross sections and gauge boson polarisation in \(pp\) collisions at \(\sqrt{s} = 13 \text{ TeV }\) with the ATLAS detector, ATLAS-CONF-2018-034. https://cds.cern.ch/record/2630187
Dulat S, Hou T-J, Gao J, Guzzi M, Huston J, Nadolsky P, Pumplin J, Schmidt C, Stump D, Yuan CP (2016) New parton distribution functions from a global analysis of quantum chromodynamics. Phys Rev D 93(3):033006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.93.033006, arXiv:1506.07443 [hep-ph]
Harland-Lang LA, Martin AD, Motylinski P, Thorne RS (2015) Parton distributions in the LHC era: MMHT 2014 PDFs. Eur Phys J C 75(5):204. http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-015-3397-6, arXiv:1412.3989 [hep-ph]
Baak M, Besjes GJ, Cte D, Koutsman A, Lorenz J, Short D (2015) HistFitter software framework for statistical data analysis. Eur Phys J C 75:153. http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-015-3327-7, arXiv:1410.1280 [hep-ex]
Cousins RD, Linnemann JT, Tucker J (2008) Evaluation of three methods for calculating statistical significance when incorporating a systematic uncertainty into a test of the background-only hypothesis for a Poisson process. Nuclear Inst. Methods Phys Res Sect. A: Accel Spectrom Detect Assoc Equip 595(2):480–501. http://dx.doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2008.07.086, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168900208010255
Read AL (2002) Presentation of search results: the CL(s) technique. J Phys G28:2693–2704. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0954-3899/28/10/313
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Resseguie, E. (2020). Search for Wino-Bino Production Using the Emulated Recursive Jigsaw Reconstruction Technique with Run 2 Data. In: Electroweak Physics at the Large Hadron Collider with the ATLAS Detector. Springer Theses. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57016-3_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57016-3_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-57015-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-57016-3
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)