Skip to main content

Care of Older Adults: Autonomy, Capacity and Duty to Protect

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Dermatoethics
  • 440 Accesses

Abstract

Older adults represent a substantial proportion of dermatological visits, particularly surgical visits. Dermatologist have an obligation to attend to the unique ethical needs of older adults. Although informed consent is ethically and legally obligatory for all patients, particular attention must be paid to the capacity assessment of older adults. Capacity assessments require dermatologists to ask open ended questions that demonstrate the patient’s ability to appreciate their medical condition, use reason to make a decision and express that decision. In patients who are unable to make decisions for themselves, the dermatologist must continue to involve them in their care to the level of their ability and identify appropriate surrogate decision makers. In helping and supporting the decision making of older adults and their surrogates, decision aids may help everyone clarify the benefits, risks and preferences that will guide their decision making. Dermatologists have a particular ethical obligation to identify and report elder abuse within their patient population. Although concerns for medical futility and distributive justice can arise in patients of all ages, physicians may more quickly raise questions of futility when older adults are critically ill.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Sessums LL, Zembrzuska H, Jackson JL. Does this patient have medical decision-making capacity? JAMA. 2011;306:420–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Appelbaum PS, Grisso T. The MacArthur treatment competence study: I. Mental illness and competence to consent to treatment. Law Hum Behav. 1995;19(2):105–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Appelbaum PS, Grisso T. Assessing patients’ capacities to consent to treatment. N Engl J Med. 1988;319:748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dardas AZ, Stockburger C, Boone S, An T, Calfee RP. Preferences for shared decision making in older adult patients with orthopedic hand conditions. J Hand Surg Am. 2016;41:978–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chi WC, Wolff J, Greer R, Dy S. Multimorbidity and decision-making preferences among older adults. Ann Fam Med. 2017;15:545–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Moise N, Ye S, Alcantara C, Davidson KW, Kronish I. Depressive symptoms and decision-making preferences in patients with comorbid illnesses. J Phychosom Res. 2017;92:63–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bynum JP, Barre L, Reed C, Passow H. Participation of very old adults in health care decisions. Med Decis Mak. 2014;32:216–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. McLellan C, O’Neil AI, Cameron M, Reed A, Henderin C, Dellavalle RP, et al. Facilitating informed treatment decisions in acne: a pilot study of a patient decision aid. J Cutan Med Surg. 2019;23:117–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. O’Neil AI, McLellan C, Cameron M, Reed A, Henderin C, Dellavalle RP, et al. Putting the patient in patient-centered care: pilot testing an updated patient decision aid for plaque psoriasis. J Cutan Med Surg. 2019;23:119–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Linos E, Berger T, Chren MM. Point: Care of potential low-risk basal cell carcinomas (BCCs) at the end of life. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015;73:158–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Tan J, Linos E, Sendelweck MA, van Zuuren EJ, Ersser S, Dellavalle RP, et al. Shared decision making and patient decision aids in dermatology. Br J Dermatol. 2016;175:1045–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. DeMartino E, Dudzinski DM, Doyle CK, Sperry BP, Gregory SE, Siegler M, et al. Who decides when a patient can’t? Statutes on alternate decision makers. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:1478–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Shalowitz DI, Garrett-Mayer E, Wendler D. The accuracy of surrogate decision makers: a systematic review. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:493–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Azoulay E, Pochard F, Kentish-Barnes N, Chevret S, Aboab J, Adrie C, et al. Risk of post-traumatic stress symptoms in family members of intensive care unit patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2005;171:987–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ubel PA, Angott AM, Zikmund-Fisher BJ. Physicians recommend different treatments for patients than they would choose for themselves. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171:630–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sulmasy DP, Hughes MT, Thompson RE, Astrow AB, Terry PB, Kub J, et al. How would terminally ill patients have others make decisions for them in the event of decisional incapacity? A longitudinal study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007;55:1981–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lachs MS, Pillemer KA. Elder abuse. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:1947–56.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Helft PR, Siegler M, Lantos J. The rise and fall of futility movement. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:293–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Housholder, A.L. (2021). Care of Older Adults: Autonomy, Capacity and Duty to Protect. In: Bercovitch, L., Perlis, C.S., Stoff, B.K., Grant-Kels, J.M. (eds) Dermatoethics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56861-0_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56861-0_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-56860-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-56861-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics