Abstract
Following over 40 years of development there is now a range of portable mechanical ventilators available which are used both inside and outside the hospital by non-specialists from the medical, paramedical and nursing professions. These devices range in their complexity from simple resuscitation devices which can replace the use of the bag-valve mask through to complex computer-controlled electronic ventilators for use in specialised patient transport and a number of classifications are possible. A basic knowledge of the function, controls and monitoring and alarm systems of a portable mechanical ventilator is essential for its safe use. The alarm systems supplement rather than replace good clinical observation and practice. Before any first use of a new ventilator there must be commissioning checks, preferably using a test lung. Equally there must be user checks before a ventilator is used in emergency or in transport. The effective use of portable ventilators requires a suitable training programme and is helped by the use of cockpit–style checklists. Although portable ventilators are increasingly widely-used around the world there is a relatively limited number of publications concerning their use and there is a need for more work in this field. A number of publications have shown the potential deficiencies of bag-valve compared with mechanical ventilation with the risk of hyperinflation of the lungs and the associated problems.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Suggestions for Further Reading
Branson R. Patient needs should drive ventilator selection for stockpiling; ‘handy’ ventilators may not ‘lend a hand’. Respir Care. 2011;56(6):879.
Goedeke A, Wenzel V, Hoermann S, et al. Effects of face mask ventilation in apnoeic patients with a with resuscitation ventilator in comparison with a bag valve mask. J Emerg Med. 2006;30(1):63–7.
L’Her E, Roy A. Bench tests of simple, handy ventilators for pandemics: performance, autonomy and ergonomy. Respir Care. 2011;56(6):751–67.
Noordergraaf GJ, van Dun PJ, Kramer BP, et al. Can first responders achieve and maintain normocapnia when sequentially ventilating with a bag-valve device and two oxygen-driven resuscitators? A controlled clinical trial in 104 patients. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2004a;21:367–72.
Noordergraaf GJ, Van Dan DJ, Shors MP, et al. Efficacy and safety in patients on an EM 100 resuscitator in comparison with a bag valve device. Am J Emerg Med. 2004b;22(7):537–43.
Salas N, Wisor B, Agazio J, et al. Comparison of ventilation and cardiac compressions when utilizing the impact model 730 automatic transport ventilator versus a conventional bag valve with a facemask in a model of adult cardiopulmonary arrest. Resuscitation. 2007;74(1):94–101.
Updike G, Moesseno VN, Auble TE, et al. Comparison of bag valve mask, manually-triggered ventilator and automatic ventilator devices used while ventilating a non-intubated mannikin model. Prehosp Emerg Care. 1998;2(1):52–5.
Weiss SJ, Ernst AA, Jones R, et al. Automatic transport ventilator versus bag valve in the EMS setting: a prospective randomized trial. South Med J. 2005;98(10):970–6.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Baker, D.J. (2020). Portable Mechanical Ventilators. In: Artificial Ventilation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55408-8_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55408-8_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-55407-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-55408-8
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)