Abstract
Paraesophageal hernia repair and the use of a mesh to avoid any tension during repair is a controversial issue (1). On one side, due to complications related to those prosthetic materials and, on the other side, about the type of mesh to be used and where they should be placed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Targarona E, Bendahan G, Balagué C, Garriga J, Trias M. Mesh in the hiatus. A Controversial Issue. Arch Surg. 2004;139:1286–96.
DeMeester SR. Laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair: critical steps and adjunct techniques to minimize recurrence. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2013;23:429–35.
Pfluke JM, Parker M, Bowers SP, et al. Hiatal hernia repair with mesh: a survey of SAGES members. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:1843–8.
Frantzides CT, Madan AK, Carlson MA, Stavropoulos GP. A prospective, randomized trial of laparoscopic polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) patch repair vs simple cruroplasty for large hiatal hernia. Arch Surg. 2002;137:649–52.
Granderath FA, Schweiger UM, Kamolz T, et al. Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication with prosthetic hiatal closure reduces postoperative intrathoracic wrap herniation: preliminary results of a prospective randomized functional and clinical study. Arch Surg. 2005;140:40–8.
Tam V, Winger DG, Nason KS. A systematic reviw and meta-analysis of mesh vs suture cruroplasty in laparoscopic large hiatal hernia repair. Am J Surg. 2016;211:226–38.
Memon MA, Memon B, Yunus RM, Khan S. Suture cruroplasty versus prosthetic hiatal herniorrhaphy for large hiatal hernia. A meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2016; 263:258–66.
Oelschlager BK, Pellegrini CA, Hunter J, et al. Biologic prosthesis reduces recurrences after laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair. Ann Surg. 2006;244:481–90.
Watson DI, Thompson SK, Devitt PG, et al. Laparoscopic repair of very large hiatus hernia with sutures versus absorbable mesh versus non-absorbable mesh. Ann Surg. 2015;261:282–9.
Antoniou SA, Pointner R, Granderath FA, Köckerling F. The use of biological meshes in diaphragmatic defects—an evidence-based review of the literature. Front Surg. 2015;2:56.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
6.1 Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Laparoscopic correction of paraesophageal hernia
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Morales-Conde, S., Lopez Bernal, F., Alarcón, I. (2021). Minimally Invasive Surgery of Paraesophageal Hernias. In: Asunción Acosta, M., Cuesta, M.A., Bruna, M. (eds) Atlas of Minimally Invasive Techniques in Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55176-6_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55176-6_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-55175-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-55176-6
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)