Abstract
The second phase of the Porto Maravilha project went through an inflection period in 2017, when the consortium Porto Novo—private entity and operator of the venture—paralyzed the maintenance and operation services in the area. Porto Novo demanded the CDURP, a company of Rio Municipality responsible for managing the whole operation, for R$ 6 million (reais) in the court, alleging breach of contract. Despite the services reactivation in November of 2017, this episode uncovered a break in the political coalition that manages the country’s largest urban operation and raised questions about the risk distribution. The serious financial crisis in 2015 caused FIIPM illiquidity, the fund responsible for resources. For this reason, the Municipality paid the cleaning and maintenance of the area, dismantling the official speech that the arrangement wouldn’t jeopardize public resources. This article intends to explain two elements. On the one hand, we want to test the hypothesis that the coalition rupture has brought to the fore a diversity of actors, in addition to the public–private coalition. The second is that the state acts as an enabler of the process, a sort of “state by contract” that guarantees the financial security of private agents, to the detriment of local resources.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
To understand the debate about the availability of federal land transferred to the Municipality for the Porto Maravilha operation, we recommend Tuanni Borba’s chapter “Institutional Analysis of the Secretariat of Federal Property (SPU)” in this book.
- 2.
FGTS is a fund that belongs to Brazilian workers as guarantees of unfair dismissal or any cause of unemployment. It is a fund guaranteed by employers and corresponds to 8% of the salary of each worker. The FGTS is administered by the Federal Government through Banco CAIXA Econômica Federal. CAIXA has the faculties of managing and investing in real estate funds, ensuring the provision of funds for certain urban programs and policies, such as the Minha Casa, Minha Vida Program, for example.
- 3.
During the first phase of operation, from 2010 to 2016, this model allowed the development of initial works such as the construction of two road tunnels, the overthrow of Perimetral Avenue, the construction of two museums (Rio Art Museum and Museum of Tomorrow), 70 km of reurbanized roads and 650,000 m2 of sidewalks, among other related works. The second phase would be characterized by the construction of large real estate developments but it is the phase that faces the most profound stagnation as we will analyze in this chapter.
- 4.
All the reports by trimester are available directly from the CDURP website at this link: https://www.portomaravilha.com.br/trimestrais/relatorios/.
- 5.
This understanding has been highly consecrated in Political Science from the various meanings of rational choice theory that focuses on actors. This approach came from the economic understandings of political phenomena, thanks to the contributions of Antonhy Downs, Mancur Olson and George Stigler.
- 6.
Report available at: https://www.portomaravilha.com.br/relatorios_trimestrais/.
- 7.
References
Bennet A, Elman C (2006) Complex causal relations and case study methods: the example of path dependence. In: Advance access publication
Giannella L (2013) A produção histórica do espaço portuário da cidade do Rio de Janeiro e o projeto Porto Maravilha, Espaço e Economia [Online], 3 |2013, posto online no dia 19 dezembro
Giannella L (2019) Financeirização e Produção do Espaço Urbano no Porto Maravilha, Rio de Janeiro. Neoliberalismo às avessas? Paper apresentado no XVIII Enanpur, 2019. Maio
Hall P, Taylor RC (2003) As três versões do neo-institucionalismo. In: Revista Lua Nova, No. 58. São Paulo
Logan J, Molotch H (1987) Urban fortunes: the political economy of place. University of California Press, Berkeley
Lowndes V (2009) New institutionalism and urban politics. In: Davies J, Imbroscio D (ed) Theories of urban politics, 2nd edn. Sage, Los Angeles/london/new Delhi/Singapore/Washington DC, pp 91–105
Marques CN (2008) Para onde vai a zona portuária do Rio de Janeiro?: singularidades do lugar e diversidades de propostas. 2008. 161 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Geografia Humana)–Instituto de Geografia, Universidade Estadual do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro
Moloch H (1976) The city as a growth machine: toward a political economy of place. Am J Sociol 82(2):309–332
Mota VM, Fedozzi L (2019) Atores Urbanos e Arranjos Institucionais nas políticas de “revitalizações” portuárias do Brasil contemporâneo: Notas de uma pesquisa em curso. Paper apresentado no XVIII Enanpur, 2019. Maio
Mosciaro M, Pereira dos Santos AL, Aalbers M (s/n) The finacialization of urban development: speculation and public land in Porto Maravilha, Rio de Janeiro. In: Chu CL, He S (eds) The speculative city: emergin forms and norms of the built environment. Toronto University Press, Toronto
Pierson P (2000) Increasing returns, path dependence and the study of politics. Am Polit Sci Rev 94(2)
Pereira dos Santos A (2016) Intervenções em centros urbanos e conflitos distributivos: Modelos regulatórios, circuitos de valorização e estratégias discursivas. Tese de Doutorado em Direito. Universidade de São Paulo, USP, São Paulo
Pierson P, Skocpol T (2008) El Institucionalismo Histórico en la Ciencia Política Contemporánea. Revista Uruguaya de Ciencia Política. Revista Uruguaya de Ciencia Política 17(1):07–38
Porto Maravilha. https://www.portomaravilha.com.br/relatorios_trimestrais/
Riberio LCQ (ed) (2017) Rio de Janeiro: Transformações na ordem urbana. Letra Capital, Rio de Janeiro
Savitch HV, Kantor P, Hadock SV (1997) The political economy of urban regimes: a comparative perspective. Urban Affairs Rev 32:348–377
Werneck M (2016) Porto Maravilha: agentes, coalizões de poder e neoliberalização no Rio de Janeiro. Dissertação apresentada ao curso de Mestrado do Programa de PósGraduação em Planejamento Urbano e Regional da Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro – UFRJ
Werneck M, Novaes P, dos Santos Junior OA (2018) A estagnação da dinâmica imobiliária e a crise da operação urbana do Porto Maravilha. Informe Crítico. Observatório das Metrópoles
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Meza, H. (2020). Porto Maravilha: The Utopia Crisis After the Global Euphoria. In: de Queiroz Ribeiro, L.C., Bignami, F. (eds) The Legacy of Mega Events. The Latin American Studies Book Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55053-0_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55053-0_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-55052-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-55053-0
eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)