Abstract
As we remember, the last fundamental question of philosophy signalled a reorientation in the history of Western philosophy, but even though it was formulated early in Husserl’s Logical Investigations (1900) as “the conditions of the possibility of science in general”, it was only answered later in his Ideas II (1925, 1952), namely, all science is founded on “social subjectivity”. All intentional objects, the objective meanings constituting the “naturalist” and “humanist sciences”, are grounded on the spiritual world. Eventually, those intentional objects would take a life of their own constituting the cultural world as a symbolic universe. This logical path came to a dead end when anthropology became separated from cosmology, the symbolic animal from the rest of the universe. However, this is no longer our fate because we have demonstrated that we can do philosophy again from without the Western tradition by discovering a new world-hypothesis as a result of answering the fundamental questions of philosophy anew using the hypothetico-inductive method. So now we have to continue our philosophical inquiry with the last fundamental question that starts with a pure fact we assume as being the case, namely, that science is grounded somehow. If so, how is the foundation of science possible? We already know the answer because it has been implicit in the main goal of this book, namely, to demonstrate that science in general is grounded on a world-hypothesis. Therefore, now that we already know the answer to the last fundamental question, all that remains to be done is to work out the implications of this philosophical discovery for human knowledge.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ashby, W. R. (1952) [1954]. Design for a brain. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Ashby, W. R. (1956) [1957]. An introduction to cybernetics. London: Chapman & Hall.
Ashby, W. R. (2008). Journal (1928–1972), The W. Ross Ashby Digital Archive, 2008. http://www.rossashby.info/journal. Accessed 19 May 2020.
Darwin, C. (1859). On the origin of species. London: John Murray.
Descartes, R. (1637) [1913]. Discourse on the method of rightly conducting one’s reason and of seeking truth in the sciences. Chicago: The Open Court Publishing Company.
Descartes, R. (1641) [1912]. Meditations on first philosophy. London: J.M. Dent & Sons.
Hartmann, N. (1933). El Problema del Ser Espiritual: Investigaciones para la fundamentación de la filosofía de la historia y de las ciencias del espíritu. Buenos Aires: Leviatán.
Heidegger, M. (1927) [2001]. Being and time. Oxford: Blackwell.
Husserl, E. (1900) [2001]. Logical investigations. London: Routledge.
Husserl, E. (1925, 1952) [1989]. Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomenological philosophy: Studies in the phenomenology of constitution. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Kelsen, H. (1934) [2002]. Introduction to the Problems of Legal Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Maxwell, J. C. (1865). A dynamical theory of the electromagnetic field. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 155, 459–512.
Mendel, G. (1866). Experiments in plant hybridization. Abhandlungen, pp. 3–47.
Newton, I. (1687). Philosophiæ naturalis principia mathematica. S. Pepys, Reg. Soc. Praeses. London: William Dawson & Sons.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pretel-Wilson, M. (2020). The Unification of Knowledge. In: Utopics. Contemporary Systems Thinking. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54177-4_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54177-4_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-54176-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-54177-4
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)