Abstract
Asset-based community development (ABCD) is a necessary antecedent to authentic co-production, since there are certain issues that citizens, their families and communities are best placed to resolve themselves; certain others that require the support of outside actors; and yet others that necessitate outside actors doing something for the community that the community cannot do alone, or even with help. ABCD is the process by which these three levels of change can be negotiated to effect a more just and inclusive social order. ABCD is aligned to the principles of subsidiarity, wherever and whenever possible: issues are dealt with at the most local level to ensure that no larger entity takes on functions that could be discharged by a smaller more localised entity.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barber, B. (2004). Strong democracy: Participatory politics for a new age. 20th anniv. ed. Oakland, CA: University of California. Originally published 1984.
Boyle, D. & Harris, M. (2009). The challenge of co-production: How equal partnerships between professionals and the public are crucial to improving public services. Discussion paper. National Endowment for Science, Technology and the Arts. http://assetbasedconsulting.co.uk/uploads/publications/The_Challenge_of_Co-production.pdf.
Boyte, H. (1980). The backyard revolution: Understanding the new citizen movement. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
Brook, K. (2005). Labour market participation: The influence of social capital. Office for National Statistics, Labour Market Trends. http://www.social-capital.net/docs/lm_social_capital.pdf.
Cahn, E. (2000). No more throwaway people: The co-production imperative. Washington, DC: Essential Books.
Davis, A. (2015). Don’t blame the poor for the faults of our economy. https://www.epi.org/blog/dont-blame-the-poor-for-the-faults-of-our-economy/.
Dunkelman, M.J. (2014). The vanishing neighbor: The transformation of American community. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
Gerstein, J. (2016). Approaching marginalized populations from an asset rather than a deficit model of education. https://usergeneratededucation.wordpress.com/2016/05/08/approaching-marginalized-populations-from-an-asset-rather-than-a-deficit-model/.
Gutierrez, G. (2004). The power of the poor in history. Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock. Originally published 1983.
Holt-Lundstad, J., et al. (2015, March 11). Loneliness and social isolation as risk factors for mortality: A meta-analytic review. Perspectives on Psychological Science.https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1745691614568352.
Hunter, S. & Rowley, D. (2015). Social work with people with learning difficulties. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
Lent, A. & Studdert, J. (2019). The community paradigm: Why public services need radical change and how it can be achieved. London: New Local Government Network.
McKnight, J. (2009). Community capacities and community necessities. Speech presented at the From Clients to Citizens Forum, Coady International Institute, St. Francis Xavier University, Antigonish, Nova Scotia. https://resources.depaul.edu/abcd-institute/publications/publications-by-topic/Documents/McKnight%20Speech%207-09.pdf.
McKnight, J. & Russell, C. (2018). The four essential elements of an asset-based community development process: What is distinctive about an asset-based community development process? DePaul University, ABCD Institute paper. https://resources.depaul.edu/abcd-institute/publications/publications-by-topic/Documents/4_Essential_Elements_of_ABCD_Process.pdf.
Miller, J. (1991). Last one over the wall: The Massachusetts experiment in closing reform schools. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.
Monbiot, G. (2016, February 8). This is how people can truly take back control: From the bottom up. The Guardian.https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/feb/08/take-back-control-bottom-up-communities.
Russell, C. (2010, September). Making the case for an asset-based community development (abcd) approach to probation: From reformation to transformation. Irish Probation Journal, 7. https://resources.depaul.edu/abcd-institute/publications/publications-by-topic/Documents/Making%20the%20Case%20for%20an%20ABCD%20Approach%20to%20Probation%20From+Reformation+to+Transformation,+CORMAC+RUSSELL(1).pdf.
Sampson, R.J., Morenoff, J.D. & Earls, F. (1999). Beyond social capital: Spatial dynamics of collective efficacy for children. American Sociological Review, 64(5), 633.
Slay, J. & Stephens, L. (2013). Co-production in mental health: A literature review. New Economics Foundation, London. https://b.3cdn.net/nefoundation/ca0975b7cd88125c3e_ywm6bp3l1.pdf.
Unwin, J. (2018). The story of our times: Shifting power, bridging divides, transforming society. Summary report, UK Civil Society Futures. https://civilsocietyfutures.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/6/2018/11/Civil-Society-Futures__The-Story-of-Our-Future.pdf.
Vollmer, J. (2010). Schools cannot do it alone: Building public support for America’s public schools. Fairfield, IA: Enlightenment Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Russell, C. (2021). Getting to Authentic Co-production: An Asset-Based Community Development Perspective on Co-production. In: Loeffler, E., Bovaird, T. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Co-Production of Public Services and Outcomes. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53705-0_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53705-0_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-53704-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-53705-0
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)