Skip to main content

Automatic Segregation and Classification of Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria of Clinical Trials to Improve Patient Eligibility Matching

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Explainable AI in Healthcare and Medicine

Part of the book series: Studies in Computational Intelligence ((SCI,volume 914))

Abstract

Clinical trials are aimed to observe the effectiveness of a new intervention. For every clinical trial the eligibility requirements of a patient are specified in the form of inclusion or exclusion criteria. However, the process of eligibility determination is extremely challenging and time-consuming. Such a process typically involves repeated manual reading followed by matching of the trial descriptions mentioning the eligibility criteria and patient’s electronic health record (EHR) for multiple trials across every visit. Thus, the number of patients to be evaluated gets reduced. In this work, we have focused on a small but important step towards automatic segregation and classification of inclusion-exclusion criteria of clinical trials to improve patient eligibility matching. Accordingly, we have proposed an attention aware CNN-Bi-LSTM model. We evaluate our model with different word and character level embeddings as input over two different openly available datasets. Experimental results demonstrate our proposed model surpasses the performance of the existing baseline models. Furthermore, we have observed that character level information along with word embeddings boost up the predictive performance of criteria classification (in terms of F1-Scores), which is a promising direction for further research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.trec-cds.org/2018.html.

  2. 2.

    https://www.kaggle.com/auriml/eligibilityforcancerclinicaltrials.

  3. 3.

    https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/results?term=neoplasmtype=Intrshowdow.

References

  1. Bustos, A., Pertusa, A.: Learning eligibility in cancer clinical trials using deep neural networks. Appl. Sci. 8(7), 1206 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cao, Y., Liu, F., Simpson, P., Antieau, L., Bennett, A., Cimino, J.J., Ely, J., Yu, H.: Askhermes: an online question answering system for complex clinical questions. J. Biomed. Inform. 44(2), 277–288 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Goldberg, Y., Levy, O.: Word2vec explained: deriving Mikolov et al.’s negative-sampling word-embedding method. arXiv preprint arXiv:1402.3722 (2014)

  4. Joulin, A., Grave, E., Bojanowski, P., Douze, M., JĂ©gou, H., Mikolov, T.: FastText. zip: compressing text classification models. arXiv preprint arXiv:1612.03651 (2016)

  5. Penberthy, L., Brown, R., Puma, F., Dahman, B.: Automated matching software for clinical trials eligibility: measuring efficiency and flexibility. Contemp. Clin. Trials 31(3), 207–217 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Penberthy, L.T., Dahman, B.A., Petkov, V.I., DeShazo, J.P.: Effort required in eligibility screening for clinical trials. J. Oncol. Pract. 8(6), 365–370 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Peters, M.E., Neumann, M., Zettlemoyer, L., Yih, W.T.: Dissecting contextual word embeddings: architecture and representation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1808.08949 (2018)

  8. Samson, C.W., Tu, W., Sim, I., Richesson, R.: Formal representation of eligibility criteria: a literature review. J. Biomed. Inform. 43(3), 451–467 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2009.12.004. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1532046409001592

  9. Shaw, P., Uszkoreit, J., Vaswani, A.: Self-attention with relative position representations. arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.02155 (2018)

  10. Shido, Y., Kobayashi, Y., Yamamoto, A., Miyamoto, A., Matsumura, T.: Automatic source code summarization with extended tree-LSTM. arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.08094 (2019)

  11. Shivade, C., Hebert, C., Lopetegui, M., de Marneffe, M.C., Fosler-Lussier, E., Lai, A.M.: Textual inference for eligibility criteria resolution in clinical trials. J. Biomed. Inform. 58, 211–218 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2015.09.008. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1532046415002014. Proceedings of the 2014 i2b2/UTHealth Shared-Tasks and Workshop on Challenges in Natural Language Processing for Clinical Data

  12. Voorhees, E.M.: The TREC medical records track. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology and Biomedical Informatics, p. 239. ACM (2013)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tirthankar Dasgupta .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Dasgupta, T., Mondal, I., Naskar, A., Dey, L. (2021). Automatic Segregation and Classification of Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria of Clinical Trials to Improve Patient Eligibility Matching. In: Shaban-Nejad, A., Michalowski, M., Buckeridge, D.L. (eds) Explainable AI in Healthcare and Medicine. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 914. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53352-6_27

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics