Skip to main content

Boosting Retrieval Via Target Elaborations (the “Late Abstraction Principle”)

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Distant Connections: The Memory Basis of Creative Analogy

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Psychology ((BRIEFSCOGNIT))

  • 182 Accesses

Abstract

A series of interventions aimed at eliciting an abstract encoding of learning contents succeeded in rendering them more retrievable during the processing of analogous situations. However, this approach is not applicable to learning contents that had not been originally encoded in ways that highlighted their abstract features. Drawing on computational accounts of the retrieval advantage of abstracting source analogs, the late abstraction principle posits that a comparable retrieval advantage should be obtained by abstracting target situations. We begin by reviewing the initial experimental evidence for the psychological reality of this computational insight: the fact that comparing two analogous situations increases access to distant analogs, as compared to their independent presentation. After discussing the limitations of the target-comparison strategy for being autonomously implemented by students, we review very recent interventions designed to help students capitalize on the late abstraction principle in truly autonomous ways. We end by describing how this finding was simulated within extant computational models of similarity-based retrieval, as well as by discussing theoretical objections to the claim that late abstraction can boost the retrieval of learning contents whose structural features had not been originally highlighted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Belenky, D., & Schalk, L. (2014). The effects of idealized and grounded materials on learning, transfer, and interest: An organizing framework for categorizing external knowledge representations. Educational Psychology Review, 26(1), 27–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernardo, A. B. I. (2001). Analogical problem construction and transfer in mathematical problem solving. Educational Psychology, 21, 137–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Z., Mo, L., & Honomichl, R. (2004). Having the memory of an elephant: Long-term retrieval and use of analogues in problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 415–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncker, K. (1945). On problem solving. Psychological Monographs, 58 (5, Whole No. 270).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunbar, K. (2001). The analogical paradox: Why analogy is so easy in naturalistic settings, yet so difficult in the psychology laboratory? In D. Gentner, K. J. Holyoak, & B. Kokinov (Eds.), The analogical mind: Perspectives from cognitive science (pp. 313–334). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Angelo, V. & Trench, M. (2020). Enhancing distant analogical retrieval via generating abstract redescriptions of the target. Paper presented at the Conceptual Abstraction and Analogy in Natural and Artificial Systems Symposium of the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falkenhainer, B. (1990). Analogical interpretation in context. In Proceedings of the 12th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 69–76). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falkenhainer, B., Forbus, K. D., & Gentner, D. (1989). The structure-mapping engine: Algorithm and examples. Artificial Intelligence, 41, 1–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finlayson, M., & Winston, P. (2006). Analogical retrieval via intermediate features: The goldilocks hypothesis (MIT CSAIL Technical Report No. MIT-CSAIL-TR-2006-071). hdl:1721.1/34635.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentner, D. (1989). The mechanisms of analogical transfer. In S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 199–242). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gentner, D., Loewenstein, J., & Thompson, L. (2004). Analogical encoding: Facilitating knowledge transfer and integration. In K. Forbus, D. Gentner, & T. Regier (Eds.), Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 450–455). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentner, D., Loewenstein, J., Thompson, L., & Forbus, K. (2009). Reviving inert knowledge: Analogical abstraction supports relational retrieval of past events. Cognitive Science, 3, 1343–1382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gentner, D., Rattermann, M. J., & Forbus, K. D. (1993). The roles of similarity in transfer: Separating retrievability from inferential soundness. Cognitive Psychology, 25, 431–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gentner, D., & Wolff, P. (2000). Metaphor and knowledge change. In E. Dietrich & A. Markman (Eds.), Cognitive dynamics: Conceptual change in humans and machines (pp. 295–342). Mahwah, NJ: LEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gick, M. L., & Holyoak, K. J. (1980). Analogical problem solving. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 306–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstadter, D. R. (1985). Metamagical Themas: Questing for the essence of mind and pattern. London: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstadter, D. R., & Sander, E. (2013). Surfaces and essences: Analogy as the fuel and fire of thinking. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstadter, D. R., & the Fluid Analogies Research Group. (1995). Fluid concepts and creative analogies: Computer models of the fundamental mechanisms of thought. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hummel, J. E., & Holyoak, K. J. (1997). Distributed representations of structure: A theory of analogical access and mapping. Psychological Review, 104, 427–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keane, M. T. (1985). On drawing analogies when solving problems: A theory and test of solution generation in an analogical problem solving task. British Journal of Psychology, 76, 449–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurtz, K., & Loewenstein, J. (2007). Converging on a new role for analogy in problem solving and retrieval: When two problems are better than one. Memory & Cognition, 35, 334–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lampert, M. (1986). Knowing, doing, and teaching multiplication. Cognition and Instruction, 3, 305–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loewenstein, J. (2010). How one’s hook is baited matters for catching an analogy. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 53, pp. 149–182). San Diego, CA: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mandler, J. M., & Orlich, F. (1993). Analogical transfer: The roles of schema abstraction and awareness. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 5, 485–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markman, A. B., & Ross, B. H. (2003). Category use and category learning. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 592–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Medin, D. L., & Ross, B. H. (1989). The specific character of abstract thought: Categorization, problem-solving, and induction. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (Vol. 5, pp. 189–223). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minervino, R., Olguín, V., & Trench, M. (2017). Promoting interdomain analogical transfer: When creating a problem helps to solve a problem. Memory & Cognition, 45, 221–232. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-016-0655-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minervino, R., Trench, M., & Oberholzer, N. (2009). Concrete and imagined simulations of situation models enhance transfer of solutions to structurally different algebra word problems. In N. A. Taatgen & H. Van Rijn (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1394–1399). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society. MORAVIA 82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nathan, M. J., Kintsch, W., & Young, E. (1992). A theory of algebra word problem comprehension and its implications for the design of computer learning environments. Cognition and Instruction, 9, 329–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rozenblit, L., & Keil, F. (2002). The misunderstood limits of folk science: An illusion of explanatory depth. Cognitive Science, 26(5), 521–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudnitsky, A., Etheredge, S., Freeman, S. J. M., & Gilbert, T. (1995). Learning to solve addition and subtraction word problems through a structure-plus-writing approach. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26, 467–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thagard, P., Holyoak, K., Nelson, G., & Gochfeld, D. (1990). Analog retrieval by constraint satisfaction. Artificial Intelligence, 46, 259–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trench, M., Tavernini, M., & Goldstone, R. L. (2017). Promoting spontaneous analogical transfer by idealizing target representations. In G. Gunzelmann, A. Howes, T. Tenbrink, & E. Davelaar (Eds.), Proceedings of the 39th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1206–1211). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124–1131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, T. B., Smith, S. M., & Finke, R. A. (1999). Creative cognition. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 189–212). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Trench, M., Minervino, R.A. (2020). Boosting Retrieval Via Target Elaborations (the “Late Abstraction Principle”). In: Distant Connections: The Memory Basis of Creative Analogy. SpringerBriefs in Psychology(). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52545-3_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics