Skip to main content

Bridging the Divide Between the Experimental and the Naturalistic Traditions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Distant Connections: The Memory Basis of Creative Analogy

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Psychology ((BRIEFSCOGNIT))

  • 177 Accesses

Abstract

A wealth of experimental studies have demonstrated that analogous situations are seldom retrieved from memory when they do not share similar elements with the target situation being processed. More naturalistic observational studies, however, are revealing a profusion of distant analogies, thus suggesting that retrieval is not invariably constrained by superficial similarity. We begin by discussing previous attempts to explain out this inconsistency in terms of the alleged artificiality of experimental tasks and materials. Next, we review our own attempts to settle this debate by means of a hybrid paradigm that retains the ecological validity of naturalistic studies, but without sacrificing the methodological control of the experimental tradition. In line with traditional findings, our results demonstrate a strong effect of superficial similarity during the retrieval of naturally acquired situations as diverse as plots of popular movies, highly publicized political affairs, and different kinds of autobiographical episodes. We conclude by reassessing the debate about the adaptive nature of the surface bias in analogical retrieval, and discuss the implications of this diagnosis for alleviating the problem of inert knowledge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    To some extent, the logic behind disregarding the bulk of analogies proposed by participants and simply concentrating the data analysis on the retrieval (or not) of this particular analog is somewhat reminiscent of techniques used in marine migration studies. As an example, consider the following questions: (1) Which is the likelihood that a mother whale that departed from California will make it to Alaska? and (2) How does it compare with the probabilities of a newborn whale? The success probabilities of mother whales can be compared to those of newborn whales without necessarily labeling all existing whales with satellite transmitters. It only requires taking the quotient between an arbitrary number of mother whales labeled in California and the subset of whales finally transmitting in Alaska, and comparing it to an analogous quotient corresponding to the newborn whales.

References

  • Blanchette, I., & Dunbar, K. (2000). How analogies are generated: The roles of structural and superficial similarity. Memory & Cognition, 28, 108–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Z., Mo, L., & Honomichl, R. (2004). Having the memory of an elephant: Long-term retrieval and use of analogues in problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 415–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dehghani, M., Gentner, D., Forbus, K., Ekhtiari, H., & Sachdeva, S. (2009). Analogy and moral decision making. In B. Kokinov, D. Gentner, & K. Holyoak (Eds.), New frontiers in analogy research (pp. 1–10). Sofia: NBU Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunbar, K. (2001). The analogical paradox: Why analogy is so easy in naturalistic settings, yet so difficult in the psychology laboratory? In D. Gentner, K. J. Holyoak, & B. Kokinov (Eds.), The analogical mind: Perspectives from cognitive science (pp. 313–334). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentner, D. (1989). The mechanisms of analogical transfer. In S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 199–242). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gentner, D., Rattermann, M. J., & Forbus, K. D. (1993). The roles of similarity in transfer: Separating retrievability from inferential soundness. Cognitive Psychology, 25, 431–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstadter, D. R., & Sander, E. (2013). Surfaces and essences: Analogy as the fuel and fire of thinking. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keane, M. T. (1987). On retrieving analogues when solving problems. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 39, 29–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markman, A. B., Taylor, E., & Gentner, D. (2007). Auditory presentation leads to better analogical retrieval than written presentation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 1101–1106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Medin, D. L., & Ross, B. H. (1989). The specific character of abstract thought: Categorization, problem-solving, and induction. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (Vol. 5, pp. 189–223). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novick, L. R. (1988). Analogical transfer, problem similarity, and expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 510–520.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O’keefe, D., & Costello, F. (2008). A fast computational model of analogical retrieval (and mapping). In B. C. Love, K. McRae, & V. M. Sloutsky (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 2003–2008). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olguin, V., Trench, M., & Minervino, R. (2020). Retrieving a distant analog from memory in daily life is very unlikely, even in optimal conditions of encoding. In S. Denison, M. Mack, Y. Xu, & B. Armstrong (Eds.), Proceedings of the 42 Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2124–2130). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osherson, D. N., Smith, E. E., Wilkie, O., López, A., & Shafir, E. (1990). Category-based induction. Psychological Review, 97, 185–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raynal, L., Clement, E., & Sander, E. (2018). Structural similarity superiority in a free-recall reminding paradigm. In C. Kalish, M. Rau, J. Zhu, & T. Rogers (Eds.), Proceedings of the 40th annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 2324–2329). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rips, L. (1975). Inductive judgments about natural categories. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 665–681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trench, M., & Minervino, R. (2015). The role of surface similarity in analogical retrieval: Bridging the gap between the naturalistic and the experimental traditions. Cognitive Science, 39, 1292–1319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trench, M., Oberholzer, N., Adrover, J. F., & Minervino, R. (2009). La eficacia del paradigma de producción para promover la recuperación de análogos base interdominio. Psykhe, 18, 39–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Trench, M., Minervino, R.A. (2020). Bridging the Divide Between the Experimental and the Naturalistic Traditions. In: Distant Connections: The Memory Basis of Creative Analogy. SpringerBriefs in Psychology(). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52545-3_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics