Abstract
This paper describes how particular normative dimensions have become embedded in public space. It identifies four periods of urban history, starting with that of the liberal city which introduces a heterogeneous set of liberal and democratic values. The sanitary city of the nineteenth century came to depict public space as a system of flows that needed to managed. The twentieth century rational city endorsed functionality and efficiency as key values, as manifested in modernist architecture and neo-liberal policies. Recently the experimental city emerged, in which digital technologies give rise to ‘smart’ systems, but also to new forms of civic engagement. It is argued that the experimental city needs to accommodate the normative dimensions of public space developed in preceding historical periods, which necessitates that conflicts between these dimensions need to subjected to democratic trade-off processes.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arendt, H. (1958). The human condition. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
Ariès, P. (1962). Centuries of childhood. A social history of the family. New York: Vintage Books.
Arthur, W. B. (1989). Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events. The Economic Journal, 99(394), 116–131.
Barnett, C. (2007). Convening publics: The parasitical spaces of public action. In The handbook of political geography (pp. 403–417). London: Routledge.
Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid modernity. Cambridge: Polity.
Benn, S. I., & Gaus, G. F. (1983). The public and the private: Concepts and actions. In S. I. Benn & G. F. Gaus (Eds.), Public and private in social life (pp. 3–27). London & Canberra: Croom Helm.
Berlin, I. (1969). Two concepts of liberty (pp. 118–172). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Bohman, J. (1998). Survey article: The coming of age of deliberative democracy. Journal of Political Philosophy, 6(4), 400–425.
Boyer, R. H. W. (2015). Grassroots innovation for urban sustainability: comparing the diffusion pathways of three ecovillage projects. Environment and Planning, 47(2), 320–337. http://www.envplan.com/abstract.cgi?id=a140250p
Braudel, F. (1982). Civilization and capitalism, 15th–18th century: The perspective of the world. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Bulkeley, H., & Castán Broto, V. (2013). Government by experiment? Global cities and the governing of climate change. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 38(3), 361–375.
Callon, M. (1998). Introduction: The embeddedness of economic markets in economics. The Sociological Review, 46(S1), 1–57.
Castells, M. (1993). European cities, the informational society, and the global economy. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 84(4), 247–257.
Castells, M. (1997). The information age: Economy, society and culture. In The power of identity (Vol. 2). Chichester: Blackwell.
Chadwick, E. (1842). Report on the sanitary condition of the labouring population of Great Britain: Supplementary report on the results of special inquiry into the practice of interment in towns. Richmond: HM Stationery Office.
Chandler, A. D. (1977). The visible hand: The managerial revolution in American business. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Coase, R. H. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica, 4(16), 386–405.
Correljé, A. F., Cuppen, E., Dignum, M., Pesch, U., & Taebi, B. (2015). Responsible innovation in energy projects: Values in the design of technologies, institutions and stakeholder interactions. In Responsible innovation (pp. 183–200). London: Springer.
Correljé, A. F., & Groenewegen, J. P. (2009). Public values in the energy sector: Economic perspectives. International Journal of Public Policy, 4(5), 395–413.
De Moor, T. (2013). De herontdekking van het Collectief. Samenleving en politiek: tijdschrift voor een democratisch socialisme (Sampol), 20(4), 29–38.
De Swaan, A. (1990). De Zorg en de Staat. In Welzijn, onderwijs, en gezondheidszorg in Europa en de Verenigde Staten in een nieuwe tijd. Amsterdam: Bert Bakker.
De Waal, B. G. M. (2012). De stad als interface: Digitale media en stedelijke openbaarheid. Groningen: University Library.
Dekkers, M. (2014). De kleine verlossing of de lust van het ontlasten. Amsterdam: Dwarsligger.
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Dewey, J. (1927). The public and its problems. New York: Holt.
Douglas, M. (1966). Purity and danger; an analysis of concepts of pollution and taboo. New York: Praeger.
Dryzek, J. S. (1994). Discursive democracy: Politics, policy, and political science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Duany, A., Plater-Zyberk, E., & Speck, J. (2001). Suburban nation: The rise of sprawl and the decline of the American dream. New York: Macmillan.
Dumont, L. (1977). From Mandeville to Marx. The genesis and triumph of economic ideology. Chicago and London: Chicago University Press.
Evans, J., Karvonen, A., & Raven, R. (2016). The experimental city. New York: Routledge.
Feola, G., & Nunes, R. (2014). Success and failure of grassroots innovations for addressing climate change: The case of the transition movement. Global Environmental Change, 24, 232–250.
Fischer, F. (1999). Technological deliberation in a democratic society: The case for participatory inquiry. Science and Public Policy, 26(5), 294–302.
Fishman, R. (1977). Urban utopias in the twentieth century. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
Fraser, N. (1990). Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. Social Text, 25–26, 56–80.
Gandy, M. (1999). The Paris sewers and the rationalization of urban space. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 24(1), 23–44.
Gandy, M. (2004). Rethinking urban metabolism: water, space and the modern city. City, 8(3), 363–379.
Gastelaars, M. (1994). Publiek private aangelegenheden. Een essay over de wc. Kennis en Methode, 1, 69–89.
Geuss, R. (2001). Public goods. Private goods. Princeton & Woodstock: Princeton University Press.
Goffman, E. (1963). Behavior in public places. Notes of the social organization of gatherings. London: The Free Press of Glencoe.
Habermas, J. (1999). The structural transformation of the public sphere. An inquiry into a category of Borugeois society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hajer, M. A. (2011). De energieke samenleving. In Op zoek naar een sturingsfilosofie voor een schone economie. Den Haag: Planbureau voor de Leefomgeving.
Hirschman, A. O. (1977). The passion and the interests. Political arguments for capitalism before its triumph. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Höflehner, T. (2011). Ecovillages as pioneers for sustainable development in communities and regions. Graz: Karl–Franzens University.
Holland, L. (2004). Diversity and connections in community gardens: a contribution to local sustainability. Local Environment, 9(3), 285–305.
Houwaart, E. S. (1991). De hygiënisten. Groningen: Historische Uitgeverij.
Jackson, S. J., Gillespie, T., & Payette, S. (2014). The policy knot: Re-integrating policy, practice and design in CSCW studies of social computing. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work & social computing (pp. 588–602). New York: ACM.
Jacobs, J. (1992a). The death and life of great American cities. The failure of town planning. Hammondsworth & Ringwood: Penguin Books.
Jacobs, J. (1992b). Systems of survival. A dialogue on the moral foundations of commerce and politics. New York: Random House.
Jewitt, S. (2011). Geographies of shit: Spatial and temporal variations in attitudes towards human waste. Progress in Human Geography, 35(5), 608–626. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132510394704
Kaplan, B. J. (2002). Fictions of privacy: House chapels and the spatial accommodation of religious dissent in early modern Europe. The American Historical Review, 107(4), 1031–1064.
Kelbaugh, D. (1996). Typology—An architecture of limits. Architectural Theory Review, 1(2), 33–52.
Kitchin, R. (2014). The real-time city? Big data and smart urbanism. GeoJournal, 79(1), 1–14.
Kohn, M. (2013). Privatization and protest: Occupy Wall Street, occupy Toronto, and the occupation of public space in a democracy. Perspectives on Politics, 11(1), 99–110.
Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space. Oxford: Blackwell.
Lintsen, H. W. (1992). Wat is techniek? Een geschiedenis van menselijke secreten en discrete technieken. Eindhoven: University of Eindhoven.
Loukaitou-Sideris, A., & Banerjee, T. (1998). Urban design downtown: Poetics and politics of form. California: University of California Press.
Low, S. M. (1996). Spatializing culture: The social production and social construction of public space in Costa Rica. American Ethnologist, 23(4), 861–879.
Low, S. M. (2006). The erosion of public space and the public realm: paranoia, surveillance and privatization in New York City. City & Society, 18(1), 43–49.
Low, S. M., & Iveson, K. (2016). Propositions for more just urban public spaces. City, 20(1), 10–31.
Macpherson, C. B. (1962). The theory of possessive individualism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mandeville, B. (2017). The fable of the bees: Or, private vices, publick benefits. Wellington: The Floating Press.
Marres, N. (2007). The issues deserve more credit pragmatist contributions to the study of public involvement in controversy. Social Studies of Science, 37(5), 759–780.
McCloskey, D. N. (2010). The bourgeois virtues: Ethics for an age of commerce. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Melosi, M. V. (1981). Garbage in the cities: refuse, reform, and the environment. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Melosi, M. V. (2000). The sanitary city. Urban infrastructure in America from colonial times to the present. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
Mill, J. S. (1985). On liberty. London: Penguin Books.
Minogue, K. (1963). The moral character of liberalism. In The Liberal Mind. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.
Mitchell, D. (1995). The end of public space? People’s park, definitions of the public, and democracy. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 85(1), 108–133.
Moore, B. (1985). Privacy. Studies in social and cultural history. Armonk & London: M.E. Sharp.
Mouffe, C. (2000). The democratic paradox. London: Verso.
Naylor, L. (2012). Hired gardens and the question of transgression: lawns, food gardens and the business of ‘alternative’ food practice. Cultural Geographies, 19(4), 483–504. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474474012451543
Nijman, J. (1999). Cultural globalization and the identity of place: The reconstruction of Amsterdam. Cultural Geographies, 6(2), 146–164. https://doi.org/10.1177/096746089900600202
Noort, J. v. d. (1990). Pion of pionier. Stichting PK: Gemeentelijke bedrijvigheid in de negentiende eeuw.
Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing government. How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. Reading: Addison-Wesley.
Pateman, C., & Phillips, A. (1987). Feminist critiques of the public/private dichotomy. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Pesch, U. (2005). The predicaments of publicness. An inquiry into the conceptual ambiguity of public administration. Delft: Eburon.
Pesch, U. (2008). The publicness of public administration. Administration & Society, 40(2), 170–193. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399707312828
Pesch, U. (2014). Sustainable development and institutional boundaries. Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences, 11(1), 39–54.
Pesch, U. (2015a). Engineers and active responsibility. Science and Engineering Ethics, 21(4), 925–939. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-014-9571-7
Pesch, U. (2015b). Publicness, privateness, and the management of pollution. Ethics, Policy & Environment, 18(1), 79–95.
Pesch, U., & Ishmaev, G. (2019). Fictions and frictions: Promises, transaction costs and the innovation of network technologies. Social Studies of Science, 49(2), 264–277. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312719838339
Pesch, U., Spekkink, W., & Quist, J. (2019). Local sustainability initiatives: innovation and civic engagement in societal experiments. European Planning Studies, 27(2), 300–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2018.1464549
Polanyi, K. (2001). The great transformation. The political and economic origins of our time. Boston: Beacon Press.
Putnam, R. D. (2001). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Rawls, J. (1997). The idea of public reason revisited. The University of Chicago Law Review, 64, 765–807.
Ryan, A. (1983). Private Selves and Public Parts. In S. I. Benn & G. F. Gaus (Eds.), Public and private in social life (pp. 135–154). London & Canberra: Croom Helm.
Sadowski, J., & Pasquale, F. A. (2015). The spectrum of control: A social theory of the smart city. First Monday, 20, 7.
Saxonhouse, A. W. (1983). Classical greek conceptions of public and private. In Public and private in social life (pp. 363–384). London: Croom Helm.
Schama, S. (1988). The embarrassment of riches: An interpretation of Dutch culture in the Golden Age. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Schor, J. (2014). Debating the sharing economy. Great transition initiative. (October 2014), http://greattransition.org/publication/debating-the-sharing-economy.
Sedlacek, T. (2011). Economics of good and evil: The quest for economic meaning from Gilgamesh to Wall Street. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sennett, R. (1992). The conscience of the eye: The design and social life of cities. New York: WW Norton & Company.
Sennett, R. (1993). The fall of public man. London and Boston: Faber & Faber.
Sennett, R. (1996). Flesh and stone: The body and the city in Western civilization. New York: WW Norton & Company.
Shaw, J., & Graham, M. (2017). An informational right to the city? Code, content, control, and the urbanization of information. Antipode, 49, 907–927.
Shorto, R. (2013). Amsterdam: A history of the world’s most liberal city. New York: Random House.
Silver, A. (1997). Two different sorts of commerce—Friendship and strangership in civil society. In J. Weintraub & K. Kumar (Eds.), Public and private in thought and practice. Perspectives on a grand dichotomy (pp. 43–74). Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press.
Simon, H. A. (1997). Administrative behavior. A study of decision-making processes in administrative organization. New York and London: The Free Press.
Smith, A. (1998). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
Smith, A. (2011). The transition town network: A review of current evolutions and renaissance. Social Movement Studies, 10(1), 99–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2011.545229
Smith, A., Hargreaves, T., Hielscher, S., Martiskainen, M., & Seyfang, G. (2016). Making the most of community energies: Three perspectives on grassroots innovation. Environment and Planning A, 48(2), 407–432.
Smith, A., & Stirling, A. (2016). Grassroots innovations and democracy.
Springer, S. (2011). Public space as emancipation: meditations on anarchism, radical democracy, neoliberalism and violence. Antipode, 43(2), 525–562.
Taylor, C. (1995). Philosophical arguments. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Taylor, F. W. (1914). The principles of scientific management. New York: Harper.
Townsend, A. M. (2013). Smart cities: Big data, civic hackers, and the quest for a new utopia. New York: WW Norton & Company.
Valentine, G. (2008). Living with difference: reflections on geographies of encounter. Progress in Human Geography, 32(3), 323–337. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133308089372
Van Horn Melton, J. (2001). The rise of the public in enlightenment Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Van Timmeren, A., & Henriquez, L. (2015). Ubikquity & the illuminated city. From smart to intelligent urban environments. Delft: Delft University Press.
Van Zon, H. (1990). Tachtig jaar RIVM. Assen: Van Gorcum.
Van Zon, H. (2002). Nederlandse Hygienisten (p. 29). Groningen: Groniek.
Veblen, T. (1994). Absentee ownership: Business enterprise in recent times: The case of America. Piscataway: Transaction Publishers.
Walker, G., & Devine-Wright, P. (2008). Community renewable energy: What should it mean? Energy Policy, 36(2), 497–500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2007.10.019
Walzer, M. (1983). Spheres of justice. A defense of pluralism and equality. Philadelphia: Basic books.
Walzer, M. (1984). Liberalism and the art of separation. Political Theory, 12(3), 315–330. http://www.jstor.org/stable/191512
Warner, M. (2002). Publics and counterpublics. Public Culture, 14(1), 49–90.
Weintraub, J. (1997). The theory and politics of the public/private distinction. In J. Weintraub & K. Kumar (Eds.), Public and private in thought and practice. Perspectives on a grand dichotomy (pp. 1–42). Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press.
Wright, F. L. (1932). The disappearing city. New York: WF Payson.
Wright, V. (2000). Blurring the public-private divide. In Governance in the twenty-first century: Revitalizing the public service (pp. 155–174). Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pesch, U. (2021). From Liberalism to Experimentation: Reconstructing the Dimensions of Public Space. In: Nagenborg, M., Stone, T., González Woge, M., Vermaas, P.E. (eds) Technology and the City. Philosophy of Engineering and Technology, vol 36. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52313-8_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52313-8_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-52312-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-52313-8
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)