Skip to main content

Complementarities Between Native and Immigrant Workers in Italy by Sector

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Economic Geography of Cross-Border Migration

Part of the book series: Footprints of Regional Science ((VRS))

  • 945 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter investigates the existence of complementarities between immigrant and native workers across sectors in Italy and the effects on wages due to immigration during the period 2011–2016. The analysis is based on a production function framework, where the aggregate labor is the result of a nested-CES function, and workers are differentiated according to their educational attainment, job experience, and nationality. This approach allows the analysis to estimate the elasticity of substitution between immigrant and native workers with the same education-experience level by sector. The contribution is twofold. First, it provides an estimate of the elasticity of substitution between native and immigrant workers by sector. Second, by considering explicitly the different degrees of substitutability between immigrant and native workers, the analysis provides an estimate of the wage impact for the two groups of workers at sectoral level. We find noticeable differences in the elasticity parameters across sectors. Similarly, the wage impact of immigrant is remarkably different both across sectors and between immigrant and native workers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See Dustmann et al. (2016) and references therein.

  2. 2.

    The analytical derivation of Eq. (14.6) and the detailed information regarding the common effects and the fixed effects can be found in the Appendix.

  3. 3.

    An alternative way would be to use the CES aggregate labor supply constructed using the estimates of \(\sigma_{IM}\) and the productivity terms computed using the estimated fixed effects from Eq. (14.5). As shown in Ottaviano and Peri (2008) when the value of \(\sigma_{IM}\) is high the two approaches deliver very similar results.

  4. 4.

    Equation (8) is obtained by total differentiating Eqs. (A.1) and equation (A.2) in the Appendix with respect to the variation of each group of workers due to immigration (until the N-1 level of the nested CES).

  5. 5.

    This sector comprises the housekeeping and elderly care services which in Italy, as in many advanced countries, is prerogative of immigrants.

  6. 6.

    According to the Solow (1956) growth model, in the long run the real interest rate and the capital output ratio are both constant while the capital labor ratio grows at a constant rate. Accordingly, a labor supply shock caused by immigration is likely to exert only short-run effects on the average wage by means of changes in the marginal productivity of labor and capital. An increase in labor supply due to immigration decreases the marginal productivity of labor and increase the one of capital. A higher real interest rate attracts investments, thereby the capital labor ratio adjusts to its balanced growth path.

References

  • Accetturo, A., Bugamelli, M., & Lamorgese, A. (2012). Welcome to the machine: Firms’ reaction to low-skilled immigration (p. 846). Temi di Discussione No: Banca d’Italia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bettin, G., Turco, A. L., & Maggioni, D. (2014). A firm-level perspective on migration. The role of extra-EU workers in Italian manufacturing. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 42(3), 305–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bettin, G., Bianchi, P., Nicolli, F., Ramaciotti, L., & Rizzo, U. (2019). Migration, ethnic concentration and firm entry: Evidence from Italian regions. Regional Studies, 53(1), 55–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blankenou, W. F., & Cassou, S. P. (2011). Industry estimates of the elasticity of substitution and the rate of biased technological change between skilled and unskilled labor. Applied Economics, 43(23), 3129–3142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borjas, G. (2003). The labor demand curve is downward sloping: Reexamining the impact of immigration on the labor market. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(4), 1335–1374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borjas, G., Freeman, R., & Katz, L. (1996). Searching for the effect of immigration on the labor market. American Economic Review, 86(2), 246–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borjas, G., Grogger, J., & Hanson, G. (2008). Imperfect substitution between immigrants and natives: A reappraisal. NBER Working Paper no. 13887, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Card, D., & Lemieux, T. (2001). Can falling supply explain the rising return to college for younger men? A cohort-based analysis. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(2), 705–746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Card, D. (2007). How immigration affects U.S. cities. CReAM Discussion Paper no. 11, University College London.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Amuri, F., Ottaviano, G., & Peri, G. (2010). The labor market impact of immigration in western Germany in the 1990s. European Economic Review, 54(4), 550–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Arcangelis, G., Di Porto, E., & Santoni, G. (2015a). Immigration and manufacturing in Italy: Evidence from the 2000s. Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, 42(2), 163–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Arcangelis, G., Di Porto, E., & Santoni, G. (2015b). Migration, labor tasks and production structure. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 53(C), 156–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dustmann, C., Schönberg, U., & Stuhler, J. (2016). The impact of immigration: Why do studies reach such different results? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 30(4), 31–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etzo, I., Massidda, C., Mattana, P., & Piras, R. (2017). The impact of immigration on output and its components: A sectoral analysis for Italy at regional level. Economia Politica. Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, 34(3), 533–564.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gavosto, A., Venturini, A., & Villosio, C. (1999). Do immigrants compete with natives? Labor, 13(3), 603–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, L., & Murphy, K. (1992). Changes in relative wages, 1963–1987: Supply and demand factors. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(1), 35–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kongsamut, P., Rebelo, S., & Xie, D. (2001). Beyond balanced growth. Review of Economic Studies, 68(4), 869–882.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manacorda, M., Manning, A., & Wadsworth, J. (2012). The impact of immigration on the structure of wages: Theory and evidence from Britain. Journal of the European Economic Association, 10(1), 120–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ngai, L., & Pissarides, C. (2007). Structural change in a multi-sector model of growth. American Economic Review, 97(1), 429–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ottaviano, G., & Peri, G. (2012). Rethinking the effect of immigration on wages. Journal of the European Economic Association, 10(1), 152–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raphael, S., & Smolensky, E. (2008). Immigration and poverty in the Unites States. Working paper, UC Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romiti, A. (2011). Immigrants-natives complementarities in production: Evidence from Italy. CERP Working Paper no 105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staffolani, S., & Valentini, E. (2010). Does immigration raise blue and white collar wages of natives? The case of Italy. Labor, 24(3), 295–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venturini, A., & Villosio, C. (2006). The labour market effects of immigration into Italy: An empirical analysis. International Labour Review, 145(1–2), 91–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welch, F. (1979). Effects of cohort size on earnings: The baby boom babies financial boost. Journal of Political Economy, 87(5), 65–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ivan Etzo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

1 Electronic supplementary material

Appendix

Appendix

A. Intermediate Formulae to Get Eq. (14.5)

In the competitive equilibrium, in each sector and for each type of workers, firms equalize wages to the marginal productivity of labor. Accordingly, we compute the marginal product of a native worker for the specific education-experience group from Eq. (14.1), then we take the natural logarithm such that

$$\begin{aligned} ln\left( {w_{m,j,s,t}^{N} } \right) = & ln\left( {\alpha A_{s,t} k_{s,t}^{1 - \alpha } } \right) + \frac{1}{{\sigma_{ED} }}lnL_{s,t} + ln\theta_{j,s} \\ & - \left( {\frac{1}{{\sigma_{ED} }} - \frac{1}{{\sigma_{EX} }}} \right)lnL_{j,s,t} + ln\theta_{m,s} - \left( {\frac{1}{{\sigma_{EX} }} - \frac{1}{{\sigma_{IM} }}} \right)lnL_{m,j,s,t} \\ & + ln\theta_{N,m,j,s} - \frac{1}{{\sigma_{IM} }}lnL_{N,m,j,s,t} \\ \end{aligned}$$
(A.1)

where ks,t = Ks,t/Ls,t. Similarly, for immigrant workers we obtain

$$\begin{aligned} ln\left( {w_{j,m,s,t}^{I} } \right) =\, & ln\left( {\alpha A_{s,t} k_{s,t}^{1 - \alpha } } \right) \\ & + \frac{1}{{\sigma_{ED} }}lnL_{t,s} + ln\theta_{j,s} - \left( {\frac{1}{{\sigma_{ED} }} - \frac{1}{{\sigma_{EX} }}} \right)lnL_{j,s,t} + ln\theta_{m,s} - \left( {\frac{1}{{\sigma_{EX} }} - \frac{1}{{\sigma_{IM} }}} \right)lnL_{m,j,s,t} \\ & + ln\theta_{I,m,j,s} - \frac{1}{{\sigma_{IM} }}lnL_{I,m,j,s,t} \\ \end{aligned}$$
(A.2)

Subtracting Eq. (A.2) from Eq. (A.1) brings to the following equation:

$$ln\left( {\frac{{w_{m,j,s,t}^{I} }}{{w_{m,j,s,t}^{N} }}} \right) = ln\left( {\frac{{\theta_{I,m,j,s} }}{{\theta_{N,m,j,s} }}} \right) - \frac{1}{{\sigma_{IM} }}ln\left( {\frac{{L_{I,m, j,s,t} }}{{L_{N,m,j,s,t} }}} \right)$$
(A.3)

Therefore, we can estimate \(\sigma_{IM}\) from the following regression model:

$$ln\left( {\frac{{w_{m,j,s,t}^{I} }}{{w_{m,j,s,t}^{N} }}} \right) = \mu_{m,j,s} - \frac{1}{{\sigma_{IM} }}ln\left( {\frac{{L_{I,m, j,s,t} }}{{L_{N,m,j,s,t} }}} \right) + \varepsilon_{m,j,s, t}$$
(A.4)

B. Analytical Derivation of Eqs. (14.6) and (14.7)

By aggregating the profit-maximizing conditions of Eqs. (A.1) and (A.2), it is possible to obtain the following optimal condition for the labor supply of workers with the same education and experience at sector level:

$$\begin{aligned} ln\bar{w}_{m,j,s,t} = & ln\left( {\alpha A_{t,s}^{{\frac{1}{\alpha }}} k_{t,s}^{{\frac{1 - \alpha }{\alpha }}} } \right) + \frac{1}{{\sigma_{ED} }}ln\left( {L_{s,t} } \right) \\ & + ln\theta_{j,s,t} - \left( {\frac{1}{{\sigma_{ED} }} - \frac{1}{{\sigma_{EX} }}} \right)ln\left( {L_{j,s,t} } \right) + ln\theta_{m,j,s} \\ & - \frac{1}{{\sigma_{EX} }}ln\left( {L_{m,j,s,t} } \right) \\ \end{aligned}$$
(B.1)

The elasticity of substitution between workers with identical education and different experience levels, that is \(\sigma_{EX }\), can be estimated using Eq. (14.6). In this regard, \(\bar{w}_{m,j,s,t}\) equals to the average weighted wage paid to immigrant and native workers with same education and experience, where the weights are the share of hours worked by each group of workers. The related empirical model can be specified as follows:

$$ln\bar{w}_{m,j,s,t} = {\text{E}}_{s,t} + {\text{E}}_{j,s,t} + {\text{E}}_{m,j,s} - \frac{1}{{\sigma_{EX} }}ln\left( {L_{m,j,s,t} } \right) + e_{ m,j,s,t}$$
(B.2)

A similar approach is followed to estimate the elasticity of substitution between workers with different education levels. Accordingly, the optimizing relationship is

$$ln\bar{w}_{j,s,t} = ln\left( {\alpha A_{s,t}^{{\frac{1}{\alpha }}} k_{s,t}^{{\frac{1 - \alpha }{\alpha }}} } \right) + \frac{1}{{\sigma_{ED} }}ln\left( {L_{s,t} } \right) + ln\theta_{j,s,t} - \frac{1}{{\sigma_{ED} }}ln\left( {L_{j,s,t} } \right)$$
(B.3)

And the corresponding empirical model is specified as follows:

$$ln\bar{w}_{j,s,t} = {\text{E}}_{s,t} + {\text{E}}_{j,s,t} - \frac{1}{{\sigma_{ED} }}ln\left( {L_{j,s,t} } \right) + u_{ j,s,t}$$
(B.4)

where the sector by time common effects (\({\text{\rm E}}_{s,t}\)) control for the variation of \(ln\left( {\alpha A_{t,s}^{{\frac{1}{\alpha }}} k_{t,s}^{{\frac{1 - \alpha }{\alpha }}} } \right) + \frac{1}{{\sigma_{ED} }}ln\left( {L_{s,t} } \right)\), the education by sector by time effects (\({\text{\rm E}}_{j,s,t}\)) control for the variation of \(ln\theta_{j,s,t} - \left( {\frac{1}{{\sigma_{ED} }} - \frac{1}{{\sigma_{EX} }}} \right)ln\left( {L_{j,s,t} } \right)\), and the education by experience by sector fixed effects (\({\text{\rm E}}_{m,j,s}\)) control for the variation of \(ln\theta_{m,j,s}\).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Etzo, I., Massidda, C., Piras, R. (2021). Complementarities Between Native and Immigrant Workers in Italy by Sector. In: Kourtit, K., Newbold, B., Nijkamp, P., Partridge, M. (eds) The Economic Geography of Cross-Border Migration. Footprints of Regional Science(). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48291-6_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics