Skip to main content

Innovation in Family Businesses

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Entrepreneurial Family Businesses

Abstract

This chapter considers innovation to be a key component for assuring continuity and involvement of family in the business. The dilemma of innovate or perish moves the family to explore for options that may even alter its current offering of products or services. After reading the chapter, students will learn the different forms of innovation, the importance of the product life cycle, the need for involving family in the innovation process, and the implementation stages to accomplish both business and family goals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abernathy, W. J., & Clark, K. (1985). Mapping the winds of creative destruction. Research Policy, 14, 3–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, C., & Zeithaml, C. (1984). Stage of the product life cycle, business strategy, and business performance. Academy of Management Journal, 27(1), 5–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benner, M. J., & Tushman, M. L. (2003). Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited. Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 238–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berent-Braun, M. M., Flören, R. H., & den Ouden, M. M. C. M. (2018). Being able and willing to innovate: A study of family firm identity and new product output among Dutch private businesses. International Review of Entrepreneurship, 16(2), 183–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boehm, G., Yao, L., Han, L., & Zhen, Q. (2013). Development of the generic drug industry in the US after the Hatch-Waxman Act of 1984. Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B, 3(5), 297–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carney, M. (2005). Corporate governance and competitive advantage in family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(3), 249–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, E. P. C., Chrisman, J. J., Chua, J. H., & Kellermanns, F. W. (2008). Regional economy as a determinant of the prevalence of family firms in the United States: A preliminary report. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(5), 559–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, E. P. C., Memili, E., Chrisman, J. J., & Welsh, D. H. (2011). What can drive successful entrepreneurial firms? An analysis of Inc. 500 companies. Journal of Small Business Strategy, 22(2), 27–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chrisman, J. J., & Patel, P. C. (2012). Variations in R&D investments of family and nonfamily firms: Behavioral agency and myopic loss aversion perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 55(4), 976–997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chrisman, J. J., Chua, J. H., & Zahra, S. (2003). Creating wealth in family firms through managing resources: Comments and extension. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27(4), 359–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chrisman, J. J., Verbeke, A., & Chang, E. P. C. (2011). The risky prospects of entrepreneurial initiatives: Bias duality and bias reversal in established firms. In F. K. Kellermanns & P. Mazzola (Eds.), Handbook of research on strategic process. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C. M. (1997). The innovator’s dilemma. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Classen, N., Carree, M., Van Gils, A., & Peters, B. (2014). Innovation in family and non-family SMEs: An exploratory analysis. Small Business Economics, 42(3), 595–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damanpour, F., Szabat, K., & Evan, W. (1989). The relationship between types of innovation and organizational performance. Journal of Management Studies, 26(6), 587–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daszkowski, D. (2019). The biography of Red Lobster founder Bill Darden. The Balance Small Business. Retrieved February 1, 2020, from https://www.thebalancesmb.com/bill-darden-biography-1350946

  • Day, G. S. (1981). The product life cycle: Analysis and applications. Journal of Marketing research, 45, 60–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Massis, A., Di Minin, A., & Frattini, F. (2015). Family-driven innovation: Resolving the paradox in family firms. California Management Review, 58(1), 5–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dosi, G. (1982). Technological paradigms and technological trajectories. Research Policy, 11, 147–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, P. (1985). Innovation and entrepreneurship. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duran, P., Kammerlander, N., van Essen, M., & Zellweger, T. (2015). Doing more with less: Innovation input and output in family firms. Academy of Management Journal, 59(4), 1224–1264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, J., Gregersen, H., & Christensen, C. M. (2019). Innovator’s DNA, updated, with a new preface: Mastering the five skills of disruptive innovators. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernst & Young. (2018). Global family business survey. Retrieved February 11, 2020 from http://www.EY.com

  • Galambos, L. (1992). Theodore N. Vail and the role of innovation in the modern Bell system. The Business History Review, 66(1), 95–126. Retrieved February 21, 2020, from www.jstor.org/stable/3117054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, S., Gavin, M., & Smith, L. (1995). Assessing a multidimensional measure of radical innovation. IEEE Transactions of Engineering Management, 42(3), 203–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hage, J. (1980). Theories of organization. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harford, T. (2019, August 21). The cold war spy technology which we all use. 50 things that made the modern economy. BBC Business News. Retrieved November, 15, 2019 & February 21, 2020, from https://www.bbc.com/news/business-48859331.

  • Henderson, R. M., & Clark, K. B. (1990). Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 9–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofer, C. W. (1975). Toward a contingency theory of business strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 18, 784–810.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ignarro, L. J., Buga, G. M., Wood, K. S., Byrns, R. E., & Chaudhuri, G. (1987). Endothelium-derived relaxing factor produced and released from artery and vein is nitric oxide. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 84(24), 9265–9269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inkpen, A. (2001). Strategic alliances. In A. Verbeke & T. Brewer (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of international business (pp. 413–427). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johannessen, J. A., Olsen, B., & Lumpkin, G. T. (2001). Innovation as newness: What is new, how new, and new to whom? European Journal of Innovation Management, 4(1), 20–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kammerlander, N., & van Essen, M. (2017, January 17). Research: Family firms are more innovative than other companies. Harvard Business Review.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. (2005). Blue ocean strategy: How to create uncontested market space and make competition irrelevant. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirzner, I. M. (1973). Competition and entrepreneurship. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraus, S., Pohjola, M., & Koponen, A. (2012). Innovation in family firms: An empirical analysis linking organizational and managerial innovation to corporate success. Review of Managerial Science, 6(3), 265–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lei, D., & Slocum, J. W., Jr. (2005). Strategic ad organizational requirements for competitive advantage. Academy of Management Executive, 19(1), 31–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, T. (1965). Exploit the life cycle. Harvard Business Review, 43(6), 81–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nierenberg, A., & Bui, Q. (2019, December 24). Chinese restaurants are closing. That’s a good thing, the owners say. The New York Times. Retrieved February 11, 2020, from https://www.nytimes.com/2019/12/24/upshot/chinese-restaurants-closing-upward-mobility-second-generation.html

  • Osborne, A., & Dvorak, J. (1984). Hypergrowth: The rise and fall of Osborne Computer Corporation. Berkeley, CA: Idthekkethan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price Waterhouse Coopers. (2018). PwC Global Family Business Survey 2018. Retrieved February 11, 2020 from https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/services/family-business/family-business-survey-2018.html

  • Roberts, E. B. (2002). Innovation: Driving product, process, and market change. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaaf, K. W., Clark, N., & Arnold, J. (2019). Engaging the next generation. Family Business Magazine, 30(1), 53–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest and the business cycle. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schupak, H. (2019). New strategies from a new generation: NextGens’ innovative ideas can revitalize their family companies. Here are three examples. Family Business Magazine, 30(3), 77–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, A. (1999). Central dilemmas of managing innovation in large firms. California Management Review, 41(3), 147–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, P., & Chrisman, J. J. (1999). Toward a reconciliation of the definitional issues in the field of corporate entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23(3), 11–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spector, B. (2018). Innovation at a 150-year-old company. Family Business Magazine, 29(5), 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, D. (2016). Follett looks toward the future. Family Business Magazine, 27(2), 42–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talley, C. (2019, April). From daily to digital: Walter Hussman and the future of newsmedia. Arkansas Money & Politics. Retrieved May 11, 2020 from https://amppob.com/walter-hussman/

  • Utterback, J. M., & Abernathy, W. J. (1975). A dynamic model of process and product innovation. Omega: The International Journal of Management Science, 3(6), 639–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ramadani, V., Memili, E., Palalić, R., Chang, E.P.C. (2020). Innovation in Family Businesses. In: Entrepreneurial Family Businesses. Springer Texts in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47778-3_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics