Skip to main content

The Illusion of a Sustainable Capitalism

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Capitalism and Environmental Collapse
  • 885 Accesses

Abstract

Capitalism’s environmental unsustainability is demonstrated not only through the arguments of Kenneth Boulding (The economics of the coming Spaceship Earth. In Jarrett, H (ed.), Environmental quality in a growing economy. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 1966, pp. 3–14) and Nicholas Georgescu-Roegen (The entropy law and the economic process. Havard University Press, 1971) but also by Herman Daly’s impossibility theorem (Sustainable growth. An impossibility theorem In Daly, HE, Townsend, K (eds.). Valuing the Earth: economics, ecology, ethics. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1993, pp. 267–285): an economy based on capital’s expanded reproduction in a limited environment occupies a position in economic theory that is the equivalent of the fundamental impossibilities of physics. This chapter examines the two impossibilities of implementing regulatory frameworks capable of containing the tendency toward collapse within the realm of globalized capitalism: (1) the self-regulation of economic agents induced by the presence of mechanisms emanating from the market itself and (2) regulation induced not only by market mechanisms but also by agreements negotiated between businesses, the state, and civil society. The idea of self-regulation does not apply to capitalism because markets are not ruled by the principle of homeostasis. Moreover, capitalism cannot price its action on ecosystems because ecosystems are broader in space and time than the investment/profit cycle. No matter how corporate leaders want to improve their corporations’ ethical conduct, they cannot afford to subordinate their corporate goals to the environmental imperative. Analysis of the second impossibility mentioned above (regulation induced by agreements negotiated between businesses, the state, and civil society) touches on the punctus dolens of all the problems discussed in this chapter and even in this book: the impossibility of this second route stems from the lack of parity between the parties, a necessary condition for an effective negotiation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See Pascal Lamy, “Capitalism Cannot Satisfy Us”. Interview granted to Daniel Fortin and Mathieu Magnaudeix. Challenges, 6/XII/2007.

  2. 2.

    See Claude Bernard, Introduction à l’étude de la medicine expérimentale” (1865): “La science antique n’a pu concevoir que le milieu extérieur; mais il faut, pour fonder la science biologique expérimentale, concevoir de plus un milieu intérieur. Je crois avoir le premier exprimé clairement cette idée”. Cited by Georges Canguilhem, (1968/1983, p. 148).

  3. 3.

    Founded by Ralph Raico, the New Individualist Review. A Journal of Classical Liberal Thought was published between 1961 and 1968. In the Introduction to its reprint, in 1981, Friedman declared that his articles “remain timely and relevant.” See M. Friedman, “Introduction”. In New Individualist Review, Indianapolis, Liberty Press, 1981, pp. ix-xiv.

  4. 4.

    On the concept of the economic value of nature and its measurement, as proposed, among others, by Pavan Sukhdev, see The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity in Business and Enterprise and his videos available on YouTube.

  5. 5.

    “Report to Congressional Addressees. Opportunities exist to Strengthen Policies and Processes for Managing Emergency Assistance”, July 2011, GAO-11-696. United States Government Accountability Office. I thank Dr. Orice Williams Brown, director of GAO’s Financial Markets and Community Investment, for kindly sharing this document with me. http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-11-696.

  6. 6.

    US Senator Bernard Sanders (I-Vt.), Washington, D.C., 12/VI/2012, “Jamie Dimon Is Not Alone”. http://www.sanders.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/061212DimonIsNotAlone.pdf

  7. 7.

    Between May 2010 and March 2011, the ECB bought 66 billion euros from bankers and other investors. In August 2011 alone, the ECB bought a further 36 billion euros (always in the secondary market and at a much higher price than the one traded in that market) of government bonds from Greece, Ireland, Portugal, Spain, and Italy. Not satisfied with this rescue operation, banks took the opportunity to buy more junk bonds in the secondary market at a rate of 42.5% of their face value on August 8, 2011 (and even lower later on), and to resell them to the ECB at 80% of this value. Eric Toussaint, “La BCE, fidèle serviteur des intérêts privés.” Interview granted to CADTM, 16/IX/2011

  8. 8.

    In “The Use and Abuse of History for Life.” (1874), Nietzsche discusses the three meanings of history necessary for the man who lives in his own time: as a being that is active and has aspirations (monumental history), as a being that preserves and venerates (antiquarian history), and as a being that suffers and has a need for liberation (critical history). Precisely between the years of Nietzsche and the twentieth century, the social democratic state was the guarantor of these “uses” (Nutzen) of history that Nietzsche refers to.

  9. 9.

    Quoted in La Tribune, 16/X/2008, p. 38

  10. 10.

    See Global Justice Now, “Corporations vs governments revenues: 2015 data.” http://www.globaljustice.org.uk/sites/default/files/files/resources/corporations_vs_governments_final.pdf.

  11. 11.

    “10 biggest corporations make more money than most countries in the world combined.” Global Justice Now, 12/IX/2016

  12. 12.

    “Band of brothers”. The Economist, 22–28/XI/2014, p. 77. Review of Karen Dawisha, Putin’s Kleptocracy: Who owns Russia? New York, 2014

  13. 13.

    See also Mark Thoma, “How To (Maybe) End Too Big to Fail.” The Economist’s View, 25/II/2013

  14. 14.

    See also Foster, “Capitalism and Degrowth: An Impossibility Theorem”. Monthly Review, 62, 8, 2011.

  15. 15.

    World Bank, Global Economic Prospects. Broad-Based Upturn, but for How Long? January, 2018, p. xv

  16. 16.

    Here is the meaning of the cowboy economy and spaceman economy metaphors: “For the sake of picturesqueness, I am tempted to call the open economy the ‘cowboy economy,’ the cowboy being symbolic of the illimitable plains and also associated with reckless, exploitative, romantic, and violent behavior, which is characteristic of open societies. The closed economy of the future might similarly be called the ‘spaceman’ economy, in which the earth has become a single spaceship, without unlimited reservoirs of anything, either for extraction or for pollution, and in which, therefore, man must find his place in a cyclical ecological system.”

References

  • AFEISSA, Hicham-Stéphane (ed.), Éthique de l’environment. Nature, valeur, respect. Paris, Vrin, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———, Portraits de philosophes en écologistes. Paris, Éditions Dehors, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • AHMED, Nafeez Mosaddek. A User’s Guide to the Crisis of Civilization: And How to Save it. Pluto Press, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • AVRAHAM, D., SELVAGGI, P. & VICKERY, J., “A Structural View of U.S. Bank Holding Companies”. FRBNY Economic Policy Review, July 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • BAST, Elizabeth et al., Empty promises. G20 subsidies to oil, gas and coal production. Oil Change International. November 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • BELLAMY FOSTER, John; CLARK, Brett & YORK, Richard, The ecological rift. Capitalism’s war on the Earth. New York, Monthly Review Press, 2010

    Google Scholar 

  • BOULDING, Kenneth E., “The economics of the coming Spaceship Earth” (1966). In Jarrett, H. (ed.), Environmental Quality in a Growing Economy, pp. 3–14. Baltimore, Resources for the Future. Johns Hopkins University Press, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • BROWN, Maurice, Adam Smith’s Economics: Its Place in the Development of Economic Thought. London, Routledge, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • CANGUILHEM, Georges, Écrits sur la médecine. Paris, PUF, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———, “Théorie et technique de l’expérimentation chez Claude Bernard”. Études d’Histoire et de Philosophie des Sciences (1968). Paris: Vrin, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • CARRINGTON, Damian, “Fossil fuels subsidised by $10m a minute”. The Guardian, 18/V/2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • COADY, David et al., “Global Fossil Fuel Subsidies Remain Large: An Update Based on Country-Level Estimates”. IMF Working Paper, May 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  • CONWAY, Eric M. & ORESKES, Naomi, The Collapse of Western Civilization. A View from the Future. Columbia University Press, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • CORBET, Jessica, “Green Groups Call Out Big Banks for Pouring Billions Into Fossil Fuel Industry”. Common Dreams, 20/III/2019.

    Google Scholar 

  • DALY, Herman E. “Sustainable Growth. An Impossibility Theorem” (1990). In: DALY, Herman E. & TOWNSEND, Kenneth (eds.). Valuing the Earth: Economics, Ecology, Ethics. Cambridge (Mass.), MIT Press, 1993, pp. 267–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • DELL’ORSO, Silvia. Altro che musei. La questione dei beni culturali in Italia. Rome/Bari, Laterza, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • DE FILIPPIS, Vittorio, “François Morin: L’oligopole bancaire s’est transformé en hydre dévastatrice pour l’économie mondiale”. Libération, 22/VII/2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • DUMONT, René, L’Utopie ou la mort! Paris, Seuil, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • GEORGESCU-ROEGEN, Nicholas. The Entropy Law and the Economic Process. Havard University Press, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. “Energy and Economic Myths”. Southern Economic Journal, 41, January 1975, pp. 347–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. La Décroissance (1979). Paris, Sang de la Terre, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • GHYS, Frederic & HINKKANEN, Hanna, “Searching for Socially Responsible Investments. Mission Impossible?”. The Guardian, 2/VII/2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • GIANNETTI, Eduardo, “A crise ambiental e a economia de mercado”. In Novo Contrato Social. Propostas para esta geração e para as futuras. Instituto Ethos, 2013, pp. 69–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • GREENFIELD, Patrick, “World’s top three asset managers oversee $300bn fossil fuel investments”. The Guardian¸ 12/X/2019.

    Google Scholar 

  • HEINBERG, Richard, Peak Everything: Waking Up to the Century of Declines. Gabriola Island, New Society Publishers, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • HENNIGAN, W. J., “Donald Trump Is Playing a Dangerous Game of Nuclear Poker”. Time, 1/II/2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • HIRSCH, S., “Making globalization moral?” Transnational Corporations, 20, 3, 2011, pp. 87–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ILLICH, Ivan. La convivialité. Oeuvres completes, vol. I. Paris, 2003, pp. 451–580.

    Google Scholar 

  • IVRY, B., KEOUN, B. & KUNTZ, P., “Secret Fed Loans Gave Banks $ 13 Billion Undisclosed to Congress”. Bloomberg, 27/XI/2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • JÖSTROM, M. & ÖSTBLOM, G. “Decoupling waste generation from economic growth – A CGE analysis of the Swedish case”. Ecological Economics, 69, 7, 15/V/2010, pp. 1545–1552.

    Google Scholar 

  • JUNG, Alexander et al., “Warming world: is capitalism destroying our planet”. Spiegel Online International, 25/II/2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • KLEIN, Naomi, “Capitalism killed our climate momentum, not ‘human nature’”. The Intercept, 3/VIII/2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • KOENIG, David, “Exxon Shareholders to Vote on Climate Change, Fracking”. ABCNews, 27/V/2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • LARDNER, Richard, “Army says no to more tanks, but Congress insists”. Associated Press, 29/IV/2013

    Google Scholar 

  • LATOUCHE, Serge. Survivre au développement. De la décolonisation de l’imaginaire économique à la construction d’une société alternative. Paris, Mille et Une Nuits, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Le pari de la décroissance. Paris, Fayard, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Petit traité de la décroissance sereine. Paris, Fayard, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Bon pour la casse. Paris, Les liens qui libèrent, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Itinérance. Du tiers-mondisme à la décroissance (2014). L’economia è una menzogna. Turin, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • MADELINE, Béatrice, « La ruée vers les métaux ». Le Monde, 12/IX/2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • MAGDOFF, Fred. “Ecological Civilization”. Monthly Review, 62, 8, 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MAGDOFF, Fred & BELLAMY FOSTER, John. What Every Environmentalist Needs to Know About Capitalism. New York, Monthly Review Press, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • MECKLIN, John, “Losing Earth” lost sight of some climate change villains, but not the scope of the problem, The Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, 6/VIII/2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • MORIN, Edgar. Vers l’abîme?. Paris, Éditions de l’Herne, 2007

    Google Scholar 

  • MORIN, François. L’hydre mondiale. L’oligopole bancaire. Montreal, Lux éditeur, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • OXFAM, Working for the few, London, 2014

    Google Scholar 

  • ———, Wealth: Having it all and wanting more, London, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———, A distância que nos une. Um retrato da desigualdade brasileira. Oxfam Brasil, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. “Panama Papers: Act now. Don’t wait for another crisis”. The Guardian, 10/IV/2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • RICH, Nathaniel, ‘Losing Earth: The decade we almost stopped climate change”, The New York Times, 1/VIII/2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • RESENDE, André Lara. Os limites do possível. A economia além da conjuntura. São Paulo, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • RIDLINGTON, Elizabeth, NORMAN, Kim & RICHARDSON, Rachel, “Fracking by the Numbers. The Damage to Our Water, Land and Climate from a Decade of Dirty Drilling”. Environment America Research & Policy Center, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • SETTIS, Salvatore. Italia S.p.A. L’assalto al patrimonio culturale. Turin, Einaudi, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • STERN, Nicholas & CALDERÓN, Felipe, Better Growth Better Climate. The New Climate Economy Report. The Synthesis Report, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • STUBBINGTON, Tommy, “Global debt surges to highest level in peacetime”. Financial Times, 25/IX/2019.

    Google Scholar 

  • TOBIAS, Michael C., “The Ehrlich Factor: A Brief History of the Fate of Humanity, With Dr. Paul R. Ehrlich”. Bloomberg, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • VITALI, S., GLATTFELDER, J.B. & BATTISTON, S., “The Network of Global Corporate Control”. Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich (ETH), PLoS ONE, 26/X/2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • XU, Yangyang & RAMANATHAN, Veerabhadran, “Well below 2°C: Mitigation strategies for avoiding dangerous to catastrophic climate changes”. PNAS, 14/IX/2017

    Google Scholar 

  • ZUCMAN, Gabriel, “Taxing across Borders: Tracking Personal Wealth and Corporate Profits”. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 28, 4, 2014, pp. 121–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Marques, L. (2020). The Illusion of a Sustainable Capitalism. In: Capitalism and Environmental Collapse. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47527-7_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47527-7_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-47526-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-47527-7

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics