Skip to main content

Local State-Society Relations in Ireland

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Close Ties in European Local Governance

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Sub-National Governance ((PSSNG))

Abstract

This chapter provides an overview of four Irish examples of local state-society networks, namely strategic policy committees, local community development committees, local development companies and Comhairle na nÓg (youth councils). The strategic policy committees and local community development committees are formalized institutional, multisectoral committees that exist in each local authority. The former are self-reflective networks while the latter are delegated networks. The Comhairle na nÓg are largely ceremonial networks, while the more autonomous local development companies are consociational networks. The recent Irish experience of local state-society networks is of the increasing formalization of the structures that exist to bring local government and civil society together.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Twenty-six county councils, 3 city councils and 2 combined city and county councils.

  2. 2.

    The 95 municipal districts exercise certain limited powers. Elected representatives are elected to the local authority and municipal district simultaneously.

  3. 3.

    Comhairle na nÓg is the Gaelic/Irish translation of youth council. The youth councils are always referred to using the Gaelic term rather than the English translation.

  4. 4.

    A large local authority may have more SPCs—the largest Irish local authority, Dublin City Council has seven SPCs: Arts, Culture, Leisure and Recreation; Climate Change, Environment and Energy; Economic Development and Enterprise; Finance; Housing; Traffic and Transport; Planning and Urban Form.

  5. 5.

    Membership of the PPN in each local authority is open to groups representing (1) community and voluntary interests, (2) social inclusion interests and (3) environmental interests in the local authority area. Each PPN is organized into three electoral colleges or pillars representing these three sets of interests. PPN linkage groups bring together PPN members who have a particular interest on an issue or topic. When a committee or board requires a representative to sit on the requisite committee or board, a linkage group of all interested PPN members is created. This group then elects the representative from within the linkage group to sit on the board/committee. The linkage group acts as a means of ensuring two-way communication between the representative on the board/committee and the wider PPN group, and acts as a support structure for the representative.

  6. 6.

    The legislation provides that while generally there will be one LCDC per local authority area, it recognized that in larger local authorities more than one may be required. Cork county as the largest county in Ireland has established three LCDCs.

  7. 7.

    County and City Development Boards were established in 2000 and set up in each of the then 34 local authority areas as a more coherent means of creating links between local authorities and those involved in local and community development. These bodies produced ten-year strategies for their areas, known as city and county development strategies, but the boards were never well resourced and the city and county development strategies were documents which had little, if any, teeth. These were dissolved and replaced by the LCDCs on June 1, 2014.

  8. 8.

    The Social Inclusion and Community Activation Programme (SICAP) is funded by the Irish Government and co-funded by the European Social Fund under the Programme for Employability, Inclusion and Learning (PEIL) 2014–2020.

  9. 9.

    Pobal is a not-for-profit company set up by the Irish Government in 1992 that manages programs focused on social inclusion and equality on behalf of the Irish Government and the EU. It works as an intermediary for government by managing funding and providing resources for suitable programs.

  10. 10.

    In LEADER 1 (1991–1994) there were 17 Local Action Groups (LAGs) in Ireland, and by the LEADER 2007–2013 program there were 36 integrated LAGs funded. In the 2014–2020 funding period there were 28 LAGs in place (see endnote 11 below for details).

  11. 11.

    Prior to the establishment of the LCDCs in 2014, rural LDCs operated as the Local Action Groups (LAGs) for LEADER. LCDCs are now the LAGs for 25 out of a total of 28 LAGs for LEADER strategies in Ireland. In these 25 cases the local development companies (LDCs ) are now considered as implementing partners and engage with potential project promoters on the LAGs behalf. In the remaining 3 LAGs the LDC takes the role of the LAG and the implementing partner.

  12. 12.

    See Pobal.ie for a full list of funding programs in the area of local development.

  13. 13.

    Until 1999 local elected members were precluded from being involved on these boards. This was changed on foot of the recommendations of the Interdepartmental Taskforce on the Integration of Local Government and Local Development Systems (1999) Preparing the Ground: Guidelines for the Progress from Strategy Groups to County/City Development Boards.

  14. 14.

    The original board structure for Area Based Partnerships was six public/state agency representatives, six community representatives and six representatives of the social partners: employers, farmer’s organizations and trade unions. This multisectoral partnership structure remains but is now less rigid in terms of the number of representatives from each sector, with the largest number of representatives on the boards drawn from the community and voluntary sector. Since 2014 local authorities are no longer required to nominate elected members to the boards of LDCs.

  15. 15.

    On their work in combating poverty and social exclusion, see for example ILDN (2014).

  16. 16.

    http://comhairlenanog.ie.

  17. 17.

    http://www.dublincity.ie/comhairle.

References

  • Barrington Report. (1991). Local Government Reorganisation and Reform: Report of the Advisory Expert Committee. Dublin: Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, R., Humphreys, P. C., O’Donnell, O., O’Riordan, J., & Timonen, V. (2003). Changing Local Government: A Review of the Local Government Modernisation Programme, CPMR Research Report, No. 5. Dublin: Institute of Public Administration.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callanan, M. (2005). Institutionalizing Participation and Governance? New Participative Structures in Local Government in Ireland. Public Administration, 83(4), 909–929.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callanan, M. (2018). Local Government in the Republic of Ireland. Dublin: Institute of Public Administration.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, N., & Quinlivan, A. (2010). Multi-level Governance. In J. Coakley & M. Gallagher (Eds.), Politics in the Republic of Ireland (5th ed.). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig, S. (1994). Progress Through Partnerships: Final Evaluation Report on the PESP Pilot Initiative on Long-term Unemployment. Dublin: Combat Poverty Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtin, C., & Varley, T. (1997). Take Your Partners and Face the Music: The State, Community Groups and Area-based Partnerships in Rural Ireland. Études irlandaises, Hors-Série 1997. L’Irlande: identités et modernité (pp. 141–155). https://doi.org/10.3406/irlan.1997.1375. Retrieved from www.persee.fr/doc/irlan_0183-973x_1997_hos_22_1_1375.

  • Department of the Environment, Community and Local Government. (2014). Establishment of New Strategic Policy Committees (SPCs). Circular Letter LG 07/2014 of 29 May 2014, Dublin: Local Government Policy and Motor Tax Section, Department of the Environment, Community and Local Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of the Environment and Local Government. (1999). Strategic Policy Committees: Guidelines for Establishment and Operation. Dublin: Department of the Environment and Local Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Housing, Planning, Community and Local Government. (2016). Revised Guidelines for the Operation of Local Community Development Committees. Dublin: Department of Housing, Planning, Community and Local Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Rural and Community Development. (2019). Review of Local Community Development Committees. Dublin: Department of Rural and Community Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forde, C., O’Byrne, D., & Ó hAdhmaill, F. (2016). Community Development under Austerity and Local Government Change: Policy and Practice. In Forde, C., O’Byrne, D., O’Connor, R., Ó hAdhmaill, F. and Power, C. (Eds.), The Changing Landscape of Local and Community Development in Ireland: Policy and Practice (pp. 15–36). Conference Proceedings 21 October 2015, Cork: University College Cork.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forde, C., & Martin, S. (2016). Children and Young People’s Right to Participate: National and Local Youth Councils in Ireland. International Journal of Children’s Rights, 24(1), 135–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Government of Ireland. (1996). Better Local Government: A Programme for Change. Dublin: The Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of Ireland. (1998). Task Force on the Integration of Local Government and Local Development Systems Report. Dublin: Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of Ireland. (2012). Putting People First: Action Programme for Effective Local Government. Dublin: Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • ILDN/Irish Local Development Network. (2014). Local Development Companies, Combating Poverty and Social Exclusion. Limerick: ILDN. Retrieved from http://ildn.ie/files/page_files/FINAL.pdf.

  • IPA/Institute of Public Administration. (2004). Review of the Operation of Strategic Policy Committees. Dublin: Institute of Public Administration.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lennon, M. (2019). Planning’s Position in the ‘Hollowing-Out’ and ‘Filling-In’ of Local Government in Ireland. Planning Theory & Practice, 20(4), 612–618. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2019.1653003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Local Government Efficiency Review Group. (2010). Report of the Local Government Efficiency Review Group. Dublin: Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loughlin, J. (2011). Ireland: Halting Steps Towards Local Democracy. In J. Loughlin, F. Hendricks, & A. Lidström (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Local and Regional Democracy in Europe (pp. 48–67). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McInerney C., & Adshead, M. (2010). The Challenge of Community Participation in the Delivery of Public Services: Exploring Local Participatory Governance in Ireland, NESF Research Series No. 7. Dublin: National Economic and Social Forum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, M. (2014). A National Level View of Area-based Interventions. In M. Norris (Ed.), Social Housing, Disadvantage and Neighbourhood Liveability: Ten Years of Change in Social Housing Neighbourhoods (pp. 102–125). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2018). Subnational Governments in OECD Countries: Key Data, OECD, Paris. Retrieved from www.oecd.org/regional/regional-policy.

  • Pobal Monitoring, Analysis and Outcomes Unit. (2018). Comhairle na nÓg Development Fund Annual Report, 2017. Dublin: Pobal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinlivan, A. (2017). Reforming Local Government: Must It Always be Democracy Versus Efficiency. Administration, 65(2), 109–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roe, S., & McEvoy, O. (2011). An Audit of Children and Young People’s Participation in Decision-Making. Dublin: Department of Children and Youth Affairs.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rylands, M, O’Connor, R., & Power, C. (2016). Local Government Reform in Ireland: Implications for Rural Development and Community Engagement. In Forde, C., O’Byrne, D., O’Connor, R., Ó hAdhmaill, F. and Power, C. (Eds.), The Changing Landscape of Local and Community Development in Ireland: Policy and Practice (pp. 57–66). Conference Proceedings 21 October 2015, Cork: University College Cork.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabel, C. (1996). Ireland: Local Partnerships and Social Innovation. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taskforce on Active Citizenship. (2007). Report of the Taskforce on Active Citizenship in Ireland. Dublin: Taskforce on Active Citizenship.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turok, I. (2001). Innovation in Local Governance: The Irish Partnership Model. In OECD, Local Partnerships for Better Governance (pp. 135–173). Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, J. (1998). Local Development and Local Government in the Republic of Ireland: From Fragmentation to Integration? Local Economy, 12(4), 329–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Working Group on Citizen Engagement. (2014). Working Group on Citizen Engagement with Local Government. Dublin, Department of the Environment, Community and Local Government.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paula Russell .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Russell, P. (2021). Local State-Society Relations in Ireland. In: Teles, F., Gendźwiłł, A., Stănuș, C., Heinelt, H. (eds) Close Ties in European Local Governance. Palgrave Studies in Sub-National Governance. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44794-6_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics