Skip to main content

Interactions of Societal Actors and Local Government in Institutionalized Governance Arrangements: The Book’s Scope and Content

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Close Ties in European Local Governance

Abstract

The chapter sets the stage for a comparative analysis of institutionalized governance networks grouping local governments and individual and collective or corporate societal actors unfolding at the municipal, sub-municipal and inter-municipal level. It details the premises for analyzing these networks with an emphasis on organized interests and interest intermediation and their relationship with the notion of democracy. It then reviews existing literature on the relationship between local governments and societal actors at two different levels. With reference to the municipal (micro) level, it looks at interest theory, the community power debate and the local governance approach. With reference to the macro level, it looks at the broader political science approaches to state–society relations, the debates on pluralism and neo-corporatism, and the policy-networks approach. At the intersection of these levels, the chapter also examines the typology of national infrastructures for local governance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For functional interest representation (and its differences from territorial interest representation through political parties and directly elected representative bodies), (see for example, Heinelt 2010: 52–53 and Knodt et al. 2011).

  2. 2.

    Concerning the different understandings of democracy among mayors and councilors detected empirically in the studies mentioned in the section on ‘The origin of the book’ of the preface of this book, (see Vetter et al. 2018). These different notions of democracy clearly follow the distinction between liberal (or representative) democracy and participatory democracy.

  3. 3.

    Finally, although the eastern and some southern parts of the European continent have experienced democratic transitions over the last three decades, accompanied by reforms of local government as well as of local governance, little has been written on the functioning of institutionalized networks among societal actors and local government in these parts of Europe (e.g. Furmankiewicz et al. 2010; Petrova 2011; Dąbrowski 2014).

  4. 4.

    Beside these empirical network studies, policy networks have been studied to understand general (governance) modes for coordinating societal interactions. For the differences between these two policy-network approaches, (see Börzel 1998, Marsh 1998).

References

  • Bachrach, P., & Baratz, M. S. (1962). Two Faces of Power. The American Political Science Review, 56(4), 947–952.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bachrach, P., & Baratz, M. S. (1963). Decisions and Non-decisions: An Analytical Framework. The American Political Science Review, 57(3), 632–642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barber, B. (1984). Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bekkers, V., Dijkstra, G., & Fenger, M. (2007). Governance and the Democratic Deficit. Assessing the Democratic Legitimacy of Governance Practices. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boddy, M., & Parkinson, M. (Eds.). (2004). City Matters. Competitiveness, Cohesion and Urban Governance. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Börzel, T. (1998). Organising Babylon – on the Different Conceptions of Policy Networks.Public Administration, 76, 253–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cawson, A. (1985). Corporatism and Local Politics. In Grant W. (Eds.), The Political Economy of Corporatism. Sociology, Politics and Cities. London: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crouch, C. (2004). Post-Democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, R. A. (1961). Who Governs? Democracy and Power in an American City. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, R. A. (1957). The Concept of Power. Behavioral Science, 2(3), 201–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, R. A. (1971). The City in the Future of Democracy. In M. Cook (Ed.), Participatory Democracy (pp. 85–114). San Francisco: Canfield Press (first published in 1967 in American Political Science Review, 61(4), 953–969).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, R. A. (1994). A Democratic Dilemma. System Effectiveness Versus Citizen Participation. Political Science Quarterly, 10(1), 23–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, J. S. (2002). Urban Regime Theory: A Normative-Empirical Critique. Journal of Urban Affairs, 24(1), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, J. S. (2003). Partnerships Versus Regimes. Why Regime Theory Cannot Explain Urban Coalitions in the UK. Journal of Urban Affairs, 25(3), 253–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, J. S. (2004). Can’t Hedgehogs Be Foxes Too? Reply to Clarence N. Stone. Journal of Urban Affairs, 26(1), 27–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dąbrowski, M. (2014). EU Cohesion Policy, Horizontal Partnership and the Patterns of Sub-National Governance: Insights from Central and Eastern Europe. European Urban and Regional Studies, 21(4), 364–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egner, B., & Grabietz, K. J. (2018). In Search of Determinants for Quoted Housing Rents: Empirical Evidence from Major German Cities. Urban Research & Practice, 11(4), 460–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elkin, S. L. (1987). City and Regime in the American Republic. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Furmankiewicz, M., Thompson, N., & Zielińska, M. (2010). Area-based Partnerships in Rural Poland: The Post-accession Experience. Journal of Rural Studies, 26(1), 52–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, M., & Duncan, S. (1986). The Local State and Local Policy: Political Mobilisation or Economic Regeneration. Capital and Class, 27, 14–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, D., & Urry, J. (Eds.). (1985). Social Relations and Spatial Structures. Houndsmills, Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halford, S., Goodwin, M., & Duncan, S. (1993). Regulation Theory, the Local State and Transition of Urban Politics. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 11(1), 67–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinelt, H. (1992). Local Labour Market Policy – Limits and Potentials. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 16(4), 522–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinelt, H. (2010). Governing Modern Societies. Towards Participatory Governance. London and New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Heinelt, H., Hlepas, N., Kuhlmann, S., & Swianiewicz, P. (2018). Local Government Systems: Grasping the Institutional Environment of Mayors. In H. Heinelt, A. Magnier, M. Cabria, & H. Reynaert (Eds.), Political Leaders and Changing Local Democracy: The European Mayor (pp. 19–78). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, F. (1953). Community Power Structure: A Study of Decision Makers. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Imbroscio, D. L. (2003). Overcoming the Neglect of Economics in Urban Regime Theory. Journal of Urban Affairs, 25(3), 271–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Imbroscio, D. L. (2004). The Imperative of Economics in Urban Political Analysis: A Reply to Clarence N. Stone. Journal of Urban Affairs, 26(1), 21–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, B. (1997). A Neo-Gramscian Approach to the Regulation of Urban Regimes: Accumulation Strategies, Hegemonic Projects, and Governance. In M. Lauria (Ed.), Reconstructing Urban Regime Theory: Regulating Urban Politics in a Global Economy (pp. 51–73). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, G., & Schubert, K. (1992). A Preliminary Ordering of Policy Network Labelling. European Journal of Political Research, 21, 7–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knodt, M., Greenwood, J., & Quittkat, C. (2011). Territorial and Functional Interest Representation in EU Governance. Journal of European Integration, 33(4), 349–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Logan, J. R., & Molotch, H. L. (1987). Urban Fortunes: The Political Economy of Place. Berkley, Los Angeles and London: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukes, S. (2005 [1974]). Power: A Radical View. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire, London: Macmillan Education Ltd.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, D. (1998). The Development of the Policy Network Approach. In D. Marsh (Ed.): Comparing Policy Networks (pp. 3–17). Buckingham and Philadelphia: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molotch, H. L. (1976). The City as a Growth Machine: Toward a Political Economy of Place. The American Journal of Sociology, 82(2), 309–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petracca, M. P. (Ed.). (1992). The Politics of Interests: Interest Groups Transformed. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrova, T. (2011). Citizen Participation in Local Governance in Eastern Europe: Rediscovering a Strength of Civil Society in the Post-Socialist World? Europe-Asia Studies, 63(5), 757–787.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierre, J. (2005). Comparative Urban Governance. Uncovering Complex Causalities. Urban Affairs Review, 40(4), 446–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savage, M., Barlow, J., Duncan, S., & Saunders, P. (1987). Locality Research: The Sussex Programme of Economic Restructuring, Social Change and the Locality. The Quarterly Journal of Social Affairs, 3(1), 27–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitter, P. C. (1993). Some Propositions About Civil Society and the Consolidation of Democracy. Wien: Institut für Höhere Studien. Reihe Politikwissenschaft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, V., & Grote, J. R. (2006). Introduction: Business Associations, Associative Order and Internationalization. In W. Streeck, J. R. Grote, V. Schneider, & J. Visser (Eds.), Governing Interests: Business Associations Facing Internationalization (pp. 1–18). Abington and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sellers, J. M., & Kwak, S.-Y. (2011). State and Society in Local Governance: Lessons from a Multilevel Comparison. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 35(3), 620–643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sellers, J. M., & Lidström, A. (2014). Multilevel Democracy, Societal Organization and the Development of the Modern State. Paper prepared for Presentation at the 23 Nordic Local Government Conference, Odense 27.–29. November 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sellers, J., Lidström, A., & Bae, Y. (2020). Multilevel Democracy: How Local Institutions and Civil Society Shape the Modern State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, C. N. (1989). Regime Politics: Governing Atlanta: 1946–1988. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, C. N. (2004a). It’s More Than the Economy After All. Continuing the Debate About Urban Regimes. Journal of Urban Affairs, 26(1), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, C. N. (2004b). Rejoinder: Multiple Imperatives, or Some Thoughts About Governance in a Loosely Coupled but Stratified Society. Journal of Urban Affairs, 26(1), 35–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vetter, A., Heinelt, H., & Rose, L. E. (2018). Mayors’ Notions of Local Democracy. In H. Heinelt, A. Magnier, M. Cabria, & H. Reynaert (Eds.), Political Leaders and Changing Local Democracy: The European Mayor (pp. 173–208). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • van Waarden, F. (1992). Dimensions and Types of Policy Networks. European Journal of Political Research, 21, 29–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zolo, D. (1992). Democracy and Complexity. A Realistic Approach. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Filipe Teles .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Teles, F., Gendźwiłł, A., Stănuş, C., Heinelt, H. (2021). Interactions of Societal Actors and Local Government in Institutionalized Governance Arrangements: The Book’s Scope and Content. In: Teles, F., Gendźwiłł, A., Stănuș, C., Heinelt, H. (eds) Close Ties in European Local Governance. Palgrave Studies in Sub-National Governance. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44794-6_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics