We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Multiobjective Optimization | SpringerLink

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Skip to main content

Multiobjective Optimization

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

  • First Online:
Scalarization and Separation by Translation Invariant Functions

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

  • 265 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter focuses on scalarization methods in multiobjective optimization and on properties of Geoffrion’s properly efficient point set. Geoffrion’s properly efficient point set is described by efficient and weakly efficient point sets related to cones, especially to different types of polyhedral cones. Moreover, existence results and the density in the Pareto optimal point set are proved under rather mild assumptions. The properly efficient point set is characterized by minimizers of strictly monotone functionals and by minimizers of translation invariant functions. Conditions for the coincidence of Geoffrion’s proper efficiency with Nehse–Iwanow’s proper efficiency are given. Statements which can be deduced from the previous chapters and from the investigation of Geoffrion’s proper efficiency are applied to scalarization procedures in multiobjective optimization. Beside relationships between the solution sets of the scalarizing problems and optimal point sets of the multiobjective optimization problem, the results for the scalar problems include statements about the existence and uniqueness of their solutions as well as about the parameter control. The weighted Chebyshev norm minimization and its extension by Choo and Atkins, Wierzbicki’s reference point projection, the \(\varepsilon \)-constraint method, and the Hurwicz Rule for decision making under uncertainty belong to the examined scalarizations. The results are relevant to many other scalarization methods since a general framework for the systematic investigation of such methods is presented. This framework is based on translation invariant functions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Petra Weidner .

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Tammer, C., Weidner, P. (2020). Multiobjective Optimization. In: Scalarization and Separation by Translation Invariant Functions. Vector Optimization. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44723-6_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics