Abstract
Two important components of decision support systems (DSSs) are a model that describes the behaviour of the system under study along a certain period of time and an optimization algorithm that searches for one or several ‘good’ options within the space of admissible human interventions. Both elements received a great deal of attention in recent decades, mostly motivated by industrial and management applications. There are also many examples of decision support projects in agronomy, in particular, in weed control for crop protection. Since the bioeconomic models arising in Integrated Weed Management (IWM) studies are nonlinear, mixed integer and large scale, they are quite difficult to optimize. In this chapter, some basic elements of optimization are reviewed, with special emphasis in practical issues (modelling, programming), which are less covered than theoretical topics in the open literature.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
- 5.
- 6.
- 7.
- 8.
- 9.
- 10.
- 11.
- 12.
- 13.
References
Benjamin LR, Milne AE, Parsons DJ, Cussans J, Lutman PJW (2009) Using stochastic dynamic programming to support weed management decisions over a rotation. Weed Res 49:207–216
Biegler LT (2010) Nonlinear programming: concepts, algorithms, and applications to chemical Processes, MOS-SIAM Series on Optimization
Biegler Lorenz T, Grossmann IE, Westerberg AW (1997) Systematic methods of chemical process design. Prentice Hall—Technology & Engineering, Upper Saddle River, NJ
Boussaïd I, Lepagnot J, Siarry P (2013) A survey on optimization metaheuristics. Inform Sci 237:82–117
Carter R (1998) Pipeline optimization: dynamic programming after 30 years. PSIG Annual Meeting, 28–30 October, Denver, Colorado
Chalak-Haghighi M, Van Ierland EC, Bourdôt GW, Leathwick D (2008) Management strategies for an invasive weed: a dynamic programming approach for Californian Thistle in New Zealand. N Z J Agric Res 51(4):409–424
Coello Coello CA (2002) Theoretical and numerical constraint-handling techniques used with evolutionary algorithms: a survey of the state of the art. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 191:1245–1287
Conejo AJ, Castillo E, Minguez R, Garcia-Bertrand R (2006) Decomposition techniques in mathematical programming: engineering and science applications. Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin
Crawford B, Soto R, Astorga G, García J, Castro C, Paredes F (2017) Putting continuous metaheuristics to work in binary search spaces. Complexity 19:8404231. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/8404231
Doole GJ, Pannell DJ (2008) Optimisation of a large, constrained simulation model using compressed annealing. J Agric Econ 59(1):188–206
Fisher BS, Lee RR (1981) A dynamic programming approach to the economic control of weed and disease infestations in wheat. Rev Mktg Agr Econ 49:175–187
Floudas C (1995) Nonlinear and mixed-integer optimization. fundamentals and applications. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Gorddard RJ, Pannell DJ, Hertzler G (1995) An optimal control model for integrated weed management under herbicide resistance. Aust J Agric Econ 39(1):71–87
Grossmann IE, Apap RM, Calfa BA, García-Herreros P, Zhang Q (2016) Recent advances in mathematical programming techniques for optimization of process systems under uncertainty. Comp Chem Eng 91:3–14
Ho YC, Pepyne DL (2002) Simple explanation of the no-free-lunch theorem and its implications. J Optim Theor Appl 115(3):549–570
Lacoste M, Powles S (2016) Beyond modelling: considering user-centred and post-development aspects to ensure the success of a decision support system. Comput Electron Agric 121:260–268
Lodovichi MV, Blanco AM, Chantre GR, Bandoni JA, Sabbatini MR, López R, Vigna M, Gigón R (2013) Operational planning of herbicide-based weed management. Agr Syst 121:117–129
Martinez Y, Cirujeda A, Gomez MI, Mari AI, Pardo G (2018) Bioeconomic model for optimal control of the invasive weed Zea Mays Subspp. (Teosinte) in Spain. Agr Syst 165:116–127
Neeser CJ, Dille A, Krishnan G, Mortensen DA, Rawlinson JT, Martin AR, Bills LB (2004) Weedsoft®: a weed management decision support system. Weed Sci 52(1):115–122
Nocedal J, Wright S (2006) Numerical optimization; Springer series in operations research. Springer, New York
Pandey S, Medd RW (1991) A stochastic dynamic programming framework for weed control decision making: an application to Avena Fatua L. Agric Econ 6:115–128
Pannell DJ, Stewart V, Bennett A, Monjardino M, Schmid C, Powles SB (2004) RIM: A bioeconomic model for integrated weed management of Lolium rigidum in Western Australia. Agric Syst 79: 305–325
Sells JE (1995) Optimising weed management using stochastic dynamic programming to take account of uncertain herbicide performance. Agr Syst 48:271–296
Shoemaker CA (1981) Applications of dynamic programming and other optimization methods in pest management. IEEE Trans Autom Control 26:1125–1132
Tawarmalani M, Sahinidis N (2002) Convexification and global optimization in continuous and mixed-integer nonlinear programming: theory, algorithms, software, and applications. Springer Science, Berlin
Taylor CR, Burt OR (1984) Near-optimal management strategies for controlling wild oats in spring wheat. Am J Agric Econ 66:50–60
Wu J (2001) Optimal weed control under static and dynamic decision rules. Agric Econ 25:119–130
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Blanco, A.M. (2020). Optimization in Decision Support Systems. In: Chantre, G., González-Andújar, J. (eds) Decision Support Systems for Weed Management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44402-0_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44402-0_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-44401-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-44402-0
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)