Skip to main content

Denaturalizing Research Practices: (Re)Signifying Subject Positions Through Decolonial Theories

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Media Activist Research Ethics

Abstract

This text proposes a theoretical reflection about research methodologies grounded in decolonial thought and the authors’ research practices. Challenged by conservative scenarios that emerge in many societies, we problematize how research and the relations embedded in it may serve as strategies for reproduction or resistance against oppressions and subalternities resulting from this context. We adopt denaturalization as a critical outlook which interrogates the scientific assumptions in the modern forms of knowledge production and in the relations involved in this colonial process. We consider as research subjects all those who, as researchers, activists and/or interlocutors, participate dialogically in unveiling the reality investigated through research. Our discussion is informed by decolonial studies and feminist epistemologies and methodologies. With this theoretical articulation, we hope to introduce elements that can make visible the positions of all subjects involved in scientific processes of knowledge co-production. Moreover, this reflection is a vote of trust in the visibility of subjects as co-authors and the ethics of otherness as strategies for recognizing the solidarity and emancipatory personal subject trajectories in their roles and contexts of social struggle.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Translator’s note: sertanejo is the inhabitant of sertão, dry and arid hinterlands in northeastern Brazil.

  2. 2.

    For an in-depth discussion, see (in Portuguese) Martins, Vera. Encontros potenciais: a pesquisa em Comunicação e as abordagens feministas e sobre as mulheres, de 2005–2014. Verso e Reverso, 32(79), 83–94, janeiro-abril 2018 Unisinos—https://doi.org/10.4013/ver.2018.32.79.08. Available at: http://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/versoereverso/article/viewFile/ver.2018.32.79.08/60746092. Retrieved 15 April 2019.

  3. 3.

    Translator’s note: in Latin languages, different from English, the third person plural is also gendered.

References

  • Bartra, E. (2012). Acerca de la investigaciĂłn y la metodologia feminista [On research and feminist methodology]. In N. B. Graf, et al. (Eds.), InvestigaciĂłn feminista: epistemologia, metodologia y representaciones sociales [Feminist research: Epistemology, methodology and social representations] (pp. 67–78). MĂ©xico: UNAM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Everardo, M. R. (2012). Metodolgia en las ciĂŞncias sociales e perspectiva de gĂŞnero. In N. B. Graf, et al. (Eds.), InvestigaciĂłn feminista: epistemologia, metodologia y representaciones sociales [Feminist research: Epistemology, methodology and social representations] (pp. 179–197). MĂ©xico: UNAM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiorenza, E. S. (2009). Caminhos da Sabedoria: uma introdução Ă  interpretação bĂ­blica feminista [Paths of knowledge: An introduction to feminist biblical interpretation]. SĂŁo Bernardo do Campo: Nhanduti Editora.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haber, A. (2011). NometodologĂ­a Payanesa: Notas de metodologĂ­a indisciplinada (con comentarios de Henry Tantalean, Francisco Gil GarcĂ­a y Dante Angelo) [Payanese Nomethodology—Notes of undisciplined methodology (commented by Henry Tantalean, Francisco Gil GarcĂ­a and Dante Angelo)]. Revista Chilena de AntropologĂ­a, 23, 9–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mignolo, W. (2010). DesobediĂŞncia epistĂ©mica: retĂłrica de la modernidade, lĂłgica de la colonialidad y gramática de la descolonialdiad. Buenos Aires: Ediciones del Signo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ripamonti, P. (2017). Investigar a travĂ©s de narrativas: notas epistĂ©mico-metodolĂłgicas. In A. Deoto & M. Alvarado (Orgs.). Metodologias em contexto. Intervenciones em perspectiva feministas/poscolonial/latino-americana [Methodologies in context—Interventions from a feminist/post-colonial/Latin American perspective] (pp. 63–82). Buenos Aires: CLACSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosa, J. G. (2005). Grande sertĂŁo: veredas [The devil to pay in the backlands] (19 ed.). SĂŁo Paulo: Nova Fronteira.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos, B. S. (2017). Justicia entre Saberes: EpistemologĂ­as del Sur contra el Epistemicidio [Epistemologies from the South—Justice against Epistemicide]. Madrid: Ediciones Morata.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Martins, V., Rosa, R. (2020). Denaturalizing Research Practices: (Re)Signifying Subject Positions Through Decolonial Theories. In: Jeppesen, S., Sartoretto, P. (eds) Media Activist Research Ethics. Global Transformations in Media and Communication Research - A Palgrave and IAMCR Series. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44389-4_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics