Abstract
This text proposes a theoretical reflection about research methodologies grounded in decolonial thought and the authors’ research practices. Challenged by conservative scenarios that emerge in many societies, we problematize how research and the relations embedded in it may serve as strategies for reproduction or resistance against oppressions and subalternities resulting from this context. We adopt denaturalization as a critical outlook which interrogates the scientific assumptions in the modern forms of knowledge production and in the relations involved in this colonial process. We consider as research subjects all those who, as researchers, activists and/or interlocutors, participate dialogically in unveiling the reality investigated through research. Our discussion is informed by decolonial studies and feminist epistemologies and methodologies. With this theoretical articulation, we hope to introduce elements that can make visible the positions of all subjects involved in scientific processes of knowledge co-production. Moreover, this reflection is a vote of trust in the visibility of subjects as co-authors and the ethics of otherness as strategies for recognizing the solidarity and emancipatory personal subject trajectories in their roles and contexts of social struggle.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Translator’s note: sertanejo is the inhabitant of sertão, dry and arid hinterlands in northeastern Brazil.
- 2.
For an in-depth discussion, see (in Portuguese) Martins, Vera. Encontros potenciais: a pesquisa em Comunicação e as abordagens feministas e sobre as mulheres, de 2005–2014. Verso e Reverso, 32(79), 83–94, janeiro-abril 2018 Unisinos—https://doi.org/10.4013/ver.2018.32.79.08. Available at: http://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/versoereverso/article/viewFile/ver.2018.32.79.08/60746092. Retrieved 15 April 2019.
- 3.
Translator’s note: in Latin languages, different from English, the third person plural is also gendered.
References
Bartra, E. (2012). Acerca de la investigación y la metodologia feminista [On research and feminist methodology]. In N. B. Graf, et al. (Eds.), Investigación feminista: epistemologia, metodologia y representaciones sociales [Feminist research: Epistemology, methodology and social representations] (pp. 67–78). México: UNAM.
Everardo, M. R. (2012). Metodolgia en las ciências sociales e perspectiva de gênero. In N. B. Graf, et al. (Eds.), Investigación feminista: epistemologia, metodologia y representaciones sociales [Feminist research: Epistemology, methodology and social representations] (pp. 179–197). México: UNAM.
Fiorenza, E. S. (2009). Caminhos da Sabedoria: uma introdução Ă interpretação bĂblica feminista [Paths of knowledge: An introduction to feminist biblical interpretation]. SĂŁo Bernardo do Campo: Nhanduti Editora.
Haber, A. (2011). NometodologĂa Payanesa: Notas de metodologĂa indisciplinada (con comentarios de Henry Tantalean, Francisco Gil GarcĂa y Dante Angelo) [Payanese Nomethodology—Notes of undisciplined methodology (commented by Henry Tantalean, Francisco Gil GarcĂa and Dante Angelo)]. Revista Chilena de AntropologĂa, 23, 9–49.
Mignolo, W. (2010). Desobediência epistémica: retórica de la modernidade, lógica de la colonialidad y gramática de la descolonialdiad. Buenos Aires: Ediciones del Signo.
Ripamonti, P. (2017). Investigar a través de narrativas: notas epistémico-metodológicas. In A. Deoto & M. Alvarado (Orgs.). Metodologias em contexto. Intervenciones em perspectiva feministas/poscolonial/latino-americana [Methodologies in context—Interventions from a feminist/post-colonial/Latin American perspective] (pp. 63–82). Buenos Aires: CLACSO.
Rosa, J. G. (2005). Grande sertĂŁo: veredas [The devil to pay in the backlands] (19 ed.). SĂŁo Paulo: Nova Fronteira.
Santos, B. S. (2017). Justicia entre Saberes: EpistemologĂas del Sur contra el Epistemicidio [Epistemologies from the South—Justice against Epistemicide]. Madrid: Ediciones Morata.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Martins, V., Rosa, R. (2020). Denaturalizing Research Practices: (Re)Signifying Subject Positions Through Decolonial Theories. In: Jeppesen, S., Sartoretto, P. (eds) Media Activist Research Ethics. Global Transformations in Media and Communication Research - A Palgrave and IAMCR Series. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44389-4_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44389-4_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-44388-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-44389-4
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)