Skip to main content

Challenges of Ongoing Conflict Research: Dialogic Autoethnography in Studies of Post-2014 Ukraine

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Media Activist Research Ethics

Abstract

The transdisciplinary collaborative project “Propaganda and management of information in the Ukraine-Russia conflict” (2016–2018) that the authors were a part of, focused on Ukrainian actors and used ethnography, and particularly interview, as its primary methodology. We have been interviewing journalists, media experts, historians, etc. Many of the informants highlighted their roles as activists and change agents in the post-2014 society. Coming from different research fields (history and journalism and media studies), we have been reflecting upon the tension between our striving at academic neutrality and the different disciplinary approaches, as well as unavoidable emotional involvement in the subject we scrutinize. The chapter is based on dialogic autoethnography wherein we reflect on the challenges the researchers face when conducting ethnographic research on activists and dealing with such sensitive issues as information warfare and armed conflict. This becomes especially problematic when scholars come from the countries involved in the conflict, Ukraine and Russia. It continues the discussion about the role of emotions in ethnographic research. We aim to contribute to several discussions: field of conflict ethnography, work in multidisciplinary research environment, and particularities of conducting interviews with activists.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    We are aware of the discussion on the use of the word “informant” (e.g. Morse, 1991). We chose to use the concept “informant” over “respondent” as it connotes qualitative research in contrast to quantitative analysis.

  2. 2.

    Self- and autoethnography can be seen as interchangeable terms. In this chapter, we will predominantly use the term “autoethnography.”

References

  • Anderson, L. (2006). Analytic autoethnography. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 35(4), 373–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avruch, K. (2001). Notes toward ethnographies of conflict and violence. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 30(5), 637–648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertilsdotter Rosqvist, H., Kourti, M., Jackson-Perry, D., Brownlow, C., Fletcher, K., Bendelman, D., … O’Dell, L. (2019). Doing it differently: Emancipatory autism studies within a neurodiverse academic space. Disability & Society. Published ahead of print. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2019.1603102.

  • Bolin, G., Jordan, P., & Ståhlberg, P. (2016). From nation branding to information warfare: The management of information in the Ukraine-Russia conflict. In M. Pantti (Ed.), Media and the Ukraine crisis: Hybrid media practices and narratives of conflict (pp. 3–18). New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (2001 [2004]). Science of science and reflexivity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodkey, L. (1996). I-site. Literacy and Numeracy Studies, 6(2), 17–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Budivska, H., & Orlova, D. (2017). Between professionalism and activism: Ukrainian journalism after the Euromaidan. Kyiv-Mohyla Law and Politics Journal, 3(2017), 137–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burdell, P., & Swadener, B. B. (1999). Critical personal narrative and autoethnography in education: Reflections on a genre. Educational Researcher, 28, 21–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnier, D. L. (2006). Encounters with the self in social science research: A political scientist looks at autoethnography. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 35(4), 410–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Checker, M., Davis, D.-A., & Schuller, M. (2014). The conflicts of crisis: Critical reflections on feminist ethnography and anthropological activism. American Anthropologist, 116(2), 408–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, P., & Gallinat, A. (Eds.). (2010). The ethnographic self as resource: Writing memory and experience into ethnography. New York and Oxford: Berghahn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, D. A. (2014). What is a feminist activist ethnographer to do? American Anthropologist, 116(2), 413–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denshire, S. (2014). On auto-ethnography. Current Sociology Review, 62(6), 831–850.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N. K. (1997). Interpretative ethnography: Ethnographic practices for the 21st century. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, C. S. (2009). Revision: Autoethnographic reflections on life and work. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, C., & Bochner, A. P. (2006). Analysing analytical autoethnography: An autopsy. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 35(4), 429–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fields, J. (2013). Feminist ethnography: Critique, conflict, and ambivalent observance. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 42(4), 492–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ginosar, A., & Cohen, I. (2017). Patriotic journalism: An appeal to emotion and cognition. Media, War & Conflict. Epub ahead of print 25 May 2017. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750635217710678.

  • Golombisky, K. (2006). Gendering the interview: Feminist reflections on gender as performance in research. Women’s Studies in Communication, 29(2), 165–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammersley, M. (2006). Ethnography: Problems and prospects. Ethnography and Education, 1(1), 3–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, E. A. (2007). Open-ended interviews, power, and emotional labor. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 36(3), 318–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holt, N. L. (2003). Representation, legitimation, and autoethography: An autoethnographic writing story. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 2(1), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoskins, A., & O’Loughlin, B. (2010). War and media: The emergence of diffused war. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaggar, A. M. (2016). Just methods: An introductory feminist reader. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, S. A. (2018). Assistants, guides, collaborators, friends: The concealed figures of conflict research. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 47(2), 143–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Käihkö, I. (2018). Conflict chatnography: Instant messaging apps, social media and conflict ethnography in Ukraine. Ethnography. Online first, https://doi.org/10.1177/1466138118781640.

  • Kennedy, S., MacPhail, A., & Varley, P. J. (2018). Expedition (auto)ethnography: An adventurer-researcher’s journey. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 19, 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khaldarova, I., & Pantti, M. (2016). Fake news: The narrative battle over the Ukrainian conflict. Journalism Practice, 10(7), 891–901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Likbez. (2018). Historic front. http://likbez.org.ua/en/. Accessed 18 December 2018.

  • Livingstone, S. (2003). On the challenges of cross-national comparative media research. European Journal of Communication, 18(4), 477–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malyutina, D. (2017). Challenges of researching Ukraine in the context of Euromaidan and Russia-Ukraine war. Historians, 26 April. http://www.historians.in.ua/index.php/en/doslidzhennya/2170-darya-malyutina-slozhnosti-issledovanij-ukrainy-v-kontekste-evromajdana-i-rossijsko-ukrainskoj-vojny-chast-i. Accessed 12 October 2018 (in Ukrainian).

  • Morse, J. M. (1991). Subjects, respondents, informants, and participants? Qualitative Health Research, 1(4), 403–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neville-Jan, A. (2003). Encounters in the world of pain: An autoethnography. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 57(1), 88–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norman, J. (2009). Got trust? The challenge of gaining access in conflict zones. In C. L. Sriram, J. C. King, J. A. Mertus, O. Martin-Ortega, & J. Herman (Eds.), Surviving field research: Working in violent and difficult situations (pp. 71–90). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • OSCE. (2018). Two countries—One profession: A dialogue between journalists’ organizations from Russia and Ukraine. https://www.osce.org/representative-on-freedom-of-media/184881. Accessed 18 December 2018.

  • Pantti, M. (Ed.). (2016). Media and the Ukraine crisis: Hybrid media practices and narratives of conflict. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed-Danahay, D. E. (Ed.). (1997). Auto/ethnography: Rewriting the self and writing the social. Oxford: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, M. (2005). Insider-outsider issues in researching violent and divided societies. In E. Porter, G. Robinson, M. Smyth, A. Schnabel, & E. Osaghae (Eds.), Researching conflict in Africa: Insights and experiences. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparkes, A. C. (2000). Authoethnography and narratives of self: Reflections on criteria in action. Sociology of Sport Journal, 17(1), 21–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svallfors, S. (2016). Om forskningsteam [On research teams]. Sociologisk forskning, 53(1), 95–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tumber, H., & Webster, F. (2006). Journalists under fire: Information war and journalistic practices. London, UK: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, L. (2013). The evocative autoethnographic ‘I’: The relational ethics of writing about oneself. In N. Short, L. Turner, & A. Grant (Eds.), Contemporary British autoethnography (pp. 213–229). Rotterdam: Sense.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Haar, G., Heijmans, A., & Hilhorst, D. (2013). Interactive research and the construction of knowledge in conflict-affected settings. Disasters, 37(S1), 20–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Visweswaran, K. (1994). Fictions of feminist ethnography. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Widdowfield, R. (2000). The place of emotions in academic research. Area, 32(2), 199–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams Moore, M. (2018). Social work practitioners in post-conflict Northern Ireland: Lessons from a critical ethnography. International Social Work, 61(3), 383–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yurchuk, Y. (2017). When history becomes a weapon: Historians’ response to information war in Ukraine. In Annual CBEES Conference, 1–2 December, Södertörn University, Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The project was funded by the Foundation for Baltic and East European Studies (2016–2018, project leader—Per Ståhlberg). Contact: Södertörn University, Alfred Nobels allé 7, 141 89 Huddinge, Sweden.

We would like to thank our colleagues with whom we were working on that project—Per Ståhlberg and Göran Bolin—for their support, trust, and encouragement. We are grateful to the editors of this collection for their insightful comments that helped to develop this chapter. Vlad Strukov, thank you for your kind encouragement to experiment with the format of an interview with each other! The Network for female, trans* and non-binary researchers and doctoral students at Södertörn University has provided us with an opportunity to finalize this text in a beautiful and inspiring atmosphere: thank you for this! And last but not least thanks to all of the informants who worked with us!

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuliya Yurchuk .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Yurchuk, Y., Voronova, L. (2020). Challenges of Ongoing Conflict Research: Dialogic Autoethnography in Studies of Post-2014 Ukraine. In: Jeppesen, S., Sartoretto, P. (eds) Media Activist Research Ethics. Global Transformations in Media and Communication Research - A Palgrave and IAMCR Series. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44389-4_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics