Abstract
In this chapter, the authors take a global approach to mapping ethical research-activist practices with social justice objectives. They find that sometimes initial research ethics practices can create tensions between researchers and participants, where intersectional power relations will depend not just on who is engaged in the research process, but also when and where the research takes place. The authors map eight key issues with respect to power and ethics in media activist research practices. First, there is an opposition to extractive research on the part of participants which committed researchers attempt to mitigate. Second, the protection from risk offered by participant anonymity is called into question, considering potential silencing of activists’ voices. Third, the labour of being a research participant is considered in relation to the power dynamics of co-research. Fourth, from the researcher’s perspective, questions of power are articulated to who participates and in which roles. Fifth, embedded versus rooted positions within social movements will have different affordances and challenges. Sixth, the double position research activists play in the university and social movements may increase their workload and render them outsiders to both worlds. Seventh, constructive reciprocal critiques, work sharing, and other strategies of mutuality are useful in developing a greater understanding of each other’s work. Finally, discussing ethical research practices openly with participants can help acknowledge complex power asymmetries.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Autonomous Geographies Collective. (2010). Beyond scholar activism: Making strategic interventions inside and outside the neoliberal university. ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies, 9(2), 245–275.
Boltanski, L. (2011). On critique: A sociology of emancipation. London: Polity.
Breton, E., Jeppesen, S., Kruzynski, A., & Sarrasin, R. (2012). Prefigurative self-governance and self-organization: The influence of antiauthoritarian (pro)feminist radical queer, and antiracist networks in Quebec. In A. Choudry, J. Hanley, & E. Shragge (Eds.), Organize!: Building from the local for global justice (pp. 156–172). Oakland, CA: PM Press.
Costanza-Chock, S. (2012). Mic check! Media cultures and the occupy movement. Social Movement Studies, 11(3–4), 375–385.
Fine, M. (2006). Bearing witness: Methods for researching oppression and resistance. Social Justice Research, 19(1), 83–108.
Giroux, H. (2002). Neoliberalism, corporate culture, and the promise of higher education: The university as a democratic public sphere. Harvard Educational Review, 72(4), 425–463.
Gordon, U. (2012). Participant observation. In R. Kinna (Ed.), The continuum companion to anarchism (pp. 86–95). London: Continuum.
Jaggar, A. M. (Ed.). (2008). Just methods: An interdisciplinary feminist reader. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.
Jeppesen, S., Hounslow, T., Khan, S., & Petrick, K. (2017). Media action research group: Toward an antiauthoritarian profeminist media research methodology. Feminist Media Studies, 17(6), 1056–1072.
Juris, J. S. (2005). The new digital media and activist networking within anti-corporate globalization movements. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 597, 189–208.
OCAP. (2016). https://fnigc.ca/news/ocaptm-now-ocapr-understanding-new-trademark-status.html.
Patai, D. (1994). When method becomes power. In A. D. Gitlin (Ed.), Power and method: Political activism and educational research (pp. 61–76). London: Routledge.
Smeltzer, S., & Hearn, A. (2015). Student rights in an age of austerity? ‘Security’, freedom of expression and the neoliberal university. Social Movement Studies, 14(3), 352–358.
Springer, S. (2016). Fuck neoliberalism. ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies, 15(2), 285–292.
United Nations. (2016). https://www.un.org/development/desa/indigenouspeoples/publications/2016/10/free-prior-and-informed-consent-an-indigenous-peoples-right-and-a-good-practice-for-local-communities-fao/.
Waisbord, S. (2019). The communication manifesto. New York: Wiley.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jeppesen, S., Sartoretto, P. (2020). Introduction: Mapping Questions of Power and Ethics in Media Activist Research Practices. In: Jeppesen, S., Sartoretto, P. (eds) Media Activist Research Ethics. Global Transformations in Media and Communication Research - A Palgrave and IAMCR Series. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44389-4_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44389-4_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-44388-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-44389-4
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)