Skip to main content

A Blockchain Supported Solution for Compliant Digital Security Offerings

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Blockchain and Distributed Ledger Technology Use Cases

Part of the book series: Progress in IS ((PROIS))

Abstract

Ethereum launched in 2015 ushering a sea change over its predecessors in it’s ability to tokenise an asset. This was a technical innovation and an Initial Coin Offering (ICO) boom ensued, peaking in 2017. The legal and compliance requirements of tokenisation failed to keep step in these early stages, but were eventually brought to bear after the ICO bubble burst, forcing technological liberalism to confront regulatory realities. The Digital Security Offering (DSO)—a name change intended to reflect full compliance—was coined. However, truly executing a fully compliant DSO remained elusive for many. In this chapter we navigate the regulatory landscape for DSOs and construct a compliant blockchain solution, using it to support the DSO capital raise for a product named Talketh in December of 2018. The journey discusses the key compliance concerns of Know-Your-Customer (KYC), Anti-Money-Laundering (AML), Custody, Tokenisation and onward secondary trading as part of a Distributed Exchange (DEX).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://horizon-globex.com.

  2. 2.

    https://kycware.com.

  3. 3.

    https://amlcop.com.

  4. 4.

    https://custodyware.com.

  5. 5.

    https://tokenetics.com.

  6. 6.

    Where a “blockchain hook” refers to an entry point on a smart contract that can be executed by traditional software.

  7. 7.

    Which, incidentally, is illegal in most jurisdictions as of July 2019.

  8. 8.

    Visit https://kycware.com for further information.

  9. 9.

    For reference, a deployed example of this contract is here: https://kovan.etherscan.io/address/0x88e6f26a86caf47873e7c84bd43808f895b88b5a#contracts.

  10. 10.

    The full list of Ethereum Request for Comment (ERC) is here: https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/tree/master/EIPS.

  11. 11.

    Used the “approve()” and “transferFrom()” operations on the standard ERC-20 interface.

  12. 12.

    The name ascribed to the production network of Ethereum.

  13. 13.

    For example, the owner of a corner shop.

References

  • Ballard, S. V. V. L. (1993). Memorandum of understanding between the United States. SEC Docket, 54(5).

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, R., Stenum Czepluch, J., Lollike, N., & Malone, S. (2016). Blockchain—The gateway to trust-free cryptographic transactions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, B. (2013). Punishing bad brokers: Self-regulation and finra sanctions. Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law, 8, 23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buterin, V. (2016a). Ethereum 2.0 mauve paper. In Ethereum developer conference (Vol. 2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Buterin, V. (2016b). Ethereum 2.0 mauve paper. In Ethereum developer conference (Vol. 2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Buterin, V. (2016c). Ethereum: Platform review. Opportunities and Challenges for Private and Consortium Blockchains.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y. (2018). Blockchain tokens and the potential democratization of entrepreneurship and innovation. Business Horizons, 61(4), 567–575.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clayton, J. (2018). Chairman’s testimony on virtual currencies: The roles of the sec and cftc. In Testimony before the committee on banking, housing, and urban affairs, United States senate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dantas, R., Exton, C., & Le Gear, A. (2017). Improving mobile voip quality through bandwidth optimisation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Domanski, D. & Heath, A. (2007). Financial investors and commodity markets. BIS Quarterly Review.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleder, M., Kester, M. S., & Pillai, S. (2015). Bitcoin transaction graph analysis. arXiv:1502.01657.

  • Freedman, D. M., & Nutting, M. R. (2015). The growth of equity crowdfunding. Value Examiner, 6–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gencer, A. E., Basu, S., Eyal, I., Van Renesse, R., & Sirer, E. G. (2018). Decentralization in bitcoin and ethereum networks. arXiv:1801.03998.

  • Gray, S., et al. (1997). Government securities: Primary issuance. Handbooks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, J. M., & Shams, A. (2018). Is bitcoin really un-tethered? Available at SSRN 3195066.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koverko, T., & Housser, C. (2018). Growth, 4, 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kranz, J., Nagel, E., & Yoo, Y. (2019). Blockchain token sale. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S.-Y. (2011). Why the accredited investor standard fails the average investor. Review of Banking and Financial Law, 31, 987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loader, D. (2013). Clearing, settlement and custody. Butterworth-Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, V. B., & Goldstein, S. Z. (2009). Guide to clearance & settlement: An introduction to dtcc. Lightbulb Press, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller-Studer, L. (2004). The function of self-regulating organisations in the swiss money laundering control scheme. Journal of Money Laundering Control, 7(1), 69–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, J. (1982). The transformation of wall street: A history of the securities and exchange commission and modern corporate finance. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spagnuolo, M., Maggi, F., & Zanero, S. (2014). Bitiodine: Extracting intelligence from the bitcoin network. In International conference on financial cryptography and data security (pp. 457–468). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J. H. (2013). A global comparison of insider trading regulations. International Journal of Accounting and Financial Reporting, 3(1), 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogelsteller, F., & Buterin, V. (2018). Erc-20 token standard, 2015. https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/tree/master/EIPS, 04–13.

  • Wong, S., & Pocock, A. (2018). Digital assets and their impact on wealth management. Available at SSRN 3367451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zetzsche, D. A., Buckley, R. P., Arner, D. W., & Föhr, L. (2018). The ICO gold rush: It’s a scam, it’s a bubble, it’s a super challenge for regulators.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew Le Gear .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Le Gear, A. (2020). A Blockchain Supported Solution for Compliant Digital Security Offerings. In: Treiblmaier, H., Clohessy, T. (eds) Blockchain and Distributed Ledger Technology Use Cases. Progress in IS. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44337-5_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics