Skip to main content

International Exchange of Financial Information on Distributed Ledgers: Outlook and Design Blueprint

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Blockchain and Distributed Ledger Technology Use Cases

Part of the book series: Progress in IS ((PROIS))

  • 3299 Accesses

Abstract

The international fiscal system is made by multiple entities that are struggling to establish sound mechanisms for co-operation. Policy initiatives are currently aiming at strengthening the information sharing of financial information for tax purposes across jurisdictions. In this work, I outline the legal landscape for the exchange of information and establish four desirable principles to which information exchange should adhere. Then, I argue that distributed ledger technology appears well-suited to address some of the challenges related to the exchange of financial information. I explore possible designs and lay the foundation for future discussion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/jul/18/wizard-hacker-charged-after-financial-records-of-nearly-every-bulgarian-exposed.

References

  • Ainsworth, R. T., & Alwohaibi, M. (2017). Blockchain, bitcoin, and VAT in the GCC: The missing trader example. Boston Univ. School of Law. Law and Economics Research Paper No. 17-05.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ainsworth, R. T., & Shact, A. (2016). Blockchain (distributed ledger technology) solves VAT fraud. Boston Univ. School of Law. Law and Economics Research Paper No. 16-41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ainsworth, R. T., & Viitasaari, V. (2017). Payroll Tax & the Blockchain. Tax Notes International, pp. 1007–1024.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ainsworth, R. T., & Musaad, A. (2017). The first real-time blockchain VAT—GCC solves MTIC fraud. Boston Univ. School of Law. Law and Economics Research Paper No. 17-23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexopoulos, C., Charalabidis, Y., Androutsopoulou, A., Loutsaris, M. A., & Lachana, Z. (2019). Benefits and obstacles of blockchain applications in E-government. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 52nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bano, S., Sonnino, A., Al-Bassam, M., Azouvi, S., McCorry, P., Meiklejohn, S., & Danezis, G. (2017). SoK: Consensus in the age of blockchains. Retrieved April 12, 2019 from https://arxiv.org/pdf/1711.03936.pdf.

  • Bean, B. W., & Wright, A. L. (2014). The US foreign Account tax compliance act: American legal imperialism. ILSA Journal of International and Comparative Law, 21, 333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benčić, F. M., & Žarko, I. P. (2018). Distributed ledger technology: Blockchain compared to directed acyclic graph. Retrieved January 21, 2019 from https://arxiv.org/pdf/1804.10013.pdf.

  • Bradbury, D., & O’Reilly, P. (2018). Inclusive fiscal reform: Ensuring fairness and transparency in the international tax system. International Tax and Public Finance. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-018-9507-2.

  • Cachin, C., & Vukolić, M. (2017). Blockchains consensus protocols in the wild. In International Symposium on Distributed Computing (Vol. 31).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cockfield, A. J. (2001). Designing tax policy for the digital biosphere: How the internet is changing tax laws. Connecticut Law Review, 34, 333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cockfield, A. J. (2017a). How countries should share tax information. Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, 50(5).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cockfield, A. J. (2017b). Tax law and technology change. In E. S. K. Y. Roger Brownsword (Ed.), Oxford handbook of the law and regulation of technology. Oxford: University of Oxford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elisa, N., Yang, L., Chao, F., & Cao, Y. (2018). A framework of blockchain-based secure and privacy-preserving E-government system. Wireless Networks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feng, Q., He, D., Zeadally, S., Khan, M. K., & Kumar, N. (2018). A survey on privacy protection in blockchain system. Journal of Network and Computer Applications. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2018.10.020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feynman, R. P., & Leighton, R. (2001). “ What do you care what other people think?” Further adventures of a curious character. WW Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flora, M. G. D. (2017). Protection of the taxpayer in the information exchange procedure. Intertax, 45(6), 447–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, F., & Bezzenberger, L. (2015). Beyond cryptocurrencies-a taxonomy of decentralized consensus systems. Paper presented at the 23rd European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), Münster, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harz, D., & Boman, M. (2018). The scalability of trustless trust. Retrieved November 8, 2018 from https://arxiv.org/abs/1801.09535.

  • Iansiti, M., & Lakhani, K. R. (2017). The truth about blockchain. Harvard Business Review, 95(1), 118–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S. R. (2016). The future of American tax administration: Conceptual alternatives and political realities. Columbia Journal of Tax Law, 7, 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jun, M. (2018). Blockchain government—A next form of infrastructure for the twenty-first century. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 4(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40852-018-0086-3.

  • Keen, M. (2008). Tax competition. In S. N. Durlauf & L. E. Blume (Eds.), The new palgrave dictionary of economics (Vols. 1–8, pp. 6516–6523). London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keen, M., & Ligthart, J. (2006a). Information sharing and international taxation: A primer. International Tax and Public Finance, 13(1), 81–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-006-3090-7.

  • Keen, M., & Ligthart, J. (2006b). Incentives and information exchange in international taxation. International Tax and Public Finance, 13(2–3), 163–180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-006-2316-z.

  • Krause, M. J., & Tolaymat, T. (2018). Quantification of energy and carbon costs for mining cryptocurrencies. Nature Sustainability, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakamoto, S. (2008). Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system. Retrieved October 13, 2016 from https://bitcoin.org/en/bitcoin-paper.

  • Narayanan, A., Bonneau, J., Felten, E., Miller, A., & Goldfeder, S. (2016). Bitcoin and cryptocurrency technologies: A comprehensive introduction. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2017a). Model Tax Convention on Income and on Capital: Condensed Version 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2017b). Standard for Automatic Exchange of Financial Account Information in Tax Matters (2nd ed.).

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD, & Council of Europe. (2011). The Multilateral Convention on Mutual Administrative Assistance in Tax Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ølnes, S., & Jansen, A. (2017). Blockchain technology as s support infrastructure in e-government. In: M. Janssen et al. (eds.), Electronic government. EGOV 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Vol. 10428). Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ølnes, S., & Jansen, A. (2018). Blockchain technology as infrastructure in public sector: An analytical framework. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research: Governance in the Data Age.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ølnes, S., Ubacht, J., & Janssen, M. (2017). Blockchain in government: Benefits and implications of distributed ledger technology for information sharing. Government Information Quarterly, 34(3), 355–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.09.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panisi, F., Buckley, R. P., & Arner, D. (2019). Blockchain and public companies: A revolution in share ownership transparency, proxy voting and corporate governance? Stanford Journal of Blockchain Law & Policy. Retrieved May 26, 2019 from https://stanford-jblp.pubpub.org/pub/blockchain-and-public-companies.

  • Shahaab, A., Lidgey, B., Hewage, C., & Khan, I. (2019). Applicability and appropriateness of distributed ledgers consensus protocols in public and private sectors: A systematic review. IEEE Access.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoll, C., Klaaßen, L., & Gallersdörfer, U. (2019). The carbon footprint of bitcoin. Joule. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2019.05.012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sup, S. J., & Erdenebold, T. (2018). The use of blockchain technology in e-government domain. In International Conference on Future Information & Communication Engineering (Vol. 10, No. 1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Swan, M. (2015). Blockchain: Blueprint for a new economy. O'Reilly Media, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanzi, V. (2005). Globalization, tax system, and the architecture of the global economic system. Retrieved September 29, 2016, from https://publications.iadb.org/publications/english/document/Globalization-Tax-System-and-the-Architecture-of-the-Global-Economic-System.pdf.

  • Tapscott, D., & Tapscott, A. (2016). Blockchain revolution: How the technology behind bitcoin is changing money, business, and the world: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • TRON. (2018). TRON advanced decentralized blockchain platform. TRON Foundation. Retrieved March 5, 2018 from https://tron.network/static/doc/white_paper_v_2_0.pdf.

  • Vishnevsky, V. P., & Chekina, V. D. (2018). Robot vs. tax inspector or how the fourth industrial revolution will change the tax system: A review of problems and solutions. Journal of Tax Reform, 4(1), 6–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, S., Zhang, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2018). A blockchain-based framework for data sharing with fine-grained access control in decentralized storage systems. IEEE Access.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, J. (2009). Understanding special drawing rights (SDRs). No. PB09–11. Peterson Institute for International Economics: Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, G. (2014). Ethereum: A secure decentralised generalised transaction ledger. Ethereum project yellow paper, 151(2014), 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, B., Luthra, D., Cole, Z., & Blakely, N. (2018). EOS: An architectural, performance, and economic analysis. Retrieved June 11, 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, X., Pautasso, C., Zhu, L., Gramoli, V., Ponomarev, A., Tran, A. B., & Chen, S. (2016). The blockchain as a software connector. Paper presented at the Software Architecture (WICSA), 2016 13th Working IEEE, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yermack, D. (2017). Corporate governance and blockchains. Review of Finance, 21(1), 7–31.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marco Crepaldi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Crepaldi, M. (2020). International Exchange of Financial Information on Distributed Ledgers: Outlook and Design Blueprint. In: Treiblmaier, H., Clohessy, T. (eds) Blockchain and Distributed Ledger Technology Use Cases. Progress in IS. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44337-5_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics