Abstract
The purpose of this article is to discuss whether equality and non-discrimination form part of the EU constitutional identity. After noting that the point of departure of the article is the theory of constitutionalism beyond the State, as well as the assumption that the EU and EU law are constitutional in nature, the author proceeds with the debate on the antecedents of the EU constitutional identity. After inquiring whether a Member State constitutional identity is the same as national identity, the author argues that, independently of the response to this question, both concepts perform the function of a brake on the absolute primacy of EU law over domestic law, as well as on the transfer of powers, which calls into question the very statehood of the Member State. This article argues that, the EU constitutional identity, in spite of its indeterminacy, vagueness and complexity, comprises common origins, common values, a common destiny and common features that differentiate the EU from other entities. Although the common origins mainly emerged from the negation of Nazism and Soviet communism, and its common destiny is rather uncertain, there is no doubt that the EU has an axiological basis and that it has certain characteristics that differentiate it from the rest of the world. One of these features concerns the respect for equality and non-discrimination as well as the respect and promotion of fundamental rights. The article concludes that equality and non-discrimination are an integral part of the EU’s constitutional identity to the precise extent they are simultaneously values and objectives of the EU.
I would like to thank Prof. Thomas Giegerich, Jean Monnet Chair, and his team for having invited me to the symposium on the European Union as Protector and Promoter of Equality.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Martins (2017), pp. 244 ff.
- 2.
It must be underlined that the definition of international organization is anything but consensual.
- 3.
Pernice (2009), p. 383.
- 4.
Martins (2016), pp. 33 ff.
- 5.
Martins (2016), pp. 303 ff.
- 6.
Neves (2009), pp. 83 ff.
- 7.
- 8.
- 9.
Walker (2012), pp. 17 ff.
- 10.
Barents (2012), pp. 153 ff.
- 11.
Martins (2017), pp. 229 ff.
- 12.
- 13.
Cruz Villalón (2013), p. 503.
- 14.
Cruz Villalón (2013), p. 503.
- 15.
Cloots (2016), pp. 82 ff.
- 16.
- 17.
Walter (2012), p. 181.
- 18.
- 19.
Polzin (2017), p. 1597.
- 20.
Manasyan (2018), p. 89.
- 21.
Besselink (2010), p. 42.
- 22.
Cruz Villalón (2013), p. 504.
- 23.
Besselink (2010), p. 44.
- 24.
Cloots (2016), pp. 86 ff.
- 25.
- 26.
Fabrini and Pollicino (2017), p. 1.
- 27.
Van der Shyff (2016), p. 169.
- 28.
Manasyan (2018), p. 81.
- 29.
Walter (2012), p. 181.
- 30.
CC Decision No. 2006-540 DC of 27 July 2006.
- 31.
Ingolf (2015), pp. 1 ff.
- 32.
BVerfG 89, 155 (Maastricht).
- 33.
BVerfG 37, 271 (Solange I); BVerfG 73, 339 (Solange II).
- 34.
BVerfG 123, 267 (Lissabon).
- 35.
- 36.
BVerfG BvR 2006/06 (Honeywell).
- 37.
- 38.
Claes and Reestman (2015), pp. 917 ff.
- 39.
Italian CC Order n. 24/2017.
- 40.
- 41.
For further reading see Claes and Reestman (2015), pp. 941 ff.
- 42.
Von Bogdandy and Schill (2011), pp. 1430 ff.
- 43.
Balaguer Calléjon (2017), pp. 14 ff.
- 44.
Case 36/02, Omega Spielhallen- und Automatenaufstellungs-GmbH v Oberbürgermeisterin der Bundesstadt Bonn (ECJ 14 October 2004).
- 45.
Case391/09, Malgožata Runevič-Vardyn and Łukasz Paweł Wardyn v Vilniaus miesto savivaldybės administracija and Others (ECJ 12 May 2019; Case C-202/11, Anton Las, ECLI:EU:C:2012:456 (April 16, 2013).
- 46.
Case 208/09, Ilonka Sayn-Wittgenstein v Landeshauptmann von Wien (ECJ 22 December 2010); Case 438/14, Nabiel Peter Bogendorff von Wolffersdorff v Standesamt der Stadt Karlsruhe, Zentraler Juristischer Dienst der Stadt Karlsruhe (ECJ 2 June 2016).
- 47.
Case 156/13, Digibet Ltd, Gert Albers v Westdeutsche Lotterie GmbH & Co. OHG (ECJ 12 June 2014); Case 51/15, Remondis v Region Hannover (ECJ 21 December 2016).
- 48.
See Digibet.
- 49.
Polzin (2017), pp. 1066–1067.
- 50.
Von Bogdandy and Schill (2011), pp. 1447 ff.
- 51.
In Joined Cases 402/05 P and 415/05 P, Yassin Abdullah Kadi and Al Barakaat International Foundation (ECJ 3 September 2008).
- 52.
Rosenfeld (2012), p. 774.
- 53.
Martins (2011), pp. 47 ff.
- 54.
Rosenfeld (2012), p. 775.
- 55.
Martins (2010), pp. 39 ff.
- 56.
Council Directive 2000/43 on implementing the principle of equal treatment between persons irrespective of racial and ethnic origin (known as ‘racial equality’ directive), OJ L 180/22—26 (2000); Council Directive 2000/78 on establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation (known as ‘employment equality Directive’), OJ L 303/ 16—22 (2000); Council Directive 2004/113 on implementing the principle of equal treatment between men and women in the access to and supply of goods and services, OJL 373/ 37—43 (2004).
- 57.
Case 356/12, Glatzel v Freistaat Bayern (ECJ 22 May 2014); Case 267/12, Frédéric Hay v Crédit agricole mutuel de Charente-Maritime et des Deux-Sèvres (ECJ 12 December 2013); Case 81/12, Asociaţia Accept v Consiliul Naţional pentru Combaterea Discriminării (ECJ 25 April 2013); Case 54/07, Centrum v Firma Feryn, (ECJ 10 July 2008); Case 506/06, Sabine Mayr vBäckerei und Konditorei Gerhard Flöckner OHG (ECJ 26 February 2008); Case 267/06, Tadao Maruko v Versorgungsanstalt der deutschen Bühnen, (ECJ 1 April 2008); Case 423/04, Sarah Margaret Richards v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, (ECJ 27 April 2006); Case 256/01, Debra Allonby, (ECJ 13 January 2004); Case 191/03, North Western Health Board v Margaret McKenna (ECJ 8 September 2005); Case 13/94, P v S and Cornwall County Council (ECJ 30 April 1996); Case 177/88, Elisabeth Johanna Pacifica Dekker v VJV Centrum (ECJ 8 November 1990); Case 32/93, Carole Louise Webb v EMO Air Cargo (UK) Ltd, (ECJ 14 July 1994).
- 58.
Case 267/06, Tadao Maruko v Versorgungsanstalt der deutschen Bühnen (ECJ 01 April 2008); Case 171/88, Ingrid Rinner-Kühn v FWW Spezial-Gebäudereinigung GmbH & Co. KG, (ECJ 13 July 1989); Case 184/89, Helga Nimz v Freie und Hansestadt Hamburg (ECJ 7 February 1991); Case 33/89, Maria Kowalska v Freie und Hansestadt Hamburg, (ECJ 27 June 1990); Case 343/92, De Weerd and Others (ECJ 24 February 1994); Case 385/11, Isabel Elbal Moreno v INSS and TGSS (ECJ 22 November 2012); Case 152/11, Johann Odar v Baxter Deutschland GmbH, (ECJ 6 December 2012); Case 267/12, Frédéric Hay v Crédit agricole mutuel de Charente-Maritime et des Deux-Sèvres (ECJ 12 December 2013); Case 83/14, CHEZ Razpredelenie Bulgaria AD v Komisia za zashtita ot diskriminatsia (ECJ 16 July 2015).
- 59.
Case 409/95, Hellmut Marshall v Land Nordrhein-Westfalen, (ECJ 11 November 1997); Case 158/97, Badeck and others, (ECJ 28 March 2000); Case 476/99, H. Lommers and Minister van Landbouw, Natuurbeheer en Visserij (ECJ 19 March 2000).
- 60.
Case 443/15, David L. Parris v Trinity College Dublin and others (ECJ 24 November 2016).
- 61.
Case 303/06, S. Coleman v Attridge Law and Steve Law (ECJ 17 July 2008).
- 62.
- 63.
Lenaerts (1991), pp. 21, 22.
- 64.
The Treaties mainly use the word sex (not gender).
References
Avbelj, Matej, and Jan Komárek. 2012. Constitutional Pluralism in the European Union and Beyond. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
Balaguer Callejón, Francisco. 2017. The Dialectic Relation Between the National and the European Constitutional Identity in the Framework of European Constitutional Law. EU Law Journal 3: 10–24.
Barents, René. 2012. The Fallacy of Multilevel Constitutionalism. In Constitutional Pluralism in the European Union and Beyond, ed. Matej Avbelj and Jan Komárek, 153–184. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
Belov, Martin. 2017. The Functions of Constitutional Identity Performed in the Context of the Constitutionalization of the EU Order and Europeanization of the Legal Orders of the EU Member States. Perspectives on Federalism 9: 72–96.
Besselink, Leonard F.M. 2010. National and Constitutional Identity Before and After Lisbon. Utrech Law Review 6: 36–49.
Bonelli, Matteo. 2018. The Taricco Saga and the Consolidation of Judicial Dialogue in the European Union – CJEU, C-105/14 Ivo Taricco and Others, ECLI:EU:C:2015:555; and C-42/17 M.A.S., M.B., ECLI:EU:C:2017:936 Italian Constitutional Court, Order no. 24/2017. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 25: 357–373.
Claes, M., and J. H. Reestman. 2015. The Protection of National Constitutional Identity and the Limits of European Integration at the Occasion of the Gauweiler Case. German Law Journal 16: 917–970.
Cloots, Elke. 2016. National Identity, Constitutional Identity, and Sovereignty in the EU. Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy 45: 82–98.
Cruz Villalón, Pedro. 2013. La identidad constitucional de los Estados Miembros: Dos Relatos Europeus. AFDUAM 17: 501–514.
Fabrini, Federico, and Oreste Pollicino. 2017. Constitutional Identity in Italy: European Integration as the Fulfilment of the Constitution. EUI Department of Law Research Paper 2017/06: 1–15.
Faraguna, Pietro. 2017a. Constitutional Identity in the EU – A Shield or a Sword? Special Issue. German Law Journal 18: 1617–1640.
———. 2017b. La saga OMT: il diritto all’ultima parola tra Corte di Giustizia e tribunali costituzionali. Giurisprudenza Costituzionale 1: 568–600.
Fredman, Sandra. 2005. Double Trouble: Multiple Discrimination and EU Law. European Anti-Discrimination Law Review 2: 13–18.
Gerards, Janneke. 2007. Discrimination Grounds. In Cases, Materials, and Text on National, Supranational and International Non-discrimination Law, ed. Dagmar Schiek, Lisa Waddington, and Mark Bell, 33–184. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
Halberstam, Daniel. 2012. Local, Global and Plural Constitutionalism: Europe Meets the World. In The Worlds of European Constitutionalism, ed. Gráinne de Búrca and J.H.H. Weiler, 150–202. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ingolf, Albert. 2015. Die verfassungsrechtliche Identität der Bundesrepublik Deutschland – Karriere – Konzept – Kritik. Archiv des öffentlichen Rechts 140: 1–30.
Jacobsohn, Gary Jeffrey. 2006. Constitutional Identity. The Review of Politics 68: 361–397.
Krisch, Nico. 2012. The Case for Pluralism in Postnational Law. In The Worlds of European Constitutionalism, ed. Gráinne de Búrca and J.H.H. Weiler, 203–261. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lenaerts, Koen. 1991. L’égalité de traitement en droit communautaire: un principe unique aux apparences multiples. Cahiers de droit européen 27: 3–41.
Ludwigs, Markus, and Patrick Sikora. 2018. Der Vorrang des Unionsrechts unter Kontrollvorbehalt des BVerfG. Europäisches Wirtshafts- und Steuerrecht 3: 121–130.
Manasyan, Anahit. 2018. The Idea of Constitutional Identity in the Modern Constitutional Law. Pravo. Zhurnal Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki 3: 81–89. https://doi.org/10.17323/2072-8166.2018.3.81.98.
Martins, Ana Maria Guerra. 2000. A natureza jurídica da revisão do Tratado da União Europeia. Lisbon: Lex.
———. 2010. A igualdade e a não discriminação dos nacionais de Estados terceiros legalmente residentes na União Europeia – da origem na integração económica ao fundamento na dignidade do ser humano. Coimbra: Almedina.
———. 2011. Os fundamentos axiológicos da União Europeia após o Tratado de Lisboa. Um estudo sobre o artigo 2.° TUE. In A União Europeia segundo o Tratado de Lisboa – Aspectos centrais, ed. Nuno Piçarra, 47–79. Coimbra: Almedina.
———. 2016. Opinion 2/13 of the Court of Justice in the Context of Multilevel Protection of Fundamental Rights and Multilevel Constitutionalism. Zeitschrift für öffentliches Recht/Journal of Public Law 71: 27–57.
———. 2017. Manual de Direito da União Europeia. 2nd ed. Coimbra: Almedina.
Neves, Marcelo. 2009. Transconstitucionalismo. São Paulo: Editora WMF Martins Fontes Lda.
Nielsen, Ruth. 2008. Is European Union Equality Law Capable of Addressing Multiple and Intersectional Discrimination yet? Precautions against neglecting intersectional cases. In European Union Non-discrimination Law – Comparative Perspectives on Multidimensional Equality Law, ed. Dagmar Schiek and Victoria Chege, 31–51. London: Routledge-Cavendish.
Pernice, Ingolf. 1999. Multilevel Constitutionalism and the Treaty of Amsterdam: European Constitution-Making Revisited? Common Market Law Review 36: 703–750.
———. 2002. Multilevel Constitutionalism in the European Union. European Law Review 27: 511–529.
———. 2009. The Treaty of Lisbon: Multilevel Constitutionalism in Action. Columbia Journal of European Law 15: 349–407.
———. 2011. Motor or Brake for European Policies? Germany’s New Role in the EU after Lisbon-Judgment of its Federal Constitutional Court. In Europe’s Constitutional Challenges in the light of the Recent Case Law of National Constitutional Court, ed. José Maria Beneyto and Ingolf Pernice, 355–390. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
———. 2015. Multilevel Constitutionalism and the Crisis of Democracy in Europe. European Constitutional Law Review 11: 541–562.
Pliakos, Asteris, and Georgias Anagnastaras. 2017. Saving Face? The German Federal Constitutional Court Decides Gauweiler. German Law Journal 18: 213–232.
Poiares Maduro, Miguel. 2006. A Constituição Plural – Constitucionalismo e União Europeia. Lisbon: Principia.
Polzin, Monika. 2017. Constitutional Identity as a Constructed Reality and a Restless Soul. German Law Journal 18: 1596–1616.
Rosenfeld, Michel. 2012. Constitutional Identity. In The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law, ed. Michel Rosenfeld and András Sajó, 756–775. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Schiek, Dagmar. 2008. From European Union Non-discrimination Law Towards Multidimensional Equality Law for Europe. In European Union Non-discrimination Law – Comparative Perspectives on Multidimensional Equality Law, ed. Dagmar Schiek and Victoria Chege. London: Routledge-Cavendish.
Thym, Daniel. 2009. In the Name of Sovereign Statehood: A Critical Introduction to the Lisbon Judgment of the German Constitutional Court. Common Market Law Review 46: 1795–1822.
Van der Schyff, Gerhard. 2016. EU Member State Constitutional Identity: A Comparison of Germany and Netherlands as Polar Opposites. ZaöRV 76: 167–191.
Von Bogdandy, Armin, and Stephan Schill. 2011. Overcome Absolute Primacy. Respect for National Identities Under the Treaty of Lisbon. Common Market Law Review 45: 147–1454.
Walker, Neil. 2012. Constitutionalism and Pluralism in Global Context. In The Worlds of European Constitutionalism, ed. Gráinne de Búrca and J.H.H. Weiler, 57–104. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Walter, Maja. 2012. Integrationsgrenze Verfassungsidentität – Konzept und Kontrolle aus europäischer, deutscher und französischer Perspektive. ZäoRV 72: 177–200.
Weiler, J.H.H. 2012. Prologue: Global and Pluralist Constitutionalism – Some Doubts. In The Worlds of European Constitutionalism, ed. Gráinne de Búrca and J.H.H. Weiler, 8–18. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Guerra Martins, A.M. (2020). Equality and Non-Discrimination as an Integral Part of the EU Constitutional Identity. In: Giegerich, T. (eds) The European Union as Protector and Promoter of Equality. European Union and its Neighbours in a Globalized World, vol 1. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43764-0_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43764-0_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-43763-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-43764-0
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)