Skip to main content

Making Antidiscrimination Law Effective: Burden of Proof, Remedies and Sanctions in Discrimination Cases

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The European Union as Protector and Promoter of Equality

Part of the book series: European Union and its Neighbours in a Globalized World ((EUNGW,volume 1))

Abstract

The anti-discrimination law regime of the European Union has stimulated the setting-up or improvements of legislation and institutional protection against discrimination at the level of the Member States. While academic debate is mostly focussing on the material part of regulations and if they are sufficient, those affected by discrimination are rather confronted with problems accessing justice. Most cases remain unreported due to a lack of knowledge but also because the investment of bringing a case to court is likely not to be paid back. The EU Anti-Discrimination Directives require Member States to lower the burden of proof and to provide for effective, proportionate and dissuasive sanctions. Legal practise of courts and other bodies in charge of deciding in discrimination cases, like specialised tribunals, labour inspectorates, administrative authorities or equality bodies shows that the sanction regimes are implemented rather hesitantly. Effectiveness of the sanctions regimes in discrimination cases is furthermore impeded by difficulties in accessing justice first hand and in the widespread lack of enforcement mechanisms once a sanction is there. In order to improve the effectiveness of anti-discrimination law, there is a need of focussing on the perspective of the person or group affected, stimulate a change in attitude at the side of those proceeding a case towards more acceptance of the procedural rules and more creativity, when it comes to the choice of sanctions. Strategic litigation has been a valuable tool in moving further on the path to more effectiveness.

Most of the information provided originate from a study on sanctions and remedies in discrimination cases the author has conducted for Equinet, the network of European equality bodies, and another one on access to justice in discrimination cases for the Fundamental Rights Agency of the European Union (FRA) the author has contributed to.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    FRA (2010).

  2. 2.

    FRA (2014).

  3. 3.

    FRA (2017).

  4. 4.

    FRA (2010).

  5. 5.

    FRA (2017).

  6. 6.

    FRA (2012).

  7. 7.

    Case 54/07, Centrum voor gelijkheid van kansen en voor racismebestrijding v Firma Feryn NV (ECJ 10 July 2008).

  8. 8.

    Racial Equality Directive (Article 8), Employment Equality Directive (Article 10), the Goods and Services Directive (Article 9) and the Recast Gender Directive (Article 19).

  9. 9.

    Case 127/92, Enderby v Frenchay Health Authority (ECJ 27 October 1993), ECR I-5535.

  10. 10.

    Case 81/12, Asociaţia Accept v Consiliul Naţional pentru Combaterea Discriminării (ECJ 25 April 2013).

  11. 11.

    Cohen (2004).

  12. 12.

    Ammer et al. (2010), p. 96.

  13. 13.

    Milieu (2011), p. 39.

  14. 14.

    FRA (2012).

  15. 15.

    FRA (2012), p. 45.

  16. 16.

    Jordache and Ionescu (2014).

  17. 17.

    Appl. no. 67336/01, Danilenkov and Others v Russia (ECtHR, Chamber Judgment 30.09.2009).

  18. 18.

    Case 14/83, Sabine von Colson and Elisabeth Kamann v Land Nordrhein-Westfalen (ECJ 10 April 1984).

  19. 19.

    Case 81/12, Asociaţia Accept v Consiliul Naţional pentru Combaterea Discriminării (ECJ 25 April 2013).

  20. 20.

    Case 177/88, Elisabeth Johanna Pacifica Dekker v Stichting Vormingscentrum voor Jong Volwassenen (VJV-Centrum) Plus (ECJ 8 November 1990).

  21. 21.

    Case C-407/14, María Auxiliadora Arjona Camacho v Securitas Seguridad España, S.A. (ECJ (Fourth Chamber) 17 December 2015).

  22. 22.

    Case C-271/91, M. Helen Marshall v Southampton and South-West Hampshire Area Health Authority (ECJ 2 August 1993).

  23. 23.

    Case C-180/95, Nils Draehmpaehl v Urania Immobilienservice OHG (ECJ 22 April 1997).

  24. 24.

    Council Direktive 2006/54/EC on the implementation of the principle of equal opportunities and equal treatment of men and women in matters of employment and occupation (recast), OJ L 204/23 (2006).

  25. 25.

    Case 177/88, Elisabeth Johanna Pacifica Dekker v Stichting Vormingscentrum voor Jong Volwassenen (VJV-Centrum) Plus (ECJ 8 November 1990).

  26. 26.

    Case 54/07, Centrum voor gelijkheid van kansen en voor racismebestrijding v Firma Feryn NV (ECJ 10 July 2008).

  27. 27.

    Appl. no. 38285/09, García Mateos v Spain (ECtHR Judgment 19 February 2013).

  28. 28.

    Mostly FRA (2012), p. 46.

  29. 29.

    Wladasch (2015).

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katrin Wladasch .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Wladasch, K. (2020). Making Antidiscrimination Law Effective: Burden of Proof, Remedies and Sanctions in Discrimination Cases. In: Giegerich, T. (eds) The European Union as Protector and Promoter of Equality. European Union and its Neighbours in a Globalized World, vol 1. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43764-0_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43764-0_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-43763-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-43764-0

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics