Skip to main content

Socially Assistive Robots in the Aging Population: End Users’ Involvement on Their Development Process

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Gerontechnology (IWoG 2019)

Abstract

There is an urgent need for efficient solutions that can promote healthy aging, with quality of life and well-being. Technological solutions might be strong allies in the promotion of active aging, to allow for the older adult to adapt and fulfill daily living activities at home. When applying technology to healthcare, particularly in the older population, socially assistive robots are found to be an important emerging research topic, being promising in preventing diseases related to aging and frailty, contributing to healthy aging. Human-centered design appears as a methodology to involve the user in the development process. Unfortunately, in the revision we made, only in few robots’ development, the authors reported the involvement of end users in the process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Population Reference Bureau: 2010 World population data sheet (2010). http://www.prb.org/pdf10/10wpds_fr.pdf

  2. Statistics National Institute: Projecções da população residente em Portugal 2008–2060 (Projections about the population living in Portugal 2008–2060) (2009). http://www.ine.pt/xpotal/xmain?xpid=INE&xpgid=inedestaques&DESTAQUESdest_boui=65573359&DESTAQUESmodo=2

  3. Statistics National Institute: Censos 2011 (2012). http://censos.ine.pt/xportal/xmain?xpid=CENSOS&xpgid=censos2011_apresentacao

  4. World Health Organization: World Report on Ageing and Health. WHO, Geneve (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  5. United Nations: World Population Prospects (2015). https://esa.un.org/unpd/wpp/Publications/Files/WPP2015_Volume-I_Comprehensive-Tables.pdf

  6. World Health Organization: Active Aging: A Policy Framework. WHO, Geneve (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Anderson, E.: Cognitive change in old age. In: Jacoby, R., Oppenheimer, C., Dening, T., Thomas, A. (eds.) Oxford Textbook of Old Age Psychiatry, pp. 33–50. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Millán-Calenti, J.C., Tubío, J., Pita-Fernández, S., Rochette, S., Lorenzo, T., Maseda, A.: Cognitive impairment as predictor of functional dependence in an elderly sample. Arch. Gerontol. Geriatr. 54, 197–201 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Razani, J., et al.: Patterns of deficits in daily functioning and cognitive performance of patients with Alzheimer disease. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry Neurol. 24(1), 23–32 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lindgren, B.: The Rise in Life Expectancy, Health Trends among the Elderly, and the Demand for Health and Social Care, pp. 1–38 (2016). National Institute of Economic Research, Lund. https://www.konj.se/download/18.45f4dff21532e40aa884dc49/1456823350974/Working-paper-142-The-rise-in-Life%20Expectancy-health-trends-among-the-elderly-and-the-demand-for-health-and-social-care.pdf

  11. Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs of the European Commission: The 2018 Ageing Report: Economic & Budgetary Projections for the 28 EU Member States (2016–2070), pp. 1–406 (2018). Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg. https://doi.org/10.2765/615631

  12. Oliveira, C.R., Rosa, M.S., Pinto, A.M., Botelho, M.A., Morais, A., Veríssimo, M.T.: Estudo do perfil do envelhecimento da população portuguesa; Coimbra; Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Coimbra, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Eurotrials scientific consultants, Programa operacional saúde XXI, Alto Comissariado da Saúde, Ministério da Saúde (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sousa, L.B.: Abordagem funcional na determinação da capacidade financeira e testamentária: Linhas orientadoras e desenvolvimento de instrumentos de avaliação (Functional approach in financial and testamentary capacity: Guidelines and development of assessment instruments). Tese de doutoramento apresentada à Faculdade de Psicologia e de Ciências da Educação da Universidade de Coimbra (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Spruytte, N., Audenhove, C., Lammertyn, F., Storms, G.: The quality of the caregiving relationship in informal care for older adults with dementia and chronic psychiatric patients. Psychol. Psychother. Theor Res. Pract. 75(3), 295–311 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1348/147608302320365208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gil, I., Costa, P., Parola, V., Cardoso, D., Almeida, M., Apóstolo, J.: Efficacy of reminiscence in cognition, depressive symptoms and quality of life in institutionalized elderly: a systematic review. Rev. Esc. Enferm. USP 53, e03458 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1590/S1980-220X2018007403458

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Luppa, M., Luck, T., Weyerer, S., Konig, H., Brahler, E., Riedel-Heller, S.: Prediction of institutionalization in the elderly. Syst. Rev. Age Ageing 39(1), 31–38 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afp202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Broekens, J., Heerink, M., Rosendal, H.: Assistive social robots in elderly care: a review. Gerontechnology 8(2), 94–103 (2009). https://doi.org/10.4017/gt.2009.08.02.002.00

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bemelmans, R., Gelderblom, G.J., Jonker, P., Witte, L.: The potential of socially assistive robotics in care for elderly, a systematic review. Soc. Inform. Telecommun. Eng. 59, 83–89 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Vandemeulebroucke, T., de Casterlé, B.D., Gastmans, C.: How older adults experience and perceive socially assistive robots in aged care: a systematic review of qualitative evidence. Aging Mental Health 22(2), 149–167 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Abdi, J., Al-Hindawi, A., Ng, T., Vizcaychipi, M.P.: Scoping review on the use of socially assistive robot technology in elderly care. BMJ Open 8, e018815 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kachouie, R., Sedighadeli, S., Khosla, R., Chu, M.: Socially assistive robots in elderly care: a mixed-method systematic literature review. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 30, 369–393 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2013.873278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bemelmans, R., Gelderblom, G.J., Jonker, P., Witte, L.: Social assistive robots in elderly care: a systematic review into effects and effectiveness. JAMDA 13, 114–120 (2012)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Robinson, H., MacDonald, B., Broadbent, E.: The role of healthcare robots for older people at home: a review. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 6, 575–591 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wu, Y., Fassert, C., Rigaud, A.: Designing robots for the elderly: appearance issue and beyond. Arch. Gerontol. Geriatr. 54, 121–126 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2011.02.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Pollack, M.E.: Intelligent technology for an aging population: the use of AI to assist elders with cognitive impairment. AI Mag. 26, 9–24 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Mordoch, E., Osterreicher, A., Guse, L., Roger, K., Thompson, G.: Use of social commitment robots in the care of elderly people with dementia: a literature review. Maturitas 74, 14–20 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Noury, N.: AILISA: experimental platforms to evaluate remote care and assistive technologies in gerontology. In: Proceedings of 7th International Workshop on Enterprise networking and Computing in Healthcare Industry 2005, HEALTHCOM 2005, Busan, South Korea, pp. 67–72 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1109/health.2005.1500395

  28. Dario, P., Guglielmelli, E., Laschi, C., Teti, G.: MOVAID: a personal robot in everyday life of disabled and elderly people. Technol. Disabil. 10(1999), 77–93 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Gross, H. et al.: Progress in developing a socially assistive mobile home robot companion for the elderly with mild cognitive impairment. In: IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, San Francisco, CA, pp. 2430–2437 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1109/iros.2011.6094770

  30. Fujita, M.: AIBO: toward the era of digital creatures. Int. J. Robot. Res. 20(10), 781–794 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1177/02783640122068092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Tapus, A.: The role of the physical embodiment of a music therapist robot for individuals with cognitive impairments: longitudinal study. In: Virtual Rehabilitation International Conference, Haifa, p. 203 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICVR.2009.5174241

  32. Graf, B., Hans, M., Schraft, R.D.: Auton. Robot. 16, 193 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:AURO.0000016865.35796.e9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Tan, Y.K., et al.: Evaluation of the pet robot CuDDler using godspeed questionnaire. In: Biswas, J., Kobayashi, H., Wong, L., Abdulrazak, B., Mokhtari, M. (eds.) ICOST 2013. LNCS, vol. 7910, pp. 102–109. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39470-6_13

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  34. Jayawardena, C., Kuo, I., Broadbent, E., MacDonald, B.A.: Socially assistive robot HealthBot: design, implementation, and field trials. IEEE Syst. J. 10(3), 1056–1067 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/JSYST.2014.2337882

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Kriglstein, S., Wallner, G.: HOMIE: an artificial companion for elderly people. In: Extended Abstracts of CHI 2005 (2005). http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1056808.1057106

  36. Stiehl, W.D., Lieberman, J., Breazeal, C., Basel, L., Lalla, L., Wolf, M.: Design of a therapeutic robotic companion for relational, affective touch. In: IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, ROMAN 2005, Nashville, TN, USA, pp. 408–415 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2005.1513813

  37. Breemen, A.J., Yan, X., Meerbeek, B.: iCat: an animated user-interface robot with personality. In: AAMAS (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Kanoh, M., Iwata, S., Kato, S., Itoh, H.: Emotive facial expressions of sensitivity communication robot “IFBOT”. Kansei Eng. Int. 5, 35–42 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Granata, C., Pino, M., Legouverneur, G., Vidal, J.S., Bidaud, P., Rigaud, A.S.: Robot services for elderly with cognitive impairment: testing usability of graphical user interfaces. Technol. Health Care 21(3), 217–231 (2013). https://doi.org/10.3233/THC-130718. PubMed PMID: 23792795

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Klamer, T., Allouch, S.B.: Acceptance and use of a social robot by elderly users in a domestic environment. In: 4th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare, Munich, pp. 1–8 (2010). https://doi.org/10.4108/icst.pervasivehealth2010.8892

  41. Libin, A., Cohen-Mansfield, J.: Therapeutic robocat for nursing home residents with dementia: preliminary inquiry. Am. J. Alzheimers Dis. Other Demen. 19(2), 111–116 (2004). PubMed PMID: 15106392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Khosla, A., Raju, A.S., Torralba, A., Oliva, A.: Understanding and predicting image memorability at a large scale. In: IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), Santiago, pp. 2390–2398 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/iccv.2015.275

  43. Wada, K., Shibata, T., Saito, T., Tanie, K.: Effects of robot assisted activity to elderly people who stay at a health service facility for the aged. In: Proceedings 2003 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2003) (Cat. No. 03CH37453), Las Vegas, NV, USA, vol. 3, pp. 2847–2852 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1109/iros.2003.1249302

  44. Pollack, M.E., et al.: Pearl: a mobile robotic assistant for the elderly. In: AAAI Workshop on Automation as Eldercare, August 2002

    Google Scholar 

  45. Onishi, M., Luo, Z., Odashima, T., Hirano, S., Tahara, K., Mukai, T.: Generation of human care behaviors by human-interactive robot RI-MAN. In: Proceedings 2007 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Roma, pp. 3128–3129 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1109/robot.2007.363950

  46. Bahadori, S., et al.: RoboCare: an integrated robotic system for the domestic care of the elderly (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H., Ono, T., Imai, M., Nakatsu, R.: Development and evaluation of an interactive humanoid robot “Robovie”. In: Proceedings 2002 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.02CH37292), Washington, DC, USA, vol. 2, pp. 1848–1855 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1109/robot.2002.1014810

  48. Dupourqué, V.: RobuLAB10, a service robot designed to aging-in-place. Gerontechnology 8(3), 183 (2009). https://doi.org/10.4017/gt.2009.08.03.009.00

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Yamamoto, H., Miyazaki, H., Tsuzuki, T., Kojima, Y.: A spoken dialogue robot, named wonder, to aid senior citizens who living alone with communication. J. Robot. Mechatron. 14(1), 54–59 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Wada, K., Shibata, T., Saito, T., Tanie, K.: Effects of robot-assisted activity for elderly people and nurses at a day center. Proc. IEEE 11, 780–788 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  51. International Organization for Standardization: ISO 13407: Human-centered design processes for interactive systems. Geneva, Switzerland (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  52. International Organization for Standardization: ISO 9241-11: Ergonomics of human-system interaction – Part 11: Usability: Definitions and concepts. Geneva, Switzerland (1998)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Health Sciences Research Unit: Nursing (UICISA: E), Nursing School of Coimbra for all the support. The authors PSC (SFRH/BD/136487/2018) and IAM (SFRH/BD/136973/2018) would like to thank the Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (FCT) for the financial support granted through the 2018 Ph.D. Scholarship program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Liliana B. Sousa .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Sousa, L.B. et al. (2020). Socially Assistive Robots in the Aging Population: End Users’ Involvement on Their Development Process. In: García-Alonso, J., Fonseca, C. (eds) Gerontechnology. IWoG 2019. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1185. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41494-8_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41494-8_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-41493-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-41494-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics