Abstract
This research aims to increase the vision of strategic knowledge management through collaboration in high education institutions. Data was obtained from online MBA students. A total of 165 students from five countries responded to a survey. The technique used was structural equation modeling (SEM). This chapter discusses the concept of collaboration climate in online studies. The results indicate that social interaction (i.e., online collaborative learning) is positively related to knowledge management. Further, the results suggest that knowledge management processes are positively related to collaboration climate. In addition, the effect of online knowledge platform on knowledge generated is positively moderated by knowledge management processes and online collaborative learning. We suggest that online collaborative learning and knowledge management processes are two of the major factors influencing the effectiveness of learning and, in turn, the knowledge generated.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ardichvili, A., et al. (2006). Cultural influences on knowledge sharing through online communities of practice. Journal of Knowledge Management, 10(1), 94–107. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270610650139.
Argote, L., & Ingram, P. (2000). Knowledge transfer: A basis for competitive advantage in firms. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82(1), 150–169. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2000.2893.
Besbes, R. (2016). Learning effectiveness enhancement project “LEEP”. In J. Zhang et al. (Eds.), ICT in education in global context: The best practices in K-12 schools (pp. 71–82). Springer: Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0373-8_5.
Bruffee, K. A. (1993). Collaborative learning: Higher education, interdependence, and the authority of knowledge. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Curtis, D. D., & Lawson, M. J. (2001). Exploring collaborative online learning. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(1), 21–34.
Davies, J., & Graff, M. (2005). Performance in e-learning: Online participation and student grades. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(4), 657–663.
Dillenbourg, P., Baker, M. J., & Malley, C. O. (2007). The evolution of research on collaborative learning.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.
Garcia, C., & Badia, A. (2017, February). Information problem-solving skills in small virtual groups and learning outcomes. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 33(4), 382–392. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12187.
Hair, J. F., et al. (2017). Mirror, mirror on the wall: A comparative evaluation of composite-based structural equation modeling methods. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 45(5), 616–632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-017-0517-x.
Hall, P. (2005). Interprofessional teamwork: Professional cultures as barriers. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 19(sup1), 188–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820500081745.
Hannafin, M. J., & Land, S. M. (1997). The foundations and assumptions of technology-enhanced student-centered learning environments. Instructional Science, 25(3), 167–202. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1002997414652.
Hayes, A. F., & Scharkow, M. (2013). The relative trustworthiness of inferential tests of the indirect effect in statistical mediation analysis: Does method really matter? Psychological Science, 24(10), 1918–1927. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613480187.
Henseler, J. (2017). Bridging design and behavioral research with variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of Advertising, 46(1), 178–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2017.1281780.
Henseler, J., Ringle, C., & Sinkovics, R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. In C. M. Ringle, R. R. Sinkovics, & P. N. Ghauri (Eds.), New Challenges to International Marketing (Vol. 20, pp. 277–319). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1474-7979(2009)0000020014.
Henseler, J., Hubona, G., & Ray, P. A. (2016). Using PLS path modeling in new technology research: Updated guidelines. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 116(1), 2–20. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-09-2015-0382.
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8.
Henseler, J., et al. (2014). Common beliefs and reality about PLS. Organizational Research Methods, 17(2), 182–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114526928.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118.
Ingleby, E., et al. (2012) Research methods in education, professional development in education. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8527.2007.00388_4.x.
Inkpen, A. C., & Dinur, A. (1998). Knowledge management processes and international joint ventures. Organization Science, 9(4), 454–468. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.9.4.454.
Jie, H., Johri, A., & Lohani, V. (2017). Computers & education analytics and patterns of knowledge creation: Experts at work in an online engineering community. Computers & Education, 112, 18–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.04.011.
Liao, S.-H., & Wu, C. (2009). System perspective of knowledge management, organizational learning, and organizational innovation. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(2), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.06.109.
Mackay, D., & Burt, G. (2015). Strategic learning, foresight and hyperopia. Management Learning, 46(5), 546–564. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507614549120.
McAlpine, I. (2000). Collaborative learning online. Distance Education, 21(1), 66–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158791000210105.
McBrien, J. L., Jones, P., & Cheng, R. (2009). Virtual spaces: Employing a synchronous online classroom to facilitate student engagement in online learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10(3), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v10i3.605.
Nechita, E., & Timofti, I. C. (2011). Increasing independence versus increasing collaboration with ICT support. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 29, 1508–1517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.391.
Neuhauser, C. (2002). Learning style and effectiveness of online and face-to-face instruction. American Journal of Distance Education, 16(2), 99–113. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15389286AJDE1602_4.
Ni, A. Y. (2013). Comparing the effectiveness of classroom and online learning: Teaching research methods. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 19(2), 199–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/15236803.2013.12001730.
Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14–37. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.5.1.14.
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nonaka, I., & Toyama, R. (2003). The knowledge-creating theory revisited: Knowledge creation as a synthesizing process. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 1, 2–10. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.kmrp.8500001.
Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
OECD. (2016). PISA 2015 assessment and analytical framework: Science, reading, mathematic and financial literacy. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Omotayo, F. O. (2015). Knowledge management as an important tool in organisational management: A review of literature. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-Journal)., 1238, 1–23.
Palloff, R., & Pratt, K. (1999). Building learning communities in cyberspace: Effective strategies for the online classroom. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Reeves, T. C., Herrington, J., & Oliver, R. (2004). A Development Research Agenda for Online Collaborative Learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(4), 53–65.
Richmond, V. P., Gorham, J. S., & Mccroskey, J. C. (1987). The relationship between selected immediacy behaviors and cognitive learning. Annals of the International Communication Association, 10(1), 574–590. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.1987.11678663.
Richter, N. F., et al. (2016). European management research using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). European Management Journal, 34(6), 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2016.08.001.
Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Becker, J.-M. (2015). SmartPLS 3. Boenningstedt: SmartPLS GmbH. Available from http://www.smartpls.com
Roberts, T. S., & McInnerney, J. M. (2007). Seven problems of online group learning (and their solutions). Educational Technology and Society, 10(4), 257–268. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2151-6952.1960.tb01699.x.
Rovai, A. P., & Barnum, K. T. (2003). On-line course effectiveness: An analysis of student interactions and perceptions of learning. Journal of Distance Education, 18(1), 57–73.
Smith, D., & Hardaker, G. (2000). e-Learning innovation through the implementation of an internet supported learning environment. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 3(3), 422–432.
Spender, J. C., & Grant, R. M. (1996). Knowledge and the firm: Overview. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 5–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250171103.
Su, A. Y. S., et al. (2010). A Web 2.0-based collaborative annotation system for enhancing knowledge sharing in collaborative learning environments. Computers & Education, 55(2), 752–766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.03.008.
Sveiby, K. E. (1997). The new organizational wealth. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
Sveiby, K. E., & Simons, R. (2006). Collaborative climate and effectiveness of knowledge work ± an empirical study. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270210450388
Swan, K. (2003). Learning effectiveness online: What the research tells us. Elements of Quality Online Education, Practice and Direction, 13–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2005.00519.x
Wang, L., et al. (2009). Assessing teamwork and collaboration in high school students. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 24(2), 108–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/0829573509335470.
Wild, R., Griggs, K., & Downing, T. (2002). A framework for e-learning as a tool for knowledge management. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 102(7), 371–380.
Wild, R. H., et al. (2006). A framework for e-learning as a tool for knowledge management. https://doi.org/10.1108/02635570210439463
Wright, R. (2015) Student-teacher interaction in online learning environments. In: R. D. Wright (Ed.), IGI Global (Advances in Educational Technologies and Instructional Design). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-6461-6
Xing, W., et al. (2015). Group learning assessment: Developing a theory-informed analytics. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 18(2), 110–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.09.034.
Zhu, C., & Engels, N. (2014). Organizational culture and instructional innovations in higher education: Perceptions and reactions of teachers and students. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 42(1), 136–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143213499253.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Martinez-Martinez, A., Cegarra-Navarro, J.G., Cepeda-Carrión, G., Martelo-Landroguez, S. (2020). A Collaboration Climate and Effectiveness of Knowledge Management. In: Bilgin, M., Danis, H., Demir, E., Aysan, A. (eds) Eurasian Business Perspectives. Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics, vol 13/2. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40160-3_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40160-3_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-40159-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-40160-3
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)