Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

How Songbird Females Sample Male Song: Communication Networks and Mate Choice

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Coding Strategies in Vertebrate Acoustic Communication

Part of the book series: Animal Signals and Communication ((ANISIGCOM,volume 7))

Abstract

The behavioural decisions animals take directly influence their fitness and thus have a fundamental impact on evolutionary processes. In many animals, acoustic signals play an important role in social decisions with mate choice being among the most apparent ones. Male bird song has played a key role along this line, yet the understanding of how female birds use song to prospect, assess and choose mates in their natural environment is surprisingly limited. A main reason for this limited understanding is that it is very difficult to follow a female during her prospecting and decision process and quantify her experience with different males before she makes a final decision. Here we integrate insights from communication networks, male song traits and female prospecting behaviour to stimulate a more integrative approach on the role of signalling in behavioural and reproductive decisions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alatalo RV, Glynn C, Lundberg A (1990) Singing rate and female attraction in the pied flycatcher: an experiment. Anim Behav 39:601–602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amrhein V, Kunc HP, Naguib M (2004) Non-territorial nightingales prospect territories during the dawn chorus. Proc R Soc B 271:S167–S169

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Amy M, Monbureau M, Durand C, Gomez D, Thery M, Leboucher G (2008) Female canary mate preferences: differential use of information from two types of male-male interaction. Anim Behav 76:971–982

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson M, Simmons LW (2006) Sexual selection and mate choice. Trends Ecol Evol 21:296–302

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ballentine B, Hyman J, Nowicki S (2004) Vocal performance influences female response to male bird song: an experimental test. Behav Ecol 15:163–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartsch C, Wenchel R, Kaiser A, Kipper S (2014) Singing onstage: female and male common nightingales eavesdrop on song type matching. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 68:1163–1171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bateson M, Healy SD (2005) Comparative evaluation and its implications for mate choice. Trends Ecol Evol 20:659–664

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beckers OM, Wagner WE (2011) Mate sampling strategy in a field cricket: evidence for a fixed threshold strategy with last chance option. Anim Behav 81:519–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bensch S, Hasselquist D (1992) Evidence for female choice in a polygynous warbler. Anim Behav 44:301–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bierbach D, Sassmannshausen V, Streit B, Arias-Rodriguez L, Plath M (2013) Females prefer males with superior fighting abilities but avoid sexually harassing winners when eavesdropping on male fights. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 67:675–683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bischoff LL, Tschirren B, Richner H (2009) Long-term effects of early parasite exposure on song duration and singing strategy in great tits. Behav Ecol 20:265–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blumenrath SH, Dabelsteen T (2004) Degradation of great tit (Parus major) song before and after foliation: implications for vocal communication in a deciduous forest. Behaviour 141:935–958

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blumenrath SH, Dabelsteen T, Pedersen SB (2007) Vocal neighbour-mate discrimination in female great tits despite high song similarity. Anim Behav 73:789–796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury JW, Vehrencamp SL (2011) Principles of animal communication. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenowitz EA (1982) The active space of red-swinged blackbird song. J Comp Physiol A 147:511–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brumm H, Naguib M (2009) Environmental acoustics and the evolution of bird song. Adv Study Behav 40:1–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan KL, Catchpole CK (1997) Female choice in the sedge warbler, Acrocephalus schoenobaenus: multiple cues from song and territory quality. Proc R Soc B 264:521–526

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan KL, Grindstaff JL, Pravosudov VV (2013) Condition dependence, developmental plasticity, and cognition: implications for ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol Evol 28:290–296

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Byers BE (2007) Extrapair paternity in chestnut-sided warblers is correlated with consistent vocal performance. Behav Ecol 18:130–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calder WA III (1990) The scaling of sound output and territory size: are they matched? Ecology 71:1810–1816

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catchpole CK, Slater PJB (2008) Bird song: biological themes and variation. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Celis-Murillo A, Benson TJ, Sosa-López JR, Ward MP (2016) Nocturnal songs in a diurnal passerine: attracting mates or repelling intruders? Anim Behav 118:105–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiver I, Stutchbury BJM, Morton ES (2008) Do male plumage and song characteristics influence female off-territory forays and paternity in the hooded warbler? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 62:1981–1990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dale S, Amundsen T, Lifjeld JT, Slagsvold T (1990) Mate sampling behaviour of female pied flycatchers: evidence for active mate choice. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 27:87–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalziell AH, Cockburn A (2008) Dawn song in superb fairy-wrens: a bird that seeks extrapair copulations during the dawn chorus. Anim Behav 75:489–500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darwin C (1859) On the origin of species by means of natural selection. Murray, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Deb R, Balakrishnan R (2014) The opportunity for sampling: the ecological context of female mate choice. Behav Ecol 24:967–974

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dechaume-Moncharmont FX, Freychet M, Montreuil S, Cezilly F (2013) Female mate choice in convict cichlids is transitive and consistent with a self-referent directional preference. Front Zool 10:69

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Doutrelant C, McGregor PK (2000) Eavesdropping and mate choice in female fighting fish. Behaviour 137:1655–1669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falls JB (1985) Song matching in western meadowlarks. Can J Zool 63:2520–2524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzsimmons LP, Foote JR, Ratcliffe LM, Mennill DJ (2008a) Eavesdropping and communication networks revealed through playback and an acoustic location system. Behav Ecol 19:824–829

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzsimmons LP, Foote JR, Ratcliffe LM, Mennill DJ (2008b) Frequency matching, overlapping and movement behaviour in diurnal countersinging interactions of black-capped chickadees. Anim Behav 75:1913–1920

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foote JR, Fitzsimmons LP, Mennill DJ, Ratcliffe LM (2008) Male chickadees match neighbors interactively at dawn: support for the social dynamics hypothesis. Behav Ecol 19:1192–1199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foote JR, Fithsimmons LP, Mennill DJ, Ratcliffe LM (2010) Black-capped chickadee dawn choruses are interactive communication networks. Behaviour 147:1219–1248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forstmeier W, Kempenaers B, Meyer A, Leisler B (2002) A novel song parameter correlates with extra-pair paternity and reflects male longevity. Proc R Soc B 269:1479–1485

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Garamszegi LZ (2004) Extrapair paternity and the evolution of bird song. Behav Ecol 15:508–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garamszegi LZ (2005) Bird song and parasites. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 59:167–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Fernandez V, Amy M, Lacroix A, Malacarne G, Leboucher G (2010) Eavesdropping on male singing interactions leads to differential allocation in eggs. Ethology 116:662–670

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson RM, Langen TA (1996) How do animals choose their mates? Trends Ecol Evol 11:468–469

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gil D, Gahr M (2002) The honesty of bird song: multiple constraints for multiple traits. Trends Ecol Evol 17:133–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasselquist D, Bensch S, vonSchantz T (1996) Correlation between male song repertoire, extra-pair paternity and offspring survival in the great reed warbler. Nature 381:229–232

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Holveck MJ, Riebel K (2007) Preferred songs predict preferred males: consistency and repeatability of zebra finch females across three test contexts. Anim Behav 74:297–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Honarmand M, Krause ET, Naguib M (2017) Implications of nutritional stress as nestling or fledgling on subsequent attractiveness and fecundity in zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata). PeerJ 5:33628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houtman AM (1992) Female zebra finches choose extra-pair copulations with genetically attractive males. Proc R Soc B 249:3–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janetos AC (1980) Strategies of female mate choice: a theoretical analysis. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 7:107–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jennions MD, Petrie M (1997) Variation in mate choice and mating preferences: a review of causes and consequences. Biol Rev 72:283–327

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kempenaers B, Verheyren GR, Dhondt AA (1997) Extrapair paternity in the blue tit (Parus caeruleus): female choice, male characteristics, and offspring quality. Behav Ecol 8:481–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick M, Rand AS, Ryan MJ (2006) Mate choice rules in animals. Anim Behav 71:1215–1225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunc HP, Amrhein V, Naguib M (2006) Vocal interactions in nightingales (Luscinia megarhynchos): more aggressive males have higher pairing success. Anim Behav 72:25–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunc HP, Amrhein V, Naguib M (2007) Vocal interactions in common nightingales (Luscinia megarhynchos): males take it easy after pairing. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 61:557–563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lea AM, Ryan MJ (2015) Irrationality in mate choice revealed by túngara frogs. Science 349:964–966

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leboucher G, Pallot K (2004) Is he all he says? Intersexual eavesdropping in the domestic canary, Serinus canaria. Anim Behav 68:957–963

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leboucher G, Vallet E, Nagle L, Béguin N, Bovet D, Hallé F, Draganoiu TI, Amy M, Kreutzer M (2012) Studying female reproductive activities in relation to male song: the domestic canary as a model. Adv Study Behav 44:183–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu WC (2004) The effect of neighbours and females on dawn and daytime singing behaviours by male chipping sparrows. Anim Behav 68:39–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGregor PK (2005) Communication networks. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • McGregor PK, Dabelsteen T (1996) Communication networks. In: Kroodsma DE, Miller EH (eds) Ecology and evolution of acoustic communication in birds. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, pp 409–425

    Google Scholar 

  • McGregor PK, Peake TM (2000) Communication networks: social environments for receiving and signalling behaviour. Acta Etol 2:71–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Mennill DJ, Ratcliffe LM, Boag PT (2002) Female eavesdropping on male song contests in songbirds. Science 296:873

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mennill DJ, Boag PT, Ratcliffe LM (2003) The reproductive choices of eavesdropping female black-capped chickadees, Poecile atricapillus. Naturwissenschaften 90:577–582

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Møller AP, Saino N, Taramino G, Galeotti P, Ferrario S (1998) Paternity and multiple signaling: effects of a secondary sexual character and song on paternity in the barn swallow. Am Nat 151:236–242

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy CG, Gerhardt HC (2002) Mate sampling by female barking treefrogs (Hyla gratiosa). Behav Ecol 13:472–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naguib M (2005) Singing interactions in song birds: implications for social relations, territoriality and territorial settlement. In: McGregor PK (ed) Communication networks. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 300–319

    Google Scholar 

  • Naguib M, Mennill D (2010) The signal value of bird song: empirical evidence suggests song overlapping is a signal. Anim Behav 80:e11–e15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naguib M, Riebel K (2014) Singing in space and time: the biology of birdsong. In: Witzany G (ed) Biocommunication of animals. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 233–247

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Naguib M, Amrhein V, Kunc HP (2004) Effects of territorial intrusions on eavesdropping neighbors: communication networks in nightingales. Behav Ecol 6:1011–1015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naguib M, Schmidt R, Sprau P, Roth T, Floercke C, Amrhein V (2008) The ecology of vocal signaling: male spacing and communication distance of different song traits in nightingales. Behav Ecol 19:1034–1040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naguib M, Kunc HP, Sprau P, Roth T, Amrhein V (2011) Communication networks and spatial ecology in nightingales. Adv Study Behav 43:239–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nemeth E, Kempenaers B, Matessi G, Brumm H (2012) Rock sparrow song reflects male age and reproductive success. PLoS One 7:e43259

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Neudorf DL, Pitcher TE (1997) Radio transmitters do not affect nestling feeding rats by female hooded warblers. J Field Ornithol 68:64–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Ophir AG, Galef BG Jr (2003) Female Japanese quail that “eavesdrop” on fighting males prefer losers to winners. Anim Behav 65:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Otte D (1974) Effects and functions in the evolution of signaling systems. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 5:385–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Otter K, Ratcliffe LM (2005) Enlightened decisions: female assessment and communication networks. In: McGregor PK (ed) Animal communication networks. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 133–151

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Otter K, Chruszcz B, Ratcliffe L (1997) Honest advertisement and song output during the dawn chorus of black-capped chickadees. Behav Ecol 8:167–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Otter K, McGregor PK, Terry AMR, Burford FRL, Peake TM, Dabelsteen T (1999) Do female great tits (Parus major) assess males by eavesdropping? A field study using interactive song playback. Proc R Soc B 266:1305–1309

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Otter KA, Stewart IRK, McGregor PK, Terry AMR, Dabelsteen T, Burke T (2001) Extra-pair paternity among great tits Parus major following manipulation of male signals. J Avian Biol 32:338–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peake TM (2005) Communication networks. In: McGregor PK (ed) Animal communication networks. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Peake TM, Terry AMR, McGregor PK, Dabelsteen T (2002) Do great tits assess rivals by combining direct experience with information gathered by eavesdropping? Proc R Soc B 269:925–1929

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pepperberg IM (2005) Cognitive aspects of networks and avian capacities. In: McGregor PK (ed) Animal communication networks. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 568–582

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Poesel A, Dabelsteen T, Pedersen SB (2004) Dawn song of male blue tits as a predictor of competitiveness in midmorning singing interactions. Acta Ethol 6:65–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poesel A, Dabelsteen T, Pedersen SB (2007) Implications of conspecific background noise for features of blue tit, Cyanistes caeruleus, communication networks at dawn. J Ornithol 148:123–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radesäter T, Jakobsson S, Andbjer N, Bylin A, Nyström K (1987) Song rate and pair formation in the willow warbler, Phylloscopus trochilus. Anim Behav 35:1645–1651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramsay SM, Otter KA, Ratcliffe LM (1999) Nest-site selection by female black-capped chickadees: settlement based on conspecific attraction? Auk 116:604–617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Real L (1991) Search theory and mate choice. II. Mutual interaction, assortative mating, and equilibrium variation in male and female fitness. Am Nat 138:901–917

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riebel K (2009) Song and female mate choice in zebra finches: a review. Adv Study Behav 40:197–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riebel K, Naguib M, Gil D (2009) Experimental manipulation of the rearing environment influences adult female zebra finch song preferences. Anim Behav 78:1397–1404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rivera-Gutierrez HF, Pinxten R, Eens M (2010) Multiple signals for multiple messages: great tit, Parus major, song signals age and survival. Anim Behav 80:451–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez RL, Boughman JW, Gray DA, Hebets EA, Höbel G, Symes LB (2013) Diversification under sexual selection: the relative roles of mate preference strength and the degree of divergence in mate preferences. Ecol Lett 16:964–974

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal GG (2017) Mate choice: the evolution of sexual decision making from microbes to humans. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Roth T, Sprau P, Schmidt R, Naguib M, Amrhein V (2009) Sex-specific timing of mate searching and territory prospecting in the nightingale: nocturnal life of females. Proc R Soc B 276:2045–2050

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan MJ, Tuttle MD, Taft LK (1981) The costs and benefits of frog chorusing behaviour. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 8:273–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saether SA (2002) Female calls in lek-mating birds: indirect mate choice, female competition for mates or direct mate choice? Behav Ecol 13:344–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saino N, Galeotti P, Sacchi R, Møller AP (1997) Song and immunological condition in male barn swallows (Hirundo rustica). Behav Ecol 8:364–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt R, Kunc HP, Amrhein V, Naguib M (2006) Responses to interactive playback predict future mating status in nightingales. Anim Behav 72:1355–1362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Searcy WA, Beecher MD (2009) Song as an aggressive signal in songbirds. Anim Behav 78:1281–1292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Searcy WA, Yaukawa K (1996) Song and female choice. In: Kroodsma DE, Miller EH (eds) Ecology and evolution of acoustic communication in birds. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, pp 454–473

    Google Scholar 

  • Snijders L, van der Eijk J, van Rooij EP, de Goede P, van Oers K, Naguib M (2015a) Song trait similarity in great tits varies with social structure. PLoS One 10:e0116881

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Snijders L, van Rooij E, Henskens M, van Oers K, Naguib M (2015b) Dawn song predicts behaviour during territory conflicts in personality-typed great tits. Anim Behav 109:45–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snijders L, van Oers K, Naguib M (2017) Sex-specific responses to territory intrusions in a communication network: evidence from radio-tagged great tits. Ecol Evol 7(3):918–927

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sprau P, Roth T, Amrhein V, Naguib M (2013) The predictive value of trill performance in a large repertoire songbird, the nightingale Luscinia megarhynchos. J Avian Biol 44:567–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tobias JA, Seddon N (2002) Female begging in European robins: do neighbors eavesdrop for extrapair copulations? Behav Ecol 13:637–642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Todt D (1981) On functions of vocal matching: effects of counter-replies on song post choice and singing. Z Tierpsychol 57:73–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Todt D, Naguib M (2000) Vocal interactions in birds: the use of song as a model in communication. Adv Study Behav 29:247–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uy JAC, Safran RJ (2013) Variation in the temporal and spatial use of signals and its implications for multimodal communication. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 67:1499–1511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uy JAC, Patricelli GL, Borgia G (2001) Complex mate searching in the satin bowerbird Ptilonorhynchus violaceus. Am Nat 158:530–542

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vasconcelos M (2008) Transitive inference in non-human animals: an empirical and theoretical analysis. Behav Process 78:313–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vehrencamp SL, Hall ML, Bohman ER, Depeine CD, Dalziell AH (2007) Song matching, overlapping, and switching in the banded wren: the sender’s perspective. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 18:849–859

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vignal C, Mathevon N, Mottin S (2004) Audience drives male songbird response to partner’s voice. Nature 430:448–450

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wiley RH (2015) Noise matters: the evolution of communication. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zandberg L, Gort G, van Oers K, Hinde CA (2017) Direct fitness benefits explain mate preference, but not choice, for similarity in heterozygosity levels. Ecol Lett 20:1306–1314

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Behavioural Ecology Group, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands

    Nina Bircher & Marc Naguib

Authors
  1. Nina Bircher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marc Naguib
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nina Bircher .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Equipe Communications Acoustiques Neuro-PSI, CNRS UMR9197, University Paris-Saclay, Orsay, France

    Thierry Aubin

  2. Equipe de Neuro-Ethologie Sensorielle, ENES/CRNL, CNRS UMR5292, INSERM UMRS1028, University of Lyon, Saint-Etienne, France

    Nicolas Mathevon

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bircher, N., Naguib, M. (2020). How Songbird Females Sample Male Song: Communication Networks and Mate Choice. In: Aubin, T., Mathevon, N. (eds) Coding Strategies in Vertebrate Acoustic Communication. Animal Signals and Communication, vol 7. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39200-0_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation