Skip to main content

Non-overlapping Sequence-Dependent Setup Scheduling with Dedicated Tasks

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Operations Research and Enterprise Systems (ICORES 2019)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 1162))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The paper deals with a parallel machines scheduling problem with dedicated tasks with sequence-dependent setup times that are subject to the non-overlapping constraint. This problem emerges in the productions where only one machine setter is available on the shop floor. We consider that setups are performed by a single person who cannot serve more than one machine at the same moment, i.e., the setups must not overlap in time. We show that the problem remains \(\mathcal {NP}\)-hard under the fixed sequence of tasks on each machine. To solve the problem, we propose an Integer Linear Programming formulation, five Constraint Programming models, and a hybrid heuristic algorithm LOFAS that leverages the strength of Integer Linear Programming for the Traveling Salesperson Problem (TSP) and the efficiency of Constraint Programming at sequencing problems minimizing makespan. Furthermore, we investigate the impact of the TSP solution quality on the overall objective value. The results show that LOFAS with a heuristic TSP solver achieves on average 10.5% worse objective values but it scales up to 5000 tasks with 5 machines.

This work was funded by Ministry of Education, Youth and Sport of the Czech Republic within the project Cluster 4.0 number CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_026/0008432.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Note that in the IBM CP Optimizer, the function TypeOfNext is used.

  2. 2.

    Again, in the IBM CP Optimizer, the function TypeOfNext is used.

References

  1. Google’s or-tools. https://developers.google.com/optimization/. Accessed 22 May 2019

  2. Allahverdi, A., Ng, C., Cheng, T.E., Kovalyov, M.Y.: A survey of scheduling problems with setup times or costs. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 187(3), 985–1032 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Applegate, D., Cook, W.: A computational study of the job-shop scheduling problem. ORSA J. Comput. 3(2), 149–156 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Balas, E.: Project scheduling with resource constraints. Technical report, Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pa, Management Sciences Research Group (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chen, D., Luh, P.B., Thakur, L.S., Moreno Jr., J.: Optimization-based manufacturing scheduling with multiple resources, setup requirements, and transfer lots. IIE Trans. 35(10), 973–985 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gurobi: Constraints. http://www.gurobi.com/documentation/8.1/refman/constraints.html (2019). Accessed 12 June 2019

  7. Hentenryck, P.V., Michel, L.: Constraint-Based Local Search. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2009)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Laborie, P., Rogerie, J., Shaw, P., Vilim, P.: Reasoning with conditional time-intervals. Part II: an algebraical model for resources. In: FLAIRS Conference, pp. 201–206 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Laborie, P., Rogerie, J., Shaw, P., Vilim, P.: IBM ILOG CP optimizer for scheduling. Constraints 23(2), 210–250 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Lasserre, J.B., Queyranne, M.: Generic scheduling polyhedra and a new mixed-integer formulation for single-machine scheduling. In: Proceedings of the 2nd IPCO (Integer Programming and Combinatorial Optimization) Conference, pp. 136–149 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lee, Y.H., Pinedo, M.: Scheduling jobs on parallel machines with sequence-dependent setup times. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 100(3), 464–474 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pisinger, D., Ropke, S.: Large neighborhood search. In: Gendreau, M., Potvin, J.Y. (eds.) Handbook of Metaheuristics. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol. 146, pp. 399–419. Springer, Boston (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1665-5_13

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Ruiz, R., Andres-Romano, C.: Scheduling unrelated parallel machines with resource-assignable sequence-dependent setup times. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 57(5–8), 777–794 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tempelmeier, H., Buschkuhl, L.: Dynamic multi-machine lotsizing and sequencing with simultaneous scheduling of a common setup resource. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 113(1), 401–412 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Vallada, E., Ruiz, R.: A genetic algorithm for the unrelated parallel machine scheduling problem with sequence dependent setup times. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 211(3), 612–622 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Vilim, P., Bartak, R., Cepek, O.: Extension of O(n log n) filtering algorithms for the unary resource constraint to optional activities. Constraints 10(4), 403–425 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10601-005-2814-0

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Vlk., M., Novak., A., Hanzalek., Z.: Makespan minimization with sequence-dependent non-overlapping setups. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Operations Research and Enterprise Systems - Volume 1: ICORES, pp. 91–101. INSTICC, SciTePress (2019). https://doi.org/10.5220/0007362700910101

  18. Wikum, E.D., Llewellyn, D.C., Nemhauser, G.L.: One-machine generalized precedence constrained scheduling problems. Oper. Res. Lett. 16(2), 87–99 (1994). http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0167637794900647

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhao, X., Luh, P.B., Wang, J.: Surrogate gradient algorithm for lagrangian relaxation. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 100(3), 699–712 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Philippe Laborie for his help with the design of CP4 model.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marek Vlk .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Vlk, M., Novak, A., Hanzalek, Z., Malapert, A. (2020). Non-overlapping Sequence-Dependent Setup Scheduling with Dedicated Tasks. In: Parlier, G., Liberatore, F., Demange, M. (eds) Operations Research and Enterprise Systems. ICORES 2019. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1162. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37584-3_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37584-3_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-37583-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-37584-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics