Abstract
Modern democratic and capitalist (i.e. classically liberal) societies are constructed and justified on a foundational assumption that human action conforms to a rationalist logic, approximating, if not identical to, that of instrumental rationality. This chapter argues that because human behavior has evolved to be adaptive, it adheres to a very different, biological, logic. After establishing the multi-layered reasons that human beings could not, and did not, evolve to be rational, it outlines the thoroughly social behavioral capacities and dispositions that could and did evolve, which together constitute the actual adaptive logic of human action. In a nutshell, the resultant model replaces the rationalist model of individualist, single-minded, amoral, materially maximizing, informed, and calculating human actors with an empirically and theoretically substantiable model of groupish, distractible, moral, Satisfycing, epistemologically conforming, and habitual actors. The chapter concludes with a consideration of several significant implications of the improved model for individuals, for social science, and for social policy/governance.
This chapter is distilled from a longer, unpublished, manuscript, which interested readers can soon find, along with a comprehensive bibliography, at the author’s Academia.edu page.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Weber, M.: Economy and Society. University of California Press, Berkeley CA (1978 [1922])
Fiske, S., Taylor, S.: Social Cognition, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York NY (1991)
Arieley, D.: Predictably Irrational: The Hidden Forces that Shape Our Decisions. Harper, New York NY (2009)
Gould, S.J., Lewontin, R.: The spandrels of San Marco and the panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser B Biol. Sci. 205, 581–598 (1979)
Darwin, C.: The Origin of Species: 150th Anniversary Edition. Signet Reprint (2003 [1859])
Kahneman, D.: Thinking, Fast and Slow. Farrar, Strauss, Giroux, New York, NY (2011)
Bonner, J.: The Evolution of Culture in Animals. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ (1980)
Berger, P., Luckmann, T.: The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Anchor Books, Garden City, NY (1967)
Harari, N.Y.: Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind. Harper Perennial, New York, NY (2018)
Bargh, J., Chartrand, T.: The unbearable automaticity of being. Am. Psychol. 54, 462–479 (1999)
Nowak, M.: Supercooperators: Altruism, Evolution, and Why We Need Each Other to Succeed. Free Press, New York, NY (2011)
Wilson, E.O.: Genesis: The Deep Origins of Societies. Liveright, New York, NY (2019)
Kaplan, H., Hill, K., Hawkes, K., Hurtado, A.: Food sharing among Aché hunter-gatherers of Eastern Paraguay. Curr. Anthropol. 25, 113–115 (1984)
Bowles, S., Gintis, H.: A Cooperative Species: Human Reciprocity and Its Evolution. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ (2011)
Hrdy, S.B.: Mother Nature: Maternal Instincts and How They Shape the Human Species. Ballantine Books, New York, NY (2000)
Diener, E., Lusk, R., DeFour, D., Flax, R.: Deindividuation: effects of group size, density, number of observers, and group member similarity on self-consciousness and disinhibited behavior. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 39, 449–459 (1980)
Tajfel, H.: Experiments in intergroup discrimination. Sci. Am. 223(5), 96–102 (1970)
Lieberman, M.: Social: Why Our Brains are Wired to Connect. Crown Publishers, New York, NY (2014)
DeWaal, F.: Primates and Philosophers: How Morality Evolved. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ (2006)
Weisner, P.: Taking the risk out of risky transactions: a forager’s dilemma. In: Salter, F. (ed.) Risky Transactions. Berghahn Books, Oxford UK (2002)
Durkheim, E. The dualism of human nature and its social conditions. In Wolff K (trans.) Emile Durkheim: Essays on Sociology and Philosophy, pp. 325–340 (1964 [1914])
Chaiken, S., Trope, Y.: Dual Process Theories in Social Psychology. Guilford Press, New York, NY (1999)
Marshall, D.A.: Behavior, belonging, and belief: a theory of ritual practice. Sociol. Theor. 20(3), 360–380 (2002)
Marshall, D.A.: Sacralization and the throes of modernization: witch trials, world war, and the WTC. New York J. Sociol. 1, 26–90 (2008). www.newyorksociology.org
Marshall, D.A.: Beyond a Rational Choice Sociology: A Sociology of Rationality. Doctoral Dissertation. Retrieved from Proquest Dissertation Publishing (2003)
Barkow, J., Cosmides, L., Tooby, J.: The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture. Oxford University Press, New York NY (1992)
Stanovich, K.: Who is rational?: Studies of Individual Differences in Reasoning. Psychology Press, London UK (1999)
Frank, T.: What’s the Matter With Kansas?. Henry Holt, New York, NY (2004)
Ellul, J.: Propaganda: The Formation of Mens’ Attitudes. Vintage Books, New York, NY (1973)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Marshall, D.A. (2020). The Biological Logic of Human Action: On the (Considerable) Difference Between “Rational” and “Adaptive”. In: Giovagnoli, R., Lowe, R. (eds) The Logic of Social Practices. Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics, vol 52. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37305-4_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37305-4_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-37304-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-37305-4
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)