Abstract
This chapter focusses on the work of Sumner in the period immediately after the publication of The Sociology of Deviance: An Obituary. In 1995, Sumner left the Cambridge Institute of Criminology after 18 years for a new role as Head of School at the University of East London, whilst continuing to explore the ramifications of his underlying theoretical position in the context of a growing pessimism about the direction of late modernity. The theory of censure was becoming more widely known as evidenced by its increasing presence in textbooks. Sumner also returned to two of the recurring themes in his work, the media and underdevelopment. In 2002 Sumner took early retirement from academia but even then he was unable to escape the continuing controversy over the Obituary. The chapter deals with each of these aspects of his work in turn.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Social Control and Political Order enjoyed a positive reception. Houchon (1999: 221), for instance, noted the “rare quality of the debate” and regarded Sumner’s contributions to the volume in the wake of the Obituary as a “twin achievement”. Calavita (1998: 348) highly recommended the book, although he took issue with Sumner’s reworking of the concept of social control. There was also a generous review from Garland (1998), who suggested that the first of Sumner’s two chapters was “well worth the purchase price alone”. He did, however, note that Sumner’s second chapter slipped “into an aspirational mode that sometimes becomes unrestrainedly Utopian” (1998: 323). He also felt that “Sumner has a tendency to slip into a rapid-fire mode of historical narration that takes for granted a readership which shares the collective memory, intellectual shorthand and sense of humour of the author” (1998: 322).
- 2.
As one reviewer put it, “one of the attractions of the Sumner collection is precisely its refusal to round up the usual suspects [on the subject] and its commitment to breaking out of the parochial stockades of mainstream British criminology and cultural studies” (Murdock 1999: 674).
- 3.
For instance, Price-Hanson (1999: 377) found the book “thought provoking” and “worthwhile reading”. Woodhouse (1999) felt it was a valuable addition to the literature despite its lack of focus on how violence should be responded to. Murdock (1999: 676) was generally positive, though he criticised the book’s silence on “the routinized violence and censure of markets and transnational capital”, which he felt required a “material turn” away from the cultural. Groombridge (1999: 471) suggested that greater editorial input would have been useful in what was an inevitably uneven collection of essays from young scholars.
- 4.
These entries also appeared, in updated form each time, in later editions of the Sage Dictionary in 2006, 2013 and 2019.
- 5.
Understandably in a reference work aimed squarely at undergraduates, there was no discussion in the Sage Dictionary entries of the historical materialist underpinnings of Sumner’s position, nor any explicit mention of Marxism.
- 6.
Or, as he later put it, “crime talk is normally aimed at profit, not truth. It is a form of moral recycling. The media dig up the dirt, launder it free of social, political and cultural implications, and re-present it as the triumph of good over evil and the permanent futility of dissent” (Sumner 2012a).
- 7.
His role as co-editor of Theoretical Criminology also ended in 2000.
- 8.
Sumner notes in these passages how Durkheim saw that “the ‘social’ world, the realm of society, does not just produce offensive behaviours but also perceptions of offensiveness, and thus crime and deviance are always doubly socially constructed” (2004b: 6). The tumult of the twentieth century had “conspired and converged to confirm that crime and deviance are doubly socially constructed, as practical or behavioural responses to social conditions and as social censures reflecting the emotions, ideologies, and values of powerful social groups” (2004b: 9).
- 9.
Despite this, Sumner (2004b: 27) also questioned the value in seeing crime as a cultural form: “Ultimately, despite its contemporary relevance, to say that crime and deviance are cultural forms tells us little in the long run when culture can mean anything and everything; and no more than the social did when it meant anything and everything.”
- 10.
Sumner (2004b: 29) went on to suggest that “it is misleading to say that crime and deviance are social constructions when there is so much doubt, confusion, and fear, about what ‘the social’ actually is or when they are so often a response to social destruction”.
- 11.
The Blackwell Companion which this remarkable chapter opened met with a generally enthusiastic response. Brown called it “sophisticated, challenging, and provocative” and praised its refusal to ‘dumb down’ (2007: 432; see also Chui 2005). Rock regarded the book as deserving of attention, but was disappointed by its lack of a “single narrative or theme” which rendered it as something of “a heterogeneous mass” (2004: 310).
- 12.
Clearly relishing the freedom given to him by his retirement, he added that “criminology as a body of scholars exhibits the cold capriciousness of the Inquisition: Its lack of collegiality is exceptional, even by the miserably low standards of academia” (Sumner 2006: 141).
- 13.
An exemplar of this tendency, according to Sumner (2006: 144), was criminology’s traditional focus on “poor boys who steal or destroy” as opposed to the significantly more damaging practices of the colonial and imperial powers; “could criminology talk of the funny shaped skulls of the colonialists or new imperialists?” he asks, rhetorically. In the original conference paper that this chapter was based on, he also amusingly pointed to criminology’s silence on the strange subcultures of the colonialists and wondered why the discipline had failed to question whether they had been insensitively labelled by working-class trade unions in ways which amplified their deviance (Sumner 2004c).
- 14.
This argument was also restated several years later (Goode 2014).
- 15.
See Best (2004) for criticism of Goode on this point.
- 16.
References
Ahire, P. (1991). Imperial policing: The emergence and role of the police in colonial Nigeria, 1860–1960. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Beirne, P., & Sumner, C. (1997). Editorial statement. Theoretical Criminology, 1(1), 5–11.
Best, J. (2003). Review of Hendershott’s The politics of deviance. Society, 40(3), 94–96.
Best, J. (2004). Deviance may be alive, but is it intellectually lively? A reaction to Goode. Deviant Behaviour, 25(5), 483–492.
Best, J. (2006). Whatever happened to social pathology? Conceptual fashions and the sociology of deviance. Sociological Spectrum, 26(6), 533–546.
Brown, M. P. (2007). Review of Sumner’s The Blackwell companion to criminology. Criminal Justice Review, 32(4), 431–432.
Calavita, K. (1998). Review of Bergalli and Sumner’s Social control and political order: European perspectives at the end of the century. Crime, Law and Social Change, 29(4), 348–350.
Chui, W. H. (2005). Review of Sumner’s The Blackwell companion to criminology. The Howard Journal, 44(5), 558–559.
Cohen, S. (1985). Visions of social control: Crime, punishment and classification. Cambridge: Polity.
Dellwing, M., Kotarba, J. A., & Pino, N. W. (Eds.). (2014). The death and resurrection of deviance: Current ideas and research. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Floud, R. (2008). Obituary: Professor Frank Gould: Visionary vice-chancellor of the University of East London. The Independent, 30 July. Retrieved from https://www.independent.co.uk/news/obituaries/professor-frank-gould-visionary-vice-chancellor-of-the-university-of-east-london-880267.html.
Garland, D. (1998). Review of Bergalli and Sumner’s Social control and political order. British Journal of Criminology, 38(2), 321–324.
Goode, E. (1997). Deviant behaviour (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Goode, E. (2002). Does the death of the sociology of deviance make sense. The American Sociologist, 33(3), 116–128.
Goode, E. (2003). The MacGuffin that refuses to die: An investigation into the condition of the sociology of deviance. Deviant Behaviour, 24(6), 507–533.
Goode, E. (2004a). Is the sociology of deviance still relevant? The American Sociologist, 35(4), 46–57.
Goode, E. (2004b). The “death” macguffin redux: Comments on Best. Deviant Behaviour, 25(5), 493–509.
Goode, E. (2006). Is the deviance concept still relevant to sociology? Sociological Spectrum, 26(6), 547–558.
Goode, E. (2013). Justifiable conduct: Self-vindication in memoir. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Goode, E. (2014). The meaning and validity of the death of deviance claim. In M. Dellwing, J. A. Kotarba, & N. W. Pino (Eds.), The death and resurrection of deviance: Current ideas and research (pp. 11–30). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Goode, E. (2019). Deviant behaviour (12th ed.). New York: Routledge.
Groombridge, N. (1999). Review of Sumner’s Violence, culture and censure. British Journal of Criminology, 39(3), 469–471.
Hall, S., & Winlow, S. (2012). Introduction: The need for new directions in criminological theory. In S. Hall & S. Winlow (Eds.), New directions in criminological theory (pp. 1–13). Abingdon: Routlegde.
Hendershott, A. (2002). The politics of deviance. San Francisco: Encounter.
Henry, S. with Howard, L. M. (2019). Social deviance (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Polity.
Houchon, G. (1999). Review of Bergalli and Sumner’s Social control and political order: European perspectives at the end of the century. Theoretical Criminology, 3(2), 221–229.
Izbicki, J. (1997). Cor blimey, prof. What made you do it? The Independent, 13 November. Retrieved from https://www.independent.co.uk/news/education/education-news/cor-blimey-prof-what-made-you-do-it-1293648.html.
Jessop, B. (1990). State theory: Putting the capitalist state in its place. Cambridge: Polity.
Maguire, M., Morgan, R., & Reiner, R. (2002). Introduction to the third edition. In M. Maguire, R. Morgan, & R. Reiner (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of criminology (3rd ed., pp. 1–4). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
McLaughlin, E., & Muncie, J. (Eds.). (2001). The Sage dictionary of criminology. London: Sage.
Mitchell Miller, J., Wright, R. A., & Dannels, D. (2001). Is deviance dead? The decline of a research specialization. The American Sociologist, 32(3), 43–59.
Muncie, J. (2001). The construction and deconstruction of crime. In J. Muncie & E. McLaughlin (Eds.), The problem of crime. London: Sage.
Murdock, G. (1999). Review of Turpin and Kurtz’s The web of violence and Sumner’s Violence, culture and censure. Sociology, 33(3), 672–676.
Price-Hanson, D. (1999). Review of Sumner’s Violence, culture and censure. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 9(4), 376–377.
Reiner, R., Morgan, R., & Maguire, M. (1997). Introduction to second edition. In M. Maguire, R. Morgan, & R. Reiner (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of criminology (2nd ed., pp. 1–7). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Roberts, P. (2017). Thinking through critical criminology. In A. Amatrudo (Ed.), Social censure and critical criminology: After Sumner (pp. 1–45). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Rock, P. (2004). Review of Sumner’s The Blackwell companion to criminology. British Journal of Sociology, 55(2), 309–311.
Ross, E. A. (1901 [1918]). Social control: A survey of the foundations of order. New York: Macmillan.
Soothill, K. (1998). Review of Sumner’s Violence, culture and censure. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology, 9(3), 697–699.
Sumner, C. (Ed.). (1982). Crime, justice and the mass media: Papers presented to the 14th Cropwood round-table conference, December 1981. University of Cambridge Institute of Criminology: Cropwood Conference Series No. 14.
Sumner, C. (1990a). Foucault, gender and the censure of deviance. In L. Gelsthorpe & A. Morris (Eds.), Feminist perspectives in criminology (pp. 26–40). Buckingham: Open University Press.
Sumner, C. (1990b). Rethinking deviance: Towards a sociology of censure. In C. Sumner (Ed.), Censure, politics and criminal justice (pp. 15–40). Buckingham: Open University Press.
Sumner, C. (1996). Collaboration, criminalisation and social comfort. Franco-British Studies: Journal of the British Institute in Paris, 21, 55–65.
Sumner, C. (1997a). Social control: The history and politics of a central concept in Anglo-American sociology. In R. Bergalli & C. Sumner (Eds.), Social control and political order: European perspectives at the end of the century (pp. 1–33). London: Sage.
Sumner, C. (1997b). The decline of social control and the rise of vocabularies of struggle. In R. Bergalli & C. Sumner (Eds.), Social control and political order: European perspectives at the end of the century (pp. 131–150). London: Sage.
Sumner, C. (1997c). Introduction: The violence of censure and the censure of violence. In C. Sumner (Ed.), Violence, culture and censure (pp. 1–6). London: Taylor and Francis.
Sumner, C. (1997d). Censure, crime and state. In M. Maguire, R. Morgan, & R. Reiner (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of criminology (2nd ed., pp. 499–510). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sumner, C. (2000). From militaristic to civil policing: A general view. In C. Sumner & H. Lorenzo (Eds.), Multicultural policing in a democracy (pp. 7–24). Missouri: The Institute for International Studies.
Sumner, C. (2001a). Entry on ‘Deviance’. In E. McLaughlin & J. Muncie (Eds.), The Sage dictionary of criminology (pp. 89–90). London: Sage.
Sumner, C. (2001b). Entry on ‘Social censure’. In E. McLaughlin & J. Muncie (Eds.), The Sage dictionary of criminology (pp. 265–266). London: Sage.
Sumner, C. (Ed.). (2004a). The Blackwell companion to criminology. Oxford: Blackwell.
Sumner, C. (2004b). The social nature of crime and deviance. In C. Sumner (Ed.), The Blackwell companion to criminology (pp. 3–31). Oxford: Blackwell.
Sumner, C. (2004c). Social censure and political domination. Paper delivered at the University of Turin, 12 March.
Sumner, C. (2006). Censure, criminology and politics. In I. Rivera, H. C. Silveira, E. Bodelon, & A. Recasens (Eds.), Contornos y pliegues del derecho: Homenaje a Roberto Bergalli (pp. 140–146). Barcelona: Anthropos.
Sumner, C. (2010). The editor, Colin Sumner. CrimeTalk. Retrieved from https://www.crimetalk.org.uk/index.php/office-stuff/the-editor-colin-sumner.
Sumner, C. (2012a). Media, policing and politics (part 1). CrimeTalk, 19 February. Retrieved from http://www.crimetalk.org.uk/index.php/library/editors-blog/664-holding-others-to-account.
Sumner, C. (2012b). Censure, culture and political economy: Beyond the death of deviance debate. In S. Hall & S. Winlow (Eds.), New directions in criminological theory (pp. 165–180). Abingdon: Routledge.
Sumner, C. (2014). Review of Goode’s Justifiable conduct: Self-vindication in memoir. American Journal of Sociology, 119(6), 1819–1821.
Sumner, C., & Lorenzo, H. (Eds.). (2000). Multicultural policing in a democracy. Missouri: The Institute for International Studies.
Sumner, C., & Sandberg, S. (1990). The press censure of “dissident minorities”: The ideology of parliamentary democracy, Thatcherism and “Policing the Crisis”. In C. Sumner (Ed.), Censure, politics and criminal justice (pp. 163–193). Buckingham: Open University Press.
van Swaaningen, R. (1997). Critical criminology: Visions form Europe. London: Sage.
Taylor, I. (1999). Crime in context: A critical criminology of market societies. Cambridge: Westview Press.
Tierney, J. (2010). Criminology: Theory and context (3rd ed.). Harlow: Pearson.
Woodhouse, T. (1999). Review of Sumner’s Violence, culture and censure and Turpin and Kurtz’s The web of violence. Sociological Research Online, 4(1), 1–2.
Young, J. (1999). The exclusive society: Social exclusion, crime and difference in late modernity. London: Sage.
Young, J. (2007). The vertigo of late modernity. London: Sage.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Moxon, D. (2020). After the Death of Deviance. In: Colin Sumner . Palgrave Pioneers in Criminology. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36941-5_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36941-5_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Pivot, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-36940-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-36941-5
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)