Abstract
Understanding which factors are determinant to guarantee the human right to education entails the study of a large number of non-linear relationships among multiple agents and their impact on the properties of the entire system. Complex network analysis of large-scale assessment results provides a set of unique advantages over classical tools for facing the challenge of measuring inequality gaps in learning outcomes and recognizing those factors associated with educational deprivation, combining the richness of qualitative analysis with quantitative inferences.
This study establishes two milestones in educational research using a census high-quality data from a Latin American country. The first one is to provide a direct method to recognize the structure of inequality and the relationship between social determinants as ethnicity, socioeconomic status of students, rurality of the area and type of school funding and educational deprivation. The second one focus in unveil and hierarchize educational and non-educational factors associated with the conditional distribution of learning outcomes. This contribution provides new tools to current theoretical framework for discovering non-trivial relationships in educational phenomena, helping policymakers to address the challenge of ensuring inclusive and equitable education for those historically marginalized population groups.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Full dataset is available in http://www.evaluacion.gob.ec/evaluaciones/descarga-de-datos/.
References
OECD: Equity in education: breaking down barriers to social mobility. PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris (2018)
UN DESA: The sustainable development goals report 2018, UN, New York (2018)
Sánchez-Restrepo, H.: Equity: the focal point of educational quality. National Educational Evaluation Policy Gazette in Mexico, Year 4. (10), pp. 42–44 (2018)
United Nations Children’s Fund (Unicef): The investment case for education and equity, Washington, DC (2015)
Keeley, B., Little, C.: The State of the World’s Children 2017: Children in a Digital World. UNICEF, New York (2017)
Samman, E.: SDG progress: fragility, crisis and leaving no one behind: report (2018)
Gray, J., Kruse, S., Tarter, C.J.: Enabling school structures, collegial trust and academic emphasis: antecedents of professional learning communities. Educ. Manag. Adm. Leadersh. 44(6), 875–891 (2016)
Laboratorio Latinoamericano de Evaluación de la Calidad de la Educación – LLECE. Agenda (2018). http://www.unesco.org/new/en/santiago/press-room/newsletters/newsletter-laboratory-for-assesSSent-of-the-quality-of-education-llece/
Motl, T.C., Multon, K.D., Zhao, F.: Persistence at a tribal university: factors associated with second year enrollment. J. Divers. High. Educ. 11(1), 51 (2018)
Tracey, B., Florian, K. (eds.): Educational Research and Innovation Governing Education in a Complex World. OECD Publishing, Paris (2016)
Davis, B., Sumara, D.: Complexity and Education: Inquiries into Learning, Teaching, and Research. Routledge, New York (2014)
Fox, J.: Applied Regression Analysis and Generalized Linear Models. Sage Public, Thousand Oaks (2015)
Moll, K., Göbel, S.M., Gooch, D., Landerl, K., Snowling, M.J.: Cognitive risk factors for specific learning disorder: processing speed, temporal processing, and working memory. J. Learn. Disabil. 49(3), 272–281 (2016)
van der Maas, H., Kan, K., MarSSan, M., Stevenson, C.: Network models for cognitive development and intelligence. J. Intell. 5(2), 1–17 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence5020016
Gelman, A., Imbens, G.: Why high-order polynomials should not be used in regression discontinuity designs. J. Bus. Econ. Stat. 1–10 (2018)
Barabási, Albert-László, Pásfai, Márton: Network Science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2016)
Johnson, J., Fortune, J., Bromley, J.: Systems, networks, and policy. In: Non-Equilibrium Social Science and Policy, pp. 111–134. Springer, Cham (2017)
Grandjean, M.: Complex structures and international organizations [Analisi e visualizzazioni delle reti in storia. L’esempio della cooperazione intellettuale della Società delle Nazioni]. Memoria e Ricerca 25(2), 371–393 (2017)
Borsboom, D., Molenaar, D.: Psychometrics. In: Wright, J. (ed.) International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, vol. 19, pp. 418–422. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2015)
Bracho, T.: Índice de déficit en competencias? Avanzamos hacia la garantía del derecho a la educación? en Reformas y Políticas Educativas, No. 4, September–December 2017. FCE, México (2017)
van Borkulo, C.D., Borsboom, D., Epskamp, S., Blanken, T.F., Boschloo, L., Schoevers, R.A., Waldorp, L.J.: A new method for constructing networks from binary data. Sci. Rep. 4(5918), 1–10 (2014)
Leban, G., Zupan, B., et al.: Vizrank: data visualization guided by machine learning. Data Min. Knowl. Discov. 13(2), 119–136 (2006)
Koller, D., Friedman, N.: Probabilistic Graphical Models: Principles and Techniques. MIT Press, Cambridge (2009)
Jacomy, M., Venturini, T., Heymann, S., Bastian, M.: ForceAtlas2, a continuous graph layout algorithm for handy network visualization designed for the Gephi software. PLoS ONE 9(6), 1–18 (2013)
Forbush, K., Siew, C., Vitevitch, M.: Application of network analysis to identify interactive systems of eating disorder psychopathology. Psychol. Med. 46(12), 2667–2677 (2016)
Isvoranu, A.M., van Borkulo, C.D., Boyette, L., Wigman, J.T.W., Vinkers, C.H., Borsboom, D., Group Investigators: A network approach to psychosis: pathways between childhood trauma and psychotic symptoms. Schizophr. Bull. 43(1), 187–196 (2017)
Sánchez-Restrepo, H., Louçã, J.: Topological properties of inequality and deprivation in an educational system: unveiling the key-drivers through complex network analysis. In: International Conference on Human Systems Engineering and Design: Future Trends and Applications, pp. 469–475. Springer, Cham, September 2019
Tsatsaroni, A., Evans, J.: Adult numeracy and the totally pedagogised society: PIAAC and other international surveys in the context of global educational policy on lifelong learning. Educ. Stud. Math. 87(2), 167–186 (2014)
Menefee, T., Bray, T.M.: Education in the Commonwealth: Quality Education for Equitable Development. Commonwealth Secretariat (2015)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Sánchez-Restrepo, H., Louçã, J. (2020). Inequality in Learning Outcomes: Unveiling Educational Deprivation Through Complex Network Analysis. In: Cherifi, H., Gaito, S., Mendes, J., Moro, E., Rocha, L. (eds) Complex Networks and Their Applications VIII. COMPLEX NETWORKS 2019. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 882. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36683-4_27
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36683-4_27
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-36682-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-36683-4
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)