Skip to main content

A Low-Cost Maximum Power Point Tracking Method Based on PI Controller Arduino Implementing

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advanced Intelligent Systems for Sustainable Development (AI2SD’2019) (AI2SD 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering ((LNEE,volume 624))

  • 492 Accesses

Abstract

This paper aims to present a method to improve the conventional perturb and observe (P&O) maximum power point tracking (MPPT) algorithm for buck converters, which is based on a proportional-integral (PI) controller to solve the main P&O MPPT drawback, which is the presence of the ripples in the output power of the converter. Currently, many electronic devices (FPGA, dSPACE…) are used to implement the MPPT methods, but they remain relatively expensive. For this reason, the Arduino board is used in this work to implement the suggested MPPT algorithm. To validate its function, a comparative study between the proposed P&O algorithm and the conventional one is developed in MathWorks software, and an experimental setup using hardware components is given at the end of the paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Katsanevakis, M.: Modelling the photovoltaic module. In: 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics, pp. 1414–1419 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rezk, H., Eltamaly, A.M.: A comprehensive comparison of different MPPT techniques for photovoltaic systems. Sol. Energy 112, 1–11 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2014.11.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ahmed, J., Salam, Z.: A modified P&O maximum power point tracking method with reduced steady-state oscillation and improved tracking efficiency. IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy 7, 1506–1515 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/TSTE.2016.2568043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Karbakhsh, F., Amiri, M., Zarchi, H.A.: Two-switch flyback inverter employing a current sensorless MPPT and scalar control for low cost solar powered pumps. IET Renew. Power Gener. 11, 669–677 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-rpg.2016.0631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Alik, R., Jusoh, A.: An enhanced P&O checking algorithm MPPT for high tracking efficiency of partially shaded PV module. Sol. Energy 163, 570–580 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2017.12.050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Satif, A., Hlou, L., Benbrahim, M., Erguig, H., Elgouri, R.: Simulation and analysis of a pv system with p and o mppt algorithm using a pi controller for buck converter. ARPN J. Eng. Appl. Sci. 13, 9 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  7. MPPT algorithm test on a photovoltaic emulating system constructed by a DC power supply and an indoor solar panel—ScienceDirect. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196890414005317

  8. A new method to extract the equivalent circuit parameters of a photovoltaic panel—ScienceDirect. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038092X18301348

  9. MAX471 Datasheet, PDF—Alldatasheet. http://www.alldatasheet.com/view.jsp?Searchword=Max471&gclid=EAIaIQobChMIz5Cr1b3K4AIV2eFRCh1Rdg-8EAAYASAAEgJWVPD_BwE

  10. Arduino—Home. https://www.arduino.cc/

  11. Babaei, E., Mahmoodieh, M.E.S., Sabah, M.: Investigating buck DC-DC converter operation in different operational modes and obtaining the minimum output voltage ripple considering filter size. J. Power Electron. 11, 793–800 (2011). https://doi.org/10.6113/JPE.2011.11.6.793

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. An enhanced P&O checking algorithm MPPT for high tracking efficiency of partially shaded PV module—ScienceDirect. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038092X17311325

  13. Irshad, M., Ali, A.: Optimal tuning rules for PI/PID controllers for inverse response processes. IFAC-PapersOnLine 51, 413–418 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.05.063

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. INA169 Datasheet, PDF—Alldatasheet. https://www.alldatasheet.com/view.jsp?Searchword=Ina169%20Datasheet&gclid=EAIaIQobChMIyaWP5uDS4AIVFIbVCh1ylAs9EAAYASAAEgLddfD_BwE

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Satif .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Satif, A., Hlou, L., Elgouri, R. (2020). A Low-Cost Maximum Power Point Tracking Method Based on PI Controller Arduino Implementing. In: Ezziyyani, M. (eds) Advanced Intelligent Systems for Sustainable Development (AI2SD’2019). AI2SD 2019. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 624. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36475-5_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics