Skip to main content

Regulation and Business Models

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Power and Gas Asset Management

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Energy ((LNEN,volume 72))

  • 389 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter an overview on energy regulation is provided, covering both technical and economic criteria. Prior to addressing power and gas idiosyncrasies, a common background of regulation theory is introduced. This regulatory framework envisages not only the sector organization and value chain, but also a recipe for liberalization of energy services. Afterwards, this chapter brings a description of technical and economic aspects of power generation, energy transmission and distribution, and LNG business. As detailed within the chapter, in power generation and LNG regasification businesses one finds a competitive environment, while in transmission and distribution grids monopoly regulation prevails. Finally, this chapter draws an overview on future trends of energy regulation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    British Standards Institution’s Publicly Available Specification for the optimized management of physical assets.

References

  • Allan RN, Takieddine FN (1977) Generation modelling in power system reliability evaluation, pp 47–50. IEEE Conference Publication, p 148

    Google Scholar 

  • Allan RN, Silva AMLd, Abu-Nasser A, Burchett RC (1981) Discrete convolution in power system reliability, pp 452–456. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, R-30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batle C (2013) Electricity generation and wholesale markets. In: Regulation of the power sector, power systems, 61. Editor Pérez Arriaga, I. J., Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhavaraju MP (1974) An analysis of generating capacity reserve requirements, Paper no. C-74-155-0. IEEE

    Google Scholar 

  • Billinton R (1966) Bibliography on application of probability methods in the evaluation of generating capacity requirements, Paper no. 31 CP 66–62. IEEE Winter Power Meeting

    Google Scholar 

  • Billinton R (1970) Power system reliability evaliation. Gordon and Breach

    Google Scholar 

  • Billinton R, Allan RN (1996) Reliability evaluation of power systems, 2nd edn. Plenum Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Billinton R, Chu K (1992) An integrated approach to electric power system planning and cost of service allocation. Utilities Policy 2(4):303–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billinton R, Fotuhi-Firuzabad M (1994) A basic framework for generating system operating health analysis. IEEE Trans Power Syst 9(3):1610–1617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billinton R, Huang D (2005) Basic considerations on generating capacity adequacy evaluation. CCECE/CCGEI IEEE, pp 611–614

    Google Scholar 

  • Billinton R, Karki R (1999) Application of Monte Carlo simulation to generating system well-being analysis. IEEE Trans PWRS 14(3):1172–1177

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop S, Officer RR (2013) Review of debt risk premium and market risk premium. Value Adviser Associates

    Google Scholar 

  • Canaport LNG (2019) Available: https://www.canaportlng.com/lng-process. Accessed 25 July 2019

  • Carr M (2018) After topping commodity gains in 2018. Carbon set to surge again, Bloomberg, 27 Dec 2018

    Google Scholar 

  • CEER—Council of European Energy Regulators (2017) Removing LNG barriers on gas markets, Ref: C17-LNG-32-03, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • CEER—Council of European Energy Regulators (2019) Report on regulatory frameworks for European energy networks. Incentive Regulation and Benchmarking Work Stream

    Google Scholar 

  • Decker C (2014) Modern economic regulation: an introduction to theory and practice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Deng SJ, Oren SS (2006) Electricity derivatives and risk management. Energy 31(6):940–953

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ERSE—Entidade Reguladora dos Serviços Energéticos (2017) Portuguese energy regulatory framework for TSO allowed revenues, Lisbon

    Google Scholar 

  • Eugene KRF, Fama F (2004) The capital asset pricing model: theory and evidence. J Econ Perspect 18(3):25–46

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2010) Emissions trading: questions and answers on the EU ETS Auctioning Regulation, MEMO/10/338

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission—DG Climate Action (2011) General guidance to the allocation methodology

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrer TH (1902) The State and its relation to Trade. Macmillan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • GIIGNL (2019) The international group of liquefied natural gas importers. Information Paper No. 2, LNG Process Chain, Neuilly-sur-Seine

    Google Scholar 

  • Glachant JM, Vasconcelos J, Rious V (2015) A conceptual framework for the evolution of the operation and regulation of electricity transmission systems towards a decarbonised and increasingly integrated electricity system in the EU. Florence School of Regulation, European University Institute, Florence

    Google Scholar 

  • Gómez T (2013) Monopoly regulation. In: Pérez Arriaga IJ(ed) Regulation of the power sector, power systems, vol 61. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris C (2006) Electricity markets: pricing, structures and economics. Wiley, Hoboken

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hogan WH (2001) Federal energy regulatory commission technical conference on interregional coordination, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Holttinen H, Milligan M, Ela E, Menemenlis N, Dobschinski J, Rawn B, Bessa RJ, Flynn D, Gómez-Lázaro E, Detlefsen NK (2012) Methodologies to determine operating reserves due to increased wind power. IEEE Trans Sustain Energy 3(4):713–722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang K, Yang H, Huang C (1997) A new thermal unit commitment approach using constraint logic programming. IEEE

    Google Scholar 

  • ICE—International Exchange (2019) Available: https://www.theice.com/marketdata/reports/149. Accessed 28 June 2019

  • IEA—International Energy Agency (2018) World Energy Outlook, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamison MA (2007) Regulation: price cap and revenue cap. In: Capehart BL (ed) Encyclopedia of energy engineering and technology, vol 3. CRC Press, New York, pp 1245–1251

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Joscow PL (2008) Lessons learned from electricity market liberalization. The Energy Journal, no. Special Issue. The Future of Electricity: Papers in Honor of David Newbery, pp 9–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Khatib H (2003) Economic evaluation of projects in the Electricity Supply Industry, London. The Institution of Engineering and Technology, United Kingdom

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Leite da Silva A, Resende L, Manso L, Billinton R (2004) Well-being analysis for composite generation and transmission systems. IEEE Trans Power Syst 19(4):1763–1770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leite da Silva A, Manso L, Sales W, Resende L, Aguiar M, Matos Mea (2007) Application of Monte Carlo simulation to generating system well-being analysis considering renewable sources. Eur Trans Electr Power 17(4):387–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li C, Johnson R, Svoboda A (1997) A new unit commitment method. IEEE Transactions

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopes JP, Matos M, Cabral PG, Ferreira MS, Martins NF, Wert CA, Martos FS, Sanz RL, Rosa M, Ferreira R, Silva ALd, Sales W, Resende L, Manso L (2008) Dealing with intermittent generation in the long-term evaluation of system adequacy and operational reserve requirements in the Iberian Peninsula. CIGRE, vol C1-304

    Google Scholar 

  • Martins N, Santos J, Damas M (2012) Integrating renewable energy sources in the Portuguese power system: new generation adequacy indicators. In 11th international workshop on large integration of wind power into power systems as well as transmission networks for offshore wind power plants, Lisbon

    Google Scholar 

  • Matos MA (2007) Introdução ao problema de escalonamento e pré-despacho. Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto

    Google Scholar 

  • Matos P (2011) O Leilão em Portugal: as escolhas dos operadores energéticos, EDP

    Google Scholar 

  • Matos M, Lopes JP, Rosa M, Ferreira R, Silva ALd, Sales W, Resende L, Manso L, Cabral P, Ferreira M, Martins N, Artaiz C, Soto F, López R (2009) Probabilistic evaluation of reserve requirements of generating systems with renewable power sources: The Portuguese and Spanish cases. Electr Power Energy Syst 31:562–569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mendonça A, Matos M, Lopes JP (2004) A multicriteria approach to identify the adequate wind power penetration in isolated grids. In: Proceedings of MedPower’04

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreira da Silva M (2013) Energy planning with electricity storage and sustainable mobility: the study of an isolated system, MIT Portugal Program, Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto

    Google Scholar 

  • Mott MacDonald (2010) UK electricity generation costs update

    Google Scholar 

  • Newbery DM (1999) Privatization, restructuring, and regulation of network utilities. The MIT Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • NREL (2011) Renewable energy cost modeling: a toolkit for establishing cost-based incentives in the United States

    Google Scholar 

  • OFGEM (2010) Handbook for implementing the RIIO model

    Google Scholar 

  • OMIE (2018) Day-ahead and intraday electricity market operating rules, Madrid

    Google Scholar 

  • OMIE (2019) Available: http://www.comel.es/en/home/markets-and-products/electricity-market/our-electricity-markets/intraday-market. Accessed 11 July 2019

  • Palmintier B, Webster M (2011) Impact of unit commitment constraints on generation planning with renewables. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Engineering Systems Division

    Google Scholar 

  • Rebours Y, Kirschen D (2005) What is spinning reserve? The University of Manchester, Manchester

    Google Scholar 

  • REN—Redes Energéticas Nacionais (2004) Plano de Investimentos da Rede Nacional de Transporte 2006–2011: Padrões de Segurança de Planeamento da RNT

    Google Scholar 

  • REN—Redes Energéticas Nacionais (2008) Report and accounts 2007, Lisbon

    Google Scholar 

  • REN—Redes Energéticas Nacionais (2009) Report and accounts 2008, Lisbon

    Google Scholar 

  • REN—Redes Energéticas Nacionais (2010) Report and accounts 2009, Lisbon

    Google Scholar 

  • REN—Redes Energéticas Nacionais (2011) Report and accounts 2010, Lisbon

    Google Scholar 

  • REN—Redes Energéticas Nacionais (2012) Report and accounts 2011, Lisbon

    Google Scholar 

  • REN—Redes Energéticas Nacionais (2013a) Report and Accounts 2015, Lisbon

    Google Scholar 

  • REN—Redes Energéticas Nacionais (2013b) Report and Accounts 2012, Lisbon

    Google Scholar 

  • REN—Redes Energéticas Nacionais (2014) Report and accounts 2013, Lisbon

    Google Scholar 

  • REN—Redes Energéicas Nacionais (2015) Report and accounts 2014, Lisbon

    Google Scholar 

  • REN—Redes Energéticas Nacionais (2017) Report and accounts 2016, Lisbon

    Google Scholar 

  • REN—Redes Energéticas Nacionais (2018) Report and accounts 2017, Lisbon

    Google Scholar 

  • REN—Redes Energéticas Nacionais (2019) Available: https://www.ren.pt/. Accessed 25 July 2019

  • RWE (2008) Facts and figures 2008, Update October 2008

    Google Scholar 

  • Schenk KF, Rau NS (1979) Application of fourier transform techniques for the assessment of reliability of generating systems, Paper no. A-79-103-3. IEEE Winter Power Meeting

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen S, Kothari DP (1998) Optimal thermal generating unit commitment: a review. Electr Power Energy Syst 443–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoft S (2002) Power system economics: designing markets for electricity. IEEE Press & Wiley-Interscience, The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stremel JP (1981) Sensitivity study of the cumulant method for calculating generation system reliability, pp 771–78. IEEE transactions, PAS-100

    Google Scholar 

  • Vazquez M (2006) Optimizing the spinning reserve requirements. PhD Thesis, Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester

    Google Scholar 

  • Viana A (2004) Metaheuristics for the unit commitment problem. PhD thesis, Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood AJ, Wollenberg BF (1996) Power generation operation and control. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • Zapfel P (2011) Preparing for large-scale carbon allowance auctions. European Commission—Climate Action

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Miguel Moreira da Silva .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Moreira da Silva, M. (2020). Regulation and Business Models. In: Power and Gas Asset Management. Lecture Notes in Energy, vol 72. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36200-3_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36200-3_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-36199-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-36200-3

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics