Abstract
Despite the recent advancement in the social robotic field, important limitations restrain its progress and delay the application of robots in everyday scenarios. In the present paper, we propose to develop computational models inspired by our knowledge of human infants’ social adaptive abilities. We believe this may provide solutions at an architectural level to overcome the limits of current systems. Specifically, we present the functional advantages that adaptive Theory of Mind (ToM) systems would support in robotics (i.e., mentalizing for belief understanding, proactivity and preparation, active perception and learning) and contextualize them in practical applications. We review current computational models mainly based on the simulation and teleological theories, and robotic implementations to identify the limitations of ToM functions in current robotic architectures and suggest a possible future developmental pathway. Finally, we propose future studies to create innovative computational models integrating the properties of the simulation and teleological approaches for an improved adaptive ToM ability in robots with the aim of enhancing human-robot interactions and permitting the application of robots in unexplored environments, such as disasters and construction sites. To achieve this goal, we suggest directing future research towards the modern cross-talk between the fields of robotics and developmental psychology.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abubshait, A., Wiese, E.: You look human, but act like a machine: agent appearance and behavior modulate different aspects of human-robot interaction. Front. Psychol. 8, 1393 (2017)
Cangelosi, A., Schlesinger, M.: From babies to robots: the contribution of developmental robotics to developmental psychology. Child. Dev. Perspect. 12, 183–188 (2018)
Demiris, Y., Dearden, A.: From motor babbling to hierarchical learning by imitation: a robot developmental pathway. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Epigenetic Robotics, pp. 31–37 (2005)
Ognibene, D., Demiris, Y.: Towards active event recognition. In: Proceedings of IJCAI AAAI, pp. 2495–2501 (2013)
Wiese, E., Metta, G., Wykowska, A.: Robots as intentional agents: using neuroscientific methods to make robots appear more social. Front. Psychol. 8, 1663 (2017)
Pierson, H., Gashler, M.: Deep learning in robotics: a review of recent research. Adv. Robot. 31, 821–835 (2017)
Singh, G., Saha, S., Sapienza, M., Torr, P., Cuzzolin, F.: Online real time multiple spatiotemporal action localisation and prediction on a single platform. arXiv preprint arXiv:1611.08563 (2017)
Rabinowitz, N.C., Perbet, F., Song, H.F., Zhang, C., Eslami, S.M.A., Botvinick, M.: Machine Theory of Mind. arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.07740 (2018)
Mariolis, I., Peleka, G., Kargakos, A., Malassiotis, S.: Pose and category recognition of highly deformable objects using deep learning. In: International Conference on Advanced Robotics (ICAR), pp. 655–662 (2015)
Polydoros, A.S., Nalpantidis, L., Kruger, V.: Real-time deep learning of robotic manipulator inverse dynamics. In: IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pp. 3442–3448 (2015)
Silver, D., Schrittwieser, J., Simonyan, K., Antonoglou, I., Huang, A., Guez, A., et al.: Mastering the game of Go without human knowledge. Nature 550, 354–359 (2017)
Goldman, A.I.: Theory of mind. In: The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Cognitive Science. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2012)
Frith, C.D., Frith, U.: The neural basis of mentalizing. Neuron 50, 531–534 (2006)
Devaine, M., Hollard, G., Daunizeau, J.: The social Bayesian brain: does mentalizing make a difference when we learn? PLoS Comput. Biol. 10, e1003992 (2014)
Yott, J., Poulin-Dubois, D.: Are infants’ theory-of-mind abilities well integrated? Implicit understanding of intentions, desires, and beliefs. J. Cogn. Dev. 17, 683–698 (2016)
Kosakowski, H.L., Saxe, R.: “Affective theory of mind” and the function of the ventral medial prefrontal cortex. Cogn. Behav. Neurol. 31, 36–50 (2018)
Scassellati, B.: Theory of mind for a humanoid robot. Auton. Robots 12, 13–24 (2002)
Bianco, F., Ognibene, D.: Functional advantages of an adaptive theory of mind for robotics: a review of current architectures. In: The 11th Computer Science and Electronic Engineering Conference. IEEE Xplore, University of Essex (2019)
Görür, O.C., Rosman, B., Hoffman, G., Albayrak, A.: Toward integrating theory of mind into adaptive decision-making of social robots to understand human intention. In: Workshop on Intentions in HRI at ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (2017)
Milliez, G., Warnier, M., Clodic, A., Alami, R.: A framework for endowing an interactive robot with reasoning capabilities about perspective-taking and belief management. In: The 23rd IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, pp. 1103–1109 (2014)
Devin, S., Alami, R.: An implemented theory of mind to improve human-robot shared plans execution. In: The Eleventh ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interation, pp. 319–326 (2016)
Grosse, W.C., Friederici, A.D., Singer, T., Steinbeis, N.: Implicit and explicit false belief development in preschool children. Dev. Sci. 20, e12445 (2017)
Ognibene, D., Chinellato, E., Sarabia, M., Demiris, Y.: Contextual action recognition and target localization with an active allocation of attention on a humanoid robot. Bioinspiration Biomimetics 8, 035002 (2013)
Lake, B.M., Ullman, T.D., Tenenbaum, J.B., Gershman, S.J.: Building machines that learn and think like people. Behav. Brain Sci. 40, 1–101 (2016)
Lee, K., Ognibene, D., Chang, H.J., Kim, T.-K., Demiris, Y.: STARE: spatio-temporal attention relocation for multiple structured activities detection. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 24, 5916–5927 (2015)
Schaafsma, S.M., Pfaff, D.W., Spunt, R.P., Adolphs, R.: Deconstructing and reconstructing theory of mind. Trends Cogn. Sci. 19, 65–72 (2015)
Southgate, V., Johnson, M.H., Csibra, G.: Infants attribute goals even to biomechanically impossible actions. Cognition 107, 1059–1069 (2008)
Gergely, G., Csibra, G.: Teleological reasoning in infancy: the naive theory of rational action. Trends Cogn. Sci. 7, 287–292 (2003)
Koster-Hale, J., Richardson, H., Velez, N., Asaba, M., Young, L., Saxe, R.: Mentalizing regions represent distributed, continuous, and abstract dimensions of others’ beliefs. NeuroImage 161, 9–18 (2017)
Frith, C.D., Frith, U.: How we predict what other people are going to do. Brain Res. 1079, 36–46 (2006)
Luo, Y., Baillargeon, R.: Toward a mentalistic account of early psychological reasoning. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 19, 301–307 (2010)
Baker, C.L., Jara-Ettinger, J., Saxe, R., Tenenbaum, J.B.: Rational quantitative attribution of beliefs, desires and percepts in human mentalizing. Nat. Hum. Behav. 1, 0064 (2017)
Hamlin, J.K., Ullman, T., Tenenbaum, J., Goodman, N., Baker, C.: The mentalistic basis of core social cognition: experiments in preverbal infants and a computational model. Dev. Sci. 16, 209–226 (2013)
Gallese, V., Goldman, A.: Mirror neurons and the simulation theory of mind-reading. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2, 493–501 (1998)
Southgate, V., Johnson, M.H., Osborne, T., Csibra, G.: Predictive motor activation during action observation in human infants. Biol. Let. 5, 769–772 (2009)
Brass, M., Schmitt, R.M., Spengler, S., Gergely, G.: Investigating action understanding: inferential processes versus action simulation. Curr. Biol. 17, 2117–2121 (2007)
Keysers, C., Gazzola, V.: Integrating simulation and theory of mind: from self to social cognition. Trends Cogn. Sci. 11, 194–196 (2007)
Frith, C.D., Frith, U.: Social cognition in humans. Curr. Biol. 17, 724–732 (2007)
Kovacs, A.M., Teglas, E., Endress, A.D.: The social sense: susceptibility to others’ beliefs in human infants and adults. Science 330, 1830–1834 (2010)
Baron-Cohen, S.: Mindreading: evidence for both innate and acquired factors. J. Anthropol. Psychol. 17, 26–27 (2006)
Bhat, A.A., Mohan, V., Sandini, G., Morasso, P.: Humanoid infers Archimedes’ principle: understanding physical relations and object affordances through cumulative learning experiences. J. Roy. Soc. Interface 13 (2016)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Bianco, F., Ognibene, D. (2019). Transferring Adaptive Theory of Mind to Social Robots: Insights from Developmental Psychology to Robotics. In: Salichs, M., et al. Social Robotics. ICSR 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11876. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35888-4_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35888-4_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-35887-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-35888-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)