Skip to main content

Allen: Sexual Offences Prosecutions in the Late Twentieth Century

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Lesbianism and the Criminal Law
  • 320 Accesses

Abstract

Allen marked a shift to prosecuting lesbians for sexual offences, a legal response to the growth of lesbian visibility. In 1995, the teenage defendant was imprisoned for indecent assault offences arising from her relationship with a thirteen-year-old girl. However, the shift was less radical than it might first appear: Allen’s prosecution was broadly contemporary with others reminiscent of female husband cases including those of Jennifer Saunders and Kelly Trueman. Further, although the law was formally equal for women and men accused of indecently assaulting females, sentencing approaches were very different. In particular, lesbianism was considered a source of corruption and embarrassment, seen as peculiarly aggravating factors.

Parliament, meanwhile, was moving in a more liberal direction. The Sexual Offences Act 2003 signalled a fundamental change in approach as it aimed to implement new principles of gender neutrality and equality. The chapter ends by considering how far it did so and its particular impact upon regulation of sex between women.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    While some of the defendants discussed here were working-class, that was by no means true of all of them. In particular, the chapter later considers the prosecution of teachers : defendants in a normatively middle-class profession.

  2. 2.

    Although the Criminal Appeal Reports headnote states there were two counts and the Criminal Law Review casenote repeats this, the judgment specifies one.

  3. 3.

    Because she was under twenty-one, Allen was sentenced to detention in a young offenders’ institution rather than to imprisonment in an adult prison .

  4. 4.

    A parallel clause, section 15, governed indecent assault upon a male.

  5. 5.

    To provide a little context for these figures, in 1994 total recorded indecent assaults upon a woman exceeded 17,000 while by 2003, they exceeded 25,000 (Home Office 2006).

  6. 6.

    This terminology is further considered, and subsequent similar cases examined, in Chap. 8.

  7. 7.

    Histories of this period include Weeks (1981, 2016), Jivani (1997), and Jennings (2007).

  8. 8.

    The change would later be reflected in DSM-III (American Psychiatric Association 1980). The influence of this manual extends internationally: it is widely used in the United Kingdom, for example, where in addition to its clinical use, it is regularly cited before the courts on issues of mental illness.

  9. 9.

    Beth E. Schneider (1992) identified six areas in which AIDS affected lesbians’ lives: through their friendships and work with gay men; through HIV infection; through debates around lesbian sexual practices; in concerns around sperm donation; through work—greater homophobia in paid employment , plus unpaid caregiving responsibilities; and politically.

  10. 10.

    By contrast, the courts were not consistently hostile when dealing with non-sexual offences. For example, in 2000 a police officer who had lied about a car accident in order to conceal her lesbian relationship was found not guilty by a jury of perverting the course of justice. The judge , Paul Downes, then criticised the homophobic attitudes of her colleagues as ‘alarming’ (Flanagan and McGowan 2000).

  11. 11.

    A snapshot of the evolution in House of Commons and House of Lords attitudes to same-sex relationships can be seen in the ‘gay age of consent’ debates (Waites 2003).

  12. 12.

    In fact, it was not clear whether the legislation did so and no cases were brought to test its scope. The content of sex education was legally a matter for a school’s governors, not the local authority.

  13. 13.

    The argument in relation to economic damage is itself interesting: it suggested that men who choose a gay lifestyle and do not marry thereby deny a woman economic support (p. 103).

  14. 14.

    The case received extensive press coverage (e.g. Sun 1991a, b; M. Sharpe 1991a, b; Guardian 1992). There is a full transcript of the trial (A.M. Smith 2000). See also the discussions in Smith (1995, 1998) and Sharpe (2018).

  15. 15.

    The law at this time granted anonymity only to rape complainants. As the charge against Saunders was indecent assault , the names of the complainants were reported in full. However, in line with current law and practice, only initials are used to identify them here. Similarly, I have randomly allocated initials to identify complainants in other cases where this was not done in reports.

  16. 16.

    The Court of Appeal also referred to, but gave no details of, a social inquiry report (Smith 2000: Court of Appeal judgment).

  17. 17.

    This is not to suggest that all prosecutions of homosexual men for age of consent offences , still less all such offences, involved breach of trust, absence of consent, or inducements. Rather, it suggests that the latter were more likely to reach the Court of Appeal and/or to be selected for reporting.

  18. 18.

    While many lesbians are of course mothers, they would have had difficulty being regarded by the criminal courts as good mothers. (For a stark illustration of the division and its effect upon punishment , see the magistrates’ interviews in Carlen (1993)). Similarly, the willingness to imprison mothers for non-sexual offences is a matter of national and international concern (Gerry and Harris 2015).

  19. 19.

    The consultation paper asserted that ‘the law should be based on a public morality that protects the individual from danger, harm, fear or distress’ (Sexual Offences Review 2000, sect. 6.2.4).

  20. 20.

    For example, the group’s summary of the 2003 Act made no references to lesbians (Stonewall 2003).

  21. 21.

    Such feminist critiques substantially pre-dated the Bill (e.g. Mackinnon 1987, pp. 35–38; Naffine 1994, pp. 24–29).

  22. 22.

    For example, a woman was convicted of outraging public decency for ‘romping half-naked’ with another woman in a park (Daily Mirror 2016).

  23. 23.

    For assault by penetration , the starting point was four years’ imprisonment ; for sexual assault involving contact between the offender’s naked genitalia and a naked part of the victim’s body, two to three years; and for contact with the victim’s naked genitalia using something other than genitalia , twenty-six weeks to eighteen months. Where genital contact was not involved, the starting point was a community order.

  24. 24.

    There are numerous examples (e.g. Chapman 2009; Daily Mirror 2010, 2011, 2013; Aspinall 2018; BBC News 2014; Daily Star 2013; Twomey 2016); another case emphasised the defendant was a social worker/youth worker, although the relationship did not occur in the course of her work (Willey 1999). Exceptions include Leicester Mercury (2000), Hawken (2014), and Sharman (2018) whose subtitle refers to a ‘dangerous predator’.

  25. 25.

    This was not an isolated incident in contemporary parliamentary debate. Discussing the debates on repeal of section 28 and equalisation of the age of consent , Stychin comments that while young gay men were desexualised and young heterosexuals of either sex hypersexualised, ‘[y]oung lesbians, for the most part, seem not to exist at all’ (2003, p. 36).

References

  • American Psychiatric Association. 1980. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 3rd ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aspinall, Adam. 2018. Lesbian Head Escapes Sex Offender List. Daily Mirror, October 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auchmuty, Rosemary. 2004. Same-Sex Marriage Revived: Feminist Critique and Legal Strategy. Feminism & Psychology 14 (1): 101–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959-353504040307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015. Feminist Approaches to Sexuality and Law Scholarship. Legal Information Management 15: 4–7. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1472669615000055.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barker, Nicola. 2012. Not the Marrying Kind: A Feminist Critique of Same-Sex Marriage. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, Annie. 2005. “Sex Offenders: Madness, myth and modern monsters”. Lecture, Dana Centre, London, June 29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, Peter. 1998. Silence and Sodomy: The Creation of Homosexual Identity in Law. Modern Law Review 61 (1): 102–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BBC News. 2014. Teacher Emily Fox Jailed for Having Sex with Pupil, September 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2018. Tinder User Jailed for Tricking Blindfolded Men into Sex, November 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beresford, Sarah. 2008. Get Over Your (Legal) ‘Self’: A Brief History of Lesbians, Motherhood and the Law. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law 30 (2): 95–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/09649060802469785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014. The Age of Consent and the Ending of Queer Theory. Laws 3 (4): 759–779. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws3040759.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowcott, Owen. 2018. John Worboys’ Victims Win Human Rights Case against Police. The Guardian, February 21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, Paul. 2007. The Corrupter. Daily Mirror, October 19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capital Gay. 1991a. Judge Hits Back Over Criticism: Demo Sparks Outburst, November 15.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1991b. Judge Crabtree, November 22.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1992. Judge Frees Jailed Lesbian, June 19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlen, Pat. 1993. Women’s Imprisonment: A Study in Social Control. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, Vicki. 1992. Abseil Makes the Heart Grow Fonder: Lesbian and Gay Campaigning Tactics and Section 28. In Modern Homosexualities: Fragments of Lesbian and Gay Experience, ed. Ken Plummer, 217–226. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, John. 2009. Jailed Lesbian Teacher to See Lover, 15, When Freed. Daily Express, September 22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Committee on Homosexual Offences and Prostitution. 1957. Report of the Committee on Homosexual Offences and Prostitution. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, Davina. 1993. An Engaged State: Sexuality, Governance and the Potential for Change. In Activating Theory: Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual Politics, ed. Joseph Bristow and Angelia R. Wilson, 190–218. London: Lawrence & Wishart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crane, Paul. 1982. Gays and the Law. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crown Prosecution Service. 2004. Legal Guidance: Sexual Offences Act 2003. http://www.cps.gov.uk/legal/section7/sexoffencesact2003.html#50.

  • ———. 2017. Rape and Sexual Offences—Chapter 2: Sexual Offences Act 2003—Principal Offences, and Sexual Offences Act 1956—Most Commonly Charged Offences | The Crown Prosecution Service. Code for Crown Prosecutors. https://www.cps.gov.uk/legal-guidance/rape-and-sexual-offences-chapter-2-sexual-offences-act-2003-principal-offences-and.

  • Daily Mirror. 2010. Tutor on Sex List, November 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011. Pupil Affair Tutor Jailed, May 14.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. Lesbian Fling Teacher Jailed, November 23.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2016. Park Lesbian’s Drink Therapy, August 20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daily Star. 2013. Teacher Is Caged, November 23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, Caroline. 2019. Police Escape Misconduct Charges over Case of Serial Killer Stephen Port. The Guardian, July 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derby Evening Telegraph. 2004a. Lesbian Pervert Guilty of Abusing Girl, February 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2004b. Victim of Lesbian Predator ‘Taunted’ at School, March 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan, Padraic, and Bob McGowan. 2000. My Gay Hell in the Police. Express, October 20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gay and Lesbian Association of Doctors and Dentists. 2001. Consultation on Setting the Boundaries: Reforming the Law on Sex Offences. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerry, Felicity, and Lyndon Harris. 2015. Women in Prison: Is the Justice System Fit for Purpose? London: Halsbury’s Law Exchange.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guardian. 1992. Sex Case Girl Released on Appeal, June 13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harne, Lynne, and Rights of Women. 1997. Valued Families: The Lesbian Mothers’ Legal Handbook. London: The Women’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawken, Abe. 2014. Sex Attack at Navy Base by Lesbian Sailor. Daily Mirror, October 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Home Office. 2002. Protecting the Public—Strengthening Protection Against Sex Offenders and Reforming the Law on Sexual Offences. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2006. Sexual Assault on a Female’—Long-Term National Recorded Crime Trend. http://www.crimestatistics.org.uk/output/Page28.asp.

  • Honoré, Tony. 1978. Sex Law. London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, Louise A. 2000. Child Sexual Abuse in Victorian England. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, Stevi, and Sue Scott. 2004. Sexual Antinomies in Late Modernity. Sexualities 7 (2): 233–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, Rebecca. 2007. A Lesbian History of Britain: Love and Sex Between Women since 1500. Oxford: Greenwood World Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2008. ‘The Most Uninhibited Party They’d Ever Been to’: The Postwar Encounter Between Psychiatry and the British Lesbian, 1945–1971. Journal of British Studies 47 (4): 883–904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jivani, Alkarim. 1997. It’s Not Unusual: A History of Lesbian and Gay Britain in the Twentieth Century. London: M. O’Mara Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judicial College. 2018. Equal Treatment Bench Book. February. London: Judicial College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judicial Studies Board. 2000. Equal Treatment Bench Book. London: Judicial Studies Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacey, Nicola. 2001. Beset by Boundaries. Criminal Law Review: 3–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavelle, Ashley. 2014. ‘Wham Bam Tap Scratch Screech’: The Brief—But Proud—History of Lesbian London, 1991–1994. Journal of Lesbian Studies 18 (1): 88–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/10894160.2013.774679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leicester Mercury. 2000. Woman Is Jailed for Molesting Schoolgirl, May 19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, Ann. 1995. Doubly Deviant, Doubly Damned: Society’s Treatment of Violent Women. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Love, Heather. 2007. Feeling Backward: Loss and the Politics of Queer History. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackinnon, Catharine. 1987. Feminism Unmodified. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, Neil. 2018. Gay Tinder User Jailed for Tricking Blindfolded Men into Sex by Dressing as Woman. Mirror, November 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naffine, Ngaire. 1994. Possession: Erotic Love in the Law of Rape. Modern Law Review 56: 10–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • News of the World. 2004. Lesbian, 22 Posed as Boy of 16 to Seduce Girl of 12, February 29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pink Paper. 1991. Off with His Wig, October 26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plummer, Ken. 1992. Speaking Its Name: Inventing a Lesbian and Gay Studies. In Modern Homosexualities: Fragments of Lesbian and Gay Experience, ed. Ken Plummer, 3–28. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Policy Advisory Committee on Sexual Offences. 1981. Report on the Age of Consent in Relation to Sexual Offences. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ripley and Heanor News. 2004. Woman Posed as Teenage Boy to Assault Child, February 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Royal Commission on Marriage and Divorce. 1956. Report of the Royal Commission on Marriage and Divorce. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, Gayle. 1989. Thinking Sex: Notes for a Radical Theory of the Politics of Sexuality. In Pleasure and Danger: Exploring Female Sexuality, ed. Carole S. Vance, 267–319. London: Pandora.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, Beth E. 1992. Lesbian Politics and AIDS Work. In Modern Asian Studies, ed. Ken Plummer, 160–174. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sentencing Council. 2013. Sexual Offences Definitive Guideline. London: Sentencing Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sentencing Guidelines Council. 2007. Sexual Offences Act 2003 Definitive Guideline. London: Sentencing Guidelines Secretariat.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sexual Offences Review. 2000. Setting the Boundaries: Reforming the Law on Sex Offences, Vol. 1. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharman, Jon. 2018. Woman Jailed for String of Sex Attacks on Young Girls. Independent, September 27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe, Alex. 2018. Sexual Intimacy and Gender Identity “Fraud”: Reframing the Legal & Ethical Debate. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe, Martyn. 1991a. Blonde Dressed as Boy Seduced 2 Girls. Sun, September 19.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1991b. I’ve Got a 36D Chest, How Can I Be a Boy? Sun, September 20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Anna Marie. 1992. Resisting the Erasure of Lesbian Sexuality: A Challenge for Queer Activism. In Modern Homosexualities: Fragments of Lesbian and Gay Experience, ed. Ken Plummer, 200–213. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1995. The Regulation of Lesbian Sexuality Through Erasure: The Case of Jennifer Saunders. In Dyke Erotics, ed. Karla Jay, 164–179. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1998. The Hegemonic Regulation of Butch Performance: Regina v Saunders. In Butch/Femme: Inside Lesbian Gender, ed. Sally R. Munt, 177–190. London: Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———, ed. 2000. Regina v Saunders: A Collection of the Official Documents Relating to the 1991 Crown Court Trial and the 1992 Court of Appeal Hearing. Cornell University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Leanne. 2006. Principle or Pragmatism? Lesbian Parenting, Shared Residence and Parental Responsibility after Re G (Residence: Same Sex Partner). Child and Family Law Quarterly 18 (1): 125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, Cherry. 1991. Get Out! Get Angry? City Limits, February 14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stonewall. 2003. Sexual Offences. http://www.stonewall.org.uk/information_bank/criminal_law/69.asp#History.

  • ———. n.d.-a Age of Consent. Accessed December 13, 2006. http://www.stonewall.org.uk/information_bank/criminal_law/66.asp.

  • ———. n.d.-b Love. Accessed October 30, 2002. www.stonewall.org.uk.

  • Stychin, Carl F. 2003. Governing Sexuality: The Changing Politics of Citizenship and Law Reform. Oxford: Hart Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun. 1991a. This Is a Woman Who ‘Pretended She Was a Man Then Seduced Two Young Girls’, September 19.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1991b. 6 Years for Blonde Who Posed as a Boy to Bed Girls, September 21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tatchell, Peter. n.d. Consent at Sixteen: Protection or Persecution? Accessed September 23, 2004. www.petertatchell.net/age20%25of%2520consent/consent%2520at%252016.htm.

  • Telegraph. 2012. Margaret Thatcher Saved Career of Police Chief Who Made Aids Remarks, January 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, David, ed. 2004. Current Sentencing Practice. London: Sweet and Maxwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, Philip, and Ruth Costigan. 1990. Promoting Homosexuality: Section 28 of the Local Government Act 1988. Cardiff: Cardiff Law School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tweedie, Jill. 1972. Who Goes Home? Guardian, September 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Twomey, John. 2016. Lesbian PE Teacher Jailed for Grooming Schoolgirls for Sex. Daily Express, January 30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waites, Matthew. 2002. Inventing a ‘Lesbian Age of Consent’? The History of the Minimum Age for Sex Between Women in the UK. Social & Legal Studies 11 (3): 323–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2003. Equality at Last? Homosexuality, Heterosexuality and the Age of Consent in the United Kingdom. Sociology 37 (4): 637–655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walmesley, Roy, and Karen White. 1979. Home Office Research Unit Study No. 54: Sexual Offences, Consent and Sentencing. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weeks, Jeffrey. 1981. Sex, Politics and Society: The Regulation of Sexuality since 1800. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2016. Coming Out: Homosexual Politics in Britain from the Nineteenth Century to the Present. 3rd ed. London: Quartet Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willey, Garry. 1999. Youth Worker Is Jailed for Sex Assaults—Woman Sacked After Lesbian Affair with Under-Age Girl. Evening Chronicle, December 18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfenden, John. 1976. Turning Points. London: Bodley Head.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Caroline Derry .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Derry, C. (2020). Allen: Sexual Offences Prosecutions in the Late Twentieth Century. In: Lesbianism and the Criminal Law . Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35300-1_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35300-1_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-35299-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-35300-1

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics