Skip to main content

Mary/Charles Hamilton: Eighteenth-Century Female Husband Prosecutions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Lesbianism and the Criminal Law
  • 351 Accesses

Abstract

In 1746, travelling quack doctor Charles Hamilton married Mary Price. Within months, Price declared that her husband was in fact a woman. Hamilton was prosecuted, imprisoned, and publicly whipped. The case attracted notoriety thanks to reports in newspapers and in novelist Henry Fielding’s pamphlet The Female Husband; but the original case papers also survive. Through a detailed exploration of Hamilton’s case and its wider context, this chapter considers the motivations and experiences of eighteenth-century female husbands and their wives, husbands’ treatment as female impostors, and the reasons why such cases were prosecuted. It places them in a framework of legal, medical, and societal changes which were transforming eighteenth-century society. Those developments encouraged the emergence of silencing as a viable approach to policing lesbianism—and one which nonetheless allowed for the prosecution of female husbands.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    As explained in Chap. 1, this book will use male names and pronouns to refer to the accused while they lived as men and female names and pronouns while they lived as women.

  2. 2.

    The case was widely reported, including in the Bath Journal; Gentleman’s Magazine, Annual Register, and Newgate Calendar. The original case papers are in Somerset Archives (SA), Q/SR/314.

  3. 3.

    Banns are oral notice of a forthcoming marriage , typically read out in church on the three Sundays preceding the wedding. The entry in the marriage register gave the groom’s name as James Hamilton (SA D/P/W ST C 2/1/4 p. 63) although the marriage certificate gave it as Charles (SA Q/SR/314/159).

  4. 4.

    The actual charge may, in at least one of those cases, have been the same (fraud was an umbrella term for a variety of charges, not a single and distinct offence) but its presentation in court and the press were different.

  5. 5.

    According to the Bath Journal (1746c), this was alleged by Gould in his opening speech; no trace of the claim survives in the court records.

  6. 6.

    In light of this, it is surprising that Easton (2003, p. 131) argues that the case illustrates a shift in perceptions of female husband cases away from fraud and towards disorderly lesbian sexuality.

  7. 7.

    The Annual Register chose to use ‘Marrow’. However, as the accused’s male name had been given as Marlow, this seems more likely to be correct.

  8. 8.

    For example, John Williams in 1765 and Daniel Eaton in 1812, both convicted of sedition (Shoemaker 2004, p. 245); and a Mr Parsons who invented a ‘ghost’ to haunt his creditor: when pilloried, the crowd gave him money to pay the debts (McLynn 1989, p. 282).

  9. 9.

    Two people died in the pillory between 1775 and 1799, although for one of these, William Smith in 1780, the death may have been due to an improperly set-up pillory rather than the actions of the crowd (Shoemaker 2004, pp. 244–45).

  10. 10.

    Beattie (1986, p. 18) suggests the Vagrancy Act was used similarly to briefly imprison those suspected of theft .

  11. 11.

    The Bath Journal (1746b) stated ‘we hear that she was born at Yeovil’ but did not specify their source, and there is no corresponding information in the court record.

  12. 12.

    The marriage register for St John, Glastonbury records her marriage to George Newton, soldier , on 1 March 1748 (SA D/P/GLAJ 2/1/4 p 2).

  13. 13.

    Borthwick Institute’s account of the case notes the lack of entries in the ecclesiastical court records. There is no reference to court proceedings in local or national newspapers or the quarter sessions records held in York Archives and Local History Service.

  14. 14.

    Liberty Smith’s article (2002) is a rare but flawed exception. Unfortunately, it both depends heavily upon literary accounts and makes some questionable claims, notably that these couples were engaged in a joint project of challenging heteronormativity.

  15. 15.

    Locke’s views were by no means universally accepted; his Second Treatise was written in the context of a debate with Sir Robert Filmer over absolute monarchy and the divine right of kings.

  16. 16.

    For example, there were several cases in sixteenth- and seventeenth-century France where the death penalty was imposed (Faderman 1981, p. 51; Laqueur 1990, pp. 136–37; Jones and Stallybrass 1991, pp. 88–89; Fletcher 1995, p. 84); in the Netherlands, Henrika Schuria’s death sentence for tribadism was reduced to removal of the clitoris and exile (Laqueur 1990, p. 137); German Catherina Margaretha Linck was executed for marrying another woman and using a dildo (Faderman 1981, pp. 51–52; Hill 2001, p. 139; Peakman 2004, pp. 182–84).

  17. 17.

    For a critical discussion of both theories, see Connell (2000).

  18. 18.

    Harvey describes this dominance of Galenic over Aristotelian theory as ‘a relatively short-lived blip’ (2002, p. 211).

  19. 19.

    Indeed, several historians have argued persuasively that the shift began in the seventeenth century (Fissell 1995; Fletcher 1995; Gowing 1998).

  20. 20.

    This view is supported by the near-absence of the hermaphrodite from the legal texts I have considered.

  21. 21.

    Costs awards at the Surrey quarter sessions of 1767 ranged between seven shillings and a guinea, but probably did not represent the full cost of bringing the prosecution (Beattie 1986, pp. 46–47). A rough translation into current money values places those costs as between £30 and £91.62 at 2017 values, or between three and ten days’ wages for a skilled tradesman (The National Archives 2018). Lost earnings while attending court were also a significant cost for poorer prosecutors (Emsley 2018).

  22. 22.

    See Faderman (1981, p. 52), Fletcher (1995, p. 85), Heidensohn (1996, p. 39) which suggest lesbianism was immune from legal intervention; Hitchcock (1997, p. 77) which claims no lesbians were prosecuted qua lesbians. Peakman (2004, p. 193) argues sex between women was not criminalised because it posed less threat to the social order than sex between men.

  23. 23.

    Indeed, Fielding added a passage describing its discovery and use in evidence, an incident entirely absent from the actual records of the case.

References

  • Adolphus, John. 1824. Observations on the Vagrant Act. London: John Major.

    Google Scholar 

  • An Authentic Narrative of the Extraordinary Career of James Allen, the Female Husband, Who Was Married for the Space of Twenty-One Years, without Her Real Sex Being Discovered, Even by Her Wedded Associate. 1829. London: I.S. Thomas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Annual Register for the Year 1777. 1778. 4th ed. London: J Dodsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle’s Masterpiece; or, the Secrets of Generation Display’d in All the Parts Thereof. 1684. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, Sheridan. 1959. Henry Fielding’s The Female Husband: Fact and Fiction. Proceedings of the Modern Language Association 74 (3): 213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bannet, Eve Tavor. 1997. The Marriage Act of 1753: ‘A Most Cruel Law for the Fair Sex’. Eighteenth-Century Studies 30 (3): 233–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bath Journal. 1746a. No Title, September 22.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1746b. No Title, September 29.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1746c. No Title, November 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Battestin, Martin. 1980. Fielding and the Glastonbury Waters. Yearbook of English Studies 10: 205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beattie, J.M. 1986. Crime and the Courts in England 1660–1800. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackwell, Bonnie. 2002. ‘An Infallible Nostrum’: Female Husbands and Greensick Girls in Eighteenth-Century England. Literature and Medicine 21 (1): 56–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borthwick Institute for Archives. n.d. The Story of Barbara Hill. Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual & Transgendered History. Accessed September 6, 2019. https://www.york.ac.uk/borthwick/holdings/guides/research-guides/lgbt/barbara-hill/.

  • Bowen, H.V. 1998. British India, 1765–1813: The Metropolitan Context. In The Oxford History of the British Empire: The Eighteenth Century, ed. P.J. Marshall, 530–551. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowles, Emily. 2010. You Have Not What You Ought: Gender and Corporeal Intelligibility in Henry Fielding’s The Female Husband. Genders 52. https://www.colorado.edu/gendersarchive1998-2013/2010/10/01/you-have-not-what-you-ought-gender-and-corporeal-intelligibility-henry-fieldings-female.

  • Bullough, Vern L. 1996. Cross Dressing and Gender Role Change in the Middle Ages. In Handbook of Medieval Sexuality, ed. Vern L. Bullough and James A. Brundage, 223–242. New York: Garland Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caledonian Mercury. 1728. Edinburgh, December 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castle, Terry. 1982. Matters Not Fit to Be Mentioned: Fielding’s The Female Husband. ELH 49 (3): 602–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1993. The Apparitional Lesbian: Female Homosexuality and Modern Culture. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christian, Edward. 1819. Charges Delivered to Grand Juries in the Isle of Ely, upon Libels, Criminal Law, Vagrants, Religion, Rebellions, Assemblies, &c. & c. for the Use of Magistrates and Students of the Law. 2nd ed. London: W Clarke and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, Anna. 1996. Anne Lister’s Construction of Lesbian Identity. Journal of the History of Sexuality 7 (1): 23–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clayton, Susan. 1999. Does the Dress Make the Husband? An Example of a Female Husband, James Allen (1787–1829). Clio 10: 90–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2010. Can Two and a Half Centuries of Female Husbands Inform (Trans)Gender History? Journal of Lesbian Studies 14 (4): 288–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/10894160903048106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coke, Edward. 1628. The First Part of the Institutes of the Laws of England. London: Society of Stationers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comical News from Bloomsbury. 1690. The Female Captain: Or, The Counterfeit Bridegroom. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, Sophia M. 2000. Aristotle and Galen on Sex Difference and Reproduction: A New Approach to an Ancient Rivalry. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 31 (3): 405–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, Hera. 2005. The English Sexual Revolution: Technology and Social Change. History Workshop Journal 59: 109–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crook, G.T., ed. 1926. The Complete Newgate Calendar. London: Navarre Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derry, Caroline. 2008. Sexuality and Locality in the Trial of Mary Hamilton, ‘Female Husband’. King’s Law Journal 19 (3): 595–616. https://doi.org/10.1080/09615768.2008.11427709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2017. ‘Female Husbands’, Community and Courts in the Eighteenth Century. Journal of Legal History 38 (1): 54–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/01440365.2017.1289674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dirks, Nicholas B. 2006. The Scandal of Empire: India and the Creation of Imperial Britain. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Donoghue, Emma. 1993. Passions Between Women: British Lesbian Culture 1668–1801. London: Scarlet Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreger, Alice Domurat. 1998. Hermaphrodites and the Medical Invention of Sex. London: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duggaw, Dianne. 1989. Warrior Women and Popular Balladry, 1650–1850. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easton, Fraser. 2003. Gender’s Two Bodies: Women Warriors, Female Husbands and Plebeian Life. Past and Present 180: 131–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emsley, Clive. 2018. Crime and Society in England 1750–1900. 5th ed. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Equiano, Olaudah. 1789. The Interesting Narrative of the Life of Olaudah Equiano, or Gustavus Vassa, the African. London: Olaudah Equiano.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faderman, Lillian. 1981. Surpassing the Love of Men: Romantic Friendship and Love Between Women from the Renaissance to the Present. London: The Women’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • “February 1797, Trial of William Winklin (T17970215-46).” 2012. Old Bailey Proceedings Online. https://www.oldbaileyonline.org/browse.jsp?id=t17970215-46&div=t17970215-46&terms=winklin.

  • Fielding, Henry. 1746. The Female Husband: Or, the Surprising History of Mrs. Mary, Alias Mr. George Hamilton. London: M. Copper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fissell, Mary. 1995. Gender and Generation: Representing Reproduction in Early Modern England. Gender and History 7: 433–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, Anthony. 1995. Gender, Sex & Subordination in England 1500–1800. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedli, Lynne. 1985. Women Who Dressed as Men. Trouble and Strife 6: 25–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1987. ‘Passing Women’—A Study of Gender Boundaries in the Eighteenth Century. In Sexual Underworlds of the Enlightenment, ed. G.S. Rousseau and Roy Porter, 234–260. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gatrell, V.A.C. 1994. The Hanging Tree: Execution and the English People 1770–1868. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gowing, Laura. 1998. Domestic Dangers: Women, Words and Sex in Early Modern London. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, Karen. 2002. The Substance of Sexual Difference: Change and Persistence in Representations of the Body in Eighteenth-Century England. Gender & History 14 (2): 202–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hay, Douglas. 1975. Property, Authority and the Criminal Law. In Albion’s Fatal Tree: Crime and Society in Eighteenth-Century England, ed. D. Hay, P. Linebaugh, J.G. Rule, E.P. Thompson, and C. Winslow, 17–63. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidensohn, Frances. 1996. Women and Crime. 2nd ed. London: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, Bridget. 2001. Women Alone: Spinsters in England 1660–1850. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Histed, Elise Bennett. 2004. Mediaeval Rape: A Conceivable Defence? Cambridge Law Journal 63 (3): 743–769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hitchcock, Tim. 1997. English Sexualities, 1700–1800. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. The Reformulation of Sexual Knowledge in Eighteenth-Century England. Signs 37 (4): 823–832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, Margaret. 1999. The Sapphic Strain: English Lesbians in the Long Eighteenth Century. In Singlewomen in the European Past 1250–1800, ed. Judith M. Bennett and Amy M. Froide, 270–296. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, Robert. 1742. A Medicinal Dictionary. London: T. Osborne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Ann Rosalind, and Peter Stallybrass. 1991. Fetishizing Gender: Constructing the Hermaphrodite in Renaissance Europe. In Body Guards: The Cultural Politics of Gender Ambiguity, ed. Julia Epstein and Kristina Straub, 80–111. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, Peter. 2000. Crime, Justice, and Discretion in England 1740–1820. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2007. Newspaper Reporting and Attitudes to Crime and Justice in Late-Eighteenth- and Early-Nineteenth-Century London. Continuity and Change 22 (1): 73–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kittredge, Katharine. 2003. Introduction: Contexts for the Consideration of the Transgressive Antitype. In Lewd and Notorious: Female Transgression in the 18th Century, ed. Katharine Kittredge, 1–17. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knapp, Andrew. 1810. The New Newgate Calendar, Volume 2. London: J and J Cundee.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1826. The New Newgate Calendar, Volume 3. London: J Robins and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knelman, Judith. 1998. Twisting in the Wind: The Murderess and the English Press. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Langbein, John H. 2003. The Origins of the Adversary Criminal Trial. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanser, Susan S. 1999a. Befriending the Body: Female Intimacies as Class Acts. Eighteenth-Century Studies 32 (2): 179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1999b. Singular Politics: The Rise of the British Nation and the Production of the Old Maid. In Singlewomen in the European Past 1250–1800, ed. Judith M. Bennet and Amy M. Froide, 297–323. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2003. ‘Queer to Queer’: The Sapphic Body as Transgressive Text. In Lewd and Notorious: Female Transgression in the 18th Century, ed. Katharine Kittredge, 21–46. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laqueur, Thomas. 1990. Making Sex: Body and Gender From the Greeks to Freud. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linebaugh, Peter. 1982. The London Hanged: Crime and Civil Society in the Eighteenth Century. 2nd ed. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, John. 1690. The Second Treatise of Government. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • London Chronicle. 1760. A Female Husband Exposed, March 22.

    Google Scholar 

  • London Evening Post. 1760. No Title, March 18.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1777. No Title, July 31.

    Google Scholar 

  • London Evening Standard. 1829. The Female Husband, January 22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Love, Heather. 2007. Feeling Backward: Loss and the Politics of Queer History. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLynn, Frank. 1989. Crime and Punishment in Eighteenth-Century England. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendelson, Sara, and Patricia Crawford. 1998. Women in Early Modern England. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morning Chronicle and London Advertiser. 1777. News, July 23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moscucci, Ornella. 1996. Clitoridectomy, Circumcision, and the Politics of Sexual Pleasure in Mid-Victorian Britain. In Sexualities in Victorian Britain, ed. Andrew H. Miller and James Eli Adams, 60–78. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, Jacqueline. 1996. Twice Marginal and Twice Invisible: Lesbians in the Middle Ages. In Handbook of Medieval Sexuality, ed. Vern L. Bullough and James A. Brundage, 191–222. New York: Garland Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nechtman, Tillman W. 2010. Nabobs: Empire and Identity in Eighteenth-Century Britain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newcastle Courant. 1735. Dr. William Green, Oculist, January 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicolazzo, Sarah. 2014. Henry Fielding’s The Female Husband and the Sexuality of Vagrancy. The Eighteenth Century 55 (4): 335–353. https://doi.org/10.1353/ecy.2014.0038.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norton, Rictor. 2005. A Female Husband Exposed, 1760. Homosexuality in Eighteenth-Century England. http://rictornorton.co.uk/eighteen/1760fema.htm.

  • O’Connell, Sheila. 1999. The Popular Print in England. London: British Museum.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Driscoll, Sally. 2003. The Lesbian and the Passionless Woman: Femininity and Sexuality in Eighteenth-Century England. The Eighteenth Century 44 (2–3): 103–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2010. A Crisis of Femininity: Re-Making Gender in Popular Discourse. In Lesbian Dames, ed. John C. Beynon and Caroline Gonda. New York: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Onania or the Heinous Sin of Self Pollution. 1710. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Onania; or, the Heinous Sin of Self-Pollution. 1723. London: Thomas Crouch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxford English Dictionary, 2nd Edition. 2004. http://athens.oed.com.

  • Peakman, Julie. 2004. Lascivious Bodies: A Sexual History of the Eighteenth Century. London: Atlantic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2016. Amatory Pleasures: Explorations in Eighteenth-Century Sexual Culture. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plain Reasons for the Growth of Sodomy in England. 1728. London: A Dodd and E Nutt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powys, Llewellyn, ed. 1932. The Life & Times of Anthony à Wood. London: Wishart & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Probert, Rebecca. 2009. Marriage Law and Practice in the Long Eighteenth Century: A Reassessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Public Advertiser. 1777. No Title, July 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Public Ledger or the Daily Register of Commerce and Intelligence. 1760. No Title, March 26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, Pat. 2007. Fielding on Society, Crime, and the Law. The Cambridge Companion to Henry Fielding (May): 137–152. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521854512.011.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Salisbury, Joyce E. 1996. Gendered Sexuality. In Handbook of Medieval Sexuality, ed. Vern L. Bullough and James A. Brundage, 81–101. New York: Garland Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Satan’s Harvest Home: Or the Present State of Whorecraft. 1749. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shoemaker, Robert S. 2004. Streets of Shame? The Crowd and Public Punishments in London, 1700–1820. In Penal Practice and Culture, 1500–1900: Punishing the English, ed. Simon Devereaux and Paul Griffiths, 232–257. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sibley, Ebenezer. 1796. The Medical Mirror, or Treatise on the Impregnation of the Human Female. 2nd ed. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Liberty. 2002. Listening to the ‘Wives’ of the ‘Female Husbands’: A Project of Femme Historiography in Eighteenth-Century Britain. Journal of Lesbian Studies 6 (2): 105–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • St James’s Chronicle or the British Evening Post. 1766. No Title, May 29.

    Google Scholar 

  • The National Archives. 2018. Currency Converter: 1270–2017. The National Archives. http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/currency-converter/.

  • Tissot, Samuel. 1766. A Treatise on The Crime of Onan. 3rd ed. London: B Thomas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toulalan, Sarah. 2003. Extraordinary Satisfactions: Lesbian Visibility in Seventeenth-Century Pornography in England. Gender & History 15 (1): 50–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Traub, Valerie. 2016. Thinking Sex with the Early Moderns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trumbach, Randolph. 1991. London’s Sapphists: From Three Sexes to Four Genders in the Making of Modern Culture. In Body Guards: The Cultural Politics of Gender Ambiguity, ed. Julia Epstein and Kristina Straub, 112–141. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vicinus, Martha. 1996. They Wonder to Which Sex I Belong’: The Historical Roots of the Modern Lesbian Identity. In Lesbian Subjects: A Feminist Studies Reader, ed. Martha Vicinus, 233–260. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, Garthine. 1998. Rereading Rape and Sexual Violence in Early Modern England. Gender & History 10 (1): 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, Richard M. 2014. Print Culture, Crime and Justice in 18th Century London. London: Bloomsbury.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wheelwright, Julie. 1989a. Amazons and Military Maids: Women Who Dressed as Men in the Pursuit of Life, Liberty, and Happiness. London: Pandora.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1989b. Amazons and Military Maids. London: Pandora.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehall Evening Post or London Intelligencer. 1760a. No Title, March 25.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1760b. No Title, April 1.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Caroline Derry .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Derry, C. (2020). Mary/Charles Hamilton: Eighteenth-Century Female Husband Prosecutions. In: Lesbianism and the Criminal Law . Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35300-1_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35300-1_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-35299-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-35300-1

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics