Abstract
A successful dialogue requires that the participants have a shared understanding of what they are trying to achieve, individually and collectively. This coordination can be achieved if both recognise the type of dialogue in which they are engaged. We focus on two particular dialogue types, action persuasion and deliberation dialogues, which are often conflated because they share similar speech acts. Previously, a clear distinction was made between the two in terms of the different pre- and post-conditions used for the speech acts within these dialogues. This prior work gave formal specifications of the dialogue moves within the dialogues but offered no evaluation through implementation. In this paper, we present an implementation to demonstrate that the two dialogue types described in this way can be realised in software to support focussed communication between autonomous agents. We provide the design and implementation details of our new tool along with an evaluation of the software. The tool we have produced captures the distinctive features of each of the two dialogue types, to make plain their differences and to validate the speech acts for use in practical scenarios.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Further in this paper, we will focus on persuasion and deliberation about actions. Although [10] might seem to suggest that persuasion concerns only propositions and not actions, persuading people to do something is such an everyday occurrence that we may regard persuasion about action as a bona fide dialogue type.
- 2.
References
Atkinson, K., Bench-Capon, T., Walton, D.: Distinctive features of persuasion and deliberation dialogues. Argum. Comput. 4(2), 105–127 (2013)
Bench-Capon, T., Atkinson, K., Wyner, A.: Using argumentation to structure e-participation in policy making. In: Hameurlain, A., Küng, J., Wagner, R., Decker, H., Lhotska, L., Link, S. (eds.) Transactions on Large-Scale Data- and Knowledge-Centered Systems XVIII. LNCS, vol. 8980, pp. 1–29. Springer, Heidelberg (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-46485-4_1
Bench-Capon, T., Doutre, S., Dunne, P.E.: Asking the right question: forcing commitment in examination dialogues. In: Besnard, P., Doutre, S., Hunter, A. (eds.) Proceedings of COMMA 2008, vol. 172, pp. 49–60. IOS Press (2008)
Black, E., Hunter, A.: An inquiry dialogue system. Auton. Agents Multi Agent Syst. 19(2), 173–209 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10458-008-9074-5
Chalaguine, L.A., Hamilton, F.L., Hunter, A., Potts, H.W.: Argument harvesting using chatbots. In: Proceedings of COMMA 2018, pp. 149–160. IOS Press (2018)
Grice, H.P.: Logic and conversation. In: Cole, P., Morgan, J.L. (eds.) Syntax and Semantics, vol. 3, pp. 41–58. Academic Press, New York (1975)
Morgan, J., Paiement, A., Seisenberger, M., Williams, J., Wyner, A.: A chatbot framework for the children’s legal centre. In: Proceedings of JURIX 2018, pp. 205–209 (2018)
Olszewska, J.I., et al.: Robotic ontological standard development life cycle. In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation 2018: Workshop on Elderly Care Robotics: Technology and Ethics (2018)
Prakken, H.: Formal systems for persuasion dialogue. Knowl. Eng. Rev. 21(2), 163–188 (2006)
Walton, D., Krabbe, E.: Commitment in Dialogue: Basic Concepts of Interpersonal Reasoning. SUNY Press, New York (1995)
Wardeh, M., Wyner, A., Atkinson, K., Bench-Capon, T.: Argumentation based tools for policy-making. In: Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, pp. 249–250. ACM (2013)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Kirchev, Y., Atkinson, K., Bench-Capon, T. (2019). Demonstrating the Distinctions Between Persuasion and Deliberation Dialogues. In: Bramer, M., Petridis, M. (eds) Artificial Intelligence XXXVI. SGAI 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11927. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34885-4_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34885-4_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-34884-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-34885-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)