Skip to main content

Bearing Capacity of Square Footing: A Comparative Study Employing Non-associative MC and MCC Model

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advanced Numerical Methods in Foundation Engineering (GeoMEast 2019)

Part of the book series: Sustainable Civil Infrastructures ((SUCI))

  • 456 Accesses

Abstract

The classical bearing capacity theories adopt a plane-strain framework along with an elastic-perfectly plastic Mohr-Coulomb (MC) constitutive response of soil. It is well known that associative MC model fails to capture the evolution of principal stress and suffers from excessive dilation prediction. A non-associative extension of MC model is often employed to control such excessive dilation response; however, their applicability in prediction of 3D bearing capacity of footings should be explored. Further, the critical state based Modified Cam-Clay (MCC) models are expected to delineate a better stress-strain prediction of soil and it will be interesting to examine the 3D bearing capacity estimates of regular shaped foundations employing these two different models. In this regard, this article addresses the finite-element based bearing capacity estimation of a square footing resting on the surface of a semi-infinite homogeneous soil medium. The footing is represented by linear-elastic element, while the foundation soil has been represented by both non-associative MC and MCC models. Comparison of the load-displacement response of the uniformly loaded footing, obtained from considering the MC and MCC models, clearly delineates the shortcoming of the MC and necessity of adopting MCC behaviour in a 3-dimensional geotechnical problem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abed, A.A., Vermeer, P.A.: Numerical simulation of unsaturated soil behavior. In: Proceedings of the 1st Euro Mediterranean Conference on Advances in Geomaterials and Structures, Tunisia, pp. 1–8 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • Acharyya, R., Dey, A.: Evaluation of slip mechanism beneath the shallow footing resting on plane ground by altering flow-rules. In: National Seminar on Advanced Construction and Computational Tools in Geotechniques – Practice to Theory, Indian Geotechnical Society, Kolkata, West Bengal, India, pp. 1–8 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  • Acharyya, R., Dey, A.: Importance of dilatancy on the evolution of failure mechanism of a strip footing resting on horizontal ground. INAE Lett. 3(3), 131–142 (2018a)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acharyya, R., Dey, A.: Assessment of failure mechanism of a strip footing on horizontal ground considering flow rules. Innov. Infrastruct. Solut. 3(49), 1–16 (2018b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Acharyya, R., Dey, A. Kumar, B.: Finite element and ANN-based prediction of bearing capacity of square footing resting on the crest of c-φ soil slope. Int. J. Geotech. Eng. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/19386362.2018.1435022

  • Benmebarek, S., Remadna, M.S., Benmebarek, N., Belounar, L.: Numerical evaluation of the bearing capacity factor \( N_{\gamma }^{\prime } \) of ring footings. Comput. Geotechn. 44, 132–138 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolton, M.D., Lau, C.K.: Vertical bearing capacity factors for circular and strip footings on Mohr-Coulomb soil. Can. Geotech. J. 30, 1024–1033 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cerato, A.B., Lutenegger, A.J.: Bearing capacity of square and circular footings on a finite layer of granular soil underlain by a rigid base. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 132(11), 1496–1501 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dey, A., Mukherjee, M., Acharyya, R.: Importance of constitutive model in assessing 3-D bearing capacity of square footing on clayey soil using finite element analysis. In: 11th Structural Engineering Convention, Kolkata, India, pp. 1–6 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  • Drescher, A., Detournay, E.: Limit load in translational failure mechanisms for associative and non-associative materials. Geotechnique 43(3), 443–456 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanna, A., Rahman, A.M.E.: Ultimate bearing capacity of triangular shell strip footings on sand. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 116(12), 1851–1863 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanna, A.M.: Bearing capacity of foundations on a weak sand layer overlaying a strong deposit. Can. Geotech. J. 19(3), 392–396 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim, A., Ou, C.-Y., Hsieh, P.G.: Evaluation of clay constitutive models for analysis of deep excavation under undrained conditions. J. GeoEng. 5, 9–20 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Loukidis, D., Salgado, R.: Bearing capacity of strip and circular footings in sand using finite elements. Comput. Geotech. 36, 871–879 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manoharan, N., Dasgupta, S.P.: Bearing capacity of surface footings by finite elements. Comput. Geotech. 54(4), 563–586 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyerhof, G.G.: The ultimate bearing capacity of foundations. Geotechnique 2, 301–332 (1951)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyerhof, G.G., Koumoto, T.: Inclination factors for bearing capacity of shallow footings. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 113(9), 1013–1018 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nova, R., Montrasio, L.: Settlements of shallow foundations on sand. Geotechnique 41(2), 243–256 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oh, W.T., Vanapalli, S.K.: Modeling the stress versus settlement behaviour of shallow foundations in unsaturated cohesive soils extending the modified total stress approach. Soils Found. 58, 382–397 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reddy, A.S., Singh, A.K., Karnik, S.S.: Bearing capacity of clays whose cohesion increases linearly with depth. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 117(2), 348–353 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiau, J.S., Lyamin, A.V., Sloan, S.W.: Bearing capacity of a sand layer on clay by finite element limit analysis. Can. Geotech. J. 40, 900–915 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terzaghi, K.: Theoretical Soil Mechanics. Wiley, New York (1943)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vermeer, P.A., de Borst, R.: Non-associative plasticity for soils, concrete and rock. Heron 29(3), 1–64 (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  • Vesic, A.S.: Analysis of ultimate loads of shallow foundation. J. Soil Mech. Found. Div. 99(SM1), 45–73 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, D., Bienen, B.: Numerical investigation of penetration of a large-diameter footing into normally consolidated Kaolin clay with a consolidation phase. Geotechnique 66, 947–952 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, F., Zheng, X.C., Zhao, L.H., Tan, Y.G.: Ultimate bearing capacity of a strip footing placed on sand with a rigid basement. Comput. Geotech. 77, 115–119 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, L., Yang, F., Dan, H.: The influence of horizontal confinement on the bearing capacity factor NÎł of smooth strip footing. Comput. Geotech. 61, 127–131 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Dr. Rana Acharyya, Post-Doctoral Researcher, IIT Bombay for his help in creating the PLAXIS 3D models.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arindam Dey .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Mukherjee, M., Dey, A. (2020). Bearing Capacity of Square Footing: A Comparative Study Employing Non-associative MC and MCC Model. In: Shehata, H., Das, B., Selvadurai, A., Fayed, A. (eds) Advanced Numerical Methods in Foundation Engineering. GeoMEast 2019. Sustainable Civil Infrastructures. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34193-0_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics