Abstract
The field of Emergent Narrative in digital narrative studies has seen a lot of research since its inception in 1999, and a lot of it is helpful, but also there has been confusion in terms and a lack of focus on the specifics of how the narrative is shaped in the mind of the player. The term itself has been used to both describe the ensuing field, the concept, the process, and the resulting narrative experience. This paper aims to clarify these misunderstandings by investigating the field and defining the term “afterstory” to help solidify the relationship between the differing aspects of Emergent Narrative. Afterstory is specifically defined as the virtual, mental story that exists in the player’s mind after play and informed by the interactions and their perspective on them. Then, using previous work on retellings, the paper will relate afterstory to how people retell their afterstories, and what we can use those retellings for in relation to the system that helped form them. In conclusion, some examples will be brought forth that showcase the difficult nature of extrapolating a retelling’s quality to its interactive narrative system’s quality, but how it can still be done with careful, purposeful analysis.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
We say often attributed because an older source is Galyean III, who coined the term in their PhD thesis on Narrative Guidance of Interactivity, from 1995 [8]. However, while their use and definition is interesting, they do not have a focus on emergence the same way Aylett had.
- 2.
This inherently assumes that the system is capable of creating emergent behaviour.
- 3.
An argument can be made that a more involved (or elaborate, or deep) discourse shows an effort to want to tell a story well because it is an interesting story, but one can still tell a bad story well.
References
Abbott, H.P.: Story, plot, and narration. In: Herman, D. (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Narrative. Cambridge Companions to Literature, p. 39–51. Cambridge University Press (2007). https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521856965.003
Aylett, R.: Narrative in virtual environments-towards emergent narrative. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Fall Symposium on Narrative Intelligence, pp. 83–86 (1999)
Bois, J.: Breaking madden (2013–2015). https://www.sbnation.com/a/breaking-madden. Specific episode referenced is at https://www.sbnation.com/nfl/2013/9/5/4691010/breaking-madden-clarence-beeftank-jaguars
Bruni, L.E., Baceviciute, S.: Narrative intelligibility and closure in interactive systems. In: Koenitz, H., Sezen, T.I., Ferri, G., Haahr, M., Sezen, D., C̨atak, G. (eds.) ICIDS 2013. LNCS, vol. 8230, pp. 13–24. Springer, Cham (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02756-2_2
CCP Games: Eve Online (2008)
Tiburon, E.A., Sports, E.A.: NFL Madden 25 (2013)
Eladhari, M.P.: Re-Tellings: the fourth layer of narrative as an instrument for critique. In: Rouse, R., Koenitz, H., Haahr, M. (eds.) ICIDS 2018. LNCS, vol. 11318, pp. 65–78. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04028-4_5
Galyean III, T.A.: Narrative guidance of interactivity. Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1995)
Groen, A.: Empires of Eve. Self published (2016)
Jenkins, H.: Game design as narrative architecture. In: The Game Design Reader: A Rules of Play Anthology, chapter 4, pp. 118–130. MIT Press, Cambridge (2004)
Koenitz, H.: Towards a theoretical framework for interactive digital narrative. In: Aylett, R., Lim, M.Y., Louchart, S., Petta, P., Riedl, M. (eds.) ICIDS 2010. LNCS, vol. 6432, pp. 176–185. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16638-9_22
Koenitz, H.: Towards a specific theory of interactive digital narrative. In: Interactive Digital Narrative, pp. 107–121. Routledge (2015)
Larsen, B.A.: The narrative quality of games and play. Master’s thesis, Aalborg University, CPH (2017)
Larsen, B.A., Schoenau-Fog, H.: The narrative quality of game mechanics. In: Nack, F., Gordon, A.S. (eds.) ICIDS 2016. LNCS, vol. 10045, pp. 61–72. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48279-8_6
Linden Lab: Second Life (2003)
Louchart, S., Aylett, R.: The emergent narrative theoretical investigation. In: the 2004 Conference on Narrative and Interactive Learning Environments, pp. 21–28 (2004)
Louchart, S., Aylett, R.: Narrative theory and emergent interactive narrative. Int. J. Contin. Eng. Educ. Life Learn. 14(6), 506–518 (2004)
Louchart, S., Swartjes, I., Kriegel, M., Aylett, R.: Purposeful authoring for emergent narrative. In: Spierling, U., Szilas, N. (eds.) ICIDS 2008. LNCS, vol. 5334, pp. 273–284. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89454-4_35
Louchart, S., Truesdale, J., Suttie, N., Aylett, R.: Emergent narrative, past, present and future of an interactive storytelling approach. In: Interactive Digital Narrative: History, Theory and Practice, pp. 185–199. Routledge (2015)
Magnuson, J.: Loneliness (2010). http://www.necessarygames.com/my-games/loneliness/flash
Montfort, N.: Twisty Little Passages: An Approach to Interactive Fiction. MIT Press (2005)
Murnane, E.: Emergent narrative: stories of play, playing with stories. Ph.D. thesis, University of Central Florida (2018)
Ringer, C., Nicolaou, M.A.: Deep unsupervised multi-view detection of video game stream highlights. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games, p. 15. ACM (2018)
Ryan, J.: Curating simulated storyworlds. Ph.D. thesis, UC Santa Cruz (2018)
Ryan, J.O., Mateas, M., Wardrip-Fruin, N.: Open design challenges for interactive emergent narrative. In: Schoenau-Fog, H., Bruni, L.E., Louchart, S., Baceviciute, S. (eds.) ICIDS 2015. LNCS, vol. 9445, pp. 14–26. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27036-4_2
Ryan, M.L.: Avatars of Story. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis (2006)
Suttie, N., Louchart, S., Aylett, R., Lim, T.: Theoretical considerations towards authoring emergent narrative. In: Koenitz, H., Sezen, T.I., Ferri, G., Haahr, M., Sezen, D., C̨atak, G. (eds.) ICIDS 2013. LNCS, vol. 8230, pp. 205–216. Springer, Cham (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02756-2_25
Swartjes, I.M.T.: Whose story is it anyway? How improv informs agency and authorship of emergent narrative. Ph.D. thesis, University of Twente, The Netherlands (2010)
Various: The Boatmurdered Let’s Play Archive. all entries archived at (2006). https://lparchive.org/Dwarf-Fortress-Boatmurdered/
Walsh, R.: Emergent narrative in interactive media. Narrative 19(1), 72–85 (2011)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Larsen, B.A., Bruni, L.E., Schoenau-Fog, H. (2019). The Story We Cannot See: On How a Retelling Relates to Its Afterstory. In: Cardona-Rivera, R., Sullivan, A., Young, R. (eds) Interactive Storytelling. ICIDS 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11869. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33894-7_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33894-7_21
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-33893-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-33894-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)