Skip to main content

Innovation and Entrepreneurial Ecosystems: Structure, Boundaries, and Dynamics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Innovation in Food Ecosystems

Part of the book series: Contributions to Management Science ((MANAGEMENT SC.))

Abstract

Recognizing the broader dimensions of entrepreneurial and innovation activities, holistic and inclusive networked approaches pave the way to co-creation activities that are essential for achieving sustainability in food systems. Recent studies have started to deepen what are the critical enablers for creating thriving entrepreneurial and innovation ecosystems. Networks that include firms, institutions, and several other relevant stakeholders in knowledge spillovers enable to produce more social and economic value through co-creation processes. However, due to the unique complexity within ecosystems, there is no standardized framework or strategy to develop entrepreneurial or innovation ecosystems effectively. In this chapter, a synthesis of the structure, dynamics, and boundaries of innovation and entrepreneurial ecosystems is presented. In particular, the main differences between these two concepts and the traditional ecosystem concept are provided and an overview of the more well-established definitions and frameworks present in the business and management literature offered. So, the following questions and many others will be addressed: what are the critical factors that lead some ecosystems to success? What the key actors? What dynamics characterize them? Answering these questions may represent an effective solution to address sustainability in the multi-functionality of food systems collectively. Therefore, how the heterogeneous elements and complexity of entrepreneurial and innovation ecosystems can be applied in food system sustainability initiatives will be finally discussed and critical action points for policy and practice recommended.

Co-authored by Canio Forliano—Department of Management, University of Turin, School of Management and Economics, Turin, Italy

Department of Political Science and International relations, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy, e-mail: canio.forliano@unito.it

Co-authored by Alberto Bertello—Department of Management, University of Turin, School of Management and Economics, Turin, Italy, e-mail: alberto.bertello@unito.it

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Acs, Z. J., Autio, E., & Szerb, L. (2014). National systems of entrepreneurship: Measurement issues and policy implications. Research Policy, 43(3), 476–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acs, Z. J., Stam, E., Audretsch, D. B., & O’Connor, A. (2017). The lineages of the entrepreneurial ecosystem approach. Small Business Economics, 49(1), 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adner, R. (2012). The wide lens: A new strategy for innovation. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adner, R. (2017). Ecosystem as structure: An actionable construct for strategy. Journal of Management, 43(1), 39–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adner, R., & Kapoor, R. (2010). Value creation in innovation ecosystems: How the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations. Strategic Management Journal, 31(3), 306–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adner, R., & Kapoor, R. (2016). Innovation ecosystems and the pace of substitution: Re-examining technology S-curves. Strategic Management Journal, 37(4), 625–648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Almpanopoulou, A., Ritala, P., & Blomqvist, K. (2019). Innovation ecosystem emergence barriers: Institutional perspective. In Proceedings of the 52nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvedalen, J., & Boschma, R. (2017). A critical review of entrepreneurial ecosystems research: Towards a future research agenda. European Planning Studies, 25(6), 887–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Appleyard, M. M., & Chesbrough, H. W. (2017). The dynamics of open strategy: From adoption to reversion. Long Range Planning, 50(3), 310–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. B. (2015). Everything in its place: Entrepreneurship and the strategic management of cities, regions, and states. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Auerswald, P. E. (2015). Enabling entrepreneurial ecosystems: Insights from ecology to inform effective entrepreneurship policy. Kauffman Foundation Research Series on city, metro, and regional entrepreneurship.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auerswald, P. E., & Dani, L. (2017). The adaptive life cycle of entrepreneurial ecosystems: The biotechnology cluster. Small Business Economics, 49(1), 97–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Autio, E., & Thomas, L. (2014). Innovation ecosystems: Implications for innovation management. In M. Dodgson, D. M. Gann, & N. Phillips (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of innovation management (Vol. 1, pp. 204–288). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Autio, E., & Thomas, L. D. (2016). Tilting the playing field: Towards an endogenous strategic action theory of ecosystem creation. In Academy of management proceedings (Vol. 2016, No. 1). Briarcliff Manor, NY: Academy of Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Autio, E., Kenney, M., Mustar, P., Siegel, D., & Wright, M. (2014). Entrepreneurial innovation: The importance of context. Research Policy, 43(7), 1097–1108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Autio, E., Nambisan, S., Thomas, L. D., & Wright, M. (2018). Digital affordances, spatial affordances, and the genesis of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 12(1), 72–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bahrami, H., & Evans, S. (1995). Flexible re-cycling and high-technology entrepreneurship. California Management Review, 37(3), 62–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boschma, R. (2015). Towards an evolutionary perspective on regional resilience. Regional Studies, 49(5), 733–751.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R., & Mason, C. (2017). Looking inside the spiky bits: A critical review and conceptualisation of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Small Business Economics, 49(1), 11–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ceccagnoli, M., Forman, C., Huang, P., & Wu, D. J. (2012). Co-creation of value in a platform ecosystem: The case of enterprise software. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 263–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston: Harvard Business Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dattée, B., Alexy, O., & Autio, E. (2018). Maneuvering in poor visibility: How firms play the ecosystem game when uncertainty is high. Academy of Management Journal, 61(2), 466–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Bernardi, P., Bertello, A., & Venuti, F. (2019). Online and on-site interactions within alternative food networks: Sustainability impact of knowledge-sharing practices. Sustainability, 11(5), 1457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Bernardi, P., Bertello, A., & Venuti, F. (2020). Community-oriented motivations and knowledge sharing as drivers of success within food assemblies. In Exploring digital ecosystems (pp. 443–457). Cham: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • De Bernardi, P., Bertello, A., Venuti, F., & Zardini, A. (2019). Knowledge transfer driving community-based business models towards sustainable food-related behaviours: A commons perspective. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2019.1664271

  • De Bernardi, P., Forliano, C., Rotti, R., & Franco, M. (2019). Innovazione e sostenibilità nei nuovi modelli di business del settore vitivinicolo. Analisi del caso Fontanafredda. In F. Moreschi (Ed.), Il paesaggio vitivinicolo come patrimonio europeo: Aspetti gius-economici, geografici, ambientali, contrattuali, enoturistici, di marketing (pp. 27–41). Torino: Giappichelli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dedehayir, O., Mäkinen, S. J., & Ortt, J. R. (2018). Roles during innovation ecosystem genesis: A literature review. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 136, 18–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dell’Olio, M., Hassink, J., & Vaandrager, L. (2017). The development of social farming in Italy: A qualitative inquiry across four regions. Journal of Rural Studies, 56, 65–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durst, S., & Poutanen, P. (2013). Success factors of innovation ecosystems-initial insights from a literature review. In R. Smeds & O. Irrmann (Eds.), Co-create 2013: The boundary-crossing conference on co-design in innovation (pp. 27–38). Espoo: Aalto University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, G., Shimizu, C., Ciesinski, S., Davila, A., Hassan, S., Jia, N., & Morris, R. (2013). Entrepreneurial ecosystems around the globe and company growth dynamics (Vol. 11). Geneva: World Economic Forum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gharajedaghi, J. (2011). Systems thinking: Managing chaos and complexity: A platform for designing business architecture. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, R. (2014). Creating university-based entrepreneurial ecosystems: Evidence from emerging world leaders. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hajikhani, A. (2017). Emergence and dissemination of ecosystem concept in innovation studies: A systematic literature review study. In Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hakala, H., O’Shea, G., Farny, S., & Luoto, S. (2019). Re-storying the business, innovation and entrepreneurial ecosystem concepts. The model-narrative review method. International Journal of Management Reviews, 00, 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallen, B. L., Bingham, C. B., & Cohen, S. (2014). Do accelerators accelerate? A study of venture accelerators as a path to success?. In Academy of management proceedings (Vol. 2014, No. 1, p. 12955). Briarcliff Manor, NY: Academy of Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannah, D. P., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (2018). How firms navigate cooperation and competition in nascent ecosystems. Strategic Management Journal, 39(12), 3163–3192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hermans, F., Roep, D., & Klerkx, L. (2016). Scale dynamics of grassroots innovations through parallel pathways of transformative change. Ecological Economics, 130, 285–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, V. W., & Horowitt, G. (2012). The rainforest: The secret to building the next Silicon Valley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iansiti, M., & Levien, R. (2004). The keystone advantage: What the new dynamics of business ecosystems mean for strategy, innovation, and sustainability. Boston: Harvard Business Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingram, J. (2018). Agricultural transition: Niche and regime knowledge systems’ boundary dynamics. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 26, 117–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isenberg, D. J. (2010). How to start an entrepreneurial revolution. Harvard Business Review, 88(6), 40–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, D. J. (2011). What is an innovation ecosystem (p. 1). Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobides, M. G., Cennamo, C., & Gawer, A. (2018). Towards a theory of ecosystems. Strategic Management Journal, 39(8), 2255–2276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobides, M. G., Knudsen, T., & Augier, M. (2006). Benefiting from innovation: Value creation, value appropriation and the role of industry architectures. Research Policy, 35(8), 1200–1221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Järvi, K., Almpanopoulou, A., & Ritala, P. (2018). Organization of knowledge ecosystems: Prefigurative and partial forms. Research Policy, 47(8), 1523–1537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Junge, R., König, B., Villarroel, M., Komives, T., & Jijakli, M. (2017). Strategic points in aquaponics. Water, 9, 182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kapoor, R., & Furr, N. R. (2015). Complementarities and competition: Unpacking the drivers of entrants’ technology choices in the solar photovoltaic industry. Strategic Management Journal, 36(3), 416–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klingler-Vidra, R., Kenney, M., & Breznitz, D. (2016). Policies for financing entrepreneurship through venture capital: Learning from the successes of Israel and Taiwan. International Journal of Innovation and Regional Development, 7(3), 203–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, N. F., Jr., Reilly, M. D., & Carsrud, A. L. (2000). Competing models of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(5–6), 411–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulchina, E. (2016). A path to value creation for foreign entrepreneurs. Strategic Management Journal, 37(7), 1240–1262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levie, J. (2014). The university is the classroom: Teaching and learning technology commercialization at a technological university. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 39(5), 793–808.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenstein, B. B., Carter, N. M., Dooley, K. J., & Gartner, W. B. (2007). Complexity dynamics of nascent entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(2), 236–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lioutasa, E. D., Charatsarib, C., De Rosac, M., & La Roccad, G. (2018). Knowledge and innovation in the agrifood supply chain: Old metaphors and new research directions. In 13th European International Farming Systems Association (IFSA) Symposium, Farming systems: facing uncertainties and enhancing opportunities, 1–5 July 2018, Chania, Crete, Greece (pp. 1–13). Europe: International Farming Systems Association (IFSA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mack, E., & Mayer, H. (2016). The evolutionary dynamics of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Urban Studies, 53(10), 2118–2133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markard, J., Wirth, S., & Truffer, B. (2016). Institutional dynamics and technology legitimacy–a framework and a case study on biogas technology. Research Policy, 45(1), 330–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKelvey, B. (2004). Toward a complexity science of entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(3), 313–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minniti, M., & Bygrave, W. (2001). A dynamic model of entrepreneurial learning. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 25(3), 5–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, J. F. (1993). Predators and prey: A new ecology of competition. Harvard Business Review, 71(3), 75–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller, A., Ferré, M., Engel, S., Gattinger, A., Holzkämper, A., Huber, R., … Six, J. (2017). Can soil-less crop production be a sustainable option for soil conservation and future agriculture? Land Use Policy, 69, 102–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muñoz, F. F., & Encinar, M. I. (2014). Agents intentionality, capabilities and the performance of systems of innovation. Innovations, 16(1), 71–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, A., Stam, E., Sussan, F., & Audretsch, D. B. (2018). Entrepreneurial ecosystems: The foundations of place-based renewal. In A. O’Connor, E. Stam, F. Sussan, & D. Audretsch (Eds.), Entrepreneurial ecosystems. International studies in entrepreneurship (Vol. 38). Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orsini, F., Kahane, R., Nono-Womdim, R., & Gianquinto, G. (2013). Urban agriculture in the developing world: A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 33(4), 695–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osterwalder, A. (2004). The business model ontology a proposition in a design science approach (Doctoral dissertation, Université de Lausanne, Faculté des hautes études commerciales).

    Google Scholar 

  • Overholm, H. (2015). Collectively created opportunities in emerging ecosystems: The case of solar service ventures. Technovation, 39, 14–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petkova, A. P. (2009). A theory of entrepreneurial learning from performance errors. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 5(4), 345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pigford, A. A. E., Hickey, G. M., & Klerkx, L. (2018). Beyond agricultural innovation systems? Exploring an agricultural innovation ecosystems approach for niche design and development in sustainability transitions. Agricultural Systems, 164, 116–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pitelis, C. (2012). Clusters, entrepreneurial ecosystem co-creation, and appropriability: A conceptual framework. Industrial and Corporate Change, 21(6), 1359–1388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rabelo, R. J., Bernus, P., & Romero, D. (2015). Innovation ecosystems: A collaborative networks perspective. In Working conference on virtual enterprises (pp. 323–336). Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radojevich-Kelley, N., & Hoffman, D. L. (2012). Analysis of accelerator companies: An exploratory case study of their programs, processes, and early results. Small Business Institute Journal, 8(2), 54–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romano, A., Passiante, G., Del Vecchio, P., & Secundo, G. (2014). The innovation ecosystem as booster for the innovative entrepreneurship in the smart specialisation strategy. International Journal of Knowledge-Based Development, 5(3), 271–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romero, D., Rabelo, R. J., & Molina, A. (2012). On the management of virtual enterprise’s inheritance between virtual manufacturing & service enterprises: Supporting “dynamic” product-service business ecosystems. In 2012 18th international ICE conference on engineering, technology and innovation (pp. 1–11). Munich: IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roundy, P. T., Bradshaw, M., & Brockman, B. K. (2018). The emergence of entrepreneurial ecosystems: A complex adaptive systems approach. Journal of Business Research, 86, 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scaringella, L., & Radziwon, A. (2018). Innovation, entrepreneurial, knowledge, and business ecosystems: Old wine in new bottles? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 136, 59–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiuma, G., & Carlucci, D. (2018). Managing strategic partnerships with universities in innovation ecosystems: A research agenda. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 4(3), 25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spigel, B. (2016). Developing and governing entrepreneurial ecosystems: The structure of entrepreneurial support programs in Edinburgh, Scotland. International Journal of Innovation and Regional Development, 7(2), 141–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stam, E. (2015). Entrepreneurial ecosystems and regional policy: A sympathetic critique. European Planning Studies, 23(9), 1759–1769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Still, K., Lähteenmäki, I., & Seppänen, M. (2019). Innovation relationships in the emergence of Fintech ecosystems. In Proceedings of the 52nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suddaby, R., Bitektine, A., & Haack, P. (2017). Legitimacy. Academy of Management Annals, 11(1), 451–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tallman, S., Jenkins, M., Henry, N., & Pinch, S. (2004). Knowledge, clusters, and competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 29(2), 258–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talmar, M., Walrave, B., Podoynitsyna, K. S., Holmström, J., & Romme, A. G. L. (2018). Mapping, analyzing and designing innovation ecosystems: The ecosystem pie model. Long Range Planning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, L. D., Sharapov, D., & Autio, E. (2018). Linking entrepreneurial and innovation ecosystems: The case of AppCampus. In Entrepreneurial ecosystems and the diffusion of startups. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2016). Institutions and axioms: An extension and update of service-dominant logic. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44(1), 5–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vargo, S. L., Wieland, H., & Akaka, M. A. (2015). Innovation through institutionalization: A service ecosystems perspective. Industrial Marketing Management, 44, 63–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Hippel, E. (1986). Lead users: A source of novel product concepts. Management Science, 32(7), 791–805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winston Smith, S., Hannigan, T. J., & Gasiorowski, L. (2013). Accelerators and crowd-funding: Complementarity, competition, or convergence in the earliest stages of financing new ventures?. In University of Colorado-Kauffman Foundation Crowd-Funding Conference, Boulder, CO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfert, S., Ge, L., Verdouw, C., & Bogaardt, M. J. (2017). Big data in smart farming–a review. Agricultural Systems, 153, 69–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

De Bernardi, P., Azucar, D. (2020). Innovation and Entrepreneurial Ecosystems: Structure, Boundaries, and Dynamics. In: Innovation in Food Ecosystems. Contributions to Management Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33502-1_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics