Skip to main content

Sustainability as Criteria of Evaluation of Suppliers

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sustainable Logistics and Production in Industry 4.0

Part of the book series: EcoProduction ((ECOPROD))

  • 1471 Accesses

Abstract

The purpose of the article is to present the use by international corporations of sustainability concepts as criteria for initial and periodic evaluation of suppliers. In recent times, one may have noticed that global companies are increasingly implementing their strategies based on the concept of sustainable development, and are evaluating and selecting their suppliers based on the sustainability concept. While observing global trends one could notice that more and more suppliers are monitored in terms of the principles of sustainable development. This concept includes the economic aspects (requiring high technical quality, the reliability of supply, price competitiveness), environmental aspects, as well as social ones (rules based on the idea of the Global Compact) Requirements for the implementation of this concept are transferred to suppliers by issuing rules of conduct and ethical standards. The analyses, presented here on practical examples of the chemical, electronics, and pharmaceutical manufacturers show that buyers define specific standards for ethical conduct to their suppliers. Multinational enterprises which are buyers do not limit themselves to putting stringent requirements on suppliers. They also offer their providers support programs for the implementation of the sustainability concept.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Airike PE, Rotter JP, Mark-Herbert C (2016) Corporate motives for multi-stakeholder collaboration—corporate social responsibility in the electronics supply chains. J Clean Prod 131:639–648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burritt R, Schaltegger S (2014) Accounting towards sustainability in production and supply chains. Br Account Rev 46(4):327–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crespin-Mazet F, Dontenwill E (2012) Sustainable procurement: building legitimacy in the supply network. J Purch Supply Manag 18(4):207–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forkmann S, Henneberg SC, Naudé P, Mitrega M (2016) Supplier relationship management capability: a qualification and extension. Ind Mark Manage 57:185–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallego-Álvarez I, Ortas E (2017) Corporate environmental sustainability reporting in the context of national cultures: a quantile regression approach. Int Bus Rev 26:337–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghadimi P, Dargi A, Heavey C (2017) Sustainable supplier performance scoring using audition check-list based fuzzy inference system: A case application in automotive spare part industry. Comput Ind Eng 105:12–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goebel P, Reuter C, Pibernik R, Sichtmann Ch (2012) The influence of ethical culture on supplier selection in the context of sustainable sourcing. Int J Prod Econ 140(2):7–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Govindan K, Shankar M, Kannan D (2018) Supplier selection based on corporate social responsibility practices. Int J Prod Econ 200:353–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grimm JH, Hofstetter JS, Sarkis J (2016) Exploring sub-suppliers’ compliance with corporate sustainability standards. J Clean Prod 11:1971–1984

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grzybowska K (2012) Sustainability in the supply chain: analysing the enablers. In: Golinska P, Romano CA (eds) Environmental issues in supply chain management, EcoProduction. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 25–40

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Guenther E, Jasch Ch, Schmidt M, Wagner B, Ilg P (2015) Material flow cost accounting—looking back and ahead. J Clean Prod 108:1249–1254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hänninen N, Karjaluoto H (2017) Environmental values and customer-perceived value in industrial supplier relationships. J Clean Prod 156:604–613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helin S, Babri M (2015) Travelling with a code of ethics: a contextual study of a Swedish MNC auditing a Chinese supplier. J Clean Prod 107:41–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoejmose SU, Roehrich JK, Grosvold J (2014) Is doing more doing better? The relationship between responsible supply chain management and corporate reputation. Ind Mark Manage 43(1):77–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • http://www.abb.com

  • https://pscinitiative.org/home

  • https://www.volkswagenag.com

  • Igarashi M, de Boer L, Fet AM (2013) What is required for greener supplier selection? A literature review and conceptual model development. J Purch Supply Manag 19(4):247–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jia F, Zuluaga-Cardona L, Bailey A, Rueda X (2018) Sustainable supply chain management in developing countries: an analysis of the literature. J Clean Prod 189:263–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kammerl D, Schockenhoff D, Hollauer Ch, Weidmann D, Lindemann U (2017) A framework for sustainable product development. In: Matsumoto M, Masui K, Fukushige S, Kondoh S (eds) Sustainability through innovation in product life cycle design, EcoProduction. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 21–32

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kannan G (2018) Sustainable consumption and production in the food supply chain: a conceptual framework. Int J Prod Econ 195:419–431

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan SA, Kusi-Sarpong S, Kow F, Kusi-Sarpong AH (2018) Supplier sustainability performance evaluation and selection: a framework and methodology. J Clean Prod 205:964–979

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar DT, Rahman Z (2015) Sustainability adoption through buyer supplier relationship across supply chain: a literature review and conceptual framework. Int Strat Manag Rev 3:110–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar D, Palaniappan M, Kannan D, Shankar KM (2014) Analyzing the CSR issues behind the supplier selection process using ISM approach. Resourc Conserv Recycl 92:268–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee E, Han S, Hye HU, Rho JJ (2013) Building capabilities via suppliers’ effective management of relationships. Ind Mark Manag 42:805–813

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li W-Y, Chow P-S, Choi T-M, Chan H-L (2016) Supplier integration, green sustainability programs, and financial performance of fashion enterprises under global financial crisis. J Clean Prod 135:57–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Ch-Ch, Yu Ch-Ch, Wernick IK, Chang C-Y (2015) Using the electronic industry code of conduct to evaluate green supply chain management: an empirical study of Taiwan’s computer industry. Sustainability 7:2787–2803

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lo H-W, Liou JJH, Wang H-S, Tsai Y-S (2018) An integrated model for solving problems in green supplier selection and order allocation. J Clean Prod 190:339–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mani V, Gunasekaran A, Delgado C (2018) Enhancing supply chain performance through supplier social sustainability: an emerging economy perspective. Int J Prod Econ 195:259–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakajima M, Kimura A, Wagner B (2015) Introduction of material flow cost accounting (MFCA) to the supply chain: a questionnaire study on the challenges of constructing a low-carbon supply chain to promote resource efficiency. J Clean Prod 108:1302–1309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neutzling D, Land A, Seuring S, Machado do Nascimento LF (2018) Linking sustainability-oriented innovation to supply chain relationship integration. J Clean Prod 172:3448–3458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prasanna VS, Goh M (2016) Multi-objective supplier selection and order allocation under disruption risk. Transp Res 95:124–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Raj-Reichert G (2013) Safeguarding labour in distant factories: health and safety governance in an electronics global production network. Geoforum 44:23–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rashidi K, Saen RF (2018) Incorporating dynamic concept into gradual efficiency: improving suppliers in sustainable supplier development. J Clean Prod 202:226–243

    Google Scholar 

  • Sancha C, Gimenez C, Sierra V (2016) Achieving a socially responsible supply chain through assessment and collaboration. J Clean Prod 112:1934–1947

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Su Ch, Yang H (2017) Supplier-buyer relationship management in marketing and management research: an area for interdisciplinary integration. J Bus Res 78:180–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torres-Ruiz A, Ravindran AR (2018) Multiple criteria framework for the sustainability risk assessment of a supplier portfolio. J Clean Prod 172:4478–4493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trapp AC, Sarkis J (2016) Identifying robust portfolios of suppliers: a sustainability selection and development perspective. J Clean Prod 112:2088–2100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urbaniak M (2015) Building relationship between OEM customers and suppliers in product innovation development processes. Mod Manag Rev 20(1):185–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Vahidi F, Torabi SA, Ramezankhani MJ (2018) Sustainable supplier selection and order allocation under operational and disruption risks. J Clean Prod 174:1351–1365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner SM (2011) Supplier development and the relationship life-cycle. Int J Prod Econ 129(2):277–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilhelm M, Blome C, Wieck E, Xiao C (2016) Implementing sustainability in multi-tier supply chains: strategies and contingencies in managing sub-suppliers. Int J Prod Econ 182:196–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winter S, Lasch R (2016) Environmental and social criteria in supplier evaluation—lessons from the fashion and apparel industry. J Clean Prod 139:175–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan T, Dooley KJ (2013) Communication intensity, goal congruence, and uncertainty in buyer–supplier new product development. J Oper Manag 31(7–8):523–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yawar SA, Seuring S (2018) The role of supplier development in managing social and societal issues in supply chains. J Clean Prod 182:227–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoo SH, Shin H, Park M-S (2015) New product development and the effect of supplier involvement. Omega 51:107–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Ch, Henke JW Jr, Viswanathan S (2015) Reciprocity between buyer cost sharing and supplier technology sharing. Int J Prod Econ 163:61–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maciej Urbaniak .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Urbaniak, M. (2020). Sustainability as Criteria of Evaluation of Suppliers. In: Grzybowska, K., Awasthi, A., Sawhney, R. (eds) Sustainable Logistics and Production in Industry 4.0. EcoProduction. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33369-0_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics