Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Blockchain in Supply Chain Management: Australian Manufacturer Case Study

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Service Research and Innovation (ASSRI 2018, ASSRI 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 367))

Abstract

The recent explosion of interest around Blockchain and capabilities of this technology to track all types of transaction more transparently and securely motivate us to explore the possibilities Blockchain offers across the supply chain. This paper examines whether Blockchain makes a good fit for use in an Australian manufacturer supply chain. To address this, the research uses Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) as a framework from the literature. Blockchain allows us to have permissioned or permission-less distributed ledgers where stakeholders can interact with each other. It details how Blockchain works and the mechanism of hash algorithms which allows for greater security of information. It also focuses on the supply chain management and looks at the intricacies of a manufacturers supply chain. We present a review of the processes in place of an electrical manufacturer and the problems faced in the supply chain. A model is proposed in using public and private Blockchains to overcome these issues. The proposed solution has the potential to bring greater transparency, validity across the supply chain, and improvement of communication between stakeholders involved. We also point out some potential issues that should be considered if adopting Blockchain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ali, M.M., Babai, M.Z., Boylan, J.E., Syntetos, A.A.: Supply chain forecasting when information is not shared. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 260(3), 984–994 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Lemieux, V.L.: Trusting records: is Blockchain technology the answer? Rec. Manag. J. 26(2), 110–139 (2016)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Luther, W.J.: Bitcoin and the future of digital payments. Independent Rev. 20(3), 397–404 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Xu, X., et al.: The blockchain as a software connector. In: Proceedings - 2016 13th Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture, WICSA 2016 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Nakamoto, S., Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Swan, M.: Blockchain temporality: smart contract time specifiability with blocktime. In: Alferes, J.J.J., Bertossi, L., Governatori, G., Fodor, P., Roman, D. (eds.) RuleML 2016. LNCS, vol. 9718, pp. 184–196. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42019-6_12

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Zyskind, G., Nathan, O., Pentland, A.: Enigma: Decentralized computation platform with guaranteed privacy. arXiv preprint arXiv:1506.03471 (2015)

  8. Ølnes, S.: Beyond bitcoin enabling smart government using blockchain technology. In: Scholl, H.J., et al. (eds.) EGOVIS 2016. LNCS, vol. 9820, pp. 253–264. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44421-5_20

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Dierksmeier, C., Seele, P.: Cryptocurrencies and business ethics. J. Bus. Ethics 152, 1–14 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Vukolić, M.: The quest for scalable blockchain fabric: Proof-of-work vs. BFT replication. In: Camenisch, J., Kesdoğan, D. (eds.) iNetSec 2015, vol. 9591, pp. 112–125. Springer, Heidelberg (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39028-4_9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Yue, X., Wang, H., Jin, D., Li, M., Jiang, W.: Healthcare data gateways: found healthcare intelligence on blockchain with novel privacy risk control. J. Med. Syst. 40(10), 218 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Yuan, Y., Wang, F.Y.: Blockchain: the state of the art and future trends. Zidonghua Xuebao/Acta Autom. Sinica 42(4), 481–494 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Christidis, K., Devetsikiotis, M.: Blockchains and smart contracts for the internet of things. IEEE Access 4, 2292–2303 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Herlihy, M., Moir, M.: Enhancing accountability and trust in distributed ledgers. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.07490 (2016)

  15. Zhao, J.L., Fan, S., Yan, J.: Overview of business innovations and research opportunities in blockchain and introduction to the special issue. Financ. Innov. 2, 28 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kar, I.: Estonian citizens will soon have the world’s most hack-proof health-care records, Quartz. https://qz.com/628889/this-eastern-european-country-is-moving-its-health-records-to-the-blockchain. Accessed 15 July 2017

  17. Council, B.B.: Russia’s Central Bank to Develop National Cryptocurrency. http://brics-info.org/. Accessed 06 June 2017

  18. Nott, G.: ANZ and Westpac trial blockchain for bank guarantees, (CIO). https://www.cio.com.au/article/621585/anz-westpac-trial-blockchain-bank-guarantees. Accessed 10 July 2017

  19. Back, A., et al.: Enabling blockchain innovations with pegged sidechains. https://blockstream.com/sidechains.pdf. Accessed 20 July 2017

  20. Chuen, D.L.K., Deng, R.H. (eds.): Handbook of Blockchain, Digital Finance, & Inclusion, Volume 2: ChinaTech, Mobile Security, & Distributed Ledger. Academic Press, Cambridge (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  21. PWC, Blockchain - an opportunity for energy producers and consumers? (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Dirkmaat, O.: Beyond the Bitcoin Hype: Limitations of Bitcoin and Blockchain Technology. https://trends.ufm.edu/en/article/beyond-bitcoin. Accessed 16 Sept 2017

  23. Kan, L., Wei, Y., Muhammad, A.H., Siyuan, W., Linchao, G., Kai, H.: A multiple blockchains architecture on inter-blockchain communication. In: 2018 IEEE International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability and Security Companion (QRS-C), pp. 139–145. IEEE, July 2018

    Google Scholar 

  24. Wood, G.: Polkadot: Vision for heterogeneous multi-chain framework. White Paper (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ding, D., Duan, T., Jia, L., Li, K., Li, Z., Sun, Y.: InterChain: A Framework to Support Blockchain Interoperability (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Greenspan, G.: MultiChain private blockchain—White paper. http://www.multichain.com/download/MultiChain-White-Paper.pdf. Accessed 05 Aug 2018

  27. Andoni, M., et al.: Blockchain technology in the energy sector: a systematic review of challenges and opportunities. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 100, 143–174 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Haq, I., Monfared, R., Harrison, R., Lee, L., West, A.: A new vision for the automation systems engineering for automotive powertrain assembly. Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 23(4), 308–324 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Korpela, K., Hallikas, J., Dahlberg, T.: Digital supply chain transformation toward blockchain integration. In: Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, January 2017

    Google Scholar 

  30. Apte, S., Petrovsky, N.: Will blockchain technology revolutionize excipient supply chain management? J. Excipients Food Chem. 7(3), 910 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Kietzman, S.: What is a Supply Chain? http://www.wisegeek.org/what-is-a-supply-chain.htm. Accessed 08 Sept 2017

  32. Casado-Vara, R., Prieto, J., De la Prieta, F., Corchado, J.M.: How blockchain improves the supply chain: case study alimentary supply chain. Procedia Comput. Sci. 134, 393–398 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Davis, F.D.: A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: theory and results. Doctoral dissertation, MIT (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Davis, F.D.: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 13, 319–340 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Chen, J., Park, Y., Putzer, G.J.: An examination of the components that increase acceptance of smartphones among healthcare professionals. Electron. J. Health Inform. 5(2), 16 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Abdalla, I.: Evaluating effectiveness of e-blackboard system using TAM framework: a structural analysis approach. Aace J. 15(3), 279–287 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Liu, I.-F., Chen, M.C., Sun, Y.S., Wible, D., Kuo, C.-H.: Extending the TAM model to explore the factors that affect Intention to Use an Online Learning Community. Comput. Educ. 54(2), 600–610 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Fotiou, N., Polyzos, G.C.: Decentralized name-based security for content distribution using blockchains. In: 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Communications Workshops (INFOCOM WKSHPS). IEEE (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Coyle, J.J., Langley, C.J., Novack, R.A., Gibson, B.: Supply Chain Management: A Logistics Perspective. Cengage Learning, Boston (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Rimba, P., Tran, A.B., Weber, I., Staples, M., Ponomarev, A., Xu, X.: Comparing blockchain and cloud services for business process execution. In: Proceedings - 2017 IEEE International Conference on Software Architecture, ICSA 2017 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Staples, M., et al.: Risks and opportunities for systems using blockchain and smart contracts. Data61. CSIRO, Sydney (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Cosmos. https://cosmos.network/docs/resources/whitepaper.html. Accessed 05 July 2017

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Engineering and IT, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia

    Elias Abou Maroun & Didar Zowghi

  2. Derby Business School, University of Derby, Derby, UK

    Jay Daniel

  3. Department of Information Systems, Ansari College of Business, University of Nevada, Reno, NV, USA

    Amir Talaei-Khoei

Authors
  1. Elias Abou Maroun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jay Daniel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Didar Zowghi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Amir Talaei-Khoei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elias Abou Maroun .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. CSIRO, Eveleigh, NSW, Australia

    Ho-Pun Lam

  2. University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia

    Sajib Mistry

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Abou Maroun, E., Daniel, J., Zowghi, D., Talaei-Khoei, A. (2019). Blockchain in Supply Chain Management: Australian Manufacturer Case Study. In: Lam, HP., Mistry, S. (eds) Service Research and Innovation. ASSRI ASSRI 2018 2018. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 367. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32242-7_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32242-7_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-32241-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-32242-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation