Abstract
The metaphor of nature as a book, and its reading, has arisen in many forms in theological discussions of natural philosophy from ancient to modern periods. It is far less fixed in form than often assumed, however, but reflects cultural contextual shape. It is also too often recruited without challenge, although the implied analogies of authorship, narrative shape, and hermeneutic contain many pitfalls. I explore four flaws in the ‘Book of Nature’ narrative, finding that they are connected with two related and troublesome tensions – that of ‘methodological naturalism’ within a theistic framework, and the redundancy of ‘natural theology’ in its nineteenth century form. Approaching a theology of science from the perspective of the Wisdom tradition offers a fresh conception of who does the writing, and reading, of nature’s living book.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
We take quotations of the text from the magisterial new translation and commentary by David Clines, Vol. 3 (2011).
Bibliography
Aquinas, Thomas. Expositio super Iob ad litteram. Trans. Brian Mulladay and available on the web here: http://dhspriory.org/thomas/SSJob.htm#382. Accessed 12 Dec 2018.
Augustine, Contra Faustum, XXXII, 20 trans. http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/140632.htm. Accessed 12 Dec 2018.
Bornkamm, H. 1958. Luther’s World of Thought. Trans. M. H. Bertram. Saint Louis: Concordia.
Brague, R. 2009. The Legend of the Middle Ages: Philosophical Explorations of Medieval Christianity, Judaism and Islam. Trans. L. G. Cochrane. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Brown, W.H. 2010. The Seven Pillars of Creation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Burtt, E.A. 2003. The Metaphysical Foundations of Modern Science. New York: Dover.
Clines, D.J.A. 1989. World Bible Commentary Job, 1–20. Nashville: Thomas Nelson.
———. 2011. World Bible Commentary Job, 28–42. Nashville: Thomas Nelson.
Crombie, A.C. 1953. Robert Grosseteste and the Origins of Experimental Science, 1100–1700. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Eisely, L. 1978. The Hidden Teacher in The Star Thrower. New York: Times Books.
Gaspar, G.E.M., C. Panti, T. C. B. McLeish, and H.E. Smithson. 2019. The Scientific Works of Robert Grosseteste, Vol. 1 Knowing and Speaking: Robert Grosseteste’s De artibus liberalibus ‘On the Liberal Arts’ and De generatione sonorum ‘On the Generation of Sounds’. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Habel, N.C. 1985. The Book of Job. London: SCM Press.
———. 2001. Earth First: Inverse Cosmology in Job. In The Earth Story in Wisdom Traditions, ed. N.C. Habel and S. Wurst. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press.
Harrison, P. 2015. The Territories of Science and Religion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hunter, J.P. 1990. Robert Boyle and the Epistemology of the Novel. Eighteenth Century Fiction 2: 275–292.
McLeish, T. 2014. Faith and Wisdom in Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Neiman, S. 2016. The Rationality of the World: A Philosophical Reading of the Book of Job. http://www.abc.net.au/religion/articles/2016/10/19/4559097.htm. Accessed 7 Dec 2016.
Okello, J.B.O. 2015. A History and Critique of Methodological Naturalism. Eugene: Wipf and Stock.
Page, R. 2009. God and the Web of Creation. London: SCM Press.
Paley, W. 2006 [1802]. Natural Theology, eds. M. Eddy, and D. Knight. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Plantinga, A. 1997. Methodological Naturalism? Philosophical Analysis Origins & Design 18 (1): 18–27.
Poirel, D., ed. 2002. Hugo de Sancto Victore, De tribus diebus, CCCM, 177, Hugonis de Sancto Victore Opera, II. Turnhout: Brepols.
Ritchie, S.L., and J. Perry. 2018. Magnets, Magic, and Other Anomalies: In Defense of Methodological Naturalism. Zygon 53 (4): 1064–1093.
Robertson, D. 1973. The Book of Job: A Literary Study. Soundings 56: 446–468.
Schwöbel, C. 2018. ‘We are all God’s Vocabulary’: The Idea of Creation as a Speech-Act on the Trinitarian God and its Significance for the Dialogue between Theology and the Sciences. In Knowing Creation, ed. A.B. Torrance and T.H. McCall Jnr, vol. 1. Grand Rapids: Zondervan.
Southgate, C. 2008. The Groaning of Creation. Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press.
Stanley, M. 2015. Huxley’s Church and Maxwell’s Demon. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Stump, E. 2010. Wandering in Darkness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Taylor, J. 1991. The Didascalion of Hugh of St. Victor: A Medieval Guide to the Arts. New York: Columbia University Press.
Topham, J. 1992. Science and Popular Education in the 1830s: The Role of the Bridgewater Treatises. The British Journal for the History of Science 25: 397–430.
Torrance, A.B. 2017. Should a Christian Adopt Methodological Naturalism? Zygon 52: 691–725.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
McLeish, T.C.B. (2020). Beyond the ‘Book of Nature’ to Science as Second Person Narrative: From Methodological Naturalism to Teleological Transcendence. In: Fuller, M., Evers, D., Runehov, A., Sæther, KW., Michollet, B. (eds) Issues in Science and Theology: Nature – and Beyond. Issues in Science and Religion: Publications of the European Society for the Study of Science and Theology, vol 5. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31182-7_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31182-7_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-31181-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-31182-7
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)