Skip to main content

Nature: And Beyond? Immanence and Transcendence in Science and Religion

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Issues in Science and Theology: Nature – and Beyond

Abstract

In science-and-theology scholarship much attention has been paid to possible routes from nature to God. Some argue for a robust natural theology; others are skeptical of any inferences from the one to the other. By contrast, I ask: what is the least that humanity might know about transcendence, and in particular about God as transcendent being, and still be able to use the term in meaningful ways? Methodologically, I will argue, claims that connect nature and transcendence must be tested by all the relevant communities of inquiry (RCEs), including naturalists, and not only by whether (say) theists find the inferences compelling. Judged by this standard, no rationally justified inferences can by drawn from the world as described by the contemporary physical sciences to a robust theology of a transcendent God. The less one’s notion of the transcendent is intertwined with the natural world, the more difficult it is to show its compatibility with science. And conversely, the more one’s account of transcendence or one’s doctrine of God inherently includes immanence, the less difficult it is to show its compatibility with science. The chapter concludes with a proposal for conceiving the relationship between transcendence and immanence in ways that maximize the connection between natural emergence and that which is beyond science.

Is emergence leading nature beyond itself?

Is it a variant of traditional theism or an extended version of modern naturalism?

Or is this difference obsolete?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    One would need to consider whether this is true in physics, since it is not clear that emergent phenomena not explainable in terms of physical laws should count as a success.

  2. 2.

    Ideally, one would also follow the phenomena of religion and spirituality as they emerge across the history of human culture, from indigenous religions through the so-called Axial Age and on to the ‘religions of the book’ and the more recent popularity of ‘spiritual but not religious.’

  3. 3.

    The Oxford Handbook of Natural Theology (Manning 2013) covers both of these topics in the first two Parts, but I am not sure that vast differences are given enough weight. At least it’s true that the same words, ‘natural theology’, are used in all these diverse cases.

  4. 4.

    We spell out the standards in Clayton and Knapp (2011). Differing views on what natural theology demands can be found, e.g., in Manning (2013).

  5. 5.

    It is an interesting question to ask whether the RCE would condone agnosticism about inferences from the natural world as studied by the natural sciences to a transcendent, quasi-theological reality. My own sense is that the RCE would be more likely to be skeptical than agnostic.

  6. 6.

    Richard Dawkins ([2006] 2016), by the way, lacks this humility; he wants to use science to falsify metaphysical arguments. As an example, he argues that the early, non-complex cosmos could not come from a God who is more complex than the cosmos.

  7. 7.

    Broader issues are also raised, which we could not explore here: what, if anything, do emergent phenomena tell us about the Beyond – about metaphysics and theology, about continuities and discontinuities, about the knowable and the limits of the known? We also explored the question whether the natural world points to, or is evidence for, transcendent reality beyond the human. That raises the question: can spirituality be explained in terms of its biological or social or psychological functions, or does its explanation need to be given in terms of some reality beyond the empirical?

Bibliography

  • Aquinas, T. 1975. Summa Contra Gentiles, Book Three: Providence, Part II. South Bend: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P. 1970. A Rumor of Angels: Modern Society and the Rediscovery of the Supernatural. Garden City: Doubleday & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchler, J., ed. 2011. Philosophical Writings of Peirce. New York: Dover Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clayton, P. 2004. Mind and Emergence: From Quantum to Consciousness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clayton, P., and S. Knapp. 2011. The Predicament of Belief: Science, Philosophy, and Faith. London: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Corrington, R.S. 1993. An Introduction to C. S. Peirce: Philosopher, Semiotician, and Ecstatic Naturalist. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R. [2006] 2016. The God Delusion, 10th Anniversary edition. Boston: Mariner Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flew, A. 1968. Theology and Falsification. In Reason and Responsibility, 48–49. Belmont: Dickenson Publishing Company. Available from: http://www.stephenjaygould.org/ctrl/flew_falsification.html. Accessed 12 Apr 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodall, J. 1971. In the Shadow of Man. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1986. The Chimpanzees of Gombe: Patterns of Behavior. Cambridge: Belknap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, C.S. [1947, 1960] 2015. Miracles, Revised edition. New York: HarperOne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning, R.R., ed. 2013. The Oxford Handbook of Natural Theology. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C.S. 1982–2009. Writings of Charles S. Peirce, A Chronological Edition, vols. 1–8. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plantinga, A. 1994. Warranted Christian Belief. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, Robert J. 2012. Time in Eternity: Pannenberg, Physics, and Eschatology in Creative Mutual Interaction. Notre Dame: Notre Dame University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Weisstein, E.W. 2018. Schrödinger Equation. Available from: http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/SchroedingerEquation.html. Accessed 17 Sept 2018.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Philip Clayton .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Clayton, P. (2020). Nature: And Beyond? Immanence and Transcendence in Science and Religion. In: Fuller, M., Evers, D., Runehov, A., Sæther, KW., Michollet, B. (eds) Issues in Science and Theology: Nature – and Beyond. Issues in Science and Religion: Publications of the European Society for the Study of Science and Theology, vol 5. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31182-7_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics