Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Understanding Suffering

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Invisibilization of Suffering

  • 356 Accesses

Abstract

In this first chapter, I would like to start with what moves the whole book—and perhaps all sociological inquiry. It is not a mere intellectual passion for studying theories on societies or for reflecting on research per se that motivates thousands of social researchers all over the world; rather, this book—as is the case with many of my colleagues—is motivated by the profound feeling that action must be taken against suffering. Suffering is central to society and central to research on society. However, it is a term that is difficult to grasp, as it includes so many aspects at the same time. Therefore, I start by conceptualizing suffering, as a key concept of modernity, as social suffering; I conceptualize suffering, as a normative concept representing disrespect, as a source of critique and as a universal language.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Judith Butler (2009) calls this bodily dimension precariousness and understands it as a universal human attribute.

  2. 2.

    A tragic example of this confusion between humans and animals can be found in the wonderful documentary by Werner Herzog titled “Grizzly Man” (Herzog 2005).

Bibliography

  • Adloff, F., & Pfaller, L. (2017). Critique in statu nascendi? The Reluctance Towards Organ Donation. Historical Social Research, 42(3), 24–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adorno, T. W. (1973). Negative Dialectics. New York and London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck-Gernsheim, E. (2004). Wir und die Anderen, Vom Blick der Deutschen auf Migranten und Minderheiten. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (Ed.). (2000). The Weight of the World: Social Suffering in Contemporary Societies. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne, C. (2008). The End of Immanent Critique? European Journal of Social Theory, 11(1), 5–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. (2001). What Is Critique? An Essay on Foucault’s Virtue. In EIPCP – European Institute on Progressive Cultural Policies. Retrieved from http://eipcp.net/transversal/0806/butler/en.

  • Butler, J. (2009). Frames of War: When Is Life Grievable? London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Das, V. (1995). Critical Events. An Anthropological Perspective on Contemporary India. Delhi: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Das, V. (1997). Sufferings, Theodicies, Disciplinary Practices, Appropriations. International Social Sciences Journal, 49(154), 563–572.

    Google Scholar 

  • Decety, J., & Jackson, P. L. (2004). The Functional Architecture of Human Empathy. Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews, 3(2), 71–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desmond, M. (2014). How Should We Study Social Suffering? Ethnic and Racial Studies, 37(10), 1761–1766.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engels, F. (1963). Brief an Marx – 19. November 1944. In Marx-Engels Werke (Vol. 27, pp. 9–13). Berlin: Dietz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engels, F. (1975). The Condition of the Working Class in England. In K. Marx & F. Engels (Eds.), Collected Works of Karl Marx and Frederick Engels (Vol. 4, pp. 295–596). New York: International Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eβbach, W. (1982). Gegenzüge. Der Materialismus des Selbst und seine Ausgrenzung aus dem Marxismus. Frankfurt/Main: Materialis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feuerbach, L. (1957). The Essence of Christianity. New York: Harper Torchbooks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fink-Eitel, H. (1993). Innerweltliche Transzendenz. Mercur, 47(3), 237–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1981). The Order of Discourse. In R. Young (Ed.), Untying the Text: A Post-structural Anthology (pp. 48–78). Boston, MA: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (2007). The Politics of Truth. Los Angeles: Semiotext(e).

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, A. W. (2001). Can We Research Suffering? Qualitative Health Research, 11(3), 353–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N., & Honneth, A. (2003). Redistribution or Recognition? A Political-Philosophical Exchange. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (2002). Civilization and Its Discontents. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frost, L., & Hoggett, P. (2008). Human Agency and Social Suffering. Critical Social Policy, 28(4), 438–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallese, V. (2001). The “Shared Manifold” Hypothesis: From Mirror Neurons to Empathy. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 8, 33–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1984). Theory of Communicative Action Volume One: Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, G. W. F. (1977 [1807]). Phenomenology of Spirit. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herzog, W. (2005). Grizzly Man. Documentary directed by Werner Herzog, Lions Gate Films.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herzog, B. (2016a). Discourse Analysis as Immanent Critique: Possibilities and Limits of Normative Critique in Empirical Discourse Studies. Discourse & Society, 27(3), 278–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herzog, B. (2016b). Discourse Analysis as Social Critique. Discursive and Non-Discursive Realities in Critical Social Research. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Herzog, B. (2016c). The Discursive Construction of Drug Realities: Discourses on Drugs, Users and Drug-Related Practices. In M. O’Reilly & J. N. Lester (Eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Adult Mental Health (pp. 101–116). Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honneth, A. (Ed.). (1995a). Kommunitarismus. Eine Debatte über die moralischen Grunndlagen moderner Gesellschaften. Frankfurt/Main: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honneth, A. (1995b). The Struggle for Recognition: The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honneth, A. (2000). Das Andere der Gerechtigkeit. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honneth, A. (2004). Anerkennung als Ideologie. WestEnd Neue Zeitschrift für Sozialforschung, 1, 51–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honneth, A. (2005). Eine Physiognomie der kapitalistischen Lebensform. Skizze der Gesellschaftstheorie Adornos. In Axel Honneth (Ed.), Dialektik der Freiheit: Frankfurter Adorno-Konferenz 2003. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honneth, A. (2011). Das Recht der Freiheit. Berlin: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honneth, A. (2013). Theorie der Anerkennung als kritische Theorie der Gesellschaft? – Ein Interview mit Axel Honneth. Soziologiemagazin. Retrieved from http://soziologieblog.hypotheses.org/4000.

  • Honneth, A. (2017). Is There an Emancipatory Interest? An Attempt to Answer Critical Theory’s Most Fundamental Question. European Journal of Philosophy, 25, 908–920.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horkheimer, M. (1975). Traditional and Critical Theory. In From Critical Theory: Selected Essays (pp. 188–243). New York: Continuum Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horkheimer, M. (1988a). Bemerkungen zur philosophischen Anthropologie. In Gesammelte Schriften 3, Schriften 1931–1936 (pp. 249–276). Frankfurt/Main: Fischer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horkheimer, M. (1988b). Materialismus und Moral. In Gesammelte Schriften 3, Schriften 1931–1936 (pp. 111–149). Frankfurt/Main: Fischer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horkheimer, M. (1988c). Späne. Notizen über Gespräche mit Max Horkheimer. In Gesammelte Schriften 14: Nachgelassene Schriften 1949–1972 (pp. 172–549). Frankfurt/Main: Fischer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huxley, A. (1998). Brave New World. New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ikäheimo, H. (2002). On the Genus and Species of Recognition. Inquiry, 45, 447–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Illouz, E. (2003). Oprah Winfrey and the Glamour of Misery. An Essay on Popular Culture. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaeggi, R. (2014a). Kritik von Lebensformen. Berlin: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaeggi, R. (2014b). Was (wenn überhaupt etwas) ist falsch am Kapitalismus? Drei Wege der Kapitalismuskritik. In R. Jaeggi & D. Loick (Eds.), Nach Marx – Philosophie, Kritik, Praxis (pp. 321–349). Berlin: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jullien, F. (2016). Il n’y a pas d’identité culturelle. Paris: Éd. de l’Herne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinman, A., & Kleinman, J. (1996). The Appeal of Experience; The Dismay of Images: Cultural Appropriations of Suffering in Our Times. Daedalus, 125(1), 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinman, A., Das, V., & Lock, M. M. (Eds.). (1997). Introduction. In Social Suffering (pp. IX–XXVII). Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosonogov, V. (2012). Why the Mirror Neurons Cannot Support Action Understanding. Neurophysiology, 44(6), 499–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (2014). Hegemony and Socialist Strategy, Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1997). Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (2005). Inklusion und Exklusion. In N. Luhmann (Ed.), Soziologische Aufklärung 6 (pp. 226–251). Wiesbaden: VS-Verlag.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1958). Die deutsche Ideologie. In Marx-Engels Werke (Vol. 3, pp. 9–530). Berlin: Dietz.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNay, L. (2008). The Trouble with Recognition: Subjectivity, Suffering, and Agency. Sociological Theory, 26(3), 271–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, D. B. (1996). About Suffering: Voice, Genre, and Moral Community. Daedalus, 125(1), 25–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. (2003). Compassion & Terror. Daedalus, 132(1), 10–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oberman, L., & Ramachandran, V. S. (2009). Reflections on the Mirror Neuron System: Their Evolutionary Functions Beyond Motor Representation. In J. A. Pineda (Ed.), Mirror Neuron Systems: The Role of Mirroring Processes in Social Cognition (pp. 39–62). Totowa: Humana Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1999). A Theory of Justice – Revised Edition. Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reisigl, M., & Wodak, R. (2001). Discourse and Discrimination. Rhetorics of Racism and Antisemitism. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reitz, T. (2003). Die Sorge um sich und niemand anderen – Foucault als Vordenker neoliberaler Vergesellschaftung. Das Argument, 249, 82–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renault, E. (2009). The Political Philosophy of Social Suffering. In B. de Bruin & C. Zurn (Eds.), New Waves in Political Philosophy (pp. 158–176). Houndsmill: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Renault, E. (2010). A Critical Theory of Social Suffering. Critical Horizons, 11(2), 221–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renault, E. (2017). Social Suffering. Sociology, Psychology, Politics. London: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romero, J. M. (Ed.) (2014). Immanente Kritik heute. Bielefeld: Transcript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosa, H. (2009). Kapitalismus als Dynamisierungsspirale – Soziologie als Gesellschaftskritik. In K. Dörre, S. Lessenich, & H. Rosa (Eds.), Soziologie, Kaptialismus, Kritik: Eine Debatte (pp. 87–124). Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saar, M. (2009). Macht und Kritik. In R. Forst, M. Hartmann, R. Jaeggi, & M. Saar (Eds.), Sozialphilosophie und Kritik (pp. 467–487). Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauerwald, G. (2008). Reconocimiento y Liberació n: Axel Honneth y el pensamiento latinoamericano. Por un diá logo entre el Sur y el Norte. Berlin: Lit Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scarry, E. (1985). The Body in Pain: The Making and Unmaking of the World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sembler, C. (2013). Teoría Crítica y sufrimiento social en Max Horkheimer. Constelaciones – Revista de Teoría Crítica, 5, 260–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmel, G. (2009). Sociology: Inquiries into the Construction of Social Forms. Leiden and Boston: Brill.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sontag, S. (2003). Regarding the Pain of Others. London: Penguin.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, T. (2013a). Habermas and the Project of Immanent Critique. Constellations, 20(4), 533–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, T. (2013b). Immanente Kritik. Elemente einer Theorie sozialer Praktiken. Frankfurt/Main and New York: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stellar, J. E., & Keltner, D. (2014). Compassion. In M. M. Tugade, M. N. Shiota, & L. D. Kirby (Eds.), Handbook of Positive Emotions (pp. 329–341). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stirner, M. (1995). The Ego and Its Own. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sznaider, N. (1998). The Sociology of Compassion, A Study in the Sociology of Morals. Cultural Values, 2(1), 117–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. (1994). Multiculturalism – Examining the Politics of Recognition. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijk, T. (2009). Critical Discourse Studies: A Sociocognitive Approach. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods for Critical Discourse Analysis (pp. 62–85). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, I. (2004). Suffering: A Sociological Introduction. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zamora, J. A. (2011). Lässt sich der Kapitalismus immanent kritisieren? Reflexionen mit und über Theodor W. Adorno. Contribution at the International Seminar: Immanente Kritik. Grundlagen und Aktualität eines sozialphilosophischen Begriffs, Frankfurt/Main.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain

    Benno Herzog

Authors
  1. Benno Herzog
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Benno Herzog .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Herzog, B. (2020). Understanding Suffering. In: Invisibilization of Suffering . Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28448-0_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28448-0_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-28447-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-28448-0

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation