Skip to main content

Emily: Experiences of Mediation as Denial and ‘Sham’: Mediation as a Problematic Choice

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
How Parties Experience Mediation
  • 354 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter presents the nuanced analysis of the conflict and two mediations of Emily, an employee of a large public organisation in England. Emily has a serious medical condition and since her return to work following sick leave has been in conflict with two employees, Kate and Tracy. The analysis explicates Emily’s experience of conflict as ‘being vulnerable and unprotected in the face of threats’. A powerful portrait of Emily’s perceptions of bullying is presented involving her experience of conflict that ‘destroys’ her self-esteem and self-efficacy. Emily’s marked negative experience of mediation is explored: her subjective perceptions of a ‘sham’ process and the pressures to ‘give in’ are highlighted. The analysis raises a number of questions including the importance of a thorough intake conversation in determining whether a case is apt for mediation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bagshaw, D., Adams, V., Zannettino, L., & Wendt, S. (2015). Elder mediation and the financial abuse of older people by a family member. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 32(4), 443–480. https://doi.org/10.1002/crq.21117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ballard, R. H., Holtzworth-Munroe, A., Applegate, A. G., & D’Onofrio, B. (2011). Factors affecting the outcome of divorce and paternity mediations. Family Court Review, 49, 16–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-1617.2010.01350.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, C. J. A., & Raghavan, C. (2010). Intimate partner abuse screening in custody mediation: The importance of assessing coercive control. Family Court Review, 48(3), 555–565. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-1617.2010.01329.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, M. D., & Hughes, S. S. (2005). The art of mediation. Notre Dame, France: NITA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Björkvist, K., Österman, K., & Hjelt-Back, M. (1994). Aggression among university employees. Aggressive Behaviour, 20, 173–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boon, A., Urwin, P., & Karuk, W. (2011). What difference does it make? Facilitative judicial mediation of discrimination cases in employment tribunals. Industrial Law Journal, 40, 45–81. https://doi.org/10.1093/indlaw/dwq030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bush, R. A. B., & Folger, J. P. (2005). The promise of mediation: The transformative approach to conflict (revised edn.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Dreu, C. K. W., & Weingart, L. R. (2003). Task versus relationship conflict, team performance and member satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 741–749. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.4.741

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derycke, H., Vlerick, P., Burnay, N., Decleire, C., D’Hoore, W., Hasselhorn, H. M., et al. (2010). Impact of the effort-reward imbalance model on intent to leave among Belgian health care workers: A prospective study. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83, 879–893. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317909X477594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doherty, N., & Guyler, M. (2008). The essential guide to workplace mediation and conflict resolution: Rebuilding workplace relationships. London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Einarsen, S. (1999). The nature and causes of bullying at work. International Journal of Manpower., 20(2), 16–27. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437729910268588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Einarsen, S., Hoel, H., Zapf, D., & Cooper, C. L. (2003). The concept of bullying at work: The European tradition. In S. Einarsen, H. Hoel, D. Zapf, & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), Bullying and emotional abuse in the workplace: International perspectives in research and practice (pp. 1–30). London: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Einarsen, S., & Mikkelsen, E. G. (2003). Individual effects of exposure to bullying at work. In S. Einarsen, H. Hoel, D. Zapf, & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), Bullying and emotional abuse in the workplace: International perspectives in research and practice (pp. 127–145). London: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elovainio, M., Kivimaki, M., & Vahtera, J. (2002). Organizational justice: Evidence of a new psychosocial predictor of health. American Journal of Public Health, 92, 105–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R., & Ury, W. (1991). Getting to yes: Negotiating agreement without giving in. New York: Penguin Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauge, L. J., Skogstad, A., & Einarsen, S. (2010). A relative impact of workplace bullying as a social stressor at work. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 51, 426–433. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.2010.00813.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huston, T. L., & Robins, E. (1982). Conceptual and methodological issues in studying close relationships. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 44, 901–925.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jehn, K. A. (1997). A qualitative analysis of conflict types and dimensions in organizational groups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 530–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, M. (2011). Practice note: Is mediation suitable for complaints of workplace bullying? Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 29, 25–36. https://doi.org/10.1002/crq.21035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D. A. (2009). Getting even with one’s supervisor and one’s organisation: Relationships among types of injustice, desires for revenge and counterproductive work behaviours. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 30, 525–542. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kassin, S., Fein, S., & Markus, H. R. (2011). Social psychology (8th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, R., & Thorpe, C. (2006). Elder mediation: Optimizing major family transitions. Marq. Elder’s Advisor, 7(2), 293–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latreille, P. (2011). Mediation: A thematic review of ACAS/CIPD evidence (ACAS Research Paper, 13/11). London: ACAS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazare, A. (1995, January–February). Go ahead, say you’re sorry. Psychology Today, p. 40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linabary, J. R., Krishna, A., & Connaughton, S. L. (2017). The conflict family: Storytelling as an activity and a method for locally led, community-based peacebuilding. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 34(4), 431–453. https://doi.org/10.1002/crq.21189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J. (2015). A strengths approach to elder mediation. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 32(4), 481–498. https://doi.org/10.1002/crq.21119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miell, D., & Dallos, R. (1996). Introduction: Exploring interactions and relationships. In D. Miell & R. Dallos (Eds.), Social interactions and personal relationships (pp. 1–23). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadler, A., & Liviatan, I. (2006). Intergroup reconciliation: Effects of adversary’s expressions of empathy, responsibility, and recipients’ trust. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(4), 459–470. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167205276431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saam, J. N. (2010). Interventions in workplace bullying: A multilevel approach. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 19, 51–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saundry, R., Bennett, T., & Wibberley, G. (2013). Workplace mediation: The participant experience (ACAS Research Paper 02/13). London: ACAS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saundry, R., Latreille, P. L., Dickens, L., Irvine, C., Teague, P., Urwin, P., et al. (2014). Reframing resolution: Managing conflict and resolving individual employment disputes in the contemporary workplace (ACAS Policy Discussion Paper). ACAS: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, C. D. (2000). What it means to be sorry: The power of apology in mediation. Mediation Quarterly, 17, 265–280. https://doi.org/10.1002/crq.3900170305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegrist, J. (1991). Contributions of sociology to the prediction of heart disease and their implications for public health. European Journal of Public Health, 1, 10–21. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.1.1.27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stulberg, J. B. (1997). Facilitative versus evaluative mediator orientations: Piercing the grid lock. Florida State University Law Review, 24, 985–1005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tekleab, A. G., Quigley, N. R., & Tesluk, P. E. (2009). A longitudinal study of team conflict, conflict management, cohesion, and team effectiveness. Group & Organization Management, 34, 170–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601108331218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Canadian Centre for Elder Law. (2012). Elder and guardianship mediation (CCEL Research Paper No. 5). Vancouver, BC, Canada: British Columbia Law Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tishler, C. L., Bartholomae, S., Katz, B. L., & Landry-Meyer, L. (2004). Is domestic violence relevant? An exploratory analysis of couples referred for mediation in family court. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19(9), 1042–1062. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260504268003

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Tallodi, T. (2019). Emily: Experiences of Mediation as Denial and ‘Sham’: Mediation as a Problematic Choice. In: How Parties Experience Mediation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28239-4_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28239-4_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-28238-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-28239-4

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics