Skip to main content

Introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
How Parties Experience Mediation
  • 361 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter introduces the research presented in this book as an in-depth analytical study that explores the process of mediation. It is explained that the study investigates mediation and relationship changes during and after the process. Semi-structured interviews conducted with mediation parties are analysed applying the qualitative methodology of interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA). It is highlighted that whilst there is a large conceptual literature which suggests that mediation has wide-ranging benefits across situations there is a lack of interpretative academic qualitative studies involving parties to mediation. Therefore, this chapter establishes that the main aim and original contribution of this book is to start filling this gap by providing an interpretative analysis of individual cases. The analysis offers a nuanced insight into what it is like to experience mediation from the mediation parties’ subjective perspectives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References 

  • Beer, J. E., & Packard, C. C. (2012). The mediator’s handbook (4th ed.). Gabriola Island, BC, Canada: New Society Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer, J. E., & Stief, E. (1997). The mediator’s handbook (3rd ed.). Gabriola Island, BC, Canada: New Society Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, M. D., & Hughes, S. S. (2005). The art of mediation. Notre Dame, France: NITA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brubaker, D., Noble, C., Fincher, R., Park, S. K., & Press, S. (2014). Conflict resolution in the workplace: What will the future bring? Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 31, 357–386. https://doi.org/10.1002/crq.21104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darker, C. D., Larkin, M., & French, D. P. (2007). An exploration of walking behaviour—An interpretative phenomenological approach. Social Science & Medicine, 65(10), 2172–2183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.06.029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doherty, N., & Guyler, M. (2008). The essential guide to workplace mediation and conflict resolution: Rebuilding workplace relationships. London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedeen, T. (2004). The evolution and evaluation of community mediation: Limited research suggests unlimited progress. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 22, 101–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoskins, M. L., & Stoltz, J. M. (2003). Balancing on words: Human change processes in mediation. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 20, 331–349. https://doi.org/10.1002/crq.28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jehn, K. A. (1997). A qualitative analysis of conflict types and dimensions in organizational groups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 530–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liebmann, M. (2000). Introduction. In M. Liebmann (Ed.), Mediation in context (pp. 9–19). London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Love, L. P. (2000). Images of Justice. Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal, 29, 29–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menkel-Meadow, C. J., Love, P. L., Schneider, A. K., & Sternlight, J. R. (2019). Dispute resolution: Beyond the adversarial model (3rd ed.). New York: Aspen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, S., & Palmer, M. (2005). Dispute processes: ADR and the primary forms of decision-making (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, L. A. (2010). Divorce mediation outcome research: A meta-analysis. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 27, 447–467. https://doi.org/10.1002/crq.20006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. A. (2004). Reflecting on the development of interpretative phenomenological analysis and its contribution to qualitative research in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 1(1), 39–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. A., & Osborn, M. (2015). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In J. A. Smith (Ed.), Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods (3rd ed., pp. 25–53). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Tallodi, T. (2019). Introduction. In: How Parties Experience Mediation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28239-4_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28239-4_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-28238-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-28239-4

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics