Skip to main content

Why in France?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
ITER: The Giant Fusion Reactor

Abstract

ITER could have been built in any one of the 35 countries that are participating in the project. So why Cadarache rather than Beijing or San Diego? Overall, it took no fewer than 10 years of technical studies, political negotiations, and diplomatic arrangements before Cadarache was finally chosen to host ITER. Although this was a complex issue, it had major consequences. Formally speaking, discussions about the site started in spring 2001 when the report on ITER’s detailed design was being finalised. The three project members (Europe, Japan, and Russia) started to consider fundamental practical questions. Where were they going to build ITER? How much would it cost? Who would pay for what? All these questions had major political, economic, and technical implications since the selected site (and the host country) would receive concrete benefits, but there would also be myriad practical concerns such as transport, water, and electricity supplies. Actually, only four countries put their names forward to host ITER: Canada, France, Japan, and Spain. EU countries decided to support France as the European candidate. Canada withdrew from the discussions. But over three years of technical and diplomatic discussions were deemed necessary to reach a consensus. On May 4, 2005 Yomiuri Shimbun, the largest Japanese daily, announced a decision by the Tokyo government to withdraw its proposal to host ITER. Intense negotiations lasted until June 28, 2005 when the ministers and deputy ministers of the ITER Parties met in Moscow. After a few hours of discussion a consensus was finally reached, with members unanimously accepting that the experimental fusion reactor that China, the European Union, Japan, Korea, Russia, and the United States had decided to build together (India would join them at the end of the year) would eventually be installed in Cadarache in the small commune of Saint-Paul-lez-Durance (980 inhabitants) approximately 80 km north of Marseille. Construction work began on-site at the end of 2007. The 181-ha site on which ITER was built was leased to the ITER Organization on a 99-year long-term lease.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    At that time most scientists working for the European Commission were “temporary agents” under renewable 5-year contracts.

  2. 2.

    Interview conducted on June 23, 2017 in Jean Jacquinot’s house in Aix-en-Provence.

  3. 3.

    Working “with a wig” in French means performing a personal task during working hours using work materials [author’s note].

  4. 4.

    Minutes of the 7th Meeting of the Consultative Committee for the EURATOM Specific Research and Training Programme in the Field of Nuclear Energy (Fusion) (CCE-FU), European Commission, Brussels, July 11, 2000. The document is not available to the public.

  5. 5.

    Very surprisingly, most of the conference participants that I met afterwards underlined that the English version of the minister’s speech, provided by simultaneous interpretation, was more positive. This could mean that either interpreters received a specific briefing or that French-speaking and English-speaking participants in the conference had a different perception of Claudie Haigneré’s presentation.

  6. 6.

    It was clear from the outset that the school would not only be open to ITER families. Today approximately 60% of schoolchildren attending the international school in Manosque have at least one of their parents working for ITER.

  7. 7.

    Literally, the “Nation’s vital forces.” This expression has been used since 1982 when French President François Mitterrand decided to meet every year or so citizens whose work contributes to improving society in all possible areas―social, environmental, sport, education, research, etc.

  8. 8.

    These transport costs are however marginal compared with the total investment.

  9. 9.

    “It can go either way.”

  10. 10.

    EISS [1].

  11. 11.

    The ITER consortium is not closed, but the participation of additional states or organizations in the project has to be unanimously approved by the ITER Council. It is now becoming less and less advantageous for a new country to join the project since they will have to pay a high membership fee. Moreover, since most contracts for the manufacturing and the construction have already been placed they would not receive much in return.

  12. 12.

    I always found it strange that the decision to build ITER in Europe did not receive more rapid and spontaneous support. After all, Europe has been involved in ITER since the beginning, has a clear long-term strategy, and is paying half the construction costs. But Philippe Busquin was a little bit more nuanced than me: “ITER is managed by a global governance which has no equivalence in the world. ITER is not the United Nations. It is not the CERN either. ITER has a geopolitical dimension which is truly unique.”

  13. 13.

    As explained in the next chapter the European contribution to the construction of ITER was at that time estimated to be EUR2.4 billion.

  14. 14.

    In France the main units of local government defined by the constitution as collectivités territoriales (“territorial collectivities”) are the régions, the départements, and the communes.

  15. 15.

    European Commission Daily News [2].

  16. 16.

    Associated Press [3].

  17. 17.

    http://fusionforenergy.europa.eu/downloads/aboutf4e/l_35820061216en00620081.pdf.

  18. 18.

    The first ITER employee was the Dutchman Akko Maas who started working in Cadarache on January 15, 2006.

  19. 19.

    ITER Organization [4].

References

  1. EISS (2002) European ITER site studies. CEACEA, Cadarache. http://www-fusion-magnetique.cea.fr/site/elmt_tec_022002_fr.pdfHYPERLIhttp//www-fusion-magnetique.cea.fr/site/elmt_tec_022002_fr.pdf

  2. European Commission Daily News (2005) Déclaration du Commissaire européen à la Recherche Janez Potočnik sur ITER. https://europa.eu/rapid/midday-express-28-06-2005.htm?locale=EN. (Available only in French)

  3. Associated Press (2005) France chosen as site for nuclear reactor. USA Today. http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/world/2005-06-28-french-reactor_x.htm

  4. ITER Organization (2014) Europe’s Barroso: proud to have believed in ITER. ITER Magazine. https://www.iter.org/mag/4/35

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michel Claessens .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Claessens, M. (2020). Why in France?. In: ITER: The Giant Fusion Reactor. Copernicus, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27581-5_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27581-5_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Copernicus, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-27580-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-27581-5

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics